Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT02332590
Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab and Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (SARIL-RA-MONARCH)
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sanofi at 86 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy with respect to signs and symptoms as assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either intolerant of, or considered… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Sarilumab and Adalimumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 369 participants
- Where
- 86 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Jan 2015to 29 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of RA greater than or equal to (>=)3 months duration.
- American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Class I-III functional status.
- Active RA was defined as:
- At least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 8 of 68 tender joints, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) >=8 mg/L or ESR >=28 millimeter per hour (mm/H), and DAS28-ESR greater than (>) 5.1.
- Participants as per Investigator judgment were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, or inadequate responders treated with an adequate MTX dose for at least 12 weeks.
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years or the legal age of consent in the country of the study site, whichever was higher.
- Current treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARDs)/immunosuppressive agents including MTX, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, gold, penicillamine, sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine within 2 weeks prior to the baseline (Randomization Visit) or azathioprine, cyclophosphamide within 12 weeks prior to baseline (Randomization Visit) or leflunomide within 8 weeks prior to the Randomization Visit, or 4 weeks after cholestyramine washout.
- Treatment with any prior biologic agent, including anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonists, and prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor.
- Use of parenteral corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
86 sites in 15 countries.
86 sites in 15 countries
United States17 sites
Investigational Site Number 840402
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Investigational Site Number 840229
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Investigational Site Number 840407
Covina, California, 91723
Investigational Site Number 840073
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Investigational Site Number 840232
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Investigational Site Number 840202
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Investigational Site Number 840406
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Investigational Site Number 840130
Lewes, Delaware, 19958
Investigational Site Number 840112
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Investigational Site Number 840400
Long Beach, California, 90808
Investigational Site Number 840074
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Investigational Site Number 840404
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Investigational Site Number 840127
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Investigational Site Number 840128
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Investigational Site Number 840403
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33708
Investigational Site Number 840140
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Investigational Site Number 840141
Whittier, California, 90606
Poland9 sites
Investigational Site Number 616056
Bytom, 41-902
Investigational Site Number 616015
Elblag
Investigational Site Number 616005
Lublin, 20-582
Investigational Site Number 616030
Lublin, 20-954
Investigational Site Number 616055
Nadarzyn, 05-830
Investigational Site Number 616018
Poznan, 61-397
Investigational Site Number 616016
Szczecin, 71-252
Investigational Site Number 616004
Warsaw, 02-118
Investigational Site Number 616031
Warsaw, 03-291
Ukraine9 sites
Investigational Site Number 804029
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
Investigational Site Number 804048
Kharkiv, 61058
Investigational Site Number 804014
Kyiv, 01103
Investigational Site Number 804047
Kyiv, 02125
Investigational Site Number 804037
Lutsk, 43005
Investigational Site Number 804046
Lviv, 79010
Investigational Site Number 804049
Poltava, 36011
Investigational Site Number 804011
Vinnitsya, 21018
Investigational Site Number 804043
Vinnitsya, 21100
Chile7 sites
Investigational Site Number 152005
Osorno, 5311092
Investigational Site Number 152001
Puerto Varas
Investigational Site Number 152002
Santiago, 7501126
Investigational Site Number 152050
Santiago, 8207257
Investigational Site Number 152014
Talca
Investigational Site Number 152015
Temuco IX Region, 4790928
Investigational Site Number 152007
Viña del Mar
Russia7 sites
Investigational Site Number 643006
Kemerovo, 650000
Investigational Site Number 643020
Moscow, 115404
Investigational Site Number 643001
Moscow, 115522
Investigational Site Number 643031
Moscow, 121374
Investigational Site Number 643030
Moscow, 125284
Investigational Site Number 643008
Saint Petersburg, 192242
Investigational Site Number 643011
Saratov, 410053
Spain6 sites
Investigational Site Number 724003
Barakaldo, 48903
Investigational Site Number 724015
Barcelona, 08034
Investigational Site Number 724011
Barcelona / Sabadell, 08208
Investigational Site Number 724001
Málaga, 29010
Investigational Site Number 724012
Santiago de Compostela, 15705
Investigational Site Number 724007
Seville, 41009
Hungary5 sites
Investigational Site Number 348025
Budapest, 1027
Investigational Site Number 348020
Budapest, 1033
Investigational Site Number 348022
Budapest, 1036
Investigational Site Number 348024
Szombathely, 9700
Investigational Site Number 348023
Veszprém, 8200
Romania5 sites
Investigational Site Number 642006
Brăila, 810019
Investigational Site Number 642001
Bucharest, 010976
Investigational Site Number 642010
Bucharest, 011172
Investigational Site Number 642002
Bucharest, 020983
Investigational Site Number 642005
Galati, 800578
Czechia4 sites
Investigational Site Number 203001
Prague, 12850
Investigational Site Number 203033
Prague, 14800
Investigational Site Number 203030
Prague
Investigational Site Number 203002
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Israel4 sites
Investigational Site Number 376032
Ashkelon, 78278
Investigational Site Number 376031
Haifa, 34362
Investigational Site Number 376030
Ramat Gan, 52621
Investigational Site Number 376011
Tel Aviv, 64239
South Korea4 sites
Investigational Site Number 410005
Daegu, 42601
Investigational Site Number 410004
Daejeon, 35233
Investigational Site Number 410006
Seoul, 01830
Investigational Site Number 410001
Seoul, 03080
Peru3 sites
Investigational Site Number 604003
Lima, LIMA 27
Investigational Site Number 604005
Lima, LIMA 41
Investigational Site Number 604022
Lima, Lima29
South Africa3 sites
Investigational Site Number 710011
Cape Town, 7405
Investigational Site Number 710007
Cape Town, 7500
Investigational Site Number 710004
Kempton Park, 1619
Germany2 sites
Investigational Site Number 276058
Cologne, 50937
Investigational Site Number 276021
Osnabrück, 49074
United Kingdom1 site
Investigational Site Number 826001
Leytonstone, E11 1NR
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy with respect to signs and symptoms as assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with methotrexate (MTX), or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders.
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy in participants with active RA who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders, with respect to:
- Reduction of signs and symptoms of RA.
- Improvement in quality of life assessed by participant reported outcome questionnaires.
Assessment of the safety and tolerability of sarilumab monotherapy (including immunogenicity) throughout the study.
Read the detailed description
Total study duration was up to 310 weeks: Up to a 4 week screening period, 24 week randomized double-blind treatment phase, 276-week open-label extension, and 6 weeks post-treatment final study visit.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Sarilumab, Adalimumab, Placebo (for sarilumab), Placebo (for adalimumab)
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SarilumabDrug
Also called SAR153191, REGN88
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC
AdalimumabDrug
Also called Humira
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC
Placebo (for sarilumab)Drug
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC
Placebo (for adalimumab)Drug
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg | Active comparator | Adalimumab 40 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection in combination with placebo for sarilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) for 24 weeks during the double-blind (DB) period. The dosing frequency of adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg every week (qw) dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (less than [<] 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count [TJC] and swollen joint count [SJC] for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in open label extension (OLE) period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300). Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Placebo (for sarilumab) |
| Sarilumab 200 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg | Experimental | Sarilumab 200 mg SC injection in combination with placebo for adalimumab q2w for 24 weeks during the DB period. The dosing frequency of placebo for adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg qw dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (<20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in OLE period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300). Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo (for adalimumab) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR and RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) at Week 24 were obtained using Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Secondary outcomes (52)
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 24 were analyzed as non-responders.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Criteria at Week 24
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein [CRP] level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI], with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR50 is defined as achieving at least 50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Criteria at Week 24
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR70 was defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Criteria at Week 24
ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR20 was defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24
Physical function was assessed by HAQ-DI. It consisted of at least 2 or 3 questions per category, participant reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week rated on a 4-point scale where 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 = no disability and 3 = unable to do, high-dependency disability. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Short-Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire consisting of 8 sub-scales, measures health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the last 4 weeks covering 2 summary measures: PCS and mental component summary (MCS). PCS with 4 sub-scales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception; and MCS with 4 sub-scales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a sub-scale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same sub-scale give the sub-scale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
The FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire assessing fatigue where participants scored each item on a 5-point scale (0-4): 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. A total score ranged from 0 to 52, where higher score corresponds to a lower level of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in SF-36 - Mental Health Component Summary Score at Week 24
SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire consisting of 8 sub-scales, measures HRQL in the last 4 weeks covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS. PCS with 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception; and MCS with 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same sub-scale give the sub-scale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP Score) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28-CRP score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-CRP score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28-CRP score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28-CRP score below 2.6 means disease remission. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-CRP <2.6) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by hs-CRP in mg/L. The DAS28-CRP score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-CRP score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28-CRP score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28-CRP score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR < 3.2) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (CDAI ≤2.8) at Week 24
CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: SJC (28 joints), TJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (in cm), and physician's global assessment of disease activity (in cm). Total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.
Measured: Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 24
CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: SJC (28 joints), TJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (in cm), and physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS in cm). Total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicates a worsening of disease activity. LS means and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Scores at Week 24
EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, generic measure of health outcome. EQ-5D was designed for self-completion by participants. EQ-5D was specifically included to address concerns regarding the health economic impact of RA. EQ-5D-3L comprises of 5 questions on mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and psychological status with 3 possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3=severe problems). The 5-dimensional 3-level systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-3L-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows the participants to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) at Week 24
RAID is a composite measure of the impact of RA on participants that takes into account 7 domains: pain, functional disability, fatigue, physical and emotional well-being, quality of sleep, and coping. The RAID is calculated based on 7 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10 that corresponds to the 7 domains. The values for each of these domains are weighed by participant assessment of relative importance and combined in a single score with a total score range of 0 (not affected, very good) to 10 (most affected). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPS-RA) at Week 24: Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of work days missed in the last month by the participant was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Work Productivity Reduced by ≥ 50% Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of work days with reduced productivity by >= 50% in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Arthritis Interference With Work Productivity
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Interference in the last month with work productivity was measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: House Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with no household work in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Household Work Productivity Reduced by >= 50% Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with reduced household work productivity by >= 50% in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Family/Social/Leisure Activities Missed Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days missed of family/social/leisure activities in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Outside Help Hired Due to Arthritis
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with outside help hired in the last month by the participant was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: RA Interference With Household Work Productivity
The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). The RA interference in the last month with household work productivity was measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Morning Stiffness VAS at Week 24
RA is associated with stiffness of joints, especially in the morning after prolonged stationery state. The degree of stiffness can be an indicator of disease severity. The severity of morning stiffness was assessed on a VAS scale from 0 mm (no problem) to 100 mm (major problem). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - TJC and SJC at Week 24
ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). 68 joints were assessed for tenderness (TJC scoring 0-68) and 66 joints for swelling (SJC scoring 0-66). The 66 SJC evaluated the following joints: temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, interphalangeal of thumb, distal interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, knee, ankle mortise, ankle tarsus, metatarsophalangeal, interphalangeal of great toe, and proximal/distal interphalangeal of the toes. The TJC examined hip joints, in addition to the joints assessed for SJC. Increase in number of tender joints/swollen joints indicated severity. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - Physician Global VAS, Participant Global VAS and Pain VAS at Week 24
ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). Physician global VAS \& participant global VAS was done on 100 mm horizontal anchored VAS, ranging from 0 "no arthritis activity" to 100 "maximal arthritis activity" and Pain VAS on 100 mm VAS, ranging from 0 "no pain" to 100 "worst pain". LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - CRP Level at Week 24
ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). An elevated CRP level is considered a non-specific "marker" for RA. A decrease indicates improvement. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component- ESR Level at Week 24
ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). The ESR is a blood test that can reveal inflammatory activity. Inflammation can cause the cells to clump together. The farther the red blood cells have descended, the greater the inflammatory response. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) and did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. All reported AEs are TEAEs developed/worsened during 'on treatment period' (time from first dose of study drug up to day before first dose of open-label treatment for participants who completed 24-week randomized//DB treatment). SAEs were AEs resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or a medically important event.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received IMP and did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. All reported AEs are TEAEs developed/worsened during 'on treatment period' (from end of week 24 [Baseline of OLE Period] up to last dose in OLE period + 6 weeks [follow-up], regardless of unplanned intermittent discontinuations). SAEs were AEs resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or a medically important event.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to last dose in OLE + 6 weeks of follow up (i.e. up to Week 306)
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA) - Hematological Parameters
Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities included:
- Hemoglobin (Hb): less than or equal to (<=) 115 grams per liter (g/L) (Male), <= 95 g/L (Female); greater than or equal to (>=) 185 g/L (18.5 g/dL) (Male), >= 165 g/L (16.5 g/dL) (Female); Decrease From Baseline (DFB) = 20 g/L (2 g/dL).
- Hematocrit: <= 0.37 volume/volume (v/v) (Male); <= 0.32 v/v (F); >= 0.55 v/v (Male); >= 0.5 v/v (Female).
- Red Blood Cells (RBCs): >=6 Tera/ liter (L).
- Platelets: < 50 Giga/L, 50 - 100 Giga/L, >= 700 Giga/L.
- White blood cells (WBC): < 3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 2.0 Giga/L (Black), >= 16.0 Giga/L.
- Neutrophils: < 1.0 Giga/L, < 1.5 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 1.0 Giga/L (Black).
- Lymphocytes: < 0.5 Giga/L, >= 0.5 Giga/L - lower limit of normal (LLN), > 4.0 Giga/L.
- Monocytes: > 0.7 Giga/L.
- Basophils: > 0.1 Giga/L.
- Eosinophils: > 0.5 Giga/L or > upper limit of normal (ULN) (if ULN >= 0.5 Giga/L).
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Hematological Parameters
Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities included:
- Hb: <=115 g/L (Male), <= 95 g/L (Female); >=185 g/L (18.5 g/dL) (Male), >= 165 g/L (16.5 g/dL) (Female); DFB >= 20 g/L (2 g/dL).
- Hematocrit: <= 0.37 v/v (Male); <= 0.32 v/v (Female); >= 0.55 v/v (Male); >= 0.5 v/v (Female).
- RBCs: >=6 Tera/ L.
- Platelets: < 50 Giga/L, >=50 - 100 Giga/L, >= 700 Giga/L.
- WBC: < 3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 2.0 Giga/L (Black), >= 16.0 Giga/L.
- Neutrophils: < 1.0 Giga/L, < 1.5 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 1.0 Giga/L (Black).
- Lymphocytes: < 0.5 Giga/L, >= 0.5 Giga/L - LLN, > 4.0 Giga/L.
- Monocytes: > 0.7 Giga/L.
- Basophils: > 0.1 Giga/L.
- Eosinophils: > 0.5 Giga/L or > ULN (if ULN >= 0.5 Giga/L).
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
- Alkaline phosphatase: >1.5 ULN.
- Total bilirubin (TBILI): >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.
- Conjugated bilirubin (CBILI): >1.5 ULN.
- Unconjugated bilirubin: >1.5 ULN, >2 ULN.
- ALT >3 ULN and TBILI >2 ULN.
- CBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULN.
- Albumin: <=25 g/L.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- ALT: >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
- AST: >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
- Alkaline phosphatase: >1.5 ULN.
- TBILI: >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.
- CBILI: >1.5 ULN.
- Unconjugated bilirubin: >1.5 ULN, >2 ULN.
- ALT >3 ULN and TBILI >2 ULN.
- CBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULN.
- Albumin: <=25 g/L.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Glucose: <=3.9 millimole/liter (mmol/L) and <LLN; >=11.1 mmol/L (unfasted [unfas]) or >=7 mmol/L (fasted [fas]).
- Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): >8%.
- Total cholesterol: >=6.2 mmol/L; >=7.74 mmol/L.
- LDL cholesterol: >=4.1 mmol/L; >=4.9 mmol/L.
- Triglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L; >=5.6 mmol/L.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Glucose: <=3.9 mmol/L and <LLN; >=11.1 mmol/L (unfas) or >=7 mmol/L (fas).
- HbA1c: >8%.
- Total cholesterol: >=6.2 mmol/L; >=7.74 mmol/L.
- LDL cholesterol: >=4.1 mmol/L; >=4.9 mmol/L.
- Triglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L; >=5.6 mmol/L.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Number of participants with different post-baseline status of HDL: < 40 mg/dL, 40 - < 60 mg/dL, >= 60 mg/dL, is reported here.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein
Number of participants with different post-baseline status of HDL: < 40 mg/dL, 40 - < 60 mg/dL, >=60 mg/dL, is reported here.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Creatinine: >=150 micromol/L (adults); >=30% change from baseline, >=100% change from baseline.
- Creatinine clearance: <15 mL/min; >=15 to <30 mL/min; >=30 to <60 mL/min; >=60 to <90 mL/min.
- Blood urea nitrogen: >=17 mmol/L.
- Uric acid: <120 micromol/L; >408 micromol/L.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Creatinine: >=150 micromol/L (adults); >=30% change from baseline, >=100% change from baseline.
- Creatinine clearance: <15 mL/min; >=15 to <30 mL/min; >=30 to <60 mL/min; >=60 to <90 mL/min.
- Blood urea nitrogen: >=17 mmol/L.
- Uric acid: <120 micromol/L; >408 micromol/L.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Urinalysis
Criteria with potentially clinically significant urine abnormalities:
pH: <= 4.6; pH: >= 8.0.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Urinalysis
Criteria with potentially clinically significant urine abnormalities:
pH: <= 4.6; pH: >= 8.0.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Electrolytes
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Sodium: <=129 mmol/L; >=160 mmol/L.
- Potassium: <3 mmol/L; >=5.5 mmol/L.
- Chloride: <80 mmol/L; >115 mmol/L.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Electrolytes
Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:
- Sodium: <=129 mmol/L; >=160 mmol/L.
- Potassium: <3 mmol/L; >=5.5 mmol/L.
- Chloride: <80 mmol/L; >115 mmol/L.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Criteria for potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities:
- Heart rate (HR): <50 beats per minute (bpm); <50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <40 bpm; <40 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <30 bpm; <30 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >90 bpm; >=90 bpm and increase from baseline (IFB) >=20 bpm; >100 bpm; >=100 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >120 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm.
- PR Interval: >200 millisecond (ms); >200 ms and IFB >=25%; >220 ms; >220 ms and IFB >=25%; >240 ms; >240 ms and IFB >=25%.
- QRS Interval: >110 ms; >110 ms and IFB >=25%; >120 ms; >120 ms and IFB >=25%.
- QT Interval: >500 ms.
- QTc Bazett (QTc B): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
- QTc Fridericia (QTc F): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Abnormalities
Criteria for potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities:
- HR: <50 bpm; <50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <40 bpm; <40 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <30 bpm; <30 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >90 bpm; >=90 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >100 bpm; >=100 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >120 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm.
- PR Interval: >200 ms; >200 ms and IFB >=25%; >220 ms; >220 ms and IFB >=25%; >240 ms; >240 ms and IFB >=25%.
- QRS Interval: >110 ms; >110 ms and IFB >=25%; >120 ms; >120 ms and IFB >=25%.
- QT Interval: >500 ms.
- QTc B: >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
- QTc F: >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities:
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) supine: <=95 mmHg and DFB>=20 mmHg; >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg.
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) supine: <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg; >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg.
SBP (Orthostatic): <=-20 mmHg. DBP (Orthostatic): <=-10 mmHg. HR supine: <=50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm. Weight: >=5% DFB; >=5% IFB.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities:
SBP supine: <=95 mmHg and DFB >=20 mmHg; >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg. DBP supine: <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg; >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg. SBP (Orthostatic): <=-20 mmHg. DBP (Orthostatic): <=-10 mmHg. HR supine: <=50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm. Weight: >=5% DFB; >=5% IFB.
Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent and Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response
Anti-drug antibody response was categorized as: Treatment emergent and Treatment-boosted. Treatment emergent ADAs was defined as a participant with no positive assay response at baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period. Treatment boosted ADAs: defined as participants with a positive ADA assay response at baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to baseline during the TEAE period. TEAE period: time from first dose of study drug up to day before first dose of open-label treatment for participants who completed 24-week randomized/DB treatment.
Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent and Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibody Response During Entire Treatment-emergent Adverse Event Period
Anti-drug antibody response was categorized as: Treatment emergent and Treatment-boosted. Treatment emergent ADAs was defined as a participant with no positive assay response at baseline but with a positive assay response during the entire TEAE period. Treatment boosted ADAs: defined as participants with a positive ADA assay response at baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to baseline during the entire TEAE period. Entire TEAE period: last OLE dose - first DB dose date + 6 weeks (follow-up), regardless of unplanned intermittent discontinuations.
Measured: From Week 0 up to last dose in OLE + 6 weeks of follow-up (i.e. up to Week 306)
DB Period: Pharmacokinetics: Serum Trough (Pre-dose) Concentrations of Functional Sarilumab
Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for "Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg" arm.
Measured: Pre-dose at Week 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 12, 16, 20, and 24
OLE Period: Pharmacokinetics: Serum Trough (Pre-dose) Concentrations of Functional Sarilumab
Measured: Pre-dose at Week 24 (Baseline of OLE period), 36, 48, 60, 84, 108, 132, 156, 180, 204, 228, 252, 276, 300 and 306
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start28 Jan 2015
- Primary completion20 Jan 2016
- Study completion29 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- During the OLE period of this study, all participants received sarilumab 200 mg or 150 mg q2w via prefilled syringe.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 369 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC14092
- Other IDs
- 2014-002541-22, U1111-1160-6154, 2014
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Agueusop I, Margerie D, Remaury A, Brard R, Frau F, Gerard E, Thill G, Veeranagouda Y, Didier M, Kohlmann M, Herrmann M, Biesemann N. Deciphering differential biomarkers for anti-interleukin-6 receptor and anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis by multiomics analysis. RMD Open. 2025 Aug 4;11(3):e005556. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005556.
PubMed 40759562Burmester GR, Strand V, Kivitz AJ, Hu CC, Wang S, van Hoogstraten H, Klier GL, Fleischmann R. Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Oct 3;62(10):3268-3279. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead062.
PubMed 36727470Choy E, Bykerk V, Lee YC, van Hoogstraten H, Ford K, Praestgaard A, Perrot S, Pope J, Sebba A. Disproportionate articular pain is a frequent phenomenon in rheumatoid arthritis and responds to treatment with sarilumab. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jul 5;62(7):2386-2393. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac659.
PubMed 36413080Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Fiore S, Praestgaard A, Bykerk V, Bingham CO, Charles-Schoeman C, Burmester G. Association between low hemoglobin, clinical measures, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from post hoc analyses of three phase III trials of sarilumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Aug 25;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02891-x.
PubMed 36008838Rehberg M, Giegerich C, Praestgaard A, van Hoogstraten H, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, Curtis JR, Gottenberg JE, Schwarting A, Castaneda S, Rubbert-Roth A, Choy EHS; MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN investigators. Identification of a Rule to Predict Response to Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Machine Learning and Clinical Trial Data. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1661-1675. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00361-5. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
PubMed 34519964Strand V, Boklage SH, Kimura T, Joly F, Boyapati A, Msihid J. High levels of interleukin-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life for sarilumab compared with adalimumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 20;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02344-3.
PubMed 33081825Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Hagino O, Thangavelu K, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, John GS, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Fleischmann R. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade or TNFalpha inhibition for reducing glycaemia in patients with RA and diabetes: post hoc analyses of three randomised, controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Sep 9;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02229-5.
PubMed 32907617Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz A, Lee EB, van Hoogstraten H, Kimura T, St John G, Mangan EK, Burmester GR. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs or as monotherapy in subpopulations of patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis in three phase III randomized, controlled studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 10;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02194-z.
PubMed 32522251Boyapati A, Schwartzman S, Msihid J, Choy E, Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Lam G, Kimura T, Sadeh J, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Graham NMH. Association of High Serum Interleukin-6 Levels With Severe Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Treatment Response Differentiating Sarilumab From Adalimumab or Methotrexate in a Post Hoc Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;72(9):1456-1466. doi: 10.1002/art.41299. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
PubMed 32343882Gabay C, Burmester GR, Strand V, Msihid J, Zilberstein M, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Boklage SH, Sadeh J, Graham NMH, Boyapati A. Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Apr 7;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6.
PubMed 32264972Burmester GR, Strand V, Rubbert-Roth A, Amital H, Raskina T, Gomez-Centeno A, Pena-Rossi C, Gervitz L, Thangavelu K, St John G, Boklage S, Genovese MC. Safety and efficacy of switching from adalimumab to sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the ongoing MONARCH open-label extension. RMD Open. 2019 Oct 18;5(2):e001017. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001017. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31673415Gossec L, Strand V, Proudfoot C, Chen CI, Guillonneau S, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Mangan E, Reaney M. Effects of Sarilumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis as Reported by Patients Using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Scale. J Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;46(10):1259-1267. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180904. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
PubMed 30877216Burmester GR, Lin Y, Patel R, van Adelsberg J, Mangan EK, Graham NM, van Hoogstraten H, Bauer D, Ignacio Vargas J, Lee EB. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):840-847. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
PubMed 27856432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFC14092
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 369 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 28 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy with respect to signs and symptoms as assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with methotrexate (MTX), or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders.
Secondary Objectives:
To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy in participants with active RA who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders, with respect to:
- Reduction of signs and symptoms of RA.
- Improvement in quality of life assessed by participant reported outcome questionnaires.
Assessment of the safety and tolerability of sarilumab monotherapy (including immunogenicity) throughout the study.
Detailed description
Total study duration was up to 310 weeks: Up to a 4 week screening period, 24 week randomized double-blind treatment phase, 276-week open-label extension, and 6 weeks post-treatment final study visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- During the OLE period of this study, all participants received sarilumab 200 mg or 150 mg q2w via prefilled syringe.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Adalimumab, Drug: Placebo (for sarilumab)Adalimumab 40 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection in combination with placebo for sarilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) for 24 weeks during the double-blind (DB) period. The dosing frequency of adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg every week (qw) dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (less than [<] 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count [TJC] and swollen joint count [SJC] for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in open label extension (OLE) period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300). |
| Sarilumab 200 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab, Drug: Placebo (for adalimumab)Sarilumab 200 mg SC injection in combination with placebo for adalimumab q2w for 24 weeks during the DB period. The dosing frequency of placebo for adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg qw dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (<20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in OLE period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of RA greater than or equal to (>=)3 months duration.
- American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Class I-III functional status.
- Active RA was defined as:
- At least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 8 of 68 tender joints, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) >=8 mg/L or ESR >=28 millimeter per hour (mm/H), and DAS28-ESR greater than (>) 5.1.
- Participants as per Investigator judgment were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, or inadequate responders treated with an adequate MTX dose for at least 12 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age <18 years or the legal age of consent in the country of the study site, whichever was higher.
- Current treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARDs)/immunosuppressive agents including MTX, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, gold, penicillamine, sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine within 2 weeks prior to the baseline (Randomization Visit) or azathioprine, cyclophosphamide within 12 weeks prior to baseline (Randomization Visit) or leflunomide within 8 weeks prior to the Randomization Visit, or 4 weeks after cholestyramine washout.
- Treatment with any prior biologic agent, including anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonists, and prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor.
- Use of parenteral corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SarilumabAlso: SAR153191, REGN88Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC | Drug | Sarilumab 200 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg |
| AdalimumabAlso: HumiraPharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC | Drug | Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg |
| Placebo (for sarilumab)Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC | Drug | Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg |
| Placebo (for adalimumab)Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC | Drug | Sarilumab 200 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg |
Primary outcome
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR and RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) at Week 24 were obtained using Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.
52 secondary outcomes
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Criteria at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Criteria at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Criteria at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Short-Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in SF-36 - Mental Health Component Summary Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP Score) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-CRP <2.6) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR < 3.2) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (CDAI ≤2.8) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Scores at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPS-RA) at Week 24: Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Work Productivity Reduced by ≥ 50% Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Arthritis Interference With Work Productivity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: House Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Household Work Productivity Reduced by >= 50% Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Family/Social/Leisure Activities Missed Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Outside Help Hired Due to Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: RA Interference With Household Work Productivity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Morning Stiffness VAS at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - TJC and SJC at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - Physician Global VAS, Participant Global VAS and Pain VAS at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - CRP Level at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component- ESR Level at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to last dose in OLE + 6 weeks of follow up (i.e. up to Week 306)
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA) - Hematological Parameters
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Hematological Parameters
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function
Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function
Time frame: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40759562Agueusop I, Margerie D, Remaury A, Brard R, Frau F, Gerard E, Thill G, Veeranagouda Y, Didier M, Kohlmann M, Herrmann M, Biesemann N. Deciphering differential biomarkers for anti-interleukin-6 receptor and anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis by multiomics analysis. RMD Open. 2025 Aug 4;11(3):e005556. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005556.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36727470Burmester GR, Strand V, Kivitz AJ, Hu CC, Wang S, van Hoogstraten H, Klier GL, Fleischmann R. Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Oct 3;62(10):3268-3279. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36413080Choy E, Bykerk V, Lee YC, van Hoogstraten H, Ford K, Praestgaard A, Perrot S, Pope J, Sebba A. Disproportionate articular pain is a frequent phenomenon in rheumatoid arthritis and responds to treatment with sarilumab. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jul 5;62(7):2386-2393. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac659.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36008838Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Fiore S, Praestgaard A, Bykerk V, Bingham CO, Charles-Schoeman C, Burmester G. Association between low hemoglobin, clinical measures, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from post hoc analyses of three phase III trials of sarilumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Aug 25;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02891-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34519964Rehberg M, Giegerich C, Praestgaard A, van Hoogstraten H, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, Curtis JR, Gottenberg JE, Schwarting A, Castaneda S, Rubbert-Roth A, Choy EHS; MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN investigators. Identification of a Rule to Predict Response to Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Machine Learning and Clinical Trial Data. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1661-1675. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00361-5. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33081825Strand V, Boklage SH, Kimura T, Joly F, Boyapati A, Msihid J. High levels of interleukin-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life for sarilumab compared with adalimumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 20;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02344-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32907617Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Hagino O, Thangavelu K, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, John GS, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Fleischmann R. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade or TNFalpha inhibition for reducing glycaemia in patients with RA and diabetes: post hoc analyses of three randomised, controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Sep 9;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02229-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32522251Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz A, Lee EB, van Hoogstraten H, Kimura T, St John G, Mangan EK, Burmester GR. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs or as monotherapy in subpopulations of patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis in three phase III randomized, controlled studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 10;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02194-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32343882Boyapati A, Schwartzman S, Msihid J, Choy E, Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Lam G, Kimura T, Sadeh J, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Graham NMH. Association of High Serum Interleukin-6 Levels With Severe Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Treatment Response Differentiating Sarilumab From Adalimumab or Methotrexate in a Post Hoc Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;72(9):1456-1466. doi: 10.1002/art.41299. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32264972Gabay C, Burmester GR, Strand V, Msihid J, Zilberstein M, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Boklage SH, Sadeh J, Graham NMH, Boyapati A. Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Apr 7;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31673415Burmester GR, Strand V, Rubbert-Roth A, Amital H, Raskina T, Gomez-Centeno A, Pena-Rossi C, Gervitz L, Thangavelu K, St John G, Boklage S, Genovese MC. Safety and efficacy of switching from adalimumab to sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the ongoing MONARCH open-label extension. RMD Open. 2019 Oct 18;5(2):e001017. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001017. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30877216Gossec L, Strand V, Proudfoot C, Chen CI, Guillonneau S, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Mangan E, Reaney M. Effects of Sarilumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis as Reported by Patients Using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Scale. J Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;46(10):1259-1267. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180904. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
86 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sanofi at 86 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 86 sites in United States, Poland, Ukraine, Chile, Russia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02332590, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.