AzTrials
AzTrials

ThyroidThunderbeatNCT02304172

The Efficacy and Safety of Thunderbeat in Thyroid Surgery

A study testing Thunderbeat (Group A) and Harmonic (Group B) in people with Thyroid, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the results of total thyroidectomy using the Thunderbeat device to that with the harmonic scalpel. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Thyroid
What is being tested?
Thunderbeat (Group A) and Harmonic (Group B)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Nov 2014to Feb 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • thyroidectomy
  • normal vocal cord

Who cannot join

  • additional surgical procedures together with the total thyroidectomy (i.e., parathyroidectomy or cervical lymph node dissection)
  • Thyroid cancer patients with lymph node metastasis
  • pregnant women
  • uncontrolled hypertension, DM, chronic kidney failure, coagulation disorders
  • aspirin or anti-platelet agent in 7 days
  • Graves' disease or Hashimoto thyroiditis
  • history of radiation treatment in head and neck area

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 110-744

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy and Safety of Thunderbeat in Thyroid Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Study

The aim of this study is to compare the results of total thyroidectomy using the Thunderbeat device to that with the harmonic scalpel.

Read the detailed description

Thunderbeat instrument combines an advanced bipolar clamp to the existing ultrasonic cutter. In the animal study with pig, the result of Thunderbeat shows fast abalation rate and same thermal conductivity. There has been reported a significant reduction in operative time and same complications with Thunderbeat in gynecology patient who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymph node dissection. Comparison of the utilization of this new device, however, with the Harmonic scalpel in thyroidectomy has not been performed in any study. The objective of this study is to compare the results of thyroidectomy using the Thunderbeat to that with the Harmonic scalpel device in respect to hemostasis, operative time and perioperative complications. All patients undergoing a thyroidectomy in our endocrine surgery department are randomized into those operated with Thunderbeat (Group A) and those with Harmonic scalpel (Group B).

Conditions
Thyroid
Being tested
Thunderbeat (Group A), Harmonic (Group B)
Keywords
Thyroidectomy, Thunderbeat
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Thunderbeat (Group A)Device

    hemostatic device utilized intraoperatively

  • Harmonic (Group B)Device

    hemostatic device utilized intraoperatively

Study groups in NCT02304172
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Thunderbeat (Group A)Active comparatorPatients submitted to thyroidectomy with the use of the Thunderbeat device.
Receives: Device: Thunderbeat (Group A)
Harmonic (Group B)Active comparatorPatients submitted to thyroidectomy with the use of the Harmonic scalpel device
Receives: Device: Harmonic (Group B)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative complications including laryngeal nerve palsy, hypocalcemia, hemorrhage, hematoma, wound infection and skin burn

    Measured: postoperatively (from the day of surgery until 3 months postoperatively)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Hemostasis

    Measured: intraoperatively (from skin incision to skin closure) & postoperatively (from skin closure until 2 day postoperatively)

  2. Operative time

    Measured: from skin incision to skin closure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02304172
Sponsor's protocol ID
SNUHthyroid
Acronym
Thunderbeat
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
20 Nov 2014
Last updated
15 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Thunderbeat (Group A) and Harmonic (Group B) in people with Thyroid, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative complications including laryngeal nerve palsy, hypocalcemia, hemorrhage, hematoma, wound infection and skin burn (time frame: postoperatively (from the day of surgery until 3 months postoperatively)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in