PsoriasisPhase 3NCT02325219
An Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing CNTO 1959 50 mg and CTNO 1959 100 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. at 27 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of CNTO 1959 (guselkumab) to placebo in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (A common genetically determined, chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by rounded erythematous, dry, scaling patches). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- CNTO 1959 50 mg and CTNO 1959 100 mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 192 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 19 Dec 2014to 8 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months before Screening
- Have a PASI greater than or equal to (>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an IGA >= 3 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
- Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis (either naive or history of previous treatment)
Who cannot join
- Has a history of or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (example, unstable angina, atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months before Screening
- Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first study drug administration or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before Screening
- Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (eg, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 1 country.
27 sites in 1 country
Japan27 sites
Study site
Asahikawa
Study site
Chūō
Study site
Gifu
Study site
Isehara
Study site
Izumo
Study site
Kanazawa
Study site
Kawasaki
Study site
Kita-Gun
Study site
Kochi
Study site
Kurume
Study site
Kyoto
Study site
Matsumoto
Study site
Miyagi
Study site
Morioka
Study site
Nagoya
Study site
Osaka
Study site
Ōsaka-sayama
Study site
Sapporo
Study site
Shimotsuke
Study site
Shinjuku-ku
Study site
Tokushima
Study site
Tokyo
Study site
Tōon
Study site
Tsu
Study site
Tsukuba
Study site
Ube
Study site
Yokosuka
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of CNTO 1959 (guselkumab) to placebo in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (A common genetically determined, chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by rounded erythematous, dry, scaling patches).
Read the detailed description
A Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Investigator nor the participant know about the study treatment), placebo-controlled (a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. Participants will receive either treatment of CNTO 1959 (guselkumab) 50 milligram (mg) or 100 mg or Placebo 50 mg or 100 mg. Participants will primarily be assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Being tested
- CNTO 1959 50 mg, CTNO 1959 100 mg, Placebo 50 mg, Placebo 100 mg
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, CNTO 1959, Guselkumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CNTO 1959 50 mgDrug
Also called Guselkumab
Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 50 mg.
CTNO 1959 100 mgDrug
Also called Guselkumab
Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 100 mg.
Placebo 50 mgDrug
Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of Placebo matched to CNTO 1959 50 mg.
Placebo 100 mgDrug
Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of Placebo matched to CNTO 1959 100 mg.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 50 milligram (mg) and placebo 100 mg at Week 0, 4 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Receives: Drug: CNTO 1959 50 mg; Drug: Placebo 100 mg |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 100 milligram (mg) and placebo 50 mg at Week 0, 4 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Receives: Drug: CTNO 1959 100 mg; Drug: Placebo 50 mg |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Participants will receive subcutaneous injection of placebo 50 mg and 100 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. At Week 16, participants will be randomized in sub-group 3a to receive either CNTO1959 50 mg and placebo 100 mg at Week 16, 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or sub-group 3b to receive CNTO 1959 100 mg and placebo 50 mg at Week 16, 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Receives: Drug: CNTO 1959 50 mg; Drug: CTNO 1959 100 mg; Drug: Placebo 50 mg; Drug: Placebo 100 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (45)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), and Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) or Mild (2) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), and Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) or Mild (2) at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Measured: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 Responses at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline respectively.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 Responses at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline respectively.
Measured: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 22, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 24, 28, 22, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Psoriatic Lesions at Week 48
BSA as physical measure to define disease severity is to determine how much of the Body Surface Area (BSA) is affected by psoriasis. Involved BSA is calculated by using the palm of the participant's hand as equivalent to 1% of the BSA (rule of palm). Psoriasis affected BSA under 5% suggests mild psoriasis, a BSA of 5% to 10% is considered moderate, and an involved BSA of over 10% indicates severe psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 16
NAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. A target nail representing the worst nail psoriasis at baseline is divided into quadrants and is graded for nail matrix psoriasis (pitting, leukonychia, red spots in the lunula, and nail plate crumbling) and nail bed psoriasis (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, oil drop discoloration, and nail bed hyperkeratosis), each on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of these scores is the total NAPSI score. The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 80 (psoriasis present in all 4 quadrants of all 10 nails).
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
NAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. A target nail representing the worst nail psoriasis at baseline is divided into quadrants and is graded for nail matrix psoriasis (pitting, leukonychia, red spots in the lunula, and nail plate crumbling) and nail bed psoriasis (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, oil drop discoloration, and nail bed hyperkeratosis), each on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of these scores is the total NAPSI score. The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 80 (psoriasis present in all 4 quadrants of all 10 nails).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Week 16
NAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. A target nail representing the worst nail psoriasis at baseline is divided into quadrants and is graded for nail matrix psoriasis (pitting, leukonychia, red spots in the lunula, and nail plate crumbling) and nail bed psoriasis (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, oil drop discoloration, and nail bed hyperkeratosis), each on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of these scores is the total NAPSI score. The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 80 (psoriasis present in all 4 quadrants of all 10 nails).
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
NAPSI is an index used for assessing and grading the severity of nail psoriasis. A target nail representing the worst nail psoriasis at baseline is divided into quadrants and is graded for nail matrix psoriasis (pitting, leukonychia, red spots in the lunula, and nail plate crumbling) and nail bed psoriasis (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, oil drop discoloration, and nail bed hyperkeratosis), each on a scale of 0 to 4. The sum of these scores is the total NAPSI score. The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 80 (psoriasis present in all 4 quadrants of all 10 nails).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With a Scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (Ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
The percentage of participants with an ss-IGA score of absence of disease (0) or very mild disease (1) and at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline at Week 16 among participants who had an ss-IGA score of >= 2 at baseline was evaluated. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: Absence of Disease (0), Very Mild Disease (1), Mild Disease (2), Moderate Disease (3), and Severe Disease (4).
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Ss-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 28, 48 and 52
The percentage of participants with an ss-IGA score of absence of disease (0) or very mild disease (1) and at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline at Week 16 among participants who had an ss-IGA score of >= 2 at baseline was evaluated. The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: Absence of Disease (0), Very Mild Disease (1), Mild Disease (2), Moderate Disease (3), and Severe Disease (4).
Measured: Week 28, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ss-IGA Scores Among Participants With Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2 at Week 16
The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: Absence of Disease (0), Very Mild Disease (1), Mild Disease (2), Moderate Disease (3), and Severe Disease (4).
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ss-IGA Scores Among Participants With Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2 at Week 28, 48 and 52
The ss-IGA instrument is used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions are assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which are scored as: Absence of Disease (0), Very Mild Disease (1), Mild Disease (2), Moderate Disease (3), and Severe Disease (4).
Measured: Week 28, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 8 and 16
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Week 8
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8
Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With >=5-point Decrease in the DLQI Total Score From Baseline at Weeks 8 and 16
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants With >=5-point Decrease in the DLQI Total Score From Baseline at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participant's quality of life. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much): 0-1 = no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6 = small effect on the participant's life; 7-12 = moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18 = very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30 = extremely large effect on the participant's life. Higher scores indicate more impact on quality of life of participants.
Measured: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Index Score at Week 16
The EQ-5D is designed for self-completion by participants and consists of 2 pages - the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and severe problems. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Index Score at Weeks 28 and 48
The EQ-5D is designed for self-completion by participants and consists of 2 pages - the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and severe problems. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16
The EQ visual analog scale (EQ VAS) is the part of EQ-5D scale. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analog scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score of 0).
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Weeks 28, 48
The EQ visual analog scale (EQ VAS) is the part of EQ-5D scale. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analog scale where the endpoints are labeled 'Best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'Worst imaginable health state' (score of 0).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 16
SF-36 V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales (physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the PCS and MCS Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Weeks 28 and 48
SF-36 V2 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales (physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Scores at Week 16
Changes from baseline in the 4 types (absenteeism, activity impairment, presenteeism, and Work productivity loss) of WPAI scores at Week 16 were evaluated. The WPAI questionnaire is used to measure productivity loss associated with psoriasis during the past 7 days. It consists of six questions about absence from work because of psoriasis, hours actually worked, reduction in productivity at work attributed to psoriasis and reduction in productivity while performing daily activities. Four separate overall scores were calculated, including absenteeism (work time missed due to health), presenteeism (impairment at work due to health), work productivity loss (overall work impairment due to health), and activity impairment due to health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Scores at Weeks 28 and 48
Changes from baseline in the 4 types (absenteeism, activity impairment, presenteeism, and Work productivity loss) of WPAI scores at Weeks 28 and 48 were evaluated. The WPAI questionnaire is used to measure productivity loss associated with psoriasis during the past 7 days. It consists of six questions about absence from work because of psoriasis, hours actually worked, reduction in productivity at work attributed to psoriasis and reduction in productivity while performing daily activities. Four separate overall scores were calculated, including absenteeism (work time missed due to health), presenteeism (impairment at work due to health), work productivity loss (overall work impairment due to health), and activity impairment due to health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
ACR Response is defined as percent improvement from baseline of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) in swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and percent improvement from baseline of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (VAS; 0-10, 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, 0=very well and 10=very poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0=no arthritis activity and 10 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
ACR Response is defined as percent improvement from baseline of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) in swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and percent improvement from baseline of 20%, 50%, and 70% (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using VAS (VAS; 0-10, 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, 0=very well and 10=very poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0=no arthritis activity and 10 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percent change from baseline in the tender joints and swollen joints counts at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 was evaluated.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Percent change from baseline in the tender joints and swollen joints counts at Weeks 28, 36, 48 and 52 was evaluated.
Measured: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Change from baseline in the tender joints and swollen joints counts at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 was evaluated.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16
Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change from baseline in the tender joints and swollen joints counts at Weeks 28, 36, 48 and 52 was evaluated.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain (VAS) at Weeks 4, 8, 16
Percent change from baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain (VAS) among participants who had a diagnosis of PsA at screening at Weeks 4, 8 and 16 was evaluated. Each participant assessed his/her pain associated with joint symptoms on each assessment day using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 millimeter (mm) (no pain) to 100 mm (the worst pain imaginable).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain (VAS) at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent change from baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain (VAS) among participants who had a diagnosis of PsA at screening at Weeks 28, 36, 48 and 52 was evaluated. Each participant assessed his/her pain associated with joint symptoms on each assessment day using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (the worst pain imaginable).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 4, 8, 16
The participant's and physician's global assessments of disease activity were recorded on a VAS. The VAS for the participant's assessment ranges from "very well" (0 centimeter [cm]) to "very poor" (10 cm).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
The participant's and physician's global assessments of disease activity were recorded on a VAS. The VAS for the participant's assessment ranges from "very well" (0 cm) to "very poor" (10 cm).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response at Weeks 4, 8 and 16
HAQ-DI response was defined as change of less than or equal to (<=) -0.3 from baseline in HAQ-DI score. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HAQ-DI Response at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
HAQ-DI response was defined as change of less than or equal to (<=) -0.3 from baseline in HAQ-DI score. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning).
Measured: Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study start19 Dec 2014
- Primary completion2 Mar 2016
- Study completion8 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02325219
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR103833
- Other IDs
- CNTO1959PSO3004
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 22 May 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02325219
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR103833
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, CNTO 1959, Guselkumab, Placebo
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 May 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of CNTO 1959 (guselkumab) to placebo in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (A common genetically determined, chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by rounded erythematous, dry, scaling patches).
Detailed description
A Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Investigator nor the participant know about the study treatment), placebo-controlled (a pretend treatment [with no drug in it] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect) study of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. Participants will receive either treatment of CNTO 1959 (guselkumab) 50 milligram (mg) or 100 mg or Placebo 50 mg or 100 mg. Participants will primarily be assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Drug: CNTO 1959 50 mg, Drug: Placebo 100 mgParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 50 milligram (mg) and placebo 100 mg at Week 0, 4 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Drug: CTNO 1959 100 mg, Drug: Placebo 50 mgParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 100 milligram (mg) and placebo 50 mg at Week 0, 4 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Drug: CNTO 1959 50 mg, Drug: CTNO 1959 100 mg, Drug: Placebo 50 mg, Drug: Placebo 100 mgParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of placebo 50 mg and 100 mg at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. At Week 16, participants will be randomized in sub-group 3a to receive either CNTO1959 50 mg and placebo 100 mg at Week 16, 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or sub-group 3b to receive CNTO 1959 100 mg and placebo 50 mg at Week 16, 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months before Screening
- Have a PASI greater than or equal to (>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an IGA >= 3 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
- Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis (either naive or history of previous treatment)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Has a history of or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (example, unstable angina, atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months before Screening
- Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first study drug administration or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before Screening
- Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly
- Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (eg, bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CNTO 1959 50 mgAlso: GuselkumabParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 50 mg. | Drug | Group 1, Group 3 |
| CTNO 1959 100 mgAlso: GuselkumabParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of CNTO 1959 100 mg. | Drug | Group 2, Group 3 |
| Placebo 50 mgParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of Placebo matched to CNTO 1959 50 mg. | Drug | Group 2, Group 3 |
| Placebo 100 mgParticipants will receive subcutaneous injection of Placebo matched to CNTO 1959 100 mg. | Drug | Group 1, Group 3 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.
45 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 75 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), and Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) or Mild (2) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1), and Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) or Mild (2) at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 Responses at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 Responses at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 22, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 24, 28, 22, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in the PASI Total Score at Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Psoriatic Lesions at Week 48
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48
Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With a Scalp-specific Investigator's Global Assessment (Ss-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Ss-IGA Score of 0 or 1 and at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 28, 48 and 52
Time frame: Week 28, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ss-IGA Scores Among Participants With Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Ss-IGA Scores Among Participants With Baseline Ss-IGA Score >=2 at Week 28, 48 and 52
Time frame: Week 28, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 8 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8
Change From Baseline in the DLQI Total Score at Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With >=5-point Decrease in the DLQI Total Score From Baseline at Weeks 8 and 16
Time frame: Weeks 8 and 16
Percentage of Participants With >=5-point Decrease in the DLQI Total Score From Baseline at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Index Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D): Index Score at Weeks 28 and 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Weeks 28, 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the PCS and MCS Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Weeks 28 and 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Scores at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire Scores at Weeks 28 and 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 48
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Time frame: Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 4, 8, and 16
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16
Change From Baseline in the Tender Joints Count and Swollen Joints Count at Weeks 28, 36, 48, and 52
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 28, 36, 48, 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain (VAS) at Weeks 4, 8, 16
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
27 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing CNTO 1959 50 mg and CTNO 1959 100 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. at 27 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2020.