AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT02332590

Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab and Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (SARIL-RA-MONARCH)

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sanofi at 86 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy with respect to signs and symptoms as assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either intolerant of, or considered… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Sarilumab and Adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
369 participants
Where
86 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
28 Jan 2015to 29 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of RA greater than or equal to (>=)3 months duration.
  • American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Class I-III functional status.
  • Active RA was defined as:
  • At least 6 of 66 swollen joints and 8 of 68 tender joints, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) >=8 mg/L or ESR >=28 millimeter per hour (mm/H), and DAS28-ESR greater than (>) 5.1.
  • Participants as per Investigator judgment were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, or inadequate responders treated with an adequate MTX dose for at least 12 weeks.

Who cannot join

  • Age <18 years or the legal age of consent in the country of the study site, whichever was higher.
  • Current treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARDs)/immunosuppressive agents including MTX, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, gold, penicillamine, sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine within 2 weeks prior to the baseline (Randomization Visit) or azathioprine, cyclophosphamide within 12 weeks prior to baseline (Randomization Visit) or leflunomide within 8 weeks prior to the Randomization Visit, or 4 weeks after cholestyramine washout.
  • Treatment with any prior biologic agent, including anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonists, and prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor.
  • Use of parenteral corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

86 sites in 15 countries.

86 sites in 15 countries

United States17 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840402

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Investigational Site Number 840229

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Investigational Site Number 840407

    Covina, California, 91723

  • Investigational Site Number 840073

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Investigational Site Number 840232

    Flint, Michigan, 48504

  • Investigational Site Number 840202

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Investigational Site Number 840406

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28601

  • Investigational Site Number 840130

    Lewes, Delaware, 19958

  • Investigational Site Number 840112

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Investigational Site Number 840400

    Long Beach, California, 90808

  • Investigational Site Number 840074

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Investigational Site Number 840404

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • Investigational Site Number 840127

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Investigational Site Number 840128

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Investigational Site Number 840403

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33708

  • Investigational Site Number 840140

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Investigational Site Number 840141

    Whittier, California, 90606

Other trials in United States

Poland9 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 616056

    Bytom, 41-902

  • Investigational Site Number 616015

    Elblag

  • Investigational Site Number 616005

    Lublin, 20-582

  • Investigational Site Number 616030

    Lublin, 20-954

  • Investigational Site Number 616055

    Nadarzyn, 05-830

  • Investigational Site Number 616018

    Poznan, 61-397

  • Investigational Site Number 616016

    Szczecin, 71-252

  • Investigational Site Number 616004

    Warsaw, 02-118

  • Investigational Site Number 616031

    Warsaw, 03-291

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine9 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 804029

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

  • Investigational Site Number 804048

    Kharkiv, 61058

  • Investigational Site Number 804014

    Kyiv, 01103

  • Investigational Site Number 804047

    Kyiv, 02125

  • Investigational Site Number 804037

    Lutsk, 43005

  • Investigational Site Number 804046

    Lviv, 79010

  • Investigational Site Number 804049

    Poltava, 36011

  • Investigational Site Number 804011

    Vinnitsya, 21018

  • Investigational Site Number 804043

    Vinnitsya, 21100

Other trials in Ukraine

Chile7 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 152005

    Osorno, 5311092

  • Investigational Site Number 152001

    Puerto Varas

  • Investigational Site Number 152002

    Santiago, 7501126

  • Investigational Site Number 152050

    Santiago, 8207257

  • Investigational Site Number 152014

    Talca

  • Investigational Site Number 152015

    Temuco IX Region, 4790928

  • Investigational Site Number 152007

    Viña del Mar

Other trials in Chile

Russia7 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 643006

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • Investigational Site Number 643020

    Moscow, 115404

  • Investigational Site Number 643001

    Moscow, 115522

  • Investigational Site Number 643031

    Moscow, 121374

  • Investigational Site Number 643030

    Moscow, 125284

  • Investigational Site Number 643008

    Saint Petersburg, 192242

  • Investigational Site Number 643011

    Saratov, 410053

Other trials in Russia

Spain6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 724003

    Barakaldo, 48903

  • Investigational Site Number 724015

    Barcelona, 08034

  • Investigational Site Number 724011

    Barcelona / Sabadell, 08208

  • Investigational Site Number 724001

    Málaga, 29010

  • Investigational Site Number 724012

    Santiago de Compostela, 15705

  • Investigational Site Number 724007

    Seville, 41009

Other trials in Spain

Hungary5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 348025

    Budapest, 1027

  • Investigational Site Number 348020

    Budapest, 1033

  • Investigational Site Number 348022

    Budapest, 1036

  • Investigational Site Number 348024

    Szombathely, 9700

  • Investigational Site Number 348023

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Romania5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 642006

    Brăila, 810019

  • Investigational Site Number 642001

    Bucharest, 010976

  • Investigational Site Number 642010

    Bucharest, 011172

  • Investigational Site Number 642002

    Bucharest, 020983

  • Investigational Site Number 642005

    Galati, 800578

Other trials in Romania

Czechia4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 203001

    Prague, 12850

  • Investigational Site Number 203033

    Prague, 14800

  • Investigational Site Number 203030

    Prague

  • Investigational Site Number 203002

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

Other trials in Czechia

Israel4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 376032

    Ashkelon, 78278

  • Investigational Site Number 376031

    Haifa, 34362

  • Investigational Site Number 376030

    Ramat Gan, 52621

  • Investigational Site Number 376011

    Tel Aviv, 64239

Other trials in Israel

South Korea4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 410005

    Daegu, 42601

  • Investigational Site Number 410004

    Daejeon, 35233

  • Investigational Site Number 410006

    Seoul, 01830

  • Investigational Site Number 410001

    Seoul, 03080

Other trials in South Korea

Peru3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 604003

    Lima, LIMA 27

  • Investigational Site Number 604005

    Lima, LIMA 41

  • Investigational Site Number 604022

    Lima, Lima29

Other trials in Peru

South Africa3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 710011

    Cape Town, 7405

  • Investigational Site Number 710007

    Cape Town, 7500

  • Investigational Site Number 710004

    Kempton Park, 1619

Other trials in South Africa

Germany2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 276058

    Cologne, 50937

  • Investigational Site Number 276021

    Osnabrück, 49074

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 826001

    Leytonstone, E11 1NR

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy with respect to signs and symptoms as assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with methotrexate (MTX), or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders.

Read more

Secondary Objectives:

To demonstrate that sarilumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy in participants with active RA who were either intolerant of, or considered inappropriate candidates for continued treatment with MTX, or after at least 12 weeks of continued treatment with MTX, were determined to be inadequate responders, with respect to:

  • Reduction of signs and symptoms of RA.
  • Improvement in quality of life assessed by participant reported outcome questionnaires.

Assessment of the safety and tolerability of sarilumab monotherapy (including immunogenicity) throughout the study.

Read the detailed description

Total study duration was up to 310 weeks: Up to a 4 week screening period, 24 week randomized double-blind treatment phase, 276-week open-label extension, and 6 weeks post-treatment final study visit.

Being tested
Sarilumab, Adalimumab, Placebo (for sarilumab), Placebo (for adalimumab)
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SarilumabDrug

    Also called SAR153191, REGN88

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Also called Humira

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC

  • Placebo (for sarilumab)Drug

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC

  • Placebo (for adalimumab)Drug

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: SC

Study groups in NCT02332590
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mgActive comparatorAdalimumab 40 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection in combination with placebo for sarilumab every 2 weeks (q2w) for 24 weeks during the double-blind (DB) period. The dosing frequency of adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg every week (qw) dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (less than [<] 20% improvement from baseline in tender joint count [TJC] and swollen joint count [SJC] for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in open label extension (OLE) period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300).
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Drug: Placebo (for sarilumab)
Sarilumab 200 mg/Sarilumab 200 mgExperimentalSarilumab 200 mg SC injection in combination with placebo for adalimumab q2w for 24 weeks during the DB period. The dosing frequency of placebo for adalimumab was adjusted to 40 mg qw dosing in case of participants with inadequate response (<20% improvement from baseline in TJC and SJC for 2 consecutive visits) at or after Week 16 until Week 23. Participants who completed 24 weeks in the DB period had the option to continue in OLE period and received sarilumab 200 mg q2w until commercial availability of sarilumab in their country or up to a maximum of an additional 276 weeks (i.e. up to Week 300).
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab; Drug: Placebo (for adalimumab)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 24

    DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR and RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Least square (LS) mean and standard error (SE) at Week 24 were obtained using Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes (52)
  1. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at Week 24

    DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants who discontinued treatment prior to Week 24 were analyzed as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 24

  2. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Criteria at Week 24

    ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein [CRP] level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI], with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR50 is defined as achieving at least 50% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments of the ACR. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  3. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Criteria at Week 24

    ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR70 was defined as achieving at least 70% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  4. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Criteria at Week 24

    ACR responses are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR that includes 7 variables: TJC (68 joints); SJC (66 joints); levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level); participant's assessment of pain (measured on 0 [no pain]-100 mm [worst pain] VAS); participant's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on 0 [no arthritis activity]-100 mm [maximal arthritis activity] VAS); participant's assessment of physical function (measured by HAQ-DI, with scoring range of 0 [better physical function] - 3 [worst physical function]). ACR20 was defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in both TJC and SJC, and at least 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  5. DB Period: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24

    Physical function was assessed by HAQ-DI. It consisted of at least 2 or 3 questions per category, participant reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week rated on a 4-point scale where 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 = no disability and 3 = unable to do, high-dependency disability. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  6. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Short-Form-36 (SF-36) - Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24

    SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire consisting of 8 sub-scales, measures health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the last 4 weeks covering 2 summary measures: PCS and mental component summary (MCS). PCS with 4 sub-scales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception; and MCS with 4 sub-scales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a sub-scale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same sub-scale give the sub-scale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24

    The FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire assessing fatigue where participants scored each item on a 5-point scale (0-4): 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much. A total score ranged from 0 to 52, where higher score corresponds to a lower level of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  8. DB Period: Change From Baseline in SF-36 - Mental Health Component Summary Score at Week 24

    SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire consisting of 8 sub-scales, measures HRQL in the last 4 weeks covering 2 summary measures: PCS and MCS. PCS with 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception; and MCS with 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same sub-scale give the sub-scale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health. LS mean and SE at Week 24 by MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  9. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP Score) at Week 24

    DAS28-CRP is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L. The DAS28-CRP score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-CRP score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28-CRP score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28-CRP score below 2.6 means disease remission. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  10. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-CRP <2.6) at Week 24

    DAS28-CRP is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by hs-CRP in mg/L. The DAS28-CRP score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-CRP total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-CRP score above 5.1 means high disease activity, whereas a DAS28-CRP score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and a DAS28-CRP score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  11. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR < 3.2) at Week 24

    DAS28-ESR is a composite score that includes 4 variables: TJC (based on 28 joints); SJC (based on 28 joints); GH assessment by the participant assessed from the ACR RA core set questionnaire (participant global assessment) in 100 mm VAS; Marker of inflammation assessed by ESR in mm/hr. The DAS28-ESR score provides a number indicating the current disease activity of the RA. DAS28-ESR total score ranges from 2-10. A DAS28-ESR score above 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-ESR score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity and DAS28-ESR score below 2.6 means disease remission. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. DB Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (CDAI ≤2.8) at Week 24

    CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: SJC (28 joints), TJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (in cm), and physician's global assessment of disease activity (in cm). Total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. Participants were analyzed as non-responders from the time they discontinued treatment.

    Measured: Week 24

  13. DB Period: Change From Baseline in CDAI at Week 24

    CDAI is a composite index constructed to measure clinical remission in RA that does not include a laboratory test, and is a numerical summation of 4 components: SJC (28 joints), TJC (28 joints), participant's global assessment of disease activity (in cm), and physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS in cm). Total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicates a worsening of disease activity. LS means and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  14. DB Period: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Scores at Week 24

    EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, generic measure of health outcome. EQ-5D was designed for self-completion by participants. EQ-5D was specifically included to address concerns regarding the health economic impact of RA. EQ-5D-3L comprises of 5 questions on mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and psychological status with 3 possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problems, 3=severe problems). The 5-dimensional 3-level systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state. EQ-5D-3L-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows the participants to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  15. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) at Week 24

    RAID is a composite measure of the impact of RA on participants that takes into account 7 domains: pain, functional disability, fatigue, physical and emotional well-being, quality of sleep, and coping. The RAID is calculated based on 7 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10 that corresponds to the 7 domains. The values for each of these domains are weighed by participant assessment of relative importance and combined in a single score with a total score range of 0 (not affected, very good) to 10 (most affected). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  16. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPS-RA) at Week 24: Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of work days missed in the last month by the participant was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Work Productivity Reduced by ≥ 50% Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of work days with reduced productivity by >= 50% in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Arthritis Interference With Work Productivity

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Interference in the last month with work productivity was measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  19. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: House Work Days Missed Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with no household work in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  20. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Household Work Productivity Reduced by >= 50% Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with reduced household work productivity by >= 50% in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  21. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Family/Social/Leisure Activities Missed Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days missed of family/social/leisure activities in the last month by the participants was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  22. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: Days With Outside Help Hired Due to Arthritis

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). Number of days with outside help hired in the last month by the participant was reported. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  23. DB Period: Change From Baseline in WPS-RA at Week 24: RA Interference With Household Work Productivity

    The WPS-RA is a validated questionnaire that evaluates productivity limitations within work and within home associated with RA over the previous month. The questionnaire is interviewer-administered and based on participant self-report. It contains 9 questions addressing employment status (1 item), productivity at work (3 items), and within and outside the home (5 items). The RA interference in the last month with household work productivity was measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  24. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Morning Stiffness VAS at Week 24

    RA is associated with stiffness of joints, especially in the morning after prolonged stationery state. The degree of stiffness can be an indicator of disease severity. The severity of morning stiffness was assessed on a VAS scale from 0 mm (no problem) to 100 mm (major problem). LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  25. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - TJC and SJC at Week 24

    ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). 68 joints were assessed for tenderness (TJC scoring 0-68) and 66 joints for swelling (SJC scoring 0-66). The 66 SJC evaluated the following joints: temporomandibular, sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, interphalangeal of thumb, distal interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, knee, ankle mortise, ankle tarsus, metatarsophalangeal, interphalangeal of great toe, and proximal/distal interphalangeal of the toes. The TJC examined hip joints, in addition to the joints assessed for SJC. Increase in number of tender joints/swollen joints indicated severity. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  26. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - Physician Global VAS, Participant Global VAS and Pain VAS at Week 24

    ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). Physician global VAS \& participant global VAS was done on 100 mm horizontal anchored VAS, ranging from 0 "no arthritis activity" to 100 "maximal arthritis activity" and Pain VAS on 100 mm VAS, ranging from 0 "no pain" to 100 "worst pain". LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  27. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component - CRP Level at Week 24

    ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). An elevated CRP level is considered a non-specific "marker" for RA. A decrease indicates improvement. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  28. DB Period: Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component- ESR Level at Week 24

    ACR components were: TJC, SJC, physician global VAS, participant global VAS, pain VAS, HAQ-DI \& acute phase reactant (hs-CRP and ESR levels). The ESR is a blood test that can reveal inflammatory activity. Inflammation can cause the cells to clump together. The farther the red blood cells have descended, the greater the inflammatory response. LS mean and SE at Week 24 were obtained using MMRM approach.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  29. DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) and did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. All reported AEs are TEAEs developed/worsened during 'on treatment period' (time from first dose of study drug up to day before first dose of open-label treatment for participants who completed 24-week randomized//DB treatment). SAEs were AEs resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or a medically important event.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  30. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received IMP and did not necessarily had to have causal relationship with treatment. All reported AEs are TEAEs developed/worsened during 'on treatment period' (from end of week 24 [Baseline of OLE Period] up to last dose in OLE period + 6 weeks [follow-up], regardless of unplanned intermittent discontinuations). SAEs were AEs resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or a medically important event.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to last dose in OLE + 6 weeks of follow up (i.e. up to Week 306)

  31. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA) - Hematological Parameters

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities included:

    • Hemoglobin (Hb): less than or equal to (<=) 115 grams per liter (g/L) (Male), <= 95 g/L (Female); greater than or equal to (>=) 185 g/L (18.5 g/dL) (Male), >= 165 g/L (16.5 g/dL) (Female); Decrease From Baseline (DFB) = 20 g/L (2 g/dL).
    • Hematocrit: <= 0.37 volume/volume (v/v) (Male); <= 0.32 v/v (F); >= 0.55 v/v (Male); >= 0.5 v/v (Female).
    • Red Blood Cells (RBCs): >=6 Tera/ liter (L).
    • Platelets: < 50 Giga/L, 50 - 100 Giga/L, >= 700 Giga/L.
    • White blood cells (WBC): < 3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 2.0 Giga/L (Black), >= 16.0 Giga/L.
    • Neutrophils: < 1.0 Giga/L, < 1.5 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 1.0 Giga/L (Black).
    • Lymphocytes: < 0.5 Giga/L, >= 0.5 Giga/L - lower limit of normal (LLN), > 4.0 Giga/L.
    • Monocytes: > 0.7 Giga/L.
    • Basophils: > 0.1 Giga/L.
    • Eosinophils: > 0.5 Giga/L or > upper limit of normal (ULN) (if ULN >= 0.5 Giga/L).

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  32. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Hematological Parameters

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities included:

    • Hb: <=115 g/L (Male), <= 95 g/L (Female); >=185 g/L (18.5 g/dL) (Male), >= 165 g/L (16.5 g/dL) (Female); DFB >= 20 g/L (2 g/dL).
    • Hematocrit: <= 0.37 v/v (Male); <= 0.32 v/v (Female); >= 0.55 v/v (Male); >= 0.5 v/v (Female).
    • RBCs: >=6 Tera/ L.
    • Platelets: < 50 Giga/L, >=50 - 100 Giga/L, >= 700 Giga/L.
    • WBC: < 3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 2.0 Giga/L (Black), >= 16.0 Giga/L.
    • Neutrophils: < 1.0 Giga/L, < 1.5 Giga/L (Non-Black); < 1.0 Giga/L (Black).
    • Lymphocytes: < 0.5 Giga/L, >= 0.5 Giga/L - LLN, > 4.0 Giga/L.
    • Monocytes: > 0.7 Giga/L.
    • Basophils: > 0.1 Giga/L.
    • Eosinophils: > 0.5 Giga/L or > ULN (if ULN >= 0.5 Giga/L).

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  33. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
    • Alkaline phosphatase: >1.5 ULN.
    • Total bilirubin (TBILI): >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.
    • Conjugated bilirubin (CBILI): >1.5 ULN.
    • Unconjugated bilirubin: >1.5 ULN, >2 ULN.
    • ALT >3 ULN and TBILI >2 ULN.
    • CBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULN.
    • Albumin: <=25 g/L.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  34. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Liver Function Tests

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • ALT: >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
    • AST: >1 ULN and <=1.5 ULN; >1.5 ULN and <=3 ULN; >3 ULN and <=5 ULN; >5 ULN and <=10 ULN; >10 ULN and <=20 ULN; >20 ULN.
    • Alkaline phosphatase: >1.5 ULN.
    • TBILI: >1.5 ULN; >2 ULN.
    • CBILI: >1.5 ULN.
    • Unconjugated bilirubin: >1.5 ULN, >2 ULN.
    • ALT >3 ULN and TBILI >2 ULN.
    • CBILI >35% TBILI and TBILI >1.5 ULN.
    • Albumin: <=25 g/L.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  35. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Glucose: <=3.9 millimole/liter (mmol/L) and <LLN; >=11.1 mmol/L (unfasted [unfas]) or >=7 mmol/L (fasted [fas]).
    • Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): >8%.
    • Total cholesterol: >=6.2 mmol/L; >=7.74 mmol/L.
    • LDL cholesterol: >=4.1 mmol/L; >=4.9 mmol/L.
    • Triglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L; >=5.6 mmol/L.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  36. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Metabolic Parameters

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Glucose: <=3.9 mmol/L and <LLN; >=11.1 mmol/L (unfas) or >=7 mmol/L (fas).
    • HbA1c: >8%.
    • Total cholesterol: >=6.2 mmol/L; >=7.74 mmol/L.
    • LDL cholesterol: >=4.1 mmol/L; >=4.9 mmol/L.
    • Triglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L; >=5.6 mmol/L.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  37. DB Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

    Number of participants with different post-baseline status of HDL: < 40 mg/dL, 40 - < 60 mg/dL, >= 60 mg/dL, is reported here.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  38. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Different Post-baseline Categories of High-density Lipoprotein

    Number of participants with different post-baseline status of HDL: < 40 mg/dL, 40 - < 60 mg/dL, >=60 mg/dL, is reported here.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  39. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Creatinine: >=150 micromol/L (adults); >=30% change from baseline, >=100% change from baseline.
    • Creatinine clearance: <15 mL/min; >=15 to <30 mL/min; >=30 to <60 mL/min; >=60 to <90 mL/min.
    • Blood urea nitrogen: >=17 mmol/L.
    • Uric acid: <120 micromol/L; >408 micromol/L.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  40. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Renal Function

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Creatinine: >=150 micromol/L (adults); >=30% change from baseline, >=100% change from baseline.
    • Creatinine clearance: <15 mL/min; >=15 to <30 mL/min; >=30 to <60 mL/min; >=60 to <90 mL/min.
    • Blood urea nitrogen: >=17 mmol/L.
    • Uric acid: <120 micromol/L; >408 micromol/L.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  41. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Urinalysis

    Criteria with potentially clinically significant urine abnormalities:

    pH: <= 4.6; pH: >= 8.0.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  42. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Urinalysis

    Criteria with potentially clinically significant urine abnormalities:

    pH: <= 4.6; pH: >= 8.0.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  43. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Electrolytes

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Sodium: <=129 mmol/L; >=160 mmol/L.
    • Potassium: <3 mmol/L; >=5.5 mmol/L.
    • Chloride: <80 mmol/L; >115 mmol/L.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  44. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities - Electrolytes

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities:

    • Sodium: <=129 mmol/L; >=160 mmol/L.
    • Potassium: <3 mmol/L; >=5.5 mmol/L.
    • Chloride: <80 mmol/L; >115 mmol/L.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  45. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities:

    • Heart rate (HR): <50 beats per minute (bpm); <50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <40 bpm; <40 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <30 bpm; <30 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >90 bpm; >=90 bpm and increase from baseline (IFB) >=20 bpm; >100 bpm; >=100 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >120 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm.
    • PR Interval: >200 millisecond (ms); >200 ms and IFB >=25%; >220 ms; >220 ms and IFB >=25%; >240 ms; >240 ms and IFB >=25%.
    • QRS Interval: >110 ms; >110 ms and IFB >=25%; >120 ms; >120 ms and IFB >=25%.
    • QT Interval: >500 ms.
    • QTc Bazett (QTc B): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
    • QTc Fridericia (QTc F): >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  46. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Abnormalities

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant ECG abnormalities:

    • HR: <50 bpm; <50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <40 bpm; <40 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; <30 bpm; <30 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >90 bpm; >=90 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >100 bpm; >=100 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm; >120 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm.
    • PR Interval: >200 ms; >200 ms and IFB >=25%; >220 ms; >220 ms and IFB >=25%; >240 ms; >240 ms and IFB >=25%.
    • QRS Interval: >110 ms; >110 ms and IFB >=25%; >120 ms; >120 ms and IFB >=25%.
    • QT Interval: >500 ms.
    • QTc B: >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.
    • QTc F: >450 ms; >480 ms; >500 ms; IFB >30 and <=60 ms; IFB >60 ms.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  47. DB Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities:

    Systolic blood pressure (SBP) supine: <=95 mmHg and DFB>=20 mmHg; >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg.

    Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) supine: <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg; >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg.

    SBP (Orthostatic): <=-20 mmHg. DBP (Orthostatic): <=-10 mmHg. HR supine: <=50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm. Weight: >=5% DFB; >=5% IFB.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  48. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

    Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities:

    SBP supine: <=95 mmHg and DFB >=20 mmHg; >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg. DBP supine: <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg; >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg. SBP (Orthostatic): <=-20 mmHg. DBP (Orthostatic): <=-10 mmHg. HR supine: <=50 bpm and DFB >=20 bpm; >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm. Weight: >=5% DFB; >=5% IFB.

    Measured: From end of Week 24 (Baseline of OLE Period) up to Week 300

  49. DB Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent and Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response

    Anti-drug antibody response was categorized as: Treatment emergent and Treatment-boosted. Treatment emergent ADAs was defined as a participant with no positive assay response at baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period. Treatment boosted ADAs: defined as participants with a positive ADA assay response at baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to baseline during the TEAE period. TEAE period: time from first dose of study drug up to day before first dose of open-label treatment for participants who completed 24-week randomized/DB treatment.

    Measured: From Week 0 to Week 24

  50. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent and Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibody Response During Entire Treatment-emergent Adverse Event Period

    Anti-drug antibody response was categorized as: Treatment emergent and Treatment-boosted. Treatment emergent ADAs was defined as a participant with no positive assay response at baseline but with a positive assay response during the entire TEAE period. Treatment boosted ADAs: defined as participants with a positive ADA assay response at baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to baseline during the entire TEAE period. Entire TEAE period: last OLE dose - first DB dose date + 6 weeks (follow-up), regardless of unplanned intermittent discontinuations.

    Measured: From Week 0 up to last dose in OLE + 6 weeks of follow-up (i.e. up to Week 306)

  51. DB Period: Pharmacokinetics: Serum Trough (Pre-dose) Concentrations of Functional Sarilumab

    Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for "Adalimumab 40 mg/Sarilumab 200 mg" arm.

    Measured: Pre-dose at Week 0 (Baseline), 2, 4, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  52. OLE Period: Pharmacokinetics: Serum Trough (Pre-dose) Concentrations of Functional Sarilumab

    Measured: Pre-dose at Week 24 (Baseline of OLE period), 36, 48, 60, 84, 108, 132, 156, 180, 204, 228, 252, 276, 300 and 306

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion20 Jan 2016
  4. Study completion29 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
During the OLE period of this study, all participants received sarilumab 200 mg or 150 mg q2w via prefilled syringe.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
369 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02332590
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC14092
Other IDs
2014-002541-22, U1111-1160-6154, 2014
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
5 Jan 2015
Last updated
28 Mar 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Agueusop I, Margerie D, Remaury A, Brard R, Frau F, Gerard E, Thill G, Veeranagouda Y, Didier M, Kohlmann M, Herrmann M, Biesemann N. Deciphering differential biomarkers for anti-interleukin-6 receptor and anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis by multiomics analysis. RMD Open. 2025 Aug 4;11(3):e005556. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005556.

    PubMed 40759562
  • Burmester GR, Strand V, Kivitz AJ, Hu CC, Wang S, van Hoogstraten H, Klier GL, Fleischmann R. Long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with or without background csDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Oct 3;62(10):3268-3279. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead062.

    PubMed 36727470
  • Choy E, Bykerk V, Lee YC, van Hoogstraten H, Ford K, Praestgaard A, Perrot S, Pope J, Sebba A. Disproportionate articular pain is a frequent phenomenon in rheumatoid arthritis and responds to treatment with sarilumab. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jul 5;62(7):2386-2393. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac659.

    PubMed 36413080
  • Rubbert-Roth A, Furst DE, Fiore S, Praestgaard A, Bykerk V, Bingham CO, Charles-Schoeman C, Burmester G. Association between low hemoglobin, clinical measures, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from post hoc analyses of three phase III trials of sarilumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Aug 25;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02891-x.

    PubMed 36008838
  • Rehberg M, Giegerich C, Praestgaard A, van Hoogstraten H, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, Curtis JR, Gottenberg JE, Schwarting A, Castaneda S, Rubbert-Roth A, Choy EHS; MOBILITY, MONARCH, TARGET, and ASCERTAIN investigators. Identification of a Rule to Predict Response to Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Machine Learning and Clinical Trial Data. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1661-1675. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00361-5. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

    PubMed 34519964
  • Strand V, Boklage SH, Kimura T, Joly F, Boyapati A, Msihid J. High levels of interleukin-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life for sarilumab compared with adalimumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 20;22(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02344-3.

    PubMed 33081825
  • Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Hagino O, Thangavelu K, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, John GS, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Fleischmann R. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade or TNFalpha inhibition for reducing glycaemia in patients with RA and diabetes: post hoc analyses of three randomised, controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Sep 9;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02229-5.

    PubMed 32907617
  • Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Kivitz A, Lee EB, van Hoogstraten H, Kimura T, St John G, Mangan EK, Burmester GR. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs or as monotherapy in subpopulations of patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis in three phase III randomized, controlled studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jun 10;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02194-z.

    PubMed 32522251
  • Boyapati A, Schwartzman S, Msihid J, Choy E, Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Lam G, Kimura T, Sadeh J, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Graham NMH. Association of High Serum Interleukin-6 Levels With Severe Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Treatment Response Differentiating Sarilumab From Adalimumab or Methotrexate in a Post Hoc Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;72(9):1456-1466. doi: 10.1002/art.41299. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

    PubMed 32343882
  • Gabay C, Burmester GR, Strand V, Msihid J, Zilberstein M, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Boklage SH, Sadeh J, Graham NMH, Boyapati A. Sarilumab and adalimumab differential effects on bone remodelling and cardiovascular risk biomarkers, and predictions of treatment outcomes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Apr 7;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6.

    PubMed 32264972
  • Burmester GR, Strand V, Rubbert-Roth A, Amital H, Raskina T, Gomez-Centeno A, Pena-Rossi C, Gervitz L, Thangavelu K, St John G, Boklage S, Genovese MC. Safety and efficacy of switching from adalimumab to sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the ongoing MONARCH open-label extension. RMD Open. 2019 Oct 18;5(2):e001017. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001017. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31673415
  • Gossec L, Strand V, Proudfoot C, Chen CI, Guillonneau S, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Mangan E, Reaney M. Effects of Sarilumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis as Reported by Patients Using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Scale. J Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;46(10):1259-1267. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180904. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

    PubMed 30877216
  • Burmester GR, Lin Y, Patel R, van Adelsberg J, Mangan EK, Graham NM, van Hoogstraten H, Bauer D, Ignacio Vargas J, Lee EB. Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):840-847. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

    PubMed 27856432

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab and Adalimumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Sanofi at 86 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 86 sites in United States, Poland, Ukraine, Chile, Russia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

DB Period: Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02332590, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in