AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainfasciaNCT02310737

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Neuropathy at Cesarean Sectio With Blunt or Sharp Fascia Incision

A study testing sharp incision and blunt incision in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare sharp and blunt fascial entry during caesarean section. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
sharp incision and blunt incision
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
123 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
Sep 2014to Mar 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Woman having caesarean section for the first time
  • Woman, who have had no previous lower abdominal surgery
  • Woman who can give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Diabetes Mellitus (This does not include gestational diabetes)
  • Infection
  • Regular treatment with immunosuppressives
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Age under 18 years old
  • Chronic pain disease eg. fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis
  • BMI over 35

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Fatma Yazıcı Yılmaz

    Istanbul, 34371

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Neuropathy at Cesarean Sectio With Blunt or Sharp Fascia Incision: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare sharp and blunt fascial entry during caesarean section.

Read the detailed description

The patients will be divided into two group, The fascia will be opened with a sharp scissors in first group (group1), on the other hand in group 2 fascia distracted from the muscle tissue with a blunt maneuver. The study is planning to perform on women having cesarean section for the first time in their life and who have not previously had lower abdominal surgery before. The following parameters are evaluated for each patients

  1. All patients are evaluated for postoperative pain with VAS score when they first mobilized and following postoperative1, 3 and 7 days; 1 and 3 months 2. Postoperative sensory loss on skin incision scar, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus
Being tested
sharp incision, blunt incision
Keywords
cesarean section, facial incision, postoperative pain
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sharp incisionProcedure or surgery

    The fascia will be opened with a sharp scissors in cesarean section

  • blunt incisionProcedure or surgery

    Fascia distracted from the muscle tissue with a blunt maneuver in cesarean section

Study groups in NCT02310737
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sharp incisionActive comparatorthe patients who were included as the control group (Group 1) with sharp fascia incision
Receives: Procedure: sharp incision
blunt incisionActive comparatorthe patients who were included as the another group (Group 2) with blunt fascia incision
Receives: Procedure: blunt incision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative pain scores change on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    the difference in pain scores between two groups 1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively. Pain is registered by a score on a vas-scale from 0-10.Changes on VAS scale reported.

    Measured: 1, 3 and 7 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. postoperative sensory loss change on skin incision scar, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus

    assessment of the sensory loss difference on skin incision scar, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus postoperatively(day7). Sensory loss measured by asking their sensory feelings on scar area, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus

    Measured: 7 days postoperatively

  2. postoperative pain scores change on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    the difference in pain scores between two groups 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Pain is registered by a score on a vas-scale from 0-10.

    Measured: 1and 3 months postoperatively

  3. postoperative sensory loss change on skin incision scar

    Assessment of the sensory loss difference on skin incision scar, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus postoperatively at 1 and 3 months. Sensory loss measured by asking their sensory feelings on scar area, lower abdomen, pelvic region, groin, inner thigh, and labia majus

    Measured: 1and 3 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
123 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02310737
Sponsor's protocol ID
755
Acronym
fascia
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
14 Nov 2014
Last updated
9 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing sharp incision and blunt incision in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative pain scores change on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: 1, 3 and 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in