AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2EMMANCT02295696

EMMA: Empowerment, Motivation and Medical Adherence

A study testing EMMA in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

EMMA: Empowerment, Motivation and Medical Adherence. A consultation program based on dialogue tools for adults with poorly regulated Type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
EMMA
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
270 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Nov 2014to Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults Type 2 diabetes ≥ 18 år
  • Type 2 diabetes ≥ 1 år
  • HbA1c ≥ 64 mmol/mol (≥ 8%) at the last three measures before randomisation
  • Taking medication for Type 2 diabetes • - Speak, read and understands Danish

Who cannot join

  • Participating in other intervention research projects during the trial period
  • Being treated by a psychiatrist or psychologist during the period
  • Reduced sight or blindness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Gitte R Husted, PhD contact

4530753035

grhu@steno.dk

Bjarne B Jensen, Professor contact

4544436449

bjbj@steno.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Gitte R Husted

    Gentofte Municipality, 2820

    Gitte R Husted, PhD, 4530753035, grhu@steno.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

EMMA: Empowerment, Motivation and Medical Adherence. A consultation program based on dialogue tools for adults with poorly regulated Type 2 diabetes.

Read the detailed description

Traditionally, the success of patients to manage their diabetes has been judged by their ability to adhere to a prescribed therapeutic regimen, and efforts have been spent developing strategies to promote adherence. It is estimated that 20% to 50% of patients with chronic conditions are not adherent to their prescribed medication regimen, with non-adherence being defined as <80% adherence to prescribed, relevant medication. The treatment regimen often comprises several elements such as poly-pharmacy including insulin administration, self-monitoring of blood glucose, diet and physical exercise. It is thus not just a matter of 'taking a pill or not' but implies lifestyle changes, knowledge and competence, and internal motivation for self-management. The investigators developed a consultation program based on dialogue tools. The EMMA program aims to support medication adherence and blood glucose control by facilitating rapport, exploring patient concerns and challenges, enabling knowledge exchange and supporting goal-setting and action-planning. A pilot test of the program appeared feasible and acceptable to patients and health care professionals and showed significant decrease on HbA1c. EMMA is now ready to be tested in a randomized controlled study (RCT) study.

Being tested
EMMA
Keywords
Adults, dialogue tools, outpatient clinic visits
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EMMABehavioural

    Consultations using dialogue tools

Study groups in NCT02295696
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalIntervention arm : EMMA consultations
Receives: Behavioral: EMMA
Control groupNo interventionControl arm: Usual care/consultations

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. HbA1c

    Change from baseline in HbA1c at 4½ month which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Self-management

    Change from baseline in Self-management skills at 4½ month assessed by increase in the Perceived Competence In Diabetes (PCD scale) which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

  2. Self-management

    Change from baseline in Self-management skills at 4½ month assessed by increase in the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCC scale) which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

  3. Self-management

    Change from baseline in Self-management skills at 4½ month assessed by decrease in the Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire (PAID scale) which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

  4. Self-management

    Change from baseline in Self-management skills at 4½ month assessed by increase in The WHO5 Wellbeing Questionnaire (WHO5 scale) which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

  5. Self-management

    Change from baseline in Self-management skills at 4½ month assessed by increase in the Treament Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ scale) which is maintained or improved at 6 months

    Measured: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
270 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02295696
Sponsor's protocol ID
grhu
Acronym
EMMA
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
5 Nov 2014
Last updated
21 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EMMA in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gitte R Husted, PhD (4530753035, grhu@steno.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

HbA1c (time frame: Baseline, 4½ month and 6 months after end of intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in