Overweight and ObesityNCT02322112
The Alberta FYBER (Feed Your Gut Bacteria morE fibeR) Study
A study testing Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation in people with Overweight and Obesity, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Too much body-fat has been linked to a low-grade inflammation throughout the body. This inflammation is thought to then cause different diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. A lower amount of inflammation is usually seen in people that follow a high fiber diet. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Overweight and Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Apr 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI of 25-35
- men and pre-menopausal, non-pregnant or lactating women
- weight stability (±3%) for at least 1 month
- no diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders or history of gastrointestinal surgical interventions.
- no history of diabetes mellitus
Who cannot join
- vegetarian or vegan
- smoking
- alcohol intake greater than 7 drinks per week
- vigorous exercise more than 3 hours per week
- uses supplements (including prebiotics and probiotics)
- antibiotic treatment in the last 3 months
- allergy or intolerance to treatment fibers (wheat or acacia gum)
- use of anti-hypertensive, lipid-lowering, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, or laxative medications
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Alberta Diabetes Institute Clinical Research Unit
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1
About this study
Official title: The Alberta FYBER (Feed Your Gut Bacteria morE fibeR) Study: Exploring the Significance of Structure-function Relationships Between Dietary Fiber and the Gut Microbiota in Human Health.
Too much body-fat has been linked to a low-grade inflammation throughout the body. This inflammation is thought to then cause different diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. A lower amount of inflammation is usually seen in people that follow a high fiber diet. A reason for this is the microbes that live in our gut. Fiber is a main food source for these microbes. This allows fiber to actually change the type of microbes that live in our gut. Also, when fiber gets fermented by these microbes, health-promoting waste products get released. We aim to determine how exactly our gut microbes contribute to the health properties of fiber.
We hypothesize that fiber's health properties depend on how the gut microbes respond to the fiber. To test this, we plan to add three different fibers to the diets of healthy overweight and obese individuals for six weeks. We then will determine how the different fibers affect an individuals' health by looking at how established markers of health change from adding the fiber. Following this, we will see how an individual's gut microbes respond to the added fiber. The response will be decided by looking at changes to the microbe community, as well as their ability to ferment the fibers. By connecting health outcomes to the gut microbes' response, we can test if the gut microbes' response to the fiber determines the fiber's ability to effect health. If we can understand how our gut microbes respond to different fibers and the importance of that response. Then we could personalize diets to have a greater impact on improving health.
Read the detailed description
Being overweight and obese significantly increases the risk of developing numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and certain cancers. The microbial community (microbiota) that resides within the gut play a notable role in obesity and its associated pathologies (e.g. CVD, T2D), and is therefore a potential therapeutic target. Diet is known to determine whether the gut microbiota contributions to host metabolism are beneficial or detrimental. A westernized diet high in fat and sugar is associated with systemic inflammation, while fat intake increases lipopolysaccharide translocation through the gut membrane. In addition, gut microbial metabolism of choline and L-carnitine can produce trimethylamine, which has been shown to contribute to atherosclerosis after being oxidized in the liver to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). In contrast, diets high in dietary fiber from fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are inversely associated with inflammation and can potentially reverse effects of a high fat diet. Fermentable fiber types can resist host digestion, but are then subsequently fermented by the gut microbiota to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are known to have metabolic and immunologic benefits. Accordingly, both epidemiologic associations and human intervention trials suggest an inverse association between fiber intake, reduced systemic inflammation, and improved lipid and glucose metabolism; however, results remain inconsistent. These discrepancies might be partly attributable to (I) the low fiber doses used in most studies, and (II) the high degree of inter-individual variation in the response to fiber, which may stem from the individualized responses of the microbiome to fiber. The emerging evidence that fiber and the gut microbiota interact to influence host physiology warrant human clinical research that investigates the capacity of chemically distinct fibers to modulate host metabolism and inflammation, and the mechanistic role of the gut microbiota in their physiological effects.
Our long-term goal is to contribute to such a framework through clinical research that applies a holistic approach to examining the effect of fiber on both the host and its gut microbiota. We hypothesize that fibers show structure-dependent effects on inflammatory, metabolic, and hormonal markers of obesity-associated pathologies that can be predicted through compositional, functional, and genetic characteristics of an individual's fecal microbiome. We propose the following specific aims:
AIM 1. Perform a parallel-arm exploratory intervention study in overweight and mildly obese individuals to determine the impact of high doses of chemically distinct fibers on host inflammatory markers, measures of insulin sensitivity, and other clinical outcomes.
The effect of two physicochemically distinct fermentable dietary fibers (acacia gum and resistant starch type 4) on clinical markers of metabolic disease will be compared against a relatively non-fermentable dietary fiber (microcrystalline cellulose - control). We will employ a three-arm, parallel-design, single-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified randomized exploratory trial. Fibers will be administered in relative pure form daily over six weeks without any further lifestyle adjustments. Doses used in the trial will be 25 g/day of fiber for women and 35 g/day for men (close to Health Canada's dietary recommendations). Although, the first two days of treatment will use half the daily treatment dose of fiber (women: 12.5 g/day; men: 17.5 g/day), to ease the incorporation of the fiber into the diet. Participants will be advised on how to incorporate the fibers into their diet, as to improve tolerance and compliance.
The impact of dietary fiber on a comprehensive set of well-established obesity-related biomarkers will be determined via quantification at baseline and post-dietary intervention. High sensitive C-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers (e.g. interleukin-6, interleukin-10), as well as established markers for metabolic syndrome (e.g. fasting glucose and triglycerides) will constitute as key endpoints of the exploratory trial. To gain further understanding on the mechanisms that mediate metabolic and inflammatory improvements; five primary gut hormones, including satiety/hunger signaling hormones (e.g. glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin, and ghrelin), will be included. Lifestyle indicators, compliance with treatment, and satiation will be further assessed through self-administered questionnaires.
AIM 2. Evaluate the short- and long-term impacts of chemically distinct types of dietary fiber on gut microbiota composition, genetic characteristics, and production of anti-inflammatory (SCFA) and pathogenic (TMAO) metabolites.
We will utilize Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing and whole metagenomic sequencing to characterize the fecal microbiota (that will be enriched for large bowel bacteria) of our exploratory trial participants at weeks 0, 1, and 6, to explore fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition and gene content. These methods will be used as a majority of gut microbiota are not currently culturable. To further investigate gut microbiota function, we will quantify specific bacterial associated metabolites in plasma (TMAO) and in feces (SCFAs and bile acids). In parallel, we will quantify the fecal metabolites after in vitro fermentation, to account for absorption in the human gut. This will allow us to gain insight into fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, metabolism, and functionality that coincide with the physiological effects observed in the host.
AIM 3. Characterize associations between clinical outcomes and microbiome shifts and determine how well individual microbiome configurations predict impacts of dietary fiber.
With the establishment of a robust human exploratory trial, a well-defined set of host phenotypes, and participant microbiome characteristics, Aim 3 will statistically integrate these data to specifically test for associations between diet, the gut microbiome, and host metabolism, and evaluate if microbiome and host phenotypic signatures at baseline can predict clinical outcomes of dietary fibers
- Conditions
- Overweight and Obesity
- Being tested
- Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation, Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation
- Keywords
- Dietary Fiber, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Overweight and Obesity, Personalized Nutrition, Inflammation, Metabolism
- Medical subject headings
- Overweight, Obesity, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Microcrystalline Cellulose SupplementationOther
Also called Microcel MC-12; Blanver Farmoquímica Ltda.
Fifty overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of MCC (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.
Acacia Gum SupplementationOther
Also called Agri-Spray Acacia Fibre; Agrigum International Ltd.
Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of AG (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.
Resistant Starch Type 4 SupplementationOther
Also called Fibersym RW; MGP Ingredients, Inc.
Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of RS4 (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Microcrystalline Cellulose (Control) | Placebo comparator | Microcrystalline cellulose will be used as a placebo control, as it is known to be an insoluble, non-viscous fiber that is essentially not fermented by the human gut microbiota. However, it is important to note that cellulose does have fermentation potential within the gastrointestinal tract and may be associated with improved health benefits; indicating a role as an active comparator. Receives: Other: Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation |
| Acacia Gum | Experimental | Acacia gum is composed largely of arabinogalactan, and is considered to be a relatively non-viscous, soluble fiber this is highly fermented by the gut microbiota and well tolerated. Receives: Other: Acacia Gum Supplementation |
| Resistant Starch Type 4 | Experimental | Cross-linked phosphorylated resistant starch (type IV) is generally insoluble and with low viscosity; yet it tends to have physiologic properties similar to soluble fibers, such as fermentability. Receives: Other: Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prediction of the Clinical Improvements of Dietary Fiber
The primary objective of this study is to determine the ability of the fecal microbiome to predict clinical improvements of dietary fiber treatments relevant to the etiology of obesity-associated pathologies.
Measured: 6-week period
Secondary outcomes (6)
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Sub-clinical Inflammation
The markers of sub-clinical inflammation that will be measured are: C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-18, interleukin-10, lipopolysaccharide binding protein, and adiponectin.
Measured: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Insulin Resistance and Blood Cholesterol.
Dietary fiber associated changes in fasting glucose, insulin, and glucagon will be quantified; and the homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance will used to calculate insulin resistance. Changes in incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1) and blood cholesterol (triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein) will also be quantified.
Measured: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Satiety and Dietary Intake.
Dietary fiber associated changes in hunger and satiety will be quantified via satiety hormones (ghrelin, leptin, and peptide YY), self-reported satiety, and subsequent dietary intake and anthropometric measurements.
Measured: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO).
Dietary fiber associated changes in TMAO-a relatively new cardiovascular disease biomarker linked to the gut microbiome-will be quantified in plasma.
Measured: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Bile Acid Derivatives.
The influence of dietary fiber on the formation of bile acid derivatives, and its association with the observed clinical outcomes, will be determined.
Measured: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Gut Microbial Structure and Metabolic Function.
Fecal microbial composition will be characterized at baseline (week 0), 6 days (±1 day) post fiber initiation (week 1), and post intervention (week 6) by 16S rRNA sequencing; while fecal microbiota function will be assessed through whole metagenomic sequencing, fecal SCFA concentrations, as well as parallel in vitro fermentations with subsequent SCFA quantification.
Measured: 6-week period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionApr 2020
- Study completionApr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Overweight and ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jens Walter, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02322112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00050274
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 5 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hajer GR, van Haeften TW, Visseren FL. Adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity, diabetes, and vascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2959-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn387. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
PubMed 18775919Tilg H, Kaser A. Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2011 Jun;121(6):2126-32. doi: 10.1172/JCI58109. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
PubMed 21633181De Bandt JP, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Butel MJ. Intestinal microbiota in inflammation and insulin resistance: relevance to humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011 Jul;14(4):334-40. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328347924a.
PubMed 21587065David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, Biddinger SB, Dutton RJ, Turnbaugh PJ. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):559-63. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
PubMed 24336217Hamaker BR, Tuncil YE. A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota. J Mol Biol. 2014 Nov 25;426(23):3838-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PubMed 25088686King DE, Egan BM, Woolson RF, Mainous AG 3rd, Al-Solaiman Y, Jesri A. Effect of a high-fiber diet vs a fiber-supplemented diet on C-reactive protein level. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):502-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.502.
PubMed 17353499Ma Y, Hebert JR, Li W, Bertone-Johnson ER, Olendzki B, Pagoto SL, Tinker L, Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Ockene JK, Griffith JA, Liu S. Association between dietary fiber and markers of systemic inflammation in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Nutrition. 2008 Oct;24(10):941-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
PubMed 18562168Davis LM, Martinez I, Walter J, Hutkins R. A dose dependent impact of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides on the intestinal microbiota of healthy adults. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec 15;144(2):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
PubMed 21059476Martinez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e15046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015046.
PubMed 21151493Martinez I, Lattimer JM, Hubach KL, Case JA, Yang J, Weber CG, Louk JA, Rose DJ, Kyureghian G, Peterson DA, Haub MD, Walter J. Gut microbiome composition is linked to whole grain-induced immunological improvements. ISME J. 2013 Feb;7(2):269-80. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.104. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PubMed 23038174Armet AM, Li F, Deehan EC, Nikolaeva DD, Delannoy-Bruno O, Siegwald L, Berger B, Castelli KM, Rodionov DA, Arzamasov AA, Liu J, Seethaler B, Cole JL, Nguyen KN, Jin M, Zhao YY, Sharma AM, Curtis JM, Proctor SD, Bischoff SC, Wismer WV, Osterman AL, Bakal JA, Greiner R, Field CJ, Knights D, Prado CM, Walter J. Mechanistic insights into microbiome-dependent and personalized responses to dietary fibre in a randomized controlled trial. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Nov 21:2025.11.20.25340625. doi: 10.1101/2025.11.20.25340625.
PubMed 41332831Deehan EC, Zhang Z, Riva A, Armet AM, Perez-Munoz ME, Nguyen NK, Krysa JA, Seethaler B, Zhao YY, Cole J, Li F, Hausmann B, Spittler A, Nazare JA, Delzenne NM, Curtis JM, Wismer WV, Proctor SD, Bakal JA, Bischoff SC, Knights D, Field CJ, Berry D, Prado CM, Walter J. Elucidating the role of the gut microbiota in the physiological effects of dietary fiber. Microbiome. 2022 May 13;10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01248-5.
PubMed 35562794Nguyen NK, Deehan EC, Zhang Z, Jin M, Baskota N, Perez-Munoz ME, Cole J, Tuncil YE, Seethaler B, Wang T, Laville M, Delzenne NM, Bischoff SC, Hamaker BR, Martinez I, Knights D, Bakal JA, Prado CM, Walter J. Gut microbiota modulation with long-chain corn bran arabinoxylan in adults with overweight and obesity is linked to an individualized temporal increase in fecal propionate. Microbiome. 2020 Aug 19;8(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00887-w.
PubMed 32814582
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Alberta FYBER (Feed Your Gut Bacteria morE fibeR) Study: Exploring the Significance of Structure-function Relationships Between Dietary Fiber and the Gut Microbiota in Human Health.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02322112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00050274
- Conditions
- Overweight and Obesity
- Keywords
- Dietary Fiber, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Overweight and Obesity, Personalized Nutrition, Inflammation, Metabolism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Too much body-fat has been linked to a low-grade inflammation throughout the body. This inflammation is thought to then cause different diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. A lower amount of inflammation is usually seen in people that follow a high fiber diet. A reason for this is the microbes that live in our gut. Fiber is a main food source for these microbes. This allows fiber to actually change the type of microbes that live in our gut. Also, when fiber gets fermented by these microbes, health-promoting waste products get released. We aim to determine how exactly our gut microbes contribute to the health properties of fiber.
We hypothesize that fiber's health properties depend on how the gut microbes respond to the fiber. To test this, we plan to add three different fibers to the diets of healthy overweight and obese individuals for six weeks. We then will determine how the different fibers affect an individuals' health by looking at how established markers of health change from adding the fiber. Following this, we will see how an individual's gut microbes respond to the added fiber. The response will be decided by looking at changes to the microbe community, as well as their ability to ferment the fibers. By connecting health outcomes to the gut microbes' response, we can test if the gut microbes' response to the fiber determines the fiber's ability to effect health. If we can understand how our gut microbes respond to different fibers and the importance of that response. Then we could personalize diets to have a greater impact on improving health.
Detailed description
Being overweight and obese significantly increases the risk of developing numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and certain cancers. The microbial community (microbiota) that resides within the gut play a notable role in obesity and its associated pathologies (e.g. CVD, T2D), and is therefore a potential therapeutic target. Diet is known to determine whether the gut microbiota contributions to host metabolism are beneficial or detrimental. A westernized diet high in fat and sugar is associated with systemic inflammation, while fat intake increases lipopolysaccharide translocation through the gut membrane. In addition, gut microbial metabolism of choline and L-carnitine can produce trimethylamine, which has been shown to contribute to atherosclerosis after being oxidized in the liver to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). In contrast, diets high in dietary fiber from fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are inversely associated with inflammation and can potentially reverse effects of a high fat diet. Fermentable fiber types can resist host digestion, but are then subsequently fermented by the gut microbiota to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are known to have metabolic and immunologic benefits. Accordingly, both epidemiologic associations and human intervention trials suggest an inverse association between fiber intake, reduced systemic inflammation, and improved lipid and glucose metabolism; however, results remain inconsistent. These discrepancies might be partly attributable to (I) the low fiber doses used in most studies, and (II) the high degree of inter-individual variation in the response to fiber, which may stem from the individualized responses of the microbiome to fiber. The emerging evidence that fiber and the gut microbiota interact to influence host physiology warrant human clinical research that investigates the capacity of chemically distinct fibers to modulate host metabolism and inflammation, and the mechanistic role of the gut microbiota in their physiological effects.
Our long-term goal is to contribute to such a framework through clinical research that applies a holistic approach to examining the effect of fiber on both the host and its gut microbiota. We hypothesize that fibers show structure-dependent effects on inflammatory, metabolic, and hormonal markers of obesity-associated pathologies that can be predicted through compositional, functional, and genetic characteristics of an individual's fecal microbiome. We propose the following specific aims:
AIM 1. Perform a parallel-arm exploratory intervention study in overweight and mildly obese individuals to determine the impact of high doses of chemically distinct fibers on host inflammatory markers, measures of insulin sensitivity, and other clinical outcomes.
The effect of two physicochemically distinct fermentable dietary fibers (acacia gum and resistant starch type 4) on clinical markers of metabolic disease will be compared against a relatively non-fermentable dietary fiber (microcrystalline cellulose - control). We will employ a three-arm, parallel-design, single-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified randomized exploratory trial. Fibers will be administered in relative pure form daily over six weeks without any further lifestyle adjustments. Doses used in the trial will be 25 g/day of fiber for women and 35 g/day for men (close to Health Canada's dietary recommendations). Although, the first two days of treatment will use half the daily treatment dose of fiber (women: 12.5 g/day; men: 17.5 g/day), to ease the incorporation of the fiber into the diet. Participants will be advised on how to incorporate the fibers into their diet, as to improve tolerance and compliance.
The impact of dietary fiber on a comprehensive set of well-established obesity-related biomarkers will be determined via quantification at baseline and post-dietary intervention. High sensitive C-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers (e.g. interleukin-6, interleukin-10), as well as established markers for metabolic syndrome (e.g. fasting glucose and triglycerides) will constitute as key endpoints of the exploratory trial. To gain further understanding on the mechanisms that mediate metabolic and inflammatory improvements; five primary gut hormones, including satiety/hunger signaling hormones (e.g. glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin, and ghrelin), will be included. Lifestyle indicators, compliance with treatment, and satiation will be further assessed through self-administered questionnaires.
AIM 2. Evaluate the short- and long-term impacts of chemically distinct types of dietary fiber on gut microbiota composition, genetic characteristics, and production of anti-inflammatory (SCFA) and pathogenic (TMAO) metabolites.
We will utilize Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing and whole metagenomic sequencing to characterize the fecal microbiota (that will be enriched for large bowel bacteria) of our exploratory trial participants at weeks 0, 1, and 6, to explore fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition and gene content. These methods will be used as a majority of gut microbiota are not currently culturable. To further investigate gut microbiota function, we will quantify specific bacterial associated metabolites in plasma (TMAO) and in feces (SCFAs and bile acids). In parallel, we will quantify the fecal metabolites after in vitro fermentation, to account for absorption in the human gut. This will allow us to gain insight into fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, metabolism, and functionality that coincide with the physiological effects observed in the host.
AIM 3. Characterize associations between clinical outcomes and microbiome shifts and determine how well individual microbiome configurations predict impacts of dietary fiber.
With the establishment of a robust human exploratory trial, a well-defined set of host phenotypes, and participant microbiome characteristics, Aim 3 will statistically integrate these data to specifically test for associations between diet, the gut microbiome, and host metabolism, and evaluate if microbiome and host phenotypic signatures at baseline can predict clinical outcomes of dietary fibers
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Microcrystalline Cellulose (Control) | Placebo comparator | Other: Microcrystalline Cellulose SupplementationMicrocrystalline cellulose will be used as a placebo control, as it is known to be an insoluble, non-viscous fiber that is essentially not fermented by the human gut microbiota. However, it is important to note that cellulose does have fermentation potential within the gastrointestinal tract and may be associated with improved health benefits; indicating a role as an active comparator. |
| Acacia Gum | Experimental | Other: Acacia Gum SupplementationAcacia gum is composed largely of arabinogalactan, and is considered to be a relatively non-viscous, soluble fiber this is highly fermented by the gut microbiota and well tolerated. |
| Resistant Starch Type 4 | Experimental | Other: Resistant Starch Type 4 SupplementationCross-linked phosphorylated resistant starch (type IV) is generally insoluble and with low viscosity; yet it tends to have physiologic properties similar to soluble fibers, such as fermentability. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- BMI of 25-35
- men and pre-menopausal, non-pregnant or lactating women
- weight stability (±3%) for at least 1 month
- no diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders or history of gastrointestinal surgical interventions.
- no history of diabetes mellitus
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- vegetarian or vegan
- smoking
- alcohol intake greater than 7 drinks per week
- vigorous exercise more than 3 hours per week
- uses supplements (including prebiotics and probiotics)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microcrystalline Cellulose SupplementationAlso: Microcel MC-12; Blanver Farmoquímica Ltda.Fifty overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of MCC (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks. | Other | Microcrystalline Cellulose (Control) |
| Acacia Gum SupplementationAlso: Agri-Spray Acacia Fibre; Agrigum International Ltd.Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of AG (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks. | Other | Acacia Gum |
| Resistant Starch Type 4 SupplementationAlso: Fibersym RW; MGP Ingredients, Inc.Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of RS4 (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks. | Other | Resistant Starch Type 4 |
Primary outcome
Prediction of the Clinical Improvements of Dietary Fiber
Time frame: 6-week period
The primary objective of this study is to determine the ability of the fecal microbiome to predict clinical improvements of dietary fiber treatments relevant to the etiology of obesity-associated pathologies.
6 secondary outcomes
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Sub-clinical Inflammation
Time frame: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Insulin Resistance and Blood Cholesterol.
Time frame: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Satiety and Dietary Intake.
Time frame: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO).
Time frame: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Bile Acid Derivatives.
Time frame: 6-week period
Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Gut Microbial Structure and Metabolic Function.
Time frame: 6-week period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 18775919Hajer GR, van Haeften TW, Visseren FL. Adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity, diabetes, and vascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2959-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn387. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 21633181Tilg H, Kaser A. Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2011 Jun;121(6):2126-32. doi: 10.1172/JCI58109. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 21587065De Bandt JP, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Butel MJ. Intestinal microbiota in inflammation and insulin resistance: relevance to humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011 Jul;14(4):334-40. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328347924a.
- Background: PubMed 24336217David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, Biddinger SB, Dutton RJ, Turnbaugh PJ. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):559-63. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
- Background: PubMed 25088686Hamaker BR, Tuncil YE. A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota. J Mol Biol. 2014 Nov 25;426(23):3838-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
- Background: PubMed 17353499King DE, Egan BM, Woolson RF, Mainous AG 3rd, Al-Solaiman Y, Jesri A. Effect of a high-fiber diet vs a fiber-supplemented diet on C-reactive protein level. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):502-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.502.
- Background: PubMed 18562168Ma Y, Hebert JR, Li W, Bertone-Johnson ER, Olendzki B, Pagoto SL, Tinker L, Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Ockene JK, Griffith JA, Liu S. Association between dietary fiber and markers of systemic inflammation in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Nutrition. 2008 Oct;24(10):941-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
- Background: PubMed 21059476Davis LM, Martinez I, Walter J, Hutkins R. A dose dependent impact of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides on the intestinal microbiota of healthy adults. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec 15;144(2):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 21151493Martinez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e15046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015046.
- Background: PubMed 23038174Martinez I, Lattimer JM, Hubach KL, Case JA, Yang J, Weber CG, Louk JA, Rose DJ, Kyureghian G, Peterson DA, Haub MD, Walter J. Gut microbiome composition is linked to whole grain-induced immunological improvements. ISME J. 2013 Feb;7(2):269-80. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.104. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41332831Armet AM, Li F, Deehan EC, Nikolaeva DD, Delannoy-Bruno O, Siegwald L, Berger B, Castelli KM, Rodionov DA, Arzamasov AA, Liu J, Seethaler B, Cole JL, Nguyen KN, Jin M, Zhao YY, Sharma AM, Curtis JM, Proctor SD, Bischoff SC, Wismer WV, Osterman AL, Bakal JA, Greiner R, Field CJ, Knights D, Prado CM, Walter J. Mechanistic insights into microbiome-dependent and personalized responses to dietary fibre in a randomized controlled trial. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Nov 21:2025.11.20.25340625. doi: 10.1101/2025.11.20.25340625.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35562794Deehan EC, Zhang Z, Riva A, Armet AM, Perez-Munoz ME, Nguyen NK, Krysa JA, Seethaler B, Zhao YY, Cole J, Li F, Hausmann B, Spittler A, Nazare JA, Delzenne NM, Curtis JM, Wismer WV, Proctor SD, Bakal JA, Bischoff SC, Knights D, Field CJ, Berry D, Prado CM, Walter J. Elucidating the role of the gut microbiota in the physiological effects of dietary fiber. Microbiome. 2022 May 13;10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01248-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Overweight and Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Walter, PhD principal investigator
University of Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation in people with Overweight and Obesity, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prediction of the Clinical Improvements of Dietary Fiber (time frame: 6-week period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02322112, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2020.