AzTrials
AzTrials

Bacterial InfectionNCT02311816

Increase in Procalcitonin Kinetics May be a Good Indicator of Starting Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study of Bacterial Infection, run by Domonkos Trásy at 1 site in Hungary.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The value of procalcitonin change from the day before to the day when infection was suspected in predicting bacterial infection in intensive care patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bacterial Infection
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
Oct 2012to Oct 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients with suspected infection during their stay on the intensive care unit were screened for eligibility. Patients were enrolled, when the attending intensive care specialist had a suspicion of infection and decided to start empirical antibiotic therapy and infalmmatory markers were available from the previous day.

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical signs of infection
  • Suspected or proven acute infection requiring empiric antibiotic therapy as decided by the attending ICU physician
  • Microbiological sample sent for staining
  • Inflammatory markers available from the previous day

Who cannot join

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Who received prophylactic or empiric antibiotic therapy 48 hours before inclusion
  • Whose receiving acute renal replacement therapy in the first 24 hours following antibiotic treatment
  • Following cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • End stage diseases with a "do not resuscitate" order
  • Immunocompromised patients (human immunodeficiency virus infection, bone marrow transplantation, malignant haematological disorders and chemotherapy)
  • Post cardiac surgery patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hungary1 site
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy

    Szeged, Csongrád megye, H-6725

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

The value of procalcitonin change from the day before to the day when infection was suspected in predicting bacterial infection in intensive care patients.

Read the detailed description

Starting antibiotic therapy early in critically ill patients with suspected infection is of utmost importance with significant effect on survival. Procalcitonin is a reliable sepsis marker but results about its usefulness in initiating antimicrobials are conflicting. Our aim is to investigate the predictive value of 24 hours procalcitonin kinetics before starting empirical antibiotic therapy in intensive care patients as an indicator of the presence of bacterial infection.

Keywords
Bacterial infection, empiric antibiotic therapy
Medical subject headings
Bacterial Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02311816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InfectionBased on the microbiological results and clinical picture patients were grouped post hoc into "infection" and "no infection" groups by two independent experts (intensivist, infectologist) who were blinded for procalcitonin.
No infectionBased on the microbiological results and clinical picture patients were grouped post hoc into "infection" and "no infection" groups by two independent experts (intensivist, infectologist) who were blinded for procalcitonin.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procalcitonin kinetic

    Procalcitonin levels are measured at starting empiric antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before. The changes in percentage are calculated form the day before and right before the first exposition of the antibiotic therapy.

    Measured: 24 hours before starting empiric antibiotic treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. C-reactive protein kinetic

    C-reactive protein levels are measured at starting empiric antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before. The changes in percentage are calculated form the day before and right before the first exposition of the antibiotic therapy.

    Measured: 24 hours before starting empiric antibiotic treatment

  2. Body temperature kinetic

    Body temperatures are measured at starting empiric antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before. The changes in percentage are calculated form the day before and right before the first exposition of the antibiotic therapy.

    Measured: 24 hours before starting empiric antibiotic treatment

  3. White blood cell count kinetic

    White blood cell count levels are measured at starting empiric antibiotic treatment and 24 hours before. The changes in percentage are calculated form the day before and right before the first exposition of the antibiotic therapy.

    Measured: 24 hours before starting empiric antibiotic treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02311816
Sponsor's protocol ID
PCT-infection
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
4 Dec 2014
Last updated
8 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Trasy D, Tanczos K, Nemeth M, Hankovszky P, Lovas A, Mikor A, Hajdu E, Osztroluczki A, Fazakas J, Molnar Z. Delta Procalcitonin Is a Better Indicator of Infection Than Absolute Procalcitonin Values in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:3530752. doi: 10.1155/2016/3530752. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

    PubMed 27597981

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bacterial Infection, run by Domonkos Trásy at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procalcitonin kinetic (time frame: 24 hours before starting empiric antibiotic treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02311816, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in