AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CancerPhase 4NCT02296255

Effect of HPV Vaccination on Women Aged 25 Years

A Phase 4 study testing Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purposes of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination in 25-year old women at the time of their first access to cervical cancer screening, to understand the impact of vaccination on screening activity; to evaluate the immune response following vaccination; to study the dynamics of the infection… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 25 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Cancer
What is being tested?
Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
832 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Apr 2010to Jul 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 25 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • resident in Florence
  • invited for the first time to the cervical cancer screening in Florence
  • aged 25 years

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO

    Florence, FI, 50139

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effective Surveillance and Impact of HPV Vaccination on Screening for Cervical Cancer in Tuscany

The purposes of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination in 25-year old women at the time of their first access to cervical cancer screening, to understand the impact of vaccination on screening activity; to evaluate the immune response following vaccination; to study the dynamics of the infection after vaccination, including the possible change in the frequency of non-vaccine HPV types, to evaluate cytological abnormalities reductions in vaccinated women and to assess if HPV test in urine sample could be a useful non-invasive method to monitor HPV status in younger women.

Read the detailed description

The present trial, funded by Istituto Toscano Tumori, started in 2010 and was directed to all women aged 25 (birth cohorts 1985 and 1986), resident in the province of Florence and targeted by the screening program. After receiving approval from the Ethics Committee of the Local Health Unit of Florence, women were invited by invitation letter containing a clear description of the study. All women complying with the invitation were asked to fill in the informed consent document.

Women were randomized 1:2 in the Experimental Arm or in the Control Arm. At enrollment, women in the Experimental Arm, after collection of cervical samples (for Pap-test and HPV test), blood sample (for HPV antibody testing on serum before vaccination) and one first void urine sample (for HPV testing), received free vaccination with Cervarix® (vaccine against HPV 16 and 18, 3 doses scheduled). Women in the Control Arm received usual care, i.e. the collection of cervical sample for Pap test.

All women who signed the informed consent have been enrolled regardless of being sexually active or not. For virgo women cervical sample was not collected.

At the second round of screening (30 months since enrollment), women in both Arms were asked to collect cervical samples (for Pap-test and HPV test) while a new blood sample for HPV antibody testing was collected only in women enrolled in the Experimental Arm.

Women with normal cytology in Control Arm and women with HPV-negative result and normal cytology in Experimental Arm, received a recommendation by mail to repeat screening test after 3 years. Women with abnormal Pap test (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance or more severe, ASC-US+) were referred to immediate colposcopy at the Cancer Prevention and Research Insitute. Women with normal cytology and HPV positive were called after one year to repeat HPV test and Pap test. If HPV and Pap test were negative, women repeated both test after 30 months from enrolment. Otherwise if HPV test remained positive and/or cytology abnormalities were detected women were referred for colposcopy: if colposcopy didn't reveal high grade lesions (≤ CIN2) women repeated HPV and Pap test after 30 months from enrollment, if colposcopy revealed final histological diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions, women were recommended for an excisional treatment (both for study and control group).

The presence of high risk (HR) HPVs was evaluated by Hybrid Capture 2 (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, USA) using probe B for the detection of 12 high risk HPV types: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 (Group 1) and 1 "probably carcinogenic to humans" type HPV 68 (Group 2).

HPV genotyping was performed by INNO-LiPA Genotyping Extra that allows the identification of 28 different HPV types on L1 region on the HPV genome, it identifies all known HPV high-risk types (Group 1) 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59; "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A) HPV68; and all "possibly carcinogenic" HPV 26, 53, 66, 69, 70, 73, 82 (Group 2B) and "not classified as to its carcinogenicity to humans" (Group 3) (6, 11); and other HPV types: 40, 43, 44, 54, 71, 74.

HPV antibody testing was performed on an established and validated HPV serology method based on Luminex technology heparin coating of the beads and pseudovirions (PsVs) of 17 HPV types belonging to alpha species: 3, 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 32 ,33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and for four HPV types belonging to beta species: 5, 15, 38, 76.

Conditions
Cervical Cancer
Being tested
Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, young women vaccination, impact of HPV vaccination on screening
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKlineBiological

    3 doses (0,1,6 months) of Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline

Study groups in NCT02296255
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
no HPV vaccineNo interventionNo delivery of HPV vaccine
HPV vaccine (Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline)ExperimentalDelivery of HPV vaccine (Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline) at 0, 1, 6 months
Receives: Biological: Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. number of HR-HPV infections and number of infections due to HPV vaccine types in cervical sample in the Experimental arm and in No intervention arm

    Measured: 30 months

  2. number of cytological abnormalities in the Experimental arm and in No intervention arm

    Measured: 30 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of subjects seropositive for HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68 at enrollment

    Measured: enrollment

  2. Number of subjects seropositive for HPV16,18 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68 after vaccination

    Measured: 30 months

  3. Anti-HPV16,18 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68 Antibody Titers before vaccination

    Titers are given as Mean Fluorescence Intensity Unit (MFI)

    Measured: at enrollment

  4. Anti-HPV16,18 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68 Antibody Titers after vaccination

    Titers are given as Mean Fluorescence Intensity Unit (MFI)

    Measured: 30 months

  5. Number of participants reporting Adverse Events

    Adverse Events assessed include Local pain, Local swelling, Local pruritus, Local Erythema, Fever, and every adverse event reported day by day in a diary

    Measured: within 14 days following any injection

  6. HPV identification in urine samples

    Measured: at enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
832 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02296255
Sponsor's protocol ID
F11J09000350002
Other IDs
342/2009
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
11 Nov 2014
Last updated
20 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Levi M, Bonanni P, Burroni E, Bechini A, Boccalini S, Sani C, Bonaiuti R, Indiani L, Azzari C, Lippi F, Carozzi F; HPV Screevacc Working Group. Evaluation of bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine safety and tolerability in a sample of 25 year old Tuscan women. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jul;9(7):1407-12. doi: 10.4161/hv.24337. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

    PubMed 23571176
  • Burroni E, Bonanni P, Sani C, Lastrucci V, Carozzi F; Hpv ScreeVacc Working Group; Iossa A, Andersson KL, Brandigi L, Di Pierro C, Confortini M, Levi M, Boccalini S, Indiani L, Sala A, Tanini T, Bechini A, Azzari C. Human papillomavirus prevalence in paired urine and cervical samples in women invited for cervical cancer screening. J Med Virol. 2015 Mar;87(3):508-15. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24085. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

    PubMed 25418873
  • Carozzi FM, Ocello C, Burroni E, Faust H, Zappa M, Paci E, Iossa A, Bonanni P, Confortini M, Sani C. Effectiveness of HPV vaccination in women reaching screening age in Italy. J Clin Virol. 2016 Nov;84:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

    PubMed 27728850

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline in people with Cervical Cancer, run by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

number of HR-HPV infections and number of infections due to HPV vaccine types in cervical sample in the Experimental arm and in No intervention arm (time frame: 30 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02296255, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in