AzTrials
AzTrials

BibliotherapyRCT of CBB/CBTNCT02307097

RCT of Bibliotherapy for Social Anxiety Disorder as a Prelude to CBT in IAPT

A study testing Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and WAIT in people with Bibliotherapy and Social Anxiety Disorder, run by Solent NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The efficacy of high-intensity Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder is well established (Mayo-Wilson et al., 2014) and it is recommended by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as the first-line psychological intervention for social anxiety disorder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and WAIT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 1 Oct 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years of age;
  • ≥ 19 points on the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor, 2000);
  • Meets full Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.;
  • DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) criteria for social anxiety disorder;
  • Social anxiety is the primary disorder requiring treatment;
  • Sufficient reading and writing ability (cut-off to be decided);
Show all 9Show fewer
  • English is first language;
  • Stable dose of antidepressant medication for at least two months.
  • Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria will be offered alternative treatment within the service or referred elsewhere as required.

Who cannot join

  • If co-morbidity present, social anxiety disorder is not the primary problem;
  • Another disorder (e.g., depression) requires urgent treatment in it's own right;
  • Past or present history of psychosis, borderline personality disorder, or bipolar disorder;
  • Risk to themselves or others; Drug and alcohol misuse;
  • Previous high-intensity Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder;
  • On-going psychological therapy;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Engaging in another research trial;
  • Psychotropic medication.
  • Patients who meet the exclusion criteria will be offered alternative treatment within the service or referred elsewhere as required.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Talking Change (Solent NHS Trust)

    Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 8TA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Randomised Controlled Trial of Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy (CBB) for Social Anxiety Disorder as a Prelude to High-Intensity Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) in a Local IAPT Service.

The efficacy of high-intensity Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder is well established (Mayo-Wilson et al., 2014) and it is recommended by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as the first-line psychological intervention for social anxiety disorder. The treatment aims to modify several maintenance factors (e.g., self-focused attention) that are specified in cognitive models of social anxiety disorder (e.g., Clark \& Wells, 1995).

Cognitive-behavioural self-help treatments for social anxiety disorder have been developed to overcome various accessibility issues (e.g., long wait-lists, and the patient's need to avoid social situations, etc) associated with high-intensity CBT (Abramowitz et al., 2009; Carlbring et al., 2007) but a recent network meta-analysis (Mayo-Wilson et al., 2014) identified the former as less cost-effective than the later and thus, they are not recommended as standalone treatments.

Read more

However, the potential benefit of cognitive-behavioural self-help treatments for social anxiety disorder within a stepped-care recovery model as a prelude to high-intensity CBT has not been formally evaluated.

The aim of this study is to evaluate a seminal Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy* (CBB; "pure self-help" book) - 'Overcoming Social Anxiety \& Shyness' (Butler, 2009) - for patients with social anxiety disorder while on the wait-list for high-intensity CBT within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service, and to determine if some patients recover from CBB alone or whether there may be a reduction in the average number of high-intensity CBT sessions for those patients who subsequently require further treatment.

The study is funded by Constable \& Robinson, Kellogg College (University of Oxford) and Talking Change (Solent NHS Trust).

  • The Reading Well Books on Prescription scheme with funding from the Arts Council England enables general practitioners (GPs) and mental health professionals to prescribe seminal CBBs for patients with mood and anxiety disorders. The books are accessed free of charge via local libraries. The scheme works within NICE guidelines and it is support by the Royal Colleges of GPs, Nursing and Psychiatrists, the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies and the Department of Health through its IAPT programme.
Read the detailed description

P A R T I C I P A N T S

Patients will be recruited within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service: 'Talking Change' (Portsmouth). Advertisement for the study will be distributed locally, through social media and via the 'Talking Change' Internet website.

It is generally accepted that social anxiety disorder is a chronic condition and significant change in the wait-list does not occur. Hence, because the study aims to explore predicators of treatment response, a priori power analyses determined that approximately 114 patients randomly assigned for twelve-weeks at a ratio of 2:1 would provide sufficient power for statistical analyses; seventy-six and thirty-eight patients in the Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy (CBB) and wait-list control (WAIT) group, respectively.

Randomisation will be conducted by someone unassociated with the study using sealed envelopes.

M E A S U R E S

Risk Assessment:

An IAPT-standard risk assessment will be utilised.

Diagnostic measures:

Diagnostic interviews will use a combination of the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-5; Brown \& Barlow, 2014) for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) to identify social anxiety disorder and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-4; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) Axis I disorders (SCID-I; First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Williams, 1995) and Axis II disorders (SCID-II; First, Gibbon, Spitzer, Williams and Benjamin, 1997). All patients will be assessed with the social anxiety disorder module of the ADIS, the overview and screener modules of the SCID-I, and the screener questionnaire for SCID-II. If the SCID-I screener module indicates that another Axis I disorder might be present, the SCID-I module for that disorder will also be administered. The same applies to the screener questionnaire for the SCID-II. However, regardless of screening responses, all patients will also be assessed with the avoidant personality disorder section of the SCID-II.

The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor, 2000) will assess the main spectrum of social anxiety disorder such as fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms.

The Adult Reading Test (ART; Everatt, Brooks, \& Fidler, 2004) will assess reading accuracy, reading comprehension, speed of reading and speed of writing.

Primary measures (CBB, CBT and WAIT groups):

IAPT Standard Minimum Data Set (MDS): The brief versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006) will assess mood and generalised anxiety, respectively. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS; Marks, 1986) will assess functional impairment attributable to an identified problem. The Phobia Scales is a non-validated phobia screener of social phobia, panic disorder/agoraphobia, and specific phobia avoidance.

The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor, 2000) will assess the main spectrum of social anxiety disorder such as fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms.

The Social Participation \& Satisfaction Questionnaire (SPSQ; Alden \& Taylor, 2011) will assess the degree by which the participant is participating is social activity, and relationship satisfaction.

Secondary measures (CBB, CBT and WAIT groups):

The self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR; Baker, Heinrich, Kim, \& Hofmann, 2002; Liebowitz, 1987) will assess social anxiety and the frequency of avoidance.

The Self-Focused Attention Scale (SFA; Bögels, Alberts, \& de Jong, 1996) will assess the degree by which the participant engages in self-focused attention.

The Social Behaviour Questionnaire (SBQ; Clark et al., 2006) will assess the frequency by which the participant engages in a range of common safety-seeking behaviours.

The Social Phobia Cognitions Questionnaire (SPC; Clark et al., 2006) will assess the frequency and belief ratings for a range of typical cognitions in social anxiety.

The Anticipatory Processing Questionnaire (APQ; Vassilopoulos, 2004) and the Post-Event Processing Questionnaire-Revised (PEPQ-R; McEvoy \& Kingsep, 2006) will assess the degree by which the participant engages in pre- and post-event rumination.

Weekly measures [CBB and CBT groups only]:

IAPT Standard Minimum Data Set (MDS): The brief versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006) will assess mood and generalised anxiety, respectively. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS; Marks, 1986) is a self-report scale of functional impairment attributable to an identified problem. The Phobia Scales is a non-validated phobia screener of social phobia, panic disorder/agoraphobia, and specific phobia avoidance.

The self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR; Baker, Heinrich, Kim, \& Hofmann, 2002; Liebowitz, 1987) will be administrated weekly to assess social anxiety and the frequency of avoidance.

The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor, 2000) will assess the main spectrum of social anxiety disorder such as fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms.

A written answer to the question "What have I learnt?" will assess treatment compliance.

Qualitative measure (if received CBB):

A semi-structured interview of patients' experiences.

Other measures:

The number of high-intensity CBT sessions required following CBB will be recorded.

P R O C E D U R E

Patients will engage with a brief telephone Triage Assessment of their presenting problems and will complete the primary measures to assess symptoms of social anxiety, depression, generalised anxiety, phobia avoidance, general functioning, and social functioning.

Patients will be "stepped-up" to a full face-to-face Step Three Assessment of their presenting problems if their condition is chronic and cannot be appropriately treated with a Step 2 intervention. Thus, potential cases of social anxiety disorder who score within the clinical range (≥19 points) on the SPIN (Connor, 2000) will be "stepped-up". All other cases will be offered alternative treatment within the service or referred elsewhere as required.

Patients will complete the diagnostic measures to determine social anxiety disorder, a measure of reading and writing ability, the primary measures again, and the secondary measures to assess the maintenance factors that are specified in cognitive models of social anxiety disorder (e.g., Clark \& Wells, 1995). Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria will be offered alternative treatment within the service or referred elsewhere as required.

Patients who consent to their participation in the study will be randomly allocated to CBB or WAIT for twelve weeks. The wait-list group will begin high-intensity CBT at postWAIT.

Patients who are not "CBB responders"* will receive high-intensity CBT at postCBB whereas those who are will be discharged from the service, offered alternative treatment within the service if "caseness"** remains, or referred elsewhere as required.

The primary and secondary measures will be completed again at preCBB-WAIT-CBT, midCBB-WAIT-CBT, postCBB-WAIT-CBT, and CBB-CBT one-month follow-up. The CBB and CBT group will complete the primary measures weekly complete and weekly measures of social anxiety. The CBB group only will complete a weekly measure of treatment compliance.

Patients will the complete diagnostic measures to determine social anxiety disorder, the primary measures and the secondary measures again at postCBB-WAIT-CBT and CBB-CBT one-month follow-up. A qualitative measure of patients' experiences of treatment will be obtained at postCBB, and postCBT if they previously received CBB.

Patients will be notified when measures must be completed; most of which are completed online a secure and encrypted Internet website and some of which are completed face-to-face.

The CBB group will be provided with a self-help book ('Overcoming Social Anxiety \& Shyness'; Butler, 2009) by local libraries and encouraged to work through in a twelve-week period. A suggested timetable for completing the "pure self-help" treatment will be provided. Clinical or non-clinical contact will not be provided. The CBT group will receive up to fourteen face-to-face sessions of high-intensity CBT at their local clinic.

Patients will be provided the Chief Investigator's contact details should they wish to discuss any aspect of the study or if they become distressed. If patients' risk status should change during the trail they will be instructed to contact the Chief Investigator immediately.

At the end of study all patients will be discharged from the service, offered alternative treatment within the service if "caseness" remains, or referred elsewhere as required.

  • Those patients who have a statistically reliable improvement that place their mean LSAS-SR score within the range (mean ± two standard deviations) of the non-clinical population mean, who score ≤ 18 points on the SPIN (Connor, 2000), and who no longer meet full DSM-V criteria for social anxiety disorder (APA, 2013) will be "CBB responders" (i.e., a clinically significant change; see Jacobson \& Truax, 1991). The non-clinical population mean will be based on Fresco et al.'s (2001) non-anxious control group.

** The IAPT programme defines "caseness" as ≤ 9 points on the PHQ-9 (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) and ≤ 7 points on the GAD-7 (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006).

Being tested
Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy, WAIT
Keywords
Randomised Controlled Trial, Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy, Social Anxiety Disorder, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy, IAPT
Medical subject headings
Phobia, Social

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive-Behavioural BibliotherapyProcedure or surgery

  • Cognitive-Behavioural TherapyProcedure or surgery

  • WAITOther

Study groups in NCT02307097
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CBBExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy
CBTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy
WAITActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: WAIT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. IAPT Standard Minimum Data Set (MDS)

    The brief versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006) will assess mood and generalised anxiety, respectively. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS; Marks, 1986) will assess functional impairment attributable to an identified problem. The Phobia Scales is a non-validated phobia screener of social phobia, panic disorder/agoraphobia, and specific phobia avoidance.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  2. The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor, 2000)

    The SPIN will assess the main spectrum of social anxiety disorder such as fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  3. The Social Participation & Satisfaction Questionnaire (SPSQ; Alden & Taylor, 2011)

    The SPSQ will assess the degree by which the participant is participating is social activity, and relationship satisfaction.

    Measured: 2 minutes

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR; Baker, Heinrich, Kim, & Hofmann, 2002; Liebowitz, 1987)

    The self-report version of the LSAS-SR will assess social anxiety and the frequency of avoidance.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  2. Self-Focused Attention Scale (SFA; Bögels, Alberts, & de Jong, 1996)

    The SFA will assess the degree by which the participant engages in self-focused attention.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  3. Social Behaviour Questionnaire (SBQ; Clark et al., 2006)

    The SBQ will assess the frequency by which the participant engages in a range of common safety-seeking behaviours.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  4. Social Phobia Cognitions Questionnaire (SPC; Clark et al., 2006)

    The SPC will assess the frequency and belief ratings for a range of typical cognitions in social anxiety.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  5. Anticipatory Processing Questionnaire (APQ; Vassilopoulos, 2004) and Post-Event Processing Questionnaire-Revised (PEPQ-R; McEvoy & Kingsep, 2006)

    The APQ and PEPQ-R will assess the degree by which the participant engages in pre- and post-event rumination.

    Measured: 2 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02307097
Sponsor's protocol ID
TC-OxCADAT-2014
Acronym
RCT of CBB/CBT
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
30 Nov 2014
Last updated
10 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Abramowitz JS, Moore EL, Braddock AE, Harrington DL. Self-help cognitive-behavioral therapy with minimal therapist contact for social phobia: a controlled trial. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;40(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Apr 26.

    PubMed 18514614
  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69-93). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Butler, G. (2009). Overcoming Social Anxiety & Shyness. London: Robinson Publishing.

  • Carlbring P, Gunnarsdottir M, Hedensjo L, Andersson G, Ekselius L, Furmark T. Treatment of social phobia: randomised trial of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy with telephone support. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;190:123-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020107.

    PubMed 17267928
  • Mayo-Wilson E, Dias S, Mavranezouli I, Kew K, Clark DM, Ades AE, Pilling S. Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;1(5):368-76. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70329-3. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

    PubMed 26361000

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive-Behavioural Bibliotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and WAIT in people with Bibliotherapy and Social Anxiety Disorder, run by Solent NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

IAPT Standard Minimum Data Set (MDS) (time frame: 2 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02307097, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in