Abortion, InducedDSREGISTRYIANCT02318212
Dilapan-S / Dilasoft E-Registry in Induced Abortion
An observational study of Abortion, Induced, run by Medicem International CR s.r.o..
Trial summary
International Observational E-Registry on the use of osmotic dilators DILAPAN-S® / DILASOFT® for cervical priming prior to induced abortion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Abortion, Induced
- What is being tested?
- Dilapan-S
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 439 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients indicated for cervical priming with Dilapan-S or Dilasoft prior to induced abortion and meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria in centres involved in data collection.
Who may be able to join
- Intrauterine pregnancy ≥ 6 and ≤ 24 weeks gestation
- Patients who are capable of giving consent and sign the form
- Abortion being made in compliance with the Abortion Act 1967 (For England, Wales and Scotland)
Who cannot join
- Clinical signs of uterine, vaginal or vulvar infection
- Acute bleeding
About this study
Official title: International Observational E-Registry on the Use of Dilapan-S/Dilasoft Osmotic Dilators for Cervical Priming Prior to Induced Abortion
International Observational E-Registry on the use of osmotic dilators DILAPAN-S® / DILASOFT® for cervical priming prior to induced abortion.
Read the detailed description
International, multicentre, non-interventional, observational e-registry, post market clinical follow up study to document current clinical use of Dilapan-S or Dilasoft for cervical priming before induced abortion with regard to the number of dilators used, duration of insertion of dilators in situ and unusual complications consequent of their use.
- Conditions
- Abortion, Induced
- Being tested
- Dilapan-S
- Keywords
- Cervical dilatation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dilapan-SDevice
Also called Dilasoft
Synthetic osmotic dilators Dilapan-S or Dilasoft for cervical priming prior to induced abortion
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of inserted osmotic dilators
Measured: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Total time taken for cervical priming with Dilapan-S/Dilasoft
Duration of leaving osmotic dilators in situ
Measured: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Secondary outcomes (9)
Type of synthetic osmotic dilator used
Dilapan-S or Dilasoft
Measured: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Complications during cervical priming
pre-operative bleeding, fever, pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, premature passage of foetal or chorionic tissue
Measured: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Other observed undesirable effects uf use of synthetic osmotic dilators
Measured: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Need of additional mechanical dilation
In cases, when surgical abortion is performed
Measured: up to 10 minutes after osmotic dilators extraction
Surgical operative time
Period from speculum insertion in to speculum extraction out
Measured: estimated max. up to 10 min, estimated average 8 min.
Initiation-to-delivery time
In case of medical abortion
Measured: hrs
Induction-to-delivery time
In case of medical abortion
Measured: up to 72 hrs; estimated average 48 hrs
Complications related to induced abortion procedure
Measured: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 12 hrs
Infectious complication and its relation to the use of Dilapan-S/Dilasoft
Measured: up to 72 hrs; Complications, if any, will be followed-up until stable situation has been reached.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Abortion, InducedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 439 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medicem International CR s.r.o.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patricia Lohr, MD, Principal investigator, British Pregnancy Advisory Service, UKJiri Hanacek, MD, Principal investigator, Institute of Care for Mother and Child, Prague, CZNatalia Kan, Prof., MD, Principal investigator, Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, MoscowJohn Roizin, MD, Principal investigator, Allentown Women´s Center, Bethlehem, PA, USMary Jane Bovo, MD, Principal investigator, Choices Women´s Medical Center, New YorkLeRoy Carhart, MD, Principal investigator, Germantown Reproductive Health Service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02318212
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DIS-2014-010
- Acronym
- DSREGISTRYIA
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 19 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Allen RH, Goldberg AB; Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):139-56. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
PubMed 17656184Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PubMed 24331860Newmann S, Dalve-Endres A, Drey EA; Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2008 Apr;77(4):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PubMed 18342657Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Cates W Jr. Measures to prevent cervical injury during suction curettage abortion. Lancet. 1983 May 28;1(8335):1182-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92464-9.
PubMed 6133988Lichtenberg ES. Complications of osmotic dilators. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Jul;59(7):528-36. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200407000-00022.
PubMed 15199271Samuel MI, Parsons JH. Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7. doi: 10.1783/147118909787072234.
PubMed 19126319Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22114527Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
PubMed 17980952Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182983889.
PubMed 23743471Lyus R, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
PubMed 22898362Poon LC, Parsons J. Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20-24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):485-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01257.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
PubMed 17309543Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
PubMed 24402587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- International Observational E-Registry on the Use of Dilapan-S/Dilasoft Osmotic Dilators for Cervical Priming Prior to Induced Abortion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02318212
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DSREGISTRYIA / DIS-2014-010
- Conditions
- Abortion, Induced
- Keywords
- Cervical dilatation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 439 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medicem International CR s.r.o.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
International Observational E-Registry on the use of osmotic dilators DILAPAN-S® / DILASOFT® for cervical priming prior to induced abortion.
Detailed description
International, multicentre, non-interventional, observational e-registry, post market clinical follow up study to document current clinical use of Dilapan-S or Dilasoft for cervical priming before induced abortion with regard to the number of dilators used, duration of insertion of dilators in situ and unusual complications consequent of their use.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients indicated for cervical priming with Dilapan-S or Dilasoft prior to induced abortion and meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria in centres involved in data collection.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Intrauterine pregnancy ≥ 6 and ≤ 24 weeks gestation
- Patients who are capable of giving consent and sign the form
- Abortion being made in compliance with the Abortion Act 1967 (For England, Wales and Scotland)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Clinical signs of uterine, vaginal or vulvar infection
- Acute bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dilapan-SAlso: DilasoftSynthetic osmotic dilators Dilapan-S or Dilasoft for cervical priming prior to induced abortion | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Number of inserted osmotic dilators
Time frame: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Total time taken for cervical priming with Dilapan-S/Dilasoft
Time frame: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Duration of leaving osmotic dilators in situ
9 secondary outcomes
Type of synthetic osmotic dilator used
Time frame: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Complications during cervical priming
Time frame: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Other observed undesirable effects uf use of synthetic osmotic dilators
Time frame: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs
Need of additional mechanical dilation
Time frame: up to 10 minutes after osmotic dilators extraction
Surgical operative time
Time frame: estimated max. up to 10 min, estimated average 8 min.
Initiation-to-delivery time
Time frame: hrs
Induction-to-delivery time
Time frame: up to 72 hrs; estimated average 48 hrs
Complications related to induced abortion procedure
Time frame: up to 24 hrs; estimated average 12 hrs
Infectious complication and its relation to the use of Dilapan-S/Dilasoft
Time frame: up to 72 hrs; Complications, if any, will be followed-up until stable situation has been reached.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 17656184Allen RH, Goldberg AB; Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):139-56. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 24331860Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 18342657Newmann S, Dalve-Endres A, Drey EA; Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2008 Apr;77(4):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 6133988Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Cates W Jr. Measures to prevent cervical injury during suction curettage abortion. Lancet. 1983 May 28;1(8335):1182-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92464-9.
- Background: PubMed 15199271Lichtenberg ES. Complications of osmotic dilators. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Jul;59(7):528-36. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200407000-00022.
- Background: PubMed 19126319Samuel MI, Parsons JH. Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7. doi: 10.1783/147118909787072234.
- Background: PubMed 22114527Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 17980952Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 23743471Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182983889.
- Background: PubMed 22898362Lyus R, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 17309543Poon LC, Parsons J. Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20-24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):485-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01257.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
- Background: PubMed 24402587Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
Related trials for Abortion, Induced
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety During Surgical Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Loss
Early Pregnancy Loss, Procedural Pain, Anxiety
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Factors Influencing Fertility or Pregnancy Health
Menstrual Cycles, Conception
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Progesterone and Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Pregnancy Loss, Pregnancy Loss, Early
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Azithromycin for Cerclage Prophylaxis
Cervical Insufficiency
Recruiting
Randomized Study of a Dematerialized Management for Post-Emergency Gynecological Follow-Up
Genital Diseases, Female, Ectopic Pregnancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patricia Lohr, MD principal investigator
British Pregnancy Advisory Service, UK
Jiri Hanacek, MD principal investigator
Institute of Care for Mother and Child, Prague, CZ
Natalia Kan, Prof., MD principal investigator
Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Moscow
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Abortion, Induced, run by Medicem International CR s.r.o..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of inserted osmotic dilators (time frame: max. up to 24 hrs; estimated average 6 hrs). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02318212, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2017.