Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/RefractoryPhase 1/2GEMHDM2014NCT02295722
GEMHDM2014 : Gem-HDM HDT and ASCT for Relapsed/ Refractory Lymphoma
A Phase 1/2 study testing Gemcitabine, Melphalan and ASCT in people with Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Aggressive, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Objective of study: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infusional gemcitabine prior to HDM (high-dose melphalan) as HDCT (High Dose Chemotherapy) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Aggressive, Follicular Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine, Melphalan and ASCT
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Feb 2023
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Age over 18 years
- Relapsed/refractory lymphoma after at least 1 prior chemotherapy treatment:
- Hodgkin's lymphoma
- Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- Follicular lymphoma
Show all 13Show fewer
- Chemosensitive disease at time of transplantation (i.e. partial response or better to salvage chemotherapy)
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance 0-2
- Adequate organ function:
- Cardiac: LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)>40%
- Pulmonary: FEV1 (forced expiratory volume at one second) and DLCO (diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide)>60% predicted
- Renal: creatinine <150 µmol/L unless caused by ureteric obstruction from lymphoma
- Liver: No evidence of cirrhosis. ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) and bilirubin <2x upper limit of normal unless caused by biliary tract obstruction from lymphoma
Who cannot join
- Clinically significant active infection
- Active secondary central nervous system disease
- Other serious co-morbid illness that would compromise study participation.
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Prior HDCT/ASCT
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Infusional Gemcitabine and High-dose Melphalan (HDM) Conditioning Prior to (ASCT) Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma
Objective of study: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infusional gemcitabine prior to HDM (high-dose melphalan) as HDCT (High Dose Chemotherapy) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation is the current standard of care for patients with chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and is an established effective therapy for patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Disease relapse remains a major problem, occurring in 50% of these patients, particularly in patients with primary refractory disease or other high-risk features. The addition of gemcitabine to single-agent melphalan as a high-dose conditioning regimen presents a promising combination that may lead to improvements in EFS (Event free survival). If this trial gives encouraging results, it may lead to a phase III trial evaluating this treatment strategy.
Drug exposure would be AUC (area under curve) and clinical factors would be things like obesity, renal function, disease characteristics.
We would be looking at the safety outcomes - i.e. adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability. The adverse events would be non-hematological toxicities (any) and whether or not it is related to AUC. AUC in relationship to PFS (progression free survival) is also important (we want to know if we need to adjust dose to improve PFS).
- Conditions
- Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Aggressive, Follicular Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine, Melphalan, ASCT
- Keywords
- eligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GemcitabineDrug
gemcitabine 1.5 g/m2 INFUSED
MelphalanDrug
200 mg/m2
ASCTOther
Day 0 - Stem cell infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine/Melphalan Condition + ASCT | Experimental | Day -1 -
* IV gemcitabine 1.5-2.5 g/m2 (depending on dose level assigned) administered as a loading bolus of 75 mg/m2, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/m2/min.
* immediately following gemcitabine - IV melphalan 200 mg/m2 over 5 minutes.
Day 0
•Stem cell infusion
Patients will be assigned a dose level using the continual reassessment method based on the toxicity data available at the time of their enrollment. The dosing will start at 1.5 g/m2 and will increase by 0.5 mg/m2 at each level to a maximum of 2.5 g/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as grade 3 mucositis or skin toxicity lasting more than 3 days before downgrading, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity. Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Melphalan; Other: ASCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival of relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients treated with infusional gemcitabine, high dose melphalan (Gem-Mel) and ASCT
The goal is to improve overall 3-year PFS by 15% over what would be expected with standard conditioning regimens. Patients will be stratified into 3 groups according to disease: (a) relapsed/refractory Hodgkins's lymphoma, (b) relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and (c) relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity will be defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.
Measured: 3 years
Grade 3-4 Hematological Toxicity
Assessment of Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as grade 3 mucositis or skin toxicity lasting more than 3 days before downgrading, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity.
Measured: 3 YEARS
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall survival
The goal of this study is to improve overall 3-year PFS rate by 15% with the melphalan gemcitabine conditioning.
Measured: 3 Years
Cost Effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness as measured by in-hospital costs of Gemcitabine-Melphalan relative to historical controls treated in Calgary with BEAM or Melphalan+/-TBI (Total Body Irradiation).
Measured: 3 Years
Measure of Melphalan pharmacokinetics, AUC (area under curve)
Drug exposure would be AUC (area under curve) . Once the dose of gemcitabine has been established, all subsequent patients will receive a uniform HDCT (high dose chemotherapy) regimen. Patients will undergo blood draws for pharmacokinetic testing at the following time points relative to the end of melphalan infusion: 5 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 5 hours, 7-10 hours, and 18-23 hours. Samples will be processed at the local pharmacokinetics laboratory in Calgary
Measured: 3 Years
Evaluation of relationship between clinical factors and drug exposure in treatment of Gemcitabine/Melphalan with ASCT (autologous stem cell transplantation)
The number of patients with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability.
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of relation between drug exposure and non-hematological toxicity and progression free survival
Drug exposure as measured by area under the curve related to number of patients with adverse events (non-hematological toxicity) and progression-free survival
Measured: 3 years
Safety Outcomes assessed adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Assess adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability. The adverse events would be non-hematological toxicities (any) and whether or not it is related to AUC. AUC in relationship to PFS is also important (we want to know if we need to adjust dose to improve PFS).
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionFeb 2023
- Study completionFeb 2023
Why it stopped: It did not show a significant benefit to justify completing the full target accrual.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/RefractoryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AHS Cancer Control Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MONA SHAFEY, MD, Principal investigator, Tom Baker Cancer Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02295722
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GEMHDM2014
- Acronym
- GEMHDM2014
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Infusional Gemcitabine and High-dose Melphalan (HDM) Conditioning Prior to (ASCT) Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02295722
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEMHDM2014 / GEMHDM2014
- Conditions
- Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Aggressive, Follicular Lymphoma
- Keywords
- eligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: It did not show a significant benefit to justify completing the full target accrual.
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AHS Cancer Control AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective of study: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infusional gemcitabine prior to HDM (high-dose melphalan) as HDCT (High Dose Chemotherapy) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.
Detailed description
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation is the current standard of care for patients with chemosensitive relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and is an established effective therapy for patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Disease relapse remains a major problem, occurring in 50% of these patients, particularly in patients with primary refractory disease or other high-risk features. The addition of gemcitabine to single-agent melphalan as a high-dose conditioning regimen presents a promising combination that may lead to improvements in EFS (Event free survival). If this trial gives encouraging results, it may lead to a phase III trial evaluating this treatment strategy.
Drug exposure would be AUC (area under curve) and clinical factors would be things like obesity, renal function, disease characteristics.
We would be looking at the safety outcomes - i.e. adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability. The adverse events would be non-hematological toxicities (any) and whether or not it is related to AUC. AUC in relationship to PFS (progression free survival) is also important (we want to know if we need to adjust dose to improve PFS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine/Melphalan Condition + ASCT | Experimental | Drug: Gemcitabine, Drug: Melphalan, Other: ASCTDay -1 - * IV gemcitabine 1.5-2.5 g/m2 (depending on dose level assigned) administered as a loading bolus of 75 mg/m2, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/m2/min. * immediately following gemcitabine - IV melphalan 200 mg/m2 over 5 minutes. Day 0 •Stem cell infusion Patients will be assigned a dose level using the continual reassessment method based on the toxicity data available at the time of their enrollment. The dosing will start at 1.5 g/m2 and will increase by 0.5 mg/m2 at each level to a maximum of 2.5 g/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as grade 3 mucositis or skin toxicity lasting more than 3 days before downgrading, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Age over 18 years
- Relapsed/refractory lymphoma after at least 1 prior chemotherapy treatment:
- Chemosensitive disease at time of transplantation (i.e. partial response or better to salvage chemotherapy)
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinically significant active infection
- Active secondary central nervous system disease
- Other serious co-morbid illness that would compromise study participation.
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Prior HDCT/ASCT
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabinegemcitabine 1.5 g/m2 INFUSED | Drug | Gemcitabine/Melphalan Condition + ASCT |
| Melphalan200 mg/m2 | Drug | Gemcitabine/Melphalan Condition + ASCT |
| ASCTDay 0 - Stem cell infusion | Other | Gemcitabine/Melphalan Condition + ASCT |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival of relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients treated with infusional gemcitabine, high dose melphalan (Gem-Mel) and ASCT
Time frame: 3 years
The goal is to improve overall 3-year PFS by 15% over what would be expected with standard conditioning regimens. Patients will be stratified into 3 groups according to disease: (a) relapsed/refractory Hodgkins's lymphoma, (b) relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and (c) relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity will be defined by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.
Grade 3-4 Hematological Toxicity
Time frame: 3 YEARS
Assessment of Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as grade 3 mucositis or skin toxicity lasting more than 3 days before downgrading, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity.
6 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: 3 Years
Cost Effectiveness
Time frame: 3 Years
Measure of Melphalan pharmacokinetics, AUC (area under curve)
Time frame: 3 Years
Evaluation of relationship between clinical factors and drug exposure in treatment of Gemcitabine/Melphalan with ASCT (autologous stem cell transplantation)
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of relation between drug exposure and non-hematological toxicity and progression free survival
Time frame: 3 years
Safety Outcomes assessed adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: It did not show a significant benefit to justify completing the full target accrual.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
KSV01 Injection for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas
ALK-Positive Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Gene Therapy for CD19-Positive Hematologic Malignancies (SENTRY-CD19)
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Large B-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MONA SHAFEY, MD principal investigator
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Gemcitabine, Melphalan and ASCT in people with Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Relapsed/Refractory and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Aggressive, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: It did not show a significant benefit to justify completing the full target accrual.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival of relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients treated with infusional gemcitabine, high dose melphalan (Gem-Mel) and ASCT (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2024.