AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental DisordersNCT02329431

Padres Efectivos (Parent Activation): Skills Latina Mothers Use to Get Healthcare for Their Children

A study testing activation curriculum and support group in people with Mental Disorders, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to develop an intervention to teach activation skills to Latino parents who bring children for mental health services. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Mental Disorders
What is being tested?
activation curriculum and support group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
181 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2013to Nov 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For children:
  • seeking services at target clinic
  • maximum age 22 years
  • For caregivers:
  • Latino ethnicity
  • bringing child for services to target clinic
  • able to attend a weekly class for 4 weeks
  • able to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • For children:
  • not living with potential participant caregiver
  • For caregiver:
  • not living with target child
  • evidence of emergency mental health needs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UNC Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to develop an intervention to teach activation skills to Latino parents who bring children for mental health services.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Latinos are the largest and fastest growing minority population in the US; by 2050, 2 in 5 children will be Latino. Latino children are disproportionately affected by poverty and other factors associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorder. However, Latino children with mental health needs are half as likely to use services as children in white non-Latino families. Latino families are more likely to report problems getting services, lack of a usual source of care and a medical home, and dissatisfaction with the care they receive. Unmet mental health needs, in turn, are associated with poor outcomes over the lifespan, both economic and social. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of interventions to overcome these disparities is a major national health priority central to PCORI's mission and mandate.

Activation is a promising focus of research to eliminate disparities because it reflects a set of attitudes and skills that people can use to reduce disparities. Our work provides evidence that activation in Latino adults is associated with better quality health care and outcomes; and in African American parents with greater child mental health service use. There is need for further research on parent-focused interventions founded on culturally meaningful concepts to address these needs and disparities.

Objectives:

The long-term goal of this research is to improve the mental health care and outcomes of Latino children with mental health needs. The proposed study will examine the comparative effectiveness of an activation intervention for Latino families raising children with mental health needs by means of three aims:

Aim 1. To identify parent-reported facilitators of Latino child mental health service use amenable to change through parental activation Aim 2. To test the comparative effectiveness of an adapted psycho-educational intervention to teach activation skills adapted for Latino mothers of children with mental health needs compared to a parent support group control Aim 3. To enhance the intervention, based on parent input and lessons learned from the first trial, and test its comparative effectiveness with a parent support group control

Methods:

Qualitative and quantitative data from Latino mothers who have a child with mental health needs (n=294) will be used in a difference-in-difference mixed effects approach to address these aims.

Projected Patient Outcomes:

The proposed study will provide evidence of the comparative effectiveness of an enhanced, culturally sensitive, advocacy skills intervention to build activation among Latino families and improve service use of their children with mental health needs compared to a preliminary adaptation of an existing intervention and to a usual care discussion group. Activation skills are a promising strategy to improve child mental health service use and to bridge cultural differences and disparities with wide-ranging impacts consistent with PCORI's research agenda.

Being tested
activation curriculum, support group
Keywords
child mental health, mental health services, Latino families
Medical subject headings
Mental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • activation curriculumBehavioural

    psychosocial activation curriculum

  • support groupBehavioural

    parent directed support group

Study groups in NCT02329431
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
activation curriculumExperimentalPsycho-social curriculum teaching activation skills
Receives: Behavioral: activation curriculum
support groupActive comparatorParent-directed support group
Receives: Behavioral: support group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Activation Measure

    The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) captured parent activation on behalf of their child. The PAM is an adult self-report 13-item scale with 4-level Likert responses and scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher activation. It is valid with excellent reliability. The PAM has been translated into Spanish and has been used successfully in Latina/o patient and general populations (mean=40). The PAM has also been used to measure activation of parents on behalf of their children (mean=70). A change of 4 points in the PAM is associated with improved health behaviors in the general population.

    Measured: 1 and 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)

    Parent depression was measured with the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). The PHQ-8 is scored on a scale from 0 to 27; a higher score reflects greater severity of depression. It has excellent validity and reliability. The parent PHQ-9 has been translated into Spanish and used successfully in Latina/o populations. A change of 5 points in the PHQ-8 is associated with a shift in level of depression.

    Measured: 1 and 3 months

  2. Parental Stress Scale

    Parent stress was measured with the 17-item Parental Stress Scale. The Parental Stress Scale is scored on a scale from 0 to 75, where higher scores reflect greater stress. It has been translated into Spanish, and has been shown to have excellent validity and reliability (for women, mean=22).

    Measured: 1 and 3 months

  3. Parent Activation, Qualitative

    We collected qualitative data on parent-provider communication after completion of the 4-week MePrEPA (metas, preguntar, escuchar, preguntar para aclarar/goals, questioning, listening, questioning to clarify) and parent support groups, in an effort to capture observed activation. We coded when the parent disagreed with therapist and when the parent mentioned speaking with child's teacher.

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Number of Clinic Visits Child Attended Over 4 Months

    We collected child attendance at clinic visits during a 4-month window of time, during the 3-month period parents were participating in the study and one additional month following. Child clinic visit attendance was measured by number of visits attended.

    Measured: baseline to 4-month follow-up

  5. Child Visit No-shows Over 4 Months

    We collected child attendance at clinic visits during a 4-month window of time, during the 3-month period parents were participating in the study and one additional month following. Child clinic visit no-shows were measured by number of visits missed.

    Measured: baseline to 4-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
181 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02329431
Sponsor's protocol ID
13-2106
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
29 Dec 2014
Last updated
7 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing activation curriculum and support group in people with Mental Disorders, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Activation Measure (time frame: 1 and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in