Allergic ConjunctivitisPhase 3NCT02322216
Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution Study in Chinese Subjects
A Phase 3 study testing Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% and Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Alcon Research.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate olopatadine 0.2% QD (once per day) compared to olopatadine 0.1% BID (twice per day) in the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- What is being tested?
- Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% and Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 383 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chinese ethnicity;
- History of allergic conjunctivitis within the last 2 years;
- Positive skin prick test or skin intradermal test documented by a lab report within 24 months of, or at the baseline visit;
- Clinical diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis with specific signs and symptoms;
- Understand and sign an informed consent form;
- Willing and able to make required study visits and follow study instructions, and comply with dosing study medication as instructed;
- Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications or hypersensitivity to study medications or their components;
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score worse than 55 ETDRS letters (equivalent to approximately 0.60 logMAR, 20/80 Snellen, or 0.25 decimal) in either eye;
- Any ocular condition that could affect the study outcomes;
- Presumed or actual ocular infection or history of ocular herpes in either eye;
- Known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or any progressive retinal disease;
- Willing and able to avoid the use of any other topical ocular medication(s) (including artificial tear products);
Show all 17Show fewer
- Any significant illness that could be expected to interfere with the study, particularly any autoimmune disease;
- Intraocular surgery in either eye within 6 months, or ocular laser surgery in either eye within 3 months, or anticipation of ocular surgery during the study; ocular trauma in either eye within 3 months of baseline visit;
- Clinically relevant recent (within 6 months of baseline visit) history of or current severe, unstable, or uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, autoimmune disease and other relevant systemic diseases that would preclude the safe administration of a topical antihistamine/mast cell stabilizer in the opinion of the Investigator;
- Use of systemic medication(s) on a chronic dosing regimen for less than 1 month or have changed dosage within the month prior to baseline visit;
- Use of any disallowed medication (topical, topical ophthalmic, systemic and/or injectable) during the period indicated prior to baseline visit. These medications are also not allowed during the study. Disallowed medications include all anti-allergy therapies including those contained in prescription or over-the-counter sleeping aids;
- Use of cold compresses on the eyes during the course of the study;
- Cannot be dosed in both eyes;
- Cannot avoid contact lens wear during the course of the study;
- Therapy with another investigational agent within 30 days of baseline visit, or during the study;
- Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, intend to become pregnant during the study period, breast-feeding, or not using adequate birth control methods;
- Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.
About this study
Official title: A Comparative Study of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% QD vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% BID in the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in Chinese Subjects
The purpose of this study is to evaluate olopatadine 0.2% QD (once per day) compared to olopatadine 0.1% BID (twice per day) in the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Being tested
- Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%, Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%, Olopatadine 0.2% Vehicle
- Keywords
- Allergies, Ocular
- Medical subject headings
- Conjunctivitis, Allergic, Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%Drug
Also called PATADAY®
Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%Drug
Also called PATANOL®
Olopatadine 0.2% VehicleDrug
Inactive ingredients used as placebo comparator
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PATADAY | Experimental | Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% in the morning and olopatadine 0.2% vehicle in the evening, 1 drop in each eye for 14 days Receives: Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%; Drug: Olopatadine 0.2% Vehicle |
| PATANOL | Active comparator | Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1 drop in each eye in the morning and evening, for 14 days Receives: Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Worst Ocular Itching Score During the 24 Hours Prior at Day 14
Severity of ocular itching was evaluated as the worst score observed in the past 24 hours prior to each study visit. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a scale from 0-4, where 0=None and 4=Incapacitating itch. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Measured: Baseline, Day 14
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Allergic ConjunctivitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alcon ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 383 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Master, Clinical Medicine, Study director, Alcon (China) Ophthalmic Product Co., Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02322216
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C-12-010 (EXC458-C001)
- Other IDs
- 2016-004317-27, 2016
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparative Study of Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% QD vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% BID in the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in Chinese Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02322216
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C-12-010 (EXC458-C001)
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Keywords
- Allergies, Ocular
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 383 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon ResearchIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate olopatadine 0.2% QD (once per day) compared to olopatadine 0.1% BID (twice per day) in the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PATADAY | Experimental | Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%, Drug: Olopatadine 0.2% VehicleOlopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% in the morning and olopatadine 0.2% vehicle in the evening, 1 drop in each eye for 14 days |
| PATANOL | Active comparator | Drug: Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%Olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%, 1 drop in each eye in the morning and evening, for 14 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Chinese ethnicity;
- History of allergic conjunctivitis within the last 2 years;
- Positive skin prick test or skin intradermal test documented by a lab report within 24 months of, or at the baseline visit;
- Clinical diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis with specific signs and symptoms;
- Understand and sign an informed consent form;
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Contraindications or hypersensitivity to study medications or their components;
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score worse than 55 ETDRS letters (equivalent to approximately 0.60 logMAR, 20/80 Snellen, or 0.25 decimal) in either eye;
- Any ocular condition that could affect the study outcomes;
- Presumed or actual ocular infection or history of ocular herpes in either eye;
- Known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or any progressive retinal disease;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%Also: PATADAY® | Drug | PATADAY |
| Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1%Also: PATANOL® | Drug | PATANOL |
| Olopatadine 0.2% VehicleInactive ingredients used as placebo comparator | Drug | PATADAY |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Worst Ocular Itching Score During the 24 Hours Prior at Day 14
Time frame: Baseline, Day 14
Severity of ocular itching was evaluated as the worst score observed in the past 24 hours prior to each study visit. Ocular itching was assessed by the participant on a scale from 0-4, where 0=None and 4=Incapacitating itch. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Allergic Conjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Adult and Pediatric Participants With Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Cat Allergy
Allergic Conjunctivitis
Recruiting
Daydrop® Triple Action for Allergic Eye Symptoms
Allergic Conjunctivitis of Both Eyes
RecruitingPhase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenegermin Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Vehicle in the Treatment of PCED
Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defect
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammations
Ocular Surface Allergy, Conjunctivitis, Allergic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Master, Clinical Medicine study director
Alcon (China) Ophthalmic Product Co., Ltd.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% and Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.1% in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Alcon Research.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Worst Ocular Itching Score During the 24 Hours Prior at Day 14 (time frame: Baseline, Day 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.