AzTrials
AzTrials

Overweight and ObesityNCT02322112

The Alberta FYBER (Feed Your Gut Bacteria morE fibeR) Study

A study testing Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation in people with Overweight and Obesity, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Too much body-fat has been linked to a low-grade inflammation throughout the body. This inflammation is thought to then cause different diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. A lower amount of inflammation is usually seen in people that follow a high fiber diet. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Overweight and Obesity
What is being tested?
Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
195 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Aug 2015to Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • BMI of 25-35
  • men and pre-menopausal, non-pregnant or lactating women
  • weight stability (±3%) for at least 1 month
  • no diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders or history of gastrointestinal surgical interventions.
  • no history of diabetes mellitus

Who cannot join

  • vegetarian or vegan
  • smoking
  • alcohol intake greater than 7 drinks per week
  • vigorous exercise more than 3 hours per week
  • uses supplements (including prebiotics and probiotics)
  • antibiotic treatment in the last 3 months
  • allergy or intolerance to treatment fibers (wheat or acacia gum)
  • use of anti-hypertensive, lipid-lowering, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, or laxative medications

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Alberta Diabetes Institute Clinical Research Unit

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The Alberta FYBER (Feed Your Gut Bacteria morE fibeR) Study: Exploring the Significance of Structure-function Relationships Between Dietary Fiber and the Gut Microbiota in Human Health.

Too much body-fat has been linked to a low-grade inflammation throughout the body. This inflammation is thought to then cause different diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. A lower amount of inflammation is usually seen in people that follow a high fiber diet. A reason for this is the microbes that live in our gut. Fiber is a main food source for these microbes. This allows fiber to actually change the type of microbes that live in our gut. Also, when fiber gets fermented by these microbes, health-promoting waste products get released. We aim to determine how exactly our gut microbes contribute to the health properties of fiber.

We hypothesize that fiber's health properties depend on how the gut microbes respond to the fiber. To test this, we plan to add three different fibers to the diets of healthy overweight and obese individuals for six weeks. We then will determine how the different fibers affect an individuals' health by looking at how established markers of health change from adding the fiber. Following this, we will see how an individual's gut microbes respond to the added fiber. The response will be decided by looking at changes to the microbe community, as well as their ability to ferment the fibers. By connecting health outcomes to the gut microbes' response, we can test if the gut microbes' response to the fiber determines the fiber's ability to effect health. If we can understand how our gut microbes respond to different fibers and the importance of that response. Then we could personalize diets to have a greater impact on improving health.

Read the detailed description

Being overweight and obese significantly increases the risk of developing numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and certain cancers. The microbial community (microbiota) that resides within the gut play a notable role in obesity and its associated pathologies (e.g. CVD, T2D), and is therefore a potential therapeutic target. Diet is known to determine whether the gut microbiota contributions to host metabolism are beneficial or detrimental. A westernized diet high in fat and sugar is associated with systemic inflammation, while fat intake increases lipopolysaccharide translocation through the gut membrane. In addition, gut microbial metabolism of choline and L-carnitine can produce trimethylamine, which has been shown to contribute to atherosclerosis after being oxidized in the liver to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). In contrast, diets high in dietary fiber from fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are inversely associated with inflammation and can potentially reverse effects of a high fat diet. Fermentable fiber types can resist host digestion, but are then subsequently fermented by the gut microbiota to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are known to have metabolic and immunologic benefits. Accordingly, both epidemiologic associations and human intervention trials suggest an inverse association between fiber intake, reduced systemic inflammation, and improved lipid and glucose metabolism; however, results remain inconsistent. These discrepancies might be partly attributable to (I) the low fiber doses used in most studies, and (II) the high degree of inter-individual variation in the response to fiber, which may stem from the individualized responses of the microbiome to fiber. The emerging evidence that fiber and the gut microbiota interact to influence host physiology warrant human clinical research that investigates the capacity of chemically distinct fibers to modulate host metabolism and inflammation, and the mechanistic role of the gut microbiota in their physiological effects.

Our long-term goal is to contribute to such a framework through clinical research that applies a holistic approach to examining the effect of fiber on both the host and its gut microbiota. We hypothesize that fibers show structure-dependent effects on inflammatory, metabolic, and hormonal markers of obesity-associated pathologies that can be predicted through compositional, functional, and genetic characteristics of an individual's fecal microbiome. We propose the following specific aims:

AIM 1. Perform a parallel-arm exploratory intervention study in overweight and mildly obese individuals to determine the impact of high doses of chemically distinct fibers on host inflammatory markers, measures of insulin sensitivity, and other clinical outcomes.

The effect of two physicochemically distinct fermentable dietary fibers (acacia gum and resistant starch type 4) on clinical markers of metabolic disease will be compared against a relatively non-fermentable dietary fiber (microcrystalline cellulose - control). We will employ a three-arm, parallel-design, single-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified randomized exploratory trial. Fibers will be administered in relative pure form daily over six weeks without any further lifestyle adjustments. Doses used in the trial will be 25 g/day of fiber for women and 35 g/day for men (close to Health Canada's dietary recommendations). Although, the first two days of treatment will use half the daily treatment dose of fiber (women: 12.5 g/day; men: 17.5 g/day), to ease the incorporation of the fiber into the diet. Participants will be advised on how to incorporate the fibers into their diet, as to improve tolerance and compliance.

The impact of dietary fiber on a comprehensive set of well-established obesity-related biomarkers will be determined via quantification at baseline and post-dietary intervention. High sensitive C-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers (e.g. interleukin-6, interleukin-10), as well as established markers for metabolic syndrome (e.g. fasting glucose and triglycerides) will constitute as key endpoints of the exploratory trial. To gain further understanding on the mechanisms that mediate metabolic and inflammatory improvements; five primary gut hormones, including satiety/hunger signaling hormones (e.g. glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin, and ghrelin), will be included. Lifestyle indicators, compliance with treatment, and satiation will be further assessed through self-administered questionnaires.

AIM 2. Evaluate the short- and long-term impacts of chemically distinct types of dietary fiber on gut microbiota composition, genetic characteristics, and production of anti-inflammatory (SCFA) and pathogenic (TMAO) metabolites.

We will utilize Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing and whole metagenomic sequencing to characterize the fecal microbiota (that will be enriched for large bowel bacteria) of our exploratory trial participants at weeks 0, 1, and 6, to explore fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition and gene content. These methods will be used as a majority of gut microbiota are not currently culturable. To further investigate gut microbiota function, we will quantify specific bacterial associated metabolites in plasma (TMAO) and in feces (SCFAs and bile acids). In parallel, we will quantify the fecal metabolites after in vitro fermentation, to account for absorption in the human gut. This will allow us to gain insight into fiber-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, metabolism, and functionality that coincide with the physiological effects observed in the host.

AIM 3. Characterize associations between clinical outcomes and microbiome shifts and determine how well individual microbiome configurations predict impacts of dietary fiber.

With the establishment of a robust human exploratory trial, a well-defined set of host phenotypes, and participant microbiome characteristics, Aim 3 will statistically integrate these data to specifically test for associations between diet, the gut microbiome, and host metabolism, and evaluate if microbiome and host phenotypic signatures at baseline can predict clinical outcomes of dietary fibers

Being tested
Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation, Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation
Keywords
Dietary Fiber, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Overweight and Obesity, Personalized Nutrition, Inflammation, Metabolism
Medical subject headings
Overweight, Obesity, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microcrystalline Cellulose SupplementationOther

    Also called Microcel MC-12; Blanver Farmoquímica Ltda.

    Fifty overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of MCC (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.

  • Acacia Gum SupplementationOther

    Also called Agri-Spray Acacia Fibre; Agrigum International Ltd.

    Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of AG (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.

  • Resistant Starch Type 4 SupplementationOther

    Also called Fibersym RW; MGP Ingredients, Inc.

    Seventy five overweight and mildly obese subjects will supplement their normal dietary intake with a significant yet tolerable amount of RS4 (Females: 25 g; Males: 35 g) daily for six consecutive weeks.

Study groups in NCT02322112
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microcrystalline Cellulose (Control)Placebo comparatorMicrocrystalline cellulose will be used as a placebo control, as it is known to be an insoluble, non-viscous fiber that is essentially not fermented by the human gut microbiota. However, it is important to note that cellulose does have fermentation potential within the gastrointestinal tract and may be associated with improved health benefits; indicating a role as an active comparator.
Receives: Other: Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation
Acacia GumExperimentalAcacia gum is composed largely of arabinogalactan, and is considered to be a relatively non-viscous, soluble fiber this is highly fermented by the gut microbiota and well tolerated.
Receives: Other: Acacia Gum Supplementation
Resistant Starch Type 4ExperimentalCross-linked phosphorylated resistant starch (type IV) is generally insoluble and with low viscosity; yet it tends to have physiologic properties similar to soluble fibers, such as fermentability.
Receives: Other: Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prediction of the Clinical Improvements of Dietary Fiber

    The primary objective of this study is to determine the ability of the fecal microbiome to predict clinical improvements of dietary fiber treatments relevant to the etiology of obesity-associated pathologies.

    Measured: 6-week period

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Sub-clinical Inflammation

    The markers of sub-clinical inflammation that will be measured are: C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-18, interleukin-10, lipopolysaccharide binding protein, and adiponectin.

    Measured: 6-week period

  2. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Insulin Resistance and Blood Cholesterol.

    Dietary fiber associated changes in fasting glucose, insulin, and glucagon will be quantified; and the homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance will used to calculate insulin resistance. Changes in incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1) and blood cholesterol (triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein) will also be quantified.

    Measured: 6-week period

  3. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Satiety and Dietary Intake.

    Dietary fiber associated changes in hunger and satiety will be quantified via satiety hormones (ghrelin, leptin, and peptide YY), self-reported satiety, and subsequent dietary intake and anthropometric measurements.

    Measured: 6-week period

  4. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO).

    Dietary fiber associated changes in TMAO-a relatively new cardiovascular disease biomarker linked to the gut microbiome-will be quantified in plasma.

    Measured: 6-week period

  5. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Bile Acid Derivatives.

    The influence of dietary fiber on the formation of bile acid derivatives, and its association with the observed clinical outcomes, will be determined.

    Measured: 6-week period

  6. Dietary Fiber Associated Changes in Gut Microbial Structure and Metabolic Function.

    Fecal microbial composition will be characterized at baseline (week 0), 6 days (±1 day) post fiber initiation (week 1), and post intervention (week 6) by 16S rRNA sequencing; while fecal microbiota function will be assessed through whole metagenomic sequencing, fecal SCFA concentrations, as well as parallel in vitro fermentations with subsequent SCFA quantification.

    Measured: 6-week period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2020
  4. Study completionApr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
195 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02322112
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00050274
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
17 Dec 2014
Last updated
5 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hajer GR, van Haeften TW, Visseren FL. Adipose tissue dysfunction in obesity, diabetes, and vascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2959-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn387. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

    PubMed 18775919
  • Tilg H, Kaser A. Gut microbiome, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2011 Jun;121(6):2126-32. doi: 10.1172/JCI58109. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

    PubMed 21633181
  • De Bandt JP, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Butel MJ. Intestinal microbiota in inflammation and insulin resistance: relevance to humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011 Jul;14(4):334-40. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328347924a.

    PubMed 21587065
  • David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, Biddinger SB, Dutton RJ, Turnbaugh PJ. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):559-63. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

    PubMed 24336217
  • Hamaker BR, Tuncil YE. A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota. J Mol Biol. 2014 Nov 25;426(23):3838-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

    PubMed 25088686
  • King DE, Egan BM, Woolson RF, Mainous AG 3rd, Al-Solaiman Y, Jesri A. Effect of a high-fiber diet vs a fiber-supplemented diet on C-reactive protein level. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):502-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.502.

    PubMed 17353499
  • Ma Y, Hebert JR, Li W, Bertone-Johnson ER, Olendzki B, Pagoto SL, Tinker L, Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Ockene JK, Griffith JA, Liu S. Association between dietary fiber and markers of systemic inflammation in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Nutrition. 2008 Oct;24(10):941-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

    PubMed 18562168
  • Davis LM, Martinez I, Walter J, Hutkins R. A dose dependent impact of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides on the intestinal microbiota of healthy adults. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec 15;144(2):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

    PubMed 21059476
  • Martinez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e15046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015046.

    PubMed 21151493
  • Martinez I, Lattimer JM, Hubach KL, Case JA, Yang J, Weber CG, Louk JA, Rose DJ, Kyureghian G, Peterson DA, Haub MD, Walter J. Gut microbiome composition is linked to whole grain-induced immunological improvements. ISME J. 2013 Feb;7(2):269-80. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.104. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

    PubMed 23038174
  • Armet AM, Li F, Deehan EC, Nikolaeva DD, Delannoy-Bruno O, Siegwald L, Berger B, Castelli KM, Rodionov DA, Arzamasov AA, Liu J, Seethaler B, Cole JL, Nguyen KN, Jin M, Zhao YY, Sharma AM, Curtis JM, Proctor SD, Bischoff SC, Wismer WV, Osterman AL, Bakal JA, Greiner R, Field CJ, Knights D, Prado CM, Walter J. Mechanistic insights into microbiome-dependent and personalized responses to dietary fibre in a randomized controlled trial. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Nov 21:2025.11.20.25340625. doi: 10.1101/2025.11.20.25340625.

    PubMed 41332831
  • Deehan EC, Zhang Z, Riva A, Armet AM, Perez-Munoz ME, Nguyen NK, Krysa JA, Seethaler B, Zhao YY, Cole J, Li F, Hausmann B, Spittler A, Nazare JA, Delzenne NM, Curtis JM, Wismer WV, Proctor SD, Bakal JA, Bischoff SC, Knights D, Field CJ, Berry D, Prado CM, Walter J. Elucidating the role of the gut microbiota in the physiological effects of dietary fiber. Microbiome. 2022 May 13;10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01248-5.

    PubMed 35562794
  • Nguyen NK, Deehan EC, Zhang Z, Jin M, Baskota N, Perez-Munoz ME, Cole J, Tuncil YE, Seethaler B, Wang T, Laville M, Delzenne NM, Bischoff SC, Hamaker BR, Martinez I, Knights D, Bakal JA, Prado CM, Walter J. Gut microbiota modulation with long-chain corn bran arabinoxylan in adults with overweight and obesity is linked to an individualized temporal increase in fecal propionate. Microbiome. 2020 Aug 19;8(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00887-w.

    PubMed 32814582

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microcrystalline Cellulose Supplementation, Acacia Gum Supplementation and Resistant Starch Type 4 Supplementation in people with Overweight and Obesity, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prediction of the Clinical Improvements of Dietary Fiber (time frame: 6-week period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02322112, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in