AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoma, OsteoidPhase 2/3NCT02302651

Non-invasive Focal Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma

A Phase 2/3 study testing MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound in people with Osteoma, Osteoid, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteoma, Osteoid
What is being tested?
MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jun 2010to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • clinical and imaging diagnosis of osteoid osteoma
  • painful non-vertebral location

Who cannot join

  • general contraindication to MRI
  • vertebral location of the lesion
  • claustrophobia and prior surgery or RFA are not an absolute exclusion criterion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Alessandro Napoli, MD, PhD contact

3357718114

alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Alessandro Napoli

    Rome, 00100

    Alessandro Napoli, +393357718114, alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it

    Alessandro Napoli, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma With MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Procedure is performed in a single session using limited amount of acoustic energy to target the osteoid nidus. Treatment will be performed under anesthesia (peripheral or general according to age and lesion position).

Read the detailed description

An osteoid osteoma is a benign, painful musculoskeletal tumor that usually occurs in young males. The standard of care in the United States is computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation, a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure, with clinical success rates ranging between 85% and 98%.

Percutaneous or surgical therapy can lead to non-negligible side-effects and limited efficacy for pediatric population or young adults with osteoid osteoma. We investigate whether selective focal ablation of osteoid lesions can reduce this treatment burden without compromising long-term clinical efficacy.

Treatments will be performed using a 3.0-T MR unit (Discovery MR 750; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,Wis) featuring a Conformité Européenne-approved ExAblate MR-guided focused ultrasound system (InSightec,Tirat-Carmel, Israel) in which the ultrasound transducer is housed in the patient table. Alignment between the lesion and the transducer will be obtained in each patient by using a moistened gel pad and degassed water for acoustic coupling. This approach avoided air- skin interfaces, which can cause energy reflection and skin burns. After patient positioning, the lesion is localized with MR for treatment by using variably orientated non enhanced T1- and T2-weighted acquisitions. In general, an ideal 90° incidental angle between the planned focused ultrasound path and the lesion, relative to the bone long axis, is obtained or at least approximated. The shortest skin-lesion distance is selected for the beam pathway. Care will be taken to avoid multiple interfaces (skin, muscle, fasciae) as much as possible so as to minimize deflection of the focused ultrasound beam. Each lesion will be manually segmented by the operator to precisely delineate the nidus, skin surface, and cortical surface of the bone. Sensitive areas surrounding the target volumes will also be drawn to limit the energy and prevent unwanted thermal damage. The treatment plan is than calculated automatically by the ExAblate software according to previously acquired parameters, including the energy (in joules), the interval between two sonications, the sonication duration, and the spot size, which are modifiable by the operator. Thereafter, a low-energy sonication test will be performed to confirm the path and correct direction of the ultrasound beam into the target area and to confirm the planned energy dose and the effective dose deployed to the lesion.

The increase in tissue temperature is evaluated by using real-time MR thermometry of phase-difference fast spoiled gradient-echo sequences (proton resonant frequency shift method). The sequences are acquired to provide temperature-dependent images and real-time mapping of the thermal dose on a preferred imaging plane. The proton resonant frequency shift method starts simultaneously with each sonication. Similar to other treatments of bone lesions that use MR-guided focused ultrasound, the temperature increase is determined on the adjacent periskeletal tissue. In fact, proton resonant frequency sequences cannot effectively measure the temperature on the bone surface because of the absence of moving protons in the cortical zone. Thus, MR thermometry reveals a temperature increase, which propagates by conductive processes from the bone to the immediately adjacent soft tissues that respond linearly to an increase in bone temperature, thereby allowing an accurate measure of heating. Portions of periosteum and adjacent tumor that are not fully ablated can be re-treated if deemed necessary. The critical temperature threshold for ablation is set at 65°C in the soft tissues adjacent to the targeted bone structures. Postprocedural care includes evaluation of possible skin burns, monitoring of vital signs for 2 hours after treatment in the MR department, and administration of analgesic and/or antiemetic drugs if requested. Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded as minor or major on the basis of medical severity, additional treatment, and long-term consequences for patients. Treatment will be performed on an outpatient basis in the patients who receive only local and peripheral anesthesia; the patient who receives general anesthesia is usually hospitalized for 24 hours after treatment.

Being tested
MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound
Keywords
high intensity focused ultrasound, osteoid osteoma, bone tumor
Medical subject headings
Osteoma, Osteoid, Bone Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasoundDevice

    High Intensity Focused Ultrasound is a totally non-invasive procedure that can destroy tumors transcutaneously; safety and efficacy profile are dramatically increased by the MRI guidance

Study groups in NCT02302651
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Osteoid OsteomaOtherMR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound
Receives: Device: MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise)

    to assess complications

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Efficacy (Symptoms reduction)

    Symptoms reduction

    Measured: 4 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. nidus vascularization (correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve)

    correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02302651
Sponsor's protocol ID
OO-MC-MRGFUS-002
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
19 Nov 2014
Last updated
27 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Napoli A, Bazzocchi A, Scipione R, Anzidei M, Saba L, Ghanouni P, Cozzi DA, Catalano C. Noninvasive Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma: A Prospective Developmental Study with MR Imaging-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):186-196. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162680. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

    PubMed 28590796

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound in people with Osteoma, Osteoid, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alessandro Napoli, MD, PhD (3357718114, alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02302651, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in