Cerebrovascular AccidentNCT02327767
Use of a Mechanically Passive Rehabilitation Device in Vietnam: Impact on Upper Extremity Hemiparesis After Stroke
A study testing Resonating Arm Exerciser in people with Cerebrovascular Accident, run by California State University, Northridge at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
The goal of this project is to test a device (Zondervan et al, 2013) that can provide active assistance for arm training for people in Vietnam with severe to moderate stroke, but that is also simple and does not rely on powered actuators. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- What is being tested?
- Resonating Arm Exerciser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- diagnosis of stoke more than six months post injury
- patient in Da Nang, Vietnam
- <35 out of 66 on the UE-FMA
- ability to perform one complete repetition with the RAE
- participants' willingness to refrain from additional rehabilitation for the upper extremities during the duration of the RAE portion of the study.
Who cannot join
- < 24 out of 30 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Mitrushina, 1991)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Vietnam1 site
DaNang Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital
Da Nang
Thanh Do, MD, 011-84-905246877, minhducdn2004@yahoo.com
Janna Beling, PhD, PT, 8180730-0353, janna.beling@csun.edu
About this study
Official title: Use of a Mechanically Passive Rehabilitation Device as a Training Tool in Vietnam: Impact on Upper Extremity Hemiparesis After Stroke
The goal of this project is to test a device (Zondervan et al, 2013) that can provide active assistance for arm training for people in Vietnam with severe to moderate stroke, but that is also simple and does not rely on powered actuators. The hypothesis is that individuals with a severe chronic stroke, who exercise with a mechanically passive rehabilitation device, will have improved arm movement ability without experiencing an increase in arm pain.
Read the detailed description
A randomized control trial design will compare two arms, consisting of the Resonating Arm Exerciser (RAE) and standard Physical Therapy (PT), with each subject receiving both treatments. Randomization will be used to determine the order in which the subject receives each treatment; i.e. RAE followed by PT, or PT followed by RAE.
At the scheduled test period, the purpose and procedure of the study will be explained via a medical translator employed by the hospital. The subject will be asked to read and sign two copies of both the Bill of Rights and the Informed Consent Form. The researcher will retain one copy for the purpose of research records and the second copy will be given to the subject. Interview and score on the Mini Mental Status Exam will determine subject's inclusion, in order for participant's cognitive state to be intact and have the capability to follow directions, give consent, participate, and communicate directly or indirectly with translators to the investigators. Administration of the Upper Extremity-Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) will be administered next for further subject eligibility. Any additional questions asked by the subject will be answered before any testing begins. Translators and researchers will be available to assist with survey administration and completion, with no maximum time allotted for each survey. Any subject who does not meet the inclusion criteria will be thanked and released from the study. Subjects who met the criteria, will continue with the Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFRPS) and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) or SIS proxy version if the subject is unable to read and write independently.
INTERVENTION Simple random sampling will be used to allocate 30 eligible participants into either the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group will use the RAE for 3 weeks, whereas the control group will continue with existing physical therapy treatment of passive range of motion (PROM) and therapeutic exercise to their involved upper extremity by the hospital physical therapist. The treatment group will participate in supervised RAE group sessions of 45 minutes, three times a week, for a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. During each treatment session, the affected upper extremity will be used to push on the lever of the RAE in the sagittal plane. Upon pushing and pulling on the lever, the wheelchair moves a total of 20 cm from a neutral position, which indicated a repetition counted by a programed iphone. Researchers continuously will monitor the treatment group to ensure compliance with the use of the RAE, refrain from compensatory trunk movement and address patient discomfort. After four sessions with the RAE, the elastic band connected to the device will be stretched to an increased length, in order to increase stiffness for continued use.
At the completion of three weeks, participants in the control and treatment group will perform the UE-FMA, SIS, WBFPRS as a post-treatment measurement. The continued presence of medical translators will be utilized for the UE-FMA and for any questions the participants might have during the SIS and WBFPRS. Following data collection, participants will switch groups. Subjects in the experimental group will become the control group and receive their normal physical therapy treatment by the hospital PT for an additional three weeks. The treatment group will participate in supervised RAE group sessions in increments of 45 minutes, three times a week, a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. They will be supervised by two senior licensed physical therapists Hospital, who were trained by the researchers of this study. Their training will include the proper use of the RAE and data collection of outcome measures. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was established on the use of the UE-FMA, prior to data collection. At the conclusion of the six-week study, all participants will perform the UE-FMA, SIS, and WBFPRS. During the six-week duration of the study, an on-site medical professional and on-site translator will be present, to protect against medical complications and language barriers. Subjects will be able to refuse or drop out at any point of the study without repercussions and continue to receive uninterrupted medical care at the hospital.
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Being tested
- Resonating Arm Exerciser
- Keywords
- Active Assistance, Resonance, Stroke, Arm Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Resonating Arm ExerciserDevice
Participants in the exercise group will exercise using the device for 8 exercise sessions for 45 minutes per session for 3 consecutive weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Resonating Arm Exerciser | Experimental | The treatment group will participate in supervised Resonating Arm Exerciser (RAE) group sessions of 45 minutes, three times a week, for a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. During each treatment session, the affected upper extremity will be used to push on the lever of the RAE in the sagittal plane. Upon pushing and pulling on the lever, the wheelchair moves a total of 20 cm from a neutral position, which indicated a repetition counted by a programed iphone. Receives: Device: Resonating Arm Exerciser |
| Physical Therapy | No intervention | The control group will continue with existing physical therapy treatment of passive range of motion (PROM) and therapeutic exercise to their involved upper extremity by the physical therapist. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Upper Extremity-Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA)
The UE-FMA will assess sensorimotor performance of the volunteer's arm and takes 30-minutes to complete. This includes assessing reflex activity, volitional movement within synergy, volitional movement mixing synergies, volitional movement out of synergy, wrist movement, hand movement, coordination, sensation and proprioception (Fugl-Meyer, 1975). A score of < 35/66 indicated moderate to severe impairments, which will be used as a baseline measure.
Measured: up to 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Stroke Impact Scale
The SIS will be used to evaluate how stoke impacted the subject's health and life and takes 20-minutes to complete. A Vietnamese translated hard copy will be provided to the participants. A proxy version will be available in Vietnamese, in order for a caregiver or medical personnel to read the test to participants if they were unable to read or write. This survey consists of questions about physical problems, memory, mood, activities of daily living, and mobility during a 4-week timeframe (Vellone, 2014). A licensing agreement was obtained from KU Center For Technology Commercialization, Inc. for the use in our study. Christina Arana \& Associates, Inc. performed Vietnamese translations with approval via a translation agreement from Mapi Research Trust in order to achieve harmonized and consistent language.
Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale
WBFPRS will be used to assess the participants' arm pain with 0 being no pain, and 10 being the greatest pain possible and takes up to one minute to complete (Wong Baker, 2014). This scale has been translated into Vietnamese with corresponding faces to the written description of pain. Permission to use the scale was obtained from Wong-Baker Faces Foundation.
Measured: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionMar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebrovascular AccidentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- California State University, Northridge
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Janna, California State University, Northridge
- Investigators
- Janna Beling, PhD, PT, Principal investigator, California State University, Northridge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02327767
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1314-153-a
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Zondervan DK, Palafox L, Hernandez J, Reinkensmeyer DJ. The Resonating Arm Exerciser: design and pilot testing of a mechanically passive rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Apr 18;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-39.
PubMed 23597303Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
PubMed 1135616Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GD, Carod-Artal FJ, Rocco G, Alvaro R. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):229-41. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145.
PubMed 24695074Mitrushina M, Satz P. Reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State Exam in neurologically intact elderly. J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):537-43. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:43.0.co;2-9.
PubMed 1939698
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of a Mechanically Passive Rehabilitation Device as a Training Tool in Vietnam: Impact on Upper Extremity Hemiparesis After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02327767
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1314-153-a
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Keywords
- Active Assistance, Resonance, Stroke, Arm Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- California State University, NorthridgeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this project is to test a device (Zondervan et al, 2013) that can provide active assistance for arm training for people in Vietnam with severe to moderate stroke, but that is also simple and does not rely on powered actuators. The hypothesis is that individuals with a severe chronic stroke, who exercise with a mechanically passive rehabilitation device, will have improved arm movement ability without experiencing an increase in arm pain.
Detailed description
A randomized control trial design will compare two arms, consisting of the Resonating Arm Exerciser (RAE) and standard Physical Therapy (PT), with each subject receiving both treatments. Randomization will be used to determine the order in which the subject receives each treatment; i.e. RAE followed by PT, or PT followed by RAE.
At the scheduled test period, the purpose and procedure of the study will be explained via a medical translator employed by the hospital. The subject will be asked to read and sign two copies of both the Bill of Rights and the Informed Consent Form. The researcher will retain one copy for the purpose of research records and the second copy will be given to the subject. Interview and score on the Mini Mental Status Exam will determine subject's inclusion, in order for participant's cognitive state to be intact and have the capability to follow directions, give consent, participate, and communicate directly or indirectly with translators to the investigators. Administration of the Upper Extremity-Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) will be administered next for further subject eligibility. Any additional questions asked by the subject will be answered before any testing begins. Translators and researchers will be available to assist with survey administration and completion, with no maximum time allotted for each survey. Any subject who does not meet the inclusion criteria will be thanked and released from the study. Subjects who met the criteria, will continue with the Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFRPS) and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) or SIS proxy version if the subject is unable to read and write independently.
INTERVENTION Simple random sampling will be used to allocate 30 eligible participants into either the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group will use the RAE for 3 weeks, whereas the control group will continue with existing physical therapy treatment of passive range of motion (PROM) and therapeutic exercise to their involved upper extremity by the hospital physical therapist. The treatment group will participate in supervised RAE group sessions of 45 minutes, three times a week, for a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. During each treatment session, the affected upper extremity will be used to push on the lever of the RAE in the sagittal plane. Upon pushing and pulling on the lever, the wheelchair moves a total of 20 cm from a neutral position, which indicated a repetition counted by a programed iphone. Researchers continuously will monitor the treatment group to ensure compliance with the use of the RAE, refrain from compensatory trunk movement and address patient discomfort. After four sessions with the RAE, the elastic band connected to the device will be stretched to an increased length, in order to increase stiffness for continued use.
At the completion of three weeks, participants in the control and treatment group will perform the UE-FMA, SIS, WBFPRS as a post-treatment measurement. The continued presence of medical translators will be utilized for the UE-FMA and for any questions the participants might have during the SIS and WBFPRS. Following data collection, participants will switch groups. Subjects in the experimental group will become the control group and receive their normal physical therapy treatment by the hospital PT for an additional three weeks. The treatment group will participate in supervised RAE group sessions in increments of 45 minutes, three times a week, a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. They will be supervised by two senior licensed physical therapists Hospital, who were trained by the researchers of this study. Their training will include the proper use of the RAE and data collection of outcome measures. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was established on the use of the UE-FMA, prior to data collection. At the conclusion of the six-week study, all participants will perform the UE-FMA, SIS, and WBFPRS. During the six-week duration of the study, an on-site medical professional and on-site translator will be present, to protect against medical complications and language barriers. Subjects will be able to refuse or drop out at any point of the study without repercussions and continue to receive uninterrupted medical care at the hospital.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Resonating Arm Exerciser | Experimental | Device: Resonating Arm ExerciserThe treatment group will participate in supervised Resonating Arm Exerciser (RAE) group sessions of 45 minutes, three times a week, for a total of eight sessions for three consecutive weeks. During each treatment session, the affected upper extremity will be used to push on the lever of the RAE in the sagittal plane. Upon pushing and pulling on the lever, the wheelchair moves a total of 20 cm from a neutral position, which indicated a repetition counted by a programed iphone. |
| Physical Therapy | No intervention | –The control group will continue with existing physical therapy treatment of passive range of motion (PROM) and therapeutic exercise to their involved upper extremity by the physical therapist. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 18 years or older
- diagnosis of stoke more than six months post injury
- patient in Da Nang, Vietnam
- <35 out of 66 on the UE-FMA
- ability to perform one complete repetition with the RAE
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- < 24 out of 30 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Mitrushina, 1991)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Resonating Arm ExerciserParticipants in the exercise group will exercise using the device for 8 exercise sessions for 45 minutes per session for 3 consecutive weeks. | Device | Resonating Arm Exerciser |
Primary outcome
Upper Extremity-Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA)
Time frame: up to 6 weeks
The UE-FMA will assess sensorimotor performance of the volunteer's arm and takes 30-minutes to complete. This includes assessing reflex activity, volitional movement within synergy, volitional movement mixing synergies, volitional movement out of synergy, wrist movement, hand movement, coordination, sensation and proprioception (Fugl-Meyer, 1975). A score of < 35/66 indicated moderate to severe impairments, which will be used as a baseline measure.
2 secondary outcomes
Stroke Impact Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 23597303Zondervan DK, Palafox L, Hernandez J, Reinkensmeyer DJ. The Resonating Arm Exerciser: design and pilot testing of a mechanically passive rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Apr 18;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-39.
- Background: PubMed 1135616Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
- Background: PubMed 24695074Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, Dickson VV, Melkus GD, Carod-Artal FJ, Rocco G, Alvaro R. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):229-41. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145.
- Background: PubMed 1939698Mitrushina M, Satz P. Reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State Exam in neurologically intact elderly. J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):537-43. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:43.0.co;2-9.
- Wong Baker FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cerebrovascular Accident
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janna Beling, PhD, PT principal investigator
California State University, Northridge
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Resonating Arm Exerciser in people with Cerebrovascular Accident, run by California State University, Northridge at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Janna Beling, PhD, PT (818-677-7445, janna.beling@csun.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Upper Extremity-Fugl Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) (time frame: up to 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02327767, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2015.