AzTrials
AzTrials

Total Knee ArthroplastyNCT02299349

Bupivacaine Liposome Suspension Versus a Concentrated Multi Drug Periarticular Injection

A study testing bupivacaine liposome suspension and concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty, run by TriHealth Inc..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite a robust multimodal pain management regimen, patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to report low satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Patient satisfaction further declines with any adverse event such as a drug reaction to neuroleptic medications or a patient fall due to a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Total Knee Arthroplasty
What is being tested?
bupivacaine liposome suspension and concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2013to Mar 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • TKA candidacy
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Failure of non-operative treatments to control knee pain
  • Patients able to understand and agree to study inclusion

Who cannot join

  • Subjects have orthopaedic and medical co-morbidities that would thwart postoperative pain control such as extra-articular pathology with referred pain to the knee (spinal stenosis, neuropathy,ipsilateral hip disease)
  • Severe knee deformity
  • Post-traumatic and inflammatory arthritis
  • BMI above 40
  • Patients unable to receive multimodal pain remitting agents
  • Active knee sepsis
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Remote sites of active infection
  • Diabetes with A1C > 7
  • ASA class > lll
  • Cardiac disease failing medical clearance
  • Severe liver disease
  • PAD with AAI < 0.75
  • Seizure disorder
  • Allergic to any pain remitting agent
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Smoking abuse

About this study

Official title: Bupivacaine Liposome Suspension Versus a Concentrated Multi Drug Periarticular Injection in 70 Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Femoral Nerve Block: a Double-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Despite a robust multimodal pain management regimen, patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to report low satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Patient satisfaction further declines with any adverse event such as a drug reaction to neuroleptic medications or a patient fall due to a femoral nerve block. A new method of pain management throughout the hospital experience is warranted to improve patient satisfaction and the possibility of related adverse events. The purpose of this study is to examine if there is a difference in post operative pain and morphine (MSO4) total consumption for hospitalized TKA patients without femoral nerve block receiving an intra-operative periarticular injection of bupivacaine liposome suspension versus a concentrated multi drug.

Read the detailed description

The void in the literature is that while multimodal pain management reduces postoperative pain in the majority of TKA patients6-14, too many are still dissatisfied with overall pain control13 and adverse drug reactions (dizziness and somnolence) to neuroleptic medications15. Additionally, postoperative falls are greater with femoral nerve blocks16, and new neurological symptoms are associated with the block17. Bupivacaine liposome suspension periarticular injection has large scale national anecdotal support for TKA pain control with avoidance of regional block adversity. There is one recent randomized control trial in TKA patients favorably comparing periarticular injection with bupivacaine liposome suspension versus bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCL)5. To date the clinical use and published evidence most robustly supports bupivacaine liposome suspension in patients undergoing bunionectomy or hemorrhoidectomy. Additionally, in preparation for shorter hospital stays for total joint arthroplasty, a more effective and better tolerated pain management solution is needed.

Hypothesis Statement:

Hospitalized TKA patients without a pre-operative femoral nerve block will experience improved postoperative pain control and less MSO4 equivalence consumption when receiving an injection of bupivacaine liposome suspension versus concentrated multi drug.

Being tested
bupivacaine liposome suspension, concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • bupivacaine liposome suspensionDrug

    Also called Exparel

    bupivacaine liposome suspension periarticular injection

  • concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCLDrug

    Also called Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL

    Ketorolac 30 mg, Morphine PF 5 mg, Epinephrine 0.6 mg, Ropivacaine 400 mg, QS to 100ml with 0.9% NaCl

Study groups in NCT02299349
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bupivacaine liposome suspensionExperimentalbupivacaine liposome suspension periarticular injection
Receives: Drug: bupivacaine liposome suspension
concentrated multi drug injectionActive comparatorconcentrated multi drug periarticular injection
Receives: Drug: concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Scores (Visual Analog Pain Scores)

    visual analog pain scores (scale 0=no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable)

    Measured: 1 day following surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. MS04 Equivalent Consumption

    in hospital total MS04 equivalent consumption

    Measured: 1 day following surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02299349
Sponsor's protocol ID
13055-13-034
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
17 Nov 2014
Last updated
9 Oct 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing bupivacaine liposome suspension and concentrated multi drug Ketorlac, Morphine PF, Epinephrine, Ropivicaine, 0.9% NaCL in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty, run by TriHealth Inc..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Scores (Visual Analog Pain Scores) (time frame: 1 day following surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in