Osteoma, OsteoidPhase 2/3NCT02302651
Non-invasive Focal Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma
A Phase 2/3 study testing MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound in people with Osteoma, Osteoid, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoma, Osteoid
- What is being tested?
- MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- clinical and imaging diagnosis of osteoid osteoma
- painful non-vertebral location
Who cannot join
- general contraindication to MRI
- vertebral location of the lesion
- claustrophobia and prior surgery or RFA are not an absolute exclusion criterion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Alessandro Napoli
Rome, 00100
Alessandro Napoli, +393357718114, alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it
Alessandro Napoli, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma With MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Procedure is performed in a single session using limited amount of acoustic energy to target the osteoid nidus. Treatment will be performed under anesthesia (peripheral or general according to age and lesion position).
Read the detailed description
An osteoid osteoma is a benign, painful musculoskeletal tumor that usually occurs in young males. The standard of care in the United States is computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation, a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure, with clinical success rates ranging between 85% and 98%.
Percutaneous or surgical therapy can lead to non-negligible side-effects and limited efficacy for pediatric population or young adults with osteoid osteoma. We investigate whether selective focal ablation of osteoid lesions can reduce this treatment burden without compromising long-term clinical efficacy.
Treatments will be performed using a 3.0-T MR unit (Discovery MR 750; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,Wis) featuring a Conformité Européenne-approved ExAblate MR-guided focused ultrasound system (InSightec,Tirat-Carmel, Israel) in which the ultrasound transducer is housed in the patient table. Alignment between the lesion and the transducer will be obtained in each patient by using a moistened gel pad and degassed water for acoustic coupling. This approach avoided air- skin interfaces, which can cause energy reflection and skin burns. After patient positioning, the lesion is localized with MR for treatment by using variably orientated non enhanced T1- and T2-weighted acquisitions. In general, an ideal 90° incidental angle between the planned focused ultrasound path and the lesion, relative to the bone long axis, is obtained or at least approximated. The shortest skin-lesion distance is selected for the beam pathway. Care will be taken to avoid multiple interfaces (skin, muscle, fasciae) as much as possible so as to minimize deflection of the focused ultrasound beam. Each lesion will be manually segmented by the operator to precisely delineate the nidus, skin surface, and cortical surface of the bone. Sensitive areas surrounding the target volumes will also be drawn to limit the energy and prevent unwanted thermal damage. The treatment plan is than calculated automatically by the ExAblate software according to previously acquired parameters, including the energy (in joules), the interval between two sonications, the sonication duration, and the spot size, which are modifiable by the operator. Thereafter, a low-energy sonication test will be performed to confirm the path and correct direction of the ultrasound beam into the target area and to confirm the planned energy dose and the effective dose deployed to the lesion.
The increase in tissue temperature is evaluated by using real-time MR thermometry of phase-difference fast spoiled gradient-echo sequences (proton resonant frequency shift method). The sequences are acquired to provide temperature-dependent images and real-time mapping of the thermal dose on a preferred imaging plane. The proton resonant frequency shift method starts simultaneously with each sonication. Similar to other treatments of bone lesions that use MR-guided focused ultrasound, the temperature increase is determined on the adjacent periskeletal tissue. In fact, proton resonant frequency sequences cannot effectively measure the temperature on the bone surface because of the absence of moving protons in the cortical zone. Thus, MR thermometry reveals a temperature increase, which propagates by conductive processes from the bone to the immediately adjacent soft tissues that respond linearly to an increase in bone temperature, thereby allowing an accurate measure of heating. Portions of periosteum and adjacent tumor that are not fully ablated can be re-treated if deemed necessary. The critical temperature threshold for ablation is set at 65°C in the soft tissues adjacent to the targeted bone structures. Postprocedural care includes evaluation of possible skin burns, monitoring of vital signs for 2 hours after treatment in the MR department, and administration of analgesic and/or antiemetic drugs if requested. Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded as minor or major on the basis of medical severity, additional treatment, and long-term consequences for patients. Treatment will be performed on an outpatient basis in the patients who receive only local and peripheral anesthesia; the patient who receives general anesthesia is usually hospitalized for 24 hours after treatment.
- Conditions
- Osteoma, Osteoid
- Being tested
- MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound
- Keywords
- high intensity focused ultrasound, osteoid osteoma, bone tumor
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoma, Osteoid, Bone Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasoundDevice
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound is a totally non-invasive procedure that can destroy tumors transcutaneously; safety and efficacy profile are dramatically increased by the MRI guidance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoid Osteoma | Other | MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound Receives: Device: MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise)
to assess complications
Measured: 1 year
Efficacy (Symptoms reduction)
Symptoms reduction
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
nidus vascularization (correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve)
correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionJun 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoma, OsteoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Roma La SapienzaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alessandro Napoli, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Investigators
- Alessandro napoli, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02302651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OO-MC-MRGFUS-002
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Napoli A, Bazzocchi A, Scipione R, Anzidei M, Saba L, Ghanouni P, Cozzi DA, Catalano C. Noninvasive Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma: A Prospective Developmental Study with MR Imaging-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):186-196. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162680. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
PubMed 28590796
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Osteoid Osteoma With MR Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02302651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OO-MC-MRGFUS-002
- Conditions
- Osteoma, Osteoid
- Keywords
- high intensity focused ultrasound, osteoid osteoma, bone tumor
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La SapienzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-invasive treatment of Osteoid osteoma using MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. This study is designed as an intention-to-treat using a totally non-invasive approach for pain reduction, quality of life improvement and long-term bone restoration. Procedure is performed in a single session using limited amount of acoustic energy to target the osteoid nidus. Treatment will be performed under anesthesia (peripheral or general according to age and lesion position).
Detailed description
An osteoid osteoma is a benign, painful musculoskeletal tumor that usually occurs in young males. The standard of care in the United States is computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation, a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure, with clinical success rates ranging between 85% and 98%.
Percutaneous or surgical therapy can lead to non-negligible side-effects and limited efficacy for pediatric population or young adults with osteoid osteoma. We investigate whether selective focal ablation of osteoid lesions can reduce this treatment burden without compromising long-term clinical efficacy.
Treatments will be performed using a 3.0-T MR unit (Discovery MR 750; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,Wis) featuring a Conformité Européenne-approved ExAblate MR-guided focused ultrasound system (InSightec,Tirat-Carmel, Israel) in which the ultrasound transducer is housed in the patient table. Alignment between the lesion and the transducer will be obtained in each patient by using a moistened gel pad and degassed water for acoustic coupling. This approach avoided air- skin interfaces, which can cause energy reflection and skin burns. After patient positioning, the lesion is localized with MR for treatment by using variably orientated non enhanced T1- and T2-weighted acquisitions. In general, an ideal 90° incidental angle between the planned focused ultrasound path and the lesion, relative to the bone long axis, is obtained or at least approximated. The shortest skin-lesion distance is selected for the beam pathway. Care will be taken to avoid multiple interfaces (skin, muscle, fasciae) as much as possible so as to minimize deflection of the focused ultrasound beam. Each lesion will be manually segmented by the operator to precisely delineate the nidus, skin surface, and cortical surface of the bone. Sensitive areas surrounding the target volumes will also be drawn to limit the energy and prevent unwanted thermal damage. The treatment plan is than calculated automatically by the ExAblate software according to previously acquired parameters, including the energy (in joules), the interval between two sonications, the sonication duration, and the spot size, which are modifiable by the operator. Thereafter, a low-energy sonication test will be performed to confirm the path and correct direction of the ultrasound beam into the target area and to confirm the planned energy dose and the effective dose deployed to the lesion.
The increase in tissue temperature is evaluated by using real-time MR thermometry of phase-difference fast spoiled gradient-echo sequences (proton resonant frequency shift method). The sequences are acquired to provide temperature-dependent images and real-time mapping of the thermal dose on a preferred imaging plane. The proton resonant frequency shift method starts simultaneously with each sonication. Similar to other treatments of bone lesions that use MR-guided focused ultrasound, the temperature increase is determined on the adjacent periskeletal tissue. In fact, proton resonant frequency sequences cannot effectively measure the temperature on the bone surface because of the absence of moving protons in the cortical zone. Thus, MR thermometry reveals a temperature increase, which propagates by conductive processes from the bone to the immediately adjacent soft tissues that respond linearly to an increase in bone temperature, thereby allowing an accurate measure of heating. Portions of periosteum and adjacent tumor that are not fully ablated can be re-treated if deemed necessary. The critical temperature threshold for ablation is set at 65°C in the soft tissues adjacent to the targeted bone structures. Postprocedural care includes evaluation of possible skin burns, monitoring of vital signs for 2 hours after treatment in the MR department, and administration of analgesic and/or antiemetic drugs if requested. Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded as minor or major on the basis of medical severity, additional treatment, and long-term consequences for patients. Treatment will be performed on an outpatient basis in the patients who receive only local and peripheral anesthesia; the patient who receives general anesthesia is usually hospitalized for 24 hours after treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoid Osteoma | Other | Device: MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasoundMR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- clinical and imaging diagnosis of osteoid osteoma
- painful non-vertebral location
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- general contraindication to MRI
- vertebral location of the lesion
- claustrophobia and prior surgery or RFA are not an absolute exclusion criterion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasoundHigh Intensity Focused Ultrasound is a totally non-invasive procedure that can destroy tumors transcutaneously; safety and efficacy profile are dramatically increased by the MRI guidance | Device | Osteoid Osteoma |
Primary outcome
Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise)
Time frame: 1 year
to assess complications
Efficacy (Symptoms reduction)
Time frame: 4 years
Symptoms reduction
1 secondary outcome
nidus vascularization (correlation between nidus vascularization reduction and symptoms relieve)
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28590796Napoli A, Bazzocchi A, Scipione R, Anzidei M, Saba L, Ghanouni P, Cozzi DA, Catalano C. Noninvasive Therapy for Osteoid Osteoma: A Prospective Developmental Study with MR Imaging-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Radiology. 2017 Oct;285(1):186-196. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162680. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Related trials for Osteoma, Osteoid
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
MR-HIFU Treatment of Painful Osteoid Osteoma
Osteoid Osteoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Effectiveness of MRgFUS Versus CTgRFA for Osteoid Osteomas
Osteoid Osteoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alessandro napoli, MD, PhD principal investigator
Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing MR guided High Intensity focused ultrasound in people with Osteoma, Osteoid, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alessandro Napoli, MD, PhD (3357718114, alessandro.napoli@uniroma1.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety - Adverse Events (serious and otherwise) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02302651, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2014.