AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 4DIETNCT02312063

Dietary Impacts on Glucose-lowering Effects of Sitagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 4 study testing Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Kansai Electric Power Hospital at 2 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In a prospective, randomized case-controlled study, the investigators hope to demonstrate a positive correlation of plasma levels of EPA and DHA as well as fish intake with the HbA1c-lowering effect of sitagliptin but not with the active comparator glimepiride. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Sitagliptin and Glimepiride
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
2 sitesJapan
Study dates
Feb 2015to May 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Japanese T2DM patients, who are OAD naïve or receive 4-week wash out of one OAD (glinides, alpha-GI, metformin) before randomization.
  • HbA1c:6.0-8.0 %
  • BMI:18-30 kg/m2
  • Age:20-75 years old
  • CrCl: > 60mL/min

Who cannot join

  • Patients on DPP-4 inhibitors or glimepiride
  • Patients treated with pioglitazone
  • Patients with moderate/severe renal impairments
  • Patients with insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonists

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Japan2 sites
  • Saiseikai Noe Hospital Osaka

    Osaka, 536-0001

  • Kansai Electric Power Hospital

    Osaka, 553-0003

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Dietary Impacts on Glucose-lowering Effects of Sitagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective, Open-label, Clinical Trial

In a prospective, randomized case-controlled study, the investigators hope to demonstrate a positive correlation of plasma levels of EPA and DHA as well as fish intake with the HbA1c-lowering effect of sitagliptin but not with the active comparator glimepiride.

Read the detailed description

<Background and Rationale>

DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are becoming 1st line oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) in the management of type 2 diabetes in Japan; approximately 3-million patients, one third of those with diagnosis of diabetes, receive DPP-4i. The widespread use of DPP-4i in Japan is partly due to accumulating data from clinical trials demonstrating that DPP-4 inhibitors exert greater HbA1c-lowering effects in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients and also in non-obese Asian type 2 diabetes patients when compared to diabetes patients of other ethnicities (Ann Pharmacother 2012;46:1453-69; Diabetologia 2013;56:696-708).

We previously demonstrated that sources of diet such as fish can enhance the HbA1c-lowering effects of DPP-4i (J Diabet Investig 2012:3(5):464-467). In our retrospective studies, we also reported that DPP-4i treatments are more effective in type 2 diabetic patients with high plasma levels of EPA and DHA, polyunsaturated fatty acids that are rich in fish (J Diabet Investig 2012:3(5):464-467; J Diabet Investig 2012:3(6):498-502). In the course of analyzing the mechanism, we found that ingestion of fish prior to rice enhanced secretion of GLP-1 (Yabe D et al. Late breaking poster presentation in ADA 2014, manuscript in preparation). Further investigation of the ideal dietary content for combination with DPP-4i could be helpful in enhancing DPP-4i efficacy for more patients.

This prospective clinical trial studying food composition in addition to compliance of diet therapy in Japanese patients who received sitagliptin or active comparator glimepiride should provide new insights on cross-talk between diet and medicines

<Study Procedures>

  1. Initial screening period

IC, screening assessment, eligibility check except for inclusion criteria (visit 1-4 week).

  1. Hospital visit at fasting.
  2. Patient's informed consent The investigator will hand over the written information to the patients and give an explanation of the contents of the study. The patients should be provided with ample time and opportunity to inquire about details of the study, and after confirmation that the patients fully understood the contents of the study, the informed consent form to participation in the study should be signed. (The informed consent form should describe the explanatory considerations specified in Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Studies, Part IV: Informed consent <detailed rule>) Prior to a patient's participation in the study, the written informed consent form should be signed or placed the name/seal, and personally dated by both the investigator and the patient. When CRC performed a supplemental explanation, he/she should also sign or place the name/seal, and date the informed consent form. The investigator will distribute a copy of the signed informed consent form and written information to the patient. After acquisition of informed consent to participation in the study until the end of the final observation, if information becomes available that may be relevant to the patient's willingness to continue participation in the study, the patient will be informed in a timely manner to confirm as to whether the patient is still willing to participate in the study. This communication should be recorded in writing. At this time, if the investigator considers that the written information should be revised, the written information should be promptly revised. The patients may withdraw from the study at any time. If a patient has withdrawn consent, the investigator should record the reasons for withdrawal in CRF.
  3. Make an interim registration for a patient. A unique number (screening or baseline number) should be assigned for identification purposes. It should be noted that that under no circumstances should a patient be assigned more than one allocation number
  4. Check if a patient satisfies required eligibility. Inquire about the background of a patient, past medical history, a history of surgery, and prior treatment drugs, and perform physical exam, vital signs (incl. ECG), hematology, blood biochemistry, pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential), HbA1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) as well as plasma EPA/DHA, FFQ and metabolomics.
  5. Washout periods until Visit 2 are as shown below:
  • Patients who are not treated with an oral anti-diabetic agent: None
  • Patients who are on a single oral anti-diabetic agent: 4 weeks
  1. Baseline period

Physical and laboratory checkup, randomization and initiation of treatment (visit2, 0 week).

  1. Hospital admission of patients at fasting.
  2. In accordance with the study schedule, perform physical exam, vital signs (incl. ECG) and pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) should be determined. Concomitant drugs should be checked.
  3. Confirm that there is no abnormal finding, and randomize the patient [Randomization procedure] 1) The following requirements should be sent to secretariat of this study: Patient identification code Satisfying the eligibility criteria Assignments should be performed by dynamic allocation by the following factors: Gender Age BMI Plasma EPA
  4. When the person in charge of registration assessed the entry of a patient is appropriate, a study drug to be administered will be designated.
  5. Initiate a study drug at following doses (visit 2-4, 0-16 weeks):

Sitagliptin 50mg Glimepiride 0.5mg

  1. Treatment period

Physical and laboratory checkup (visit3, 8 week; visit4, 16 week).

  1. Hospital admission of patients at fasting.
  2. Check the treatment compliance status, and the presence or absence of adverse event/hypoglycemic symptoms (for the glimepiride treatment group).
  3. In accordance with the study schedule, perform physical exam, vital signs (incl. ECG) and pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential) are determined. Concomitant drugs should be checked. HbA1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) as well as plasma EPA/DHA, FFQ and metabolomics should be also checked.

3-1. Study configuration (parallel, crossover, etc.), Multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label, 2 arm parallel, clinical trial.

(2 centers, see appendix) 3-2. Duration of the treatment period 16 weeks 3-3. Control group Glimepiride 3-4. Follow-up procedures A patient was to be withdrawn from the trial if

  1. The patient withdrew consent, without the need to justify the decision.
  2. The patient had to take any concomitant drugs interfering with the study medication.
  3. The patient is no longer able to participate in the study for other medical reasons (e.g., surgery, AEs, or other diseases).
  4. Occurrence of unacceptable hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia that may put patients at risk through continued participation.
  5. The patient is not able to comply with study protocol (according to the discretion of the investigator or sub-investigator).

<Statistical Analysis and Sample Size Justification>

To evaluate the association of changes in HbA1c levels from baseline with plasma DHA/EPA, linear regression analyses are carried out at week16 in each treatment group. We construct multivariable logistic regression models to assess whether plasma DHA/EPA is independently associated with HbA1c reduction. We calculate Spearman correlation coefficients between changes in HbA1c and the following variables: compliance with diet therapy, estimated intakes of various food items including fish, and the clinical characteristics of the patients (age, sex, body mass index, duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1c) using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Sample size:

In our retrospective analysis, estimated intakes of fish or DHA/EPA (n=72) as well as serum levels of DHA/EPA (n=20) are significantly correlated with HbA1c reduction by DPP-4 inhibitors in drug-naïve T2DM patients (J Diabet Investig 2012:3(5):464-7). In another retrospective analysis, serum levels of EPA are significantly correlated with HbA1c reduction by DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM patients who received DPP-4 inhibitors as monotherapy (n=16) or add-on therapy (n=46) (J Diabet Investig 2012: 3(6):498-502).These studies support that the proposed study requires a sample size of 24 patients in each treatment group considering drop outs.

<Specific Drug Supply Requirements >

Both sitagliptin and glimepiride will be prescribed according to national health insurance. The patients who are eligible for this study will be randomized to treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride at 0 week. Patients receiving an OAD at enrollment will be subjected to washout prior to randomization at 0 week. The dose for each treatment group is as follows:

Sitagliptin: Orally, 50mg/day (q.d) throughout the treatment period Glimepiride: Orally, 0.5mg/day (q.d) throughout the treatment period

<Adverse Experience Reporting>

An adverse event (AE) is any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs will be reported to sponsor through the procedure similar to the marketed product.

Being tested
Sitagliptin, Glimepiride
Keywords
DPP-4 inhibitor, sulfonylurea
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SitagliptinDrug

    Also called Januvia

  • GlimepirideDrug

    Also called Amaryl

Study groups in NCT02312063
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SitagliptinExperimentalSitagliptin 50 mg a day for 16 weeks
Receives: Drug: Sitagliptin
GlimepirideActive comparatorGlimepiride 0.5 mg a day for 16 weeks
Receives: Drug: Glimepiride

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation of Plasma Levels of EPA and DHA With HbA1c Reduction

    Pearson's correlation coefficient of HbA1c reduction with plasma levels of EPA and DHA at baseline

    Measured: 0-16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Correlation of Estimated Seafood Intake With HbA1c Reduction

    Pearson's correlation coefficient of HbA1c reduction with estimated seafood intake

    Measured: 0-16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02312063
Sponsor's protocol ID
KEP26-49
Acronym
DIET
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
4 Dec 2014
Last updated
1 Jul 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Park H, Park C, Kim Y, Rascati KL. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Nov;46(11):1453-69. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R041. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

    PubMed 23136353
  • Kim YG, Hahn S, Oh TJ, Kwak SH, Park KS, Cho YM. Differences in the glucose-lowering efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors between Asians and non-Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2013 Apr;56(4):696-708. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2827-3. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

    PubMed 23344728
  • Iwasaki M, Hoshian F, Tsuji T, Hirose N, Matsumoto T, Kitatani N, Sugawara K, Usui R, Kuwata H, Sugizaki K, Kitamoto Y, Fujiwara S, Watanabe K, Hyo T, Kurose T, Seino Y, Yabe D. Predicting efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: Association of glycated hemoglobin reduction with serum eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid levels. J Diabetes Investig. 2012 Oct 18;3(5):464-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00214.x.

    PubMed 24843607
  • Senmaru T, Fukui M, Kobayashi K, Iwase H, Inada S, Okada H, Asano M, Yamazaki M, Hasegawa G, Nakamura N, Iwasaki M, Yabe D, Kurose T, Seino Y. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitor is effective in patients with type 2 diabetes with high serum eicosapentaenoic acid concentrations. J Diabetes Investig. 2012 Dec 20;3(6):498-502. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00220.x.

    PubMed 24843614

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Kansai Electric Power Hospital at 2 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation of Plasma Levels of EPA and DHA With HbA1c Reduction (time frame: 0-16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02312063, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in