AzTrials
AzTrials

Facial PalsyNCT02328079

Steroid-Antiviral Treatment in Rehabilitation of Facial Palsy

A study testing Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir) in people with Facial Palsy, run by Assiut University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of antiviral medicine (acyclovir) in recovery of complete facial Palsy. Fifty patients (Males and females) with acute Facial Palsy within the first 3 days of onset with age ranged from 15-60 years old. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Facial Palsy
What is being tested?
Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2013to Nov 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute onset facial palsy within the first three days of onset. Age ranged from 15-60 years old

Who cannot join

  • Patients with brittle diabetes mellitus, Morbid obesity, renal or liver impairment, osteopenia, prior history of steroid intolerance.

About this study

Official title: Antiviral Treatment in Facial Palsy. Randomized Control Trial

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of antiviral medicine (acyclovir) in recovery of complete facial Palsy. Fifty patients (Males and females) with acute Facial Palsy within the first 3 days of onset with age ranged from 15-60 years old. Each patient was submitted to the following clinical evaluation using House and Brackmann 6 facial function scoring system and Synnybrook grading system. Neurophysiological assessment of facial nerve and muscles was done before and after the end of treatment, then after the end of first and second month of treatment. EMG was done for facial muscles of both sides beside measuring facial nerve excitability to determine the excitation threshold by recording the minimum electrical stimulus required to produce visible muscle contraction. A difference greater than 3.5 mA between the affected and unaffected side is considered significant in terms of poor prognosis. Nerve conduction study of facial nerves of both sides using concentric needle electrode. Trigeminal Blink reflex for both sides of the face. Facial functional recovery was defined as "good" or "complete" using the same criteria used in the 2001 practice guideline. An outcome of grade I or II was considered a good recovery using the House and Brackmann 6 facial function scoring system

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of antiviral medicine (acyclovir) in recovery of complete facial Palsy. Fifty patients (Males and females) with acute Facial Palsy within the first 3 days of onset with age ranged from 15-60 years old. Each patient was submitted to the following clinical evaluation using House and Brackmann 6 facial function scoring system and Synnybrook grading system. Neurophysiological assessment of facial nerve and muscle was done before and after the end of treatment, then after the end of first and second month of treatment. EMG was done for facial muscles of both sides beside measuring facial nerve excitability to determine the excitation threshold by recording the minimum electrical stimulus required to produce visible muscle contraction. A difference greater than 3.5 mA between the affected and unaffected side is considered significant in terms of poor prognosis. Nerve conduction study of facial nerves of both sides using concentric needle electrode. Trigeminal Blink reflex for both sides of the face. Facial functional recovery was defined as "good" or "complete" using the same criteria used in the 2001 practice guideline. An outcome of grade I or II was considered a good recovery using the House and Brackmann 6 facial function scoring system

Conditions
Facial Palsy
Being tested
Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir)
Keywords
Facial Palsy (acute), Acyclovir, Prednisolone
Medical subject headings
Facial Paralysis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir)Drug

    Also called Steroid group (Prednisolone), Steroid plus Antiviral group (Prednisolone + acyclovir)

    Group allocations: Steroid group (prednisolone 60 mg /day IM /IV), Steroid plus Antiviral group (Prednisolone IM/ IV 60 mg /day + IV acyclovir 500 mg three time /day for 6 consecutive days) then reduced by 10 mg /day (for a total treatment time for 12 days) were placed in serially-numbered opaque closed envelopes. Each patient was placed in the appropriate group after opening the corresponding sealed envelope.

Study groups in NCT02328079
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Steroid GroupActive comparatorprednisolone 60 mg /day IM /IV for 6 consecutive days then reduced by 10 mg /day (for a total treatment time for 12 days)
Receives: Drug: Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir)
Steroid + Antiviral GroupActive comparatorPrednisolone IM/ IV 60 mg /day + IV acyclovir 500 mg three time /day for 6 consecutive days) then reduced by 10 mg /day (for a total treatment time for 12 days)
Receives: Drug: Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Facial muscle function using clinical scale

    Evaluations of facial muscle function using clinical scale were performed blindly by a neurologist who was unaware of the type of treatment of which the patient had received

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Nerve conduction study of facial nerve.

    Measurment of facial n. coduction

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02328079
Sponsor's protocol ID
Antiviral in facial palsy
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
10 Dec 2014
Last updated
16 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Khedr EM, Badry R, Ali AM, Abo El-Fetoh N, El-Hammady DH, Ghandour AM, Abdel-Haleem A. Steroid/Antiviral for the treatment of Bell's palsy: Double blind randomized clinical trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 Nov 22;34(6):897-905. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150605.

    PubMed 27689547

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Steroids (Prednisolone) and Steroids plus Antiviral (Prednisolone + acyclovir) in people with Facial Palsy, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Facial muscle function using clinical scale (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02328079, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in