StrokePhase 1MyoReArmNCT02321254
Myoelectric Robot-assisted Rehabilitation for the Upper Limb After Stroke
A Phase 1 study testing The RehaARM-Robot and Standard rehabilitation therapy in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of the RehaARM-robot and to determine the feasibility of including robotic therapy in daily rehabilitation programmes, after stroke. Additionally, we aim to investigate the acceptance of this intervention from patients and therapists. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- The RehaARM-Robot and Standard rehabilitation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2014to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients suffering from stroke, ischemic and / or hemorrhagic
- Stroke in the left hemisphere
- Score between 1 and 3 in the upper-limb sub-item of the Italian version of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (IT-NIHSS) (Pezzella et al. 2009)
- Score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale (Keith et al., 1987) less than 100 out of a total of 126. This scale is used as a reference to indicate the degree of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living (ADLs)
- Score of the upper-limb Fugl-Meyer scale (FMA) (Fugl-Meyer et al., 1975) less than 60. This scale measures the residual motor function of a person after stroke
Who cannot join
- Non-stabilized fractures
- Diagnosis of depression
- Traumatic brain Injury
- Pharmacologically uncontrolled epilepsy
- Ideomotor apraxia
- Neglect
Show all 9Show fewer
- Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <20/30
- Severe impairment of verbal comprehension, defined by a score in the Token Test (Tau points<58/78)
- Patients participating in other rehabilitation treatments for the upper-limb (e.g. virtual reality treatment, motor imagery, etc)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study of Active, Robot-assisted Therapy for Shoulder Rehabilitation After Stroke, Using Myoelectric Signals
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of the RehaARM-robot and to determine the feasibility of including robotic therapy in daily rehabilitation programmes, after stroke. Additionally, we aim to investigate the acceptance of this intervention from patients and therapists. A total of 10 patients will be recruited in this study, all the patients will receive 1 hour of standard therapy together with 45 min of robot therapy every day. The robot therapy will last 45 minutes, for 15 consecutive days within a maximum period of four weeks. Additional 15 minutes are required for placing surface electrodes on the shoulder and patient preparation. The study will include passive and active shoulder training of four movements: Horizontal abduction/adduction, abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation and flexion/extension. The passive part lasts 10 minutes and the active part 35 minutes.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- The RehaARM-Robot, Standard rehabilitation therapy
- Keywords
- Stroke, Upper limb, Robotics, Electromyography, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The RehaARM-RobotDevice
Also called Robot-assisted therapy for the shoulder
Robot therapy by using a 3-Degrees-Of-Freedom (3DOFs) robot to train the shoulder.
Standard rehabilitation therapyBehavioural
Standard therapy of stroke rehabilitation including speech, physical, occupational therapies and group activities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The RehaARM-Robot | Experimental | Receive 45 min of robot-assisted therapy for the shoulder and 1 hour of daily standard rehabilitation therapy. Receives: Device: The RehaARM-Robot; Behavioral: Standard rehabilitation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Motor function of the upper limb is measured by means of the Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale.
Measured: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
FIM is an 18-item scale that assesses patient's disability and medical rehabilitation functional outcome (A total of 126 points).
Measured: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Reaching Performance Scale (RPS)
It assesses the ability of subjects to reach an object (a cone). The cone is placed at a 4-cm distance and after at a 30-cm distance from the subject. The subject is asked to reach and grab the cone if possible. The observer evaluates the quality of reaching instead of the grip strength ( A total of 36 points).
Measured: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of five muscles
Spasticity is measured using the MAS of five muscles: Pectoralis major, biceps, wrist flexors, flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum profundus (Total of 20 points).
Measured: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Nine Hole Pegboard Test (NHPT)
It measures the dexterity of the hand. Patient should insert 9 pins in the board. There are 9 pins. The number of pins inserted in 50 min are registered or if the patient inserted 9 pins, then the time is registered.
Measured: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FerRobotics Compliant Robot GmbH, Linz, Austria
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Turolla, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
- Investigators
- Andrea Turolla, MSc, Principal investigator, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital Foundation, Venice (Italy)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02321254
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Prot.2013.16
- Acronym
- MyoReArm
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):111-20. doi: 10.1177/0269215511416383. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
PubMed 21840917Suputtitada A, Suwanwela NC, Tumvitee S. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Dec;87(12):1482-90.
PubMed 15822545Makowski NS, Knutson JS, Chae J, Crago PE. Functional electrical stimulation to augment poststroke reach and hand opening in the presence of voluntary effort: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(3):241-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968313505913. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
PubMed 24270058Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub3.
PubMed 22696362Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub2.
PubMed 21901720Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, Tonin P, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Kiper P, Cagnin A, Piron L. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 1;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-85.
PubMed 23914733Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
PubMed 17876068Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Mar;123(3):147-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20726844Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
PubMed 11018445Sartori M, Reggiani M, Farina D, Lloyd DG. EMG-driven forward-dynamic estimation of muscle force and joint moment about multiple degrees of freedom in the human lower extremity. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052618. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
PubMed 23300725
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study of Active, Robot-assisted Therapy for Shoulder Rehabilitation After Stroke, Using Myoelectric Signals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02321254
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MyoReArm / Prot.2013.16
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Upper limb, Robotics, Electromyography, Rehabilitation
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FerRobotics Compliant Robot GmbH, Linz, Austria
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of the RehaARM-robot and to determine the feasibility of including robotic therapy in daily rehabilitation programmes, after stroke. Additionally, we aim to investigate the acceptance of this intervention from patients and therapists. A total of 10 patients will be recruited in this study, all the patients will receive 1 hour of standard therapy together with 45 min of robot therapy every day. The robot therapy will last 45 minutes, for 15 consecutive days within a maximum period of four weeks. Additional 15 minutes are required for placing surface electrodes on the shoulder and patient preparation. The study will include passive and active shoulder training of four movements: Horizontal abduction/adduction, abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation and flexion/extension. The passive part lasts 10 minutes and the active part 35 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The RehaARM-Robot | Experimental | Device: The RehaARM-Robot, Behavioral: Standard rehabilitation therapyReceive 45 min of robot-assisted therapy for the shoulder and 1 hour of daily standard rehabilitation therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients suffering from stroke, ischemic and / or hemorrhagic
- Stroke in the left hemisphere
- Score between 1 and 3 in the upper-limb sub-item of the Italian version of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (IT-NIHSS) (Pezzella et al. 2009)
- Score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale (Keith et al., 1987) less than 100 out of a total of 126. This scale is used as a reference to indicate the degree of autonomy in carrying out activities of daily living (ADLs)
- Score of the upper-limb Fugl-Meyer scale (FMA) (Fugl-Meyer et al., 1975) less than 60. This scale measures the residual motor function of a person after stroke
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Non-stabilized fractures
- Diagnosis of depression
- Traumatic brain Injury
- Pharmacologically uncontrolled epilepsy
- Ideomotor apraxia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The RehaARM-RobotAlso: Robot-assisted therapy for the shoulderRobot therapy by using a 3-Degrees-Of-Freedom (3DOFs) robot to train the shoulder. | Device | The RehaARM-Robot |
| Standard rehabilitation therapyStandard therapy of stroke rehabilitation including speech, physical, occupational therapies and group activities. | Behavioural | The RehaARM-Robot |
Primary outcome
Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Motor function of the upper limb is measured by means of the Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale.
4 secondary outcomes
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Reaching Performance Scale (RPS)
Time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of five muscles
Time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Nine Hole Pegboard Test (NHPT)
Time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jul 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 21840917Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):111-20. doi: 10.1177/0269215511416383. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 15822545Suputtitada A, Suwanwela NC, Tumvitee S. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Dec;87(12):1482-90.
- Results publication: PubMed 24270058Makowski NS, Knutson JS, Chae J, Crago PE. Functional electrical stimulation to augment poststroke reach and hand opening in the presence of voluntary effort: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(3):241-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968313505913. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 22696362Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 21901720Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 23914733Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, Tonin P, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Kiper P, Cagnin A, Piron L. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 1;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-85.
- Results publication: PubMed 17876068Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 20726844Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 Mar;123(3):147-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 11018445Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 23300725Sartori M, Reggiani M, Farina D, Lloyd DG. EMG-driven forward-dynamic estimation of muscle force and joint moment about multiple degrees of freedom in the human lower extremity. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052618. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Turolla, MSc principal investigator
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital Foundation, Venice (Italy)
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing The RehaARM-Robot and Standard rehabilitation therapy in people with Stroke, run by IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Austria, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (time frame: 3 weeks (15 sessions)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02321254, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2017.