Self EsteemNCT02332746
Exploring Temporal Relationships Between Self-worth and Physical Activity Middle-aged Women
An observational study of Self Esteem and Physical Activity, run by Arizona State University.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to explore temporal relationships between self-worth and physical activity (PA) participation in middle-aged women (aged 35-64 years). We are particularly interested in the predictive role of self-worth on women's daily PA participation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 64 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Self Esteem, Physical Activity
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 64 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Nationally recruited sample of active and inactive middle-aged women (35-64 years-old)
Who may be able to join
- 35-64 years of age
- English speaking
- Able to ambulate
- Own a mobile phone with access to text messaging and cellular Internet
- Able to receive text messages from a short code
- Agree that user rates will apply when receiving text messages and completing assessments
Who cannot join
- Males
- Not within age range; children
- Non-English speaking
- Unable to ambulate
- Do not own a mobile phone with access to text messaging or cellular Internet
- Not able to receive text messages from a short code
- Do not agree to accept user rates
About this study
Official title: Novel Exploration of Temporal Relationships Between Self-worth and Physical Activity in Middle-aged Women
The purpose of this study is to explore temporal relationships between self-worth and physical activity (PA) participation in middle-aged women (aged 35-64 years). We are particularly interested in the predictive role of self-worth on women's daily PA participation.
This study will include two phases: a pilot phase to test the procedures and a test phase to assess self-worth and PA. During the test phase, Women will receive text message prompts in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 28 days on their cell phones. Each prompt will include a link to an 11-item mobile Internet-based survey assessing momentary PA, self-worth, and self-efficacy. Women will also concurrently wear an activity monitor (GENEActiv) to objectively measure their activity levels throughout the study.
Read the detailed description
Using ecological momentary assessment, the purpose of this study is to explore temporal relationships between self-worth and physical activity (PA) participation in middle-aged women (aged 35-64 years).
This study will occur in two phases. During an initial pilot phase ten women will be asked to test the instruments and procedures for this study. During the second phase, the test phase, 60-100 women will be asked to complete daily surveys assessing their self-worth, self-efficacy, and PA participation. The results of the pilot phase will be used to modify instruments and procedures before the test phase commences.
During the pilot phase, 10 women will be asked to participate in an initial intake appointment to sign the informed consent form, complete baseline questionnaires, receive an activity monitor, and receive instructions on completing the daily surveys and wearing the activity monitor. Women will also be asked to provide their typical daily wake times and bedtimes during this appointment to guide the sampling schedule. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in which women receive two or three daily prompts to complete a short survey will be used in this study. Women will be asked to answer seven questions assessing their momentary activity (1), self-efficacy (1), and self-worth (5) twice per day for one week and three times per day for one week. Five women will be assigned to each condition each week so that half of the sample receives the twice per day condition during the first week and half receives the twice per day condition during the second week of the pilot phase. Women sampled twice per day will be prompted to complete assessments 1) 15 minutes after their typical wake time reported during their intake appointment and 2) 90 minutes prior to their typical bedtime. Women sampled three times per day will be prompted one additional time during the afternoon (random time between 2:00 and 3:00pm). Women will be prompted to complete the survey via text message. A link will be provided in each text message to direct women to a mobile compatible Qualtrics survey containing seven items assessing women's current activity, self-efficacy, general self-worth, knowledge self-worth, emotional self-worth, social self-worth, and physical self-worth. At the end of the two week pilot phase, women will be asked to complete a survey to provide feedback on the sampling scheme and the usability of the mobile survey. Results of the survey will inform modifications to the test phase.
During the test phase, 60-100 women will be asked to participate in an initial intake appointment to sign the informed consent form, complete baseline questionnaires, receive an activity monitor, and receive instructions on completing the daily surveys and wearing the activity monitor. Women will be asked to answer eleven questions assessing their current activity (1), self-efficacy (1), and self-worth (9) three times per day for 28 days, depending upon the results of the pilot phase. The three-times daily sampling scheme will be adopted for the test phase. Therefore, women will receive text message prompts with a link to the mobile compatible Qualtrics survey daily in the morning, afternoon, and evening.
Current activity will be measured using an item modified from a recent EMA study by Dunton and colleagues (2012). Using a list of options, this item assesses the activity in which the participant was engaged immediately prior to receiving the prompt. One item from the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (McAuley, 1993) will be used to assess women's confidence in their ability to participate in daily PA on a scale of 0% to 100% - "I am able to participate in physical activity at a moderate intensity for 30+ minutes today without quitting." General self-worth will be measured using one item from the general self-worth subscale of the Adult Self-Perception Profile (Messer \& Harter, 1986). Women will choose among four statements to indicate how they feel about themselves: "Which of the following statements is most true of how you feel RIGHT NOW? It is REALLY TRUE that I am dissatisfied with myself It is SORT OF TRUE that I am dissatisfied with myself It is SORT OF TRUE that I am satisfied with myself It is REALLY TRUE that I am satisfied with myself"
The Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (WPASWI) (Huberty et al., 2013) will be used to measure knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth. Women will be asked the extent to which they agree (strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree) with statements describing their knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth. One WPASWI item from each of the self-worth domains was chosen for the pilot phase. Based upon results of the pilot phase, the EMA survey was modified for the test phase and two items were chosen to assess each domain, for a total of six items from the WPASWI. Examples include: "RIGHT NOW - My knowledge about physical activity affects the way I feel about myself." (knowledge self-worth) "RIGHT NOW - I feel it is important to take time to be physically active today." (emotional self-worth) "RIGHT NOW - I need to know I have friends or family to support my commitment to exercise in order to feel good about myself." (social self-worth)
Two items from the Physical Self-Perception Profile (Fox \& Corbin, 1989) will be used to measure perceived body attractiveness and physical condition, both important subdomains of physical self-worth. Women will be asked the extent to which they agree (strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree) with the following statements:
"RIGHT NOW - I feel confident about the appearance of my body." (body attractiveness) "RIGHT NOW - I am confident in my level of physical conditioning and fitness." (physical condition)
In summary, the EMA survey used in the test phase of this study will include eleven items assessing momentary activity (1) (Dunton et al., 2012); self-efficacy (1) (McAuley, 1993), general self-worth (1) (Messer \& Harter, 1986); knowledge (2), emotional (2), and social (2) self-worth (Huberty et al., 2013); and physical self-worth (2) (Fox \& Corbin, 1989).
Women will also be asked to wear a GENEActiv accelerometer for the duration of their participation in the study (14 days for the pilot phase and 28 days for the test phase). All participants will receive their GENEActiv during the initial intake appointment and will return the device during a schedule appointment with a researcher. Women not local to the Phoenix area will receive and return their GENEActiv by mail. As part of wearing the activity monitor, women will also be asked to log their wear time, wake time, and bedtime. All participants will receive comprehensive feedback on their time spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activity each day.
During the intake appointment, women will also be asked to complete the full-length questionnaires upon which the EMA survey was developed (i.e., Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale [McAuley, 1993], Adult Self-Perception Profile [Messer \& Harter, 1986], WPASWI [Huberty et al., 2013], Physical Self-Perception Profile [Fox \& Corbin, 1989]), a demographics questionnaire, and a regular PA questionnaire (Past-Week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire [Gabriel et al., 2010]).
- Conditions
- Self Esteem, Physical Activity
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Middle-aged women | Middle-aged women (35-64 years) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-Worth
General self-worth: One item from the general self-worth subscale of the Adult Self-Perception Profile (Messer \& Harter, 1986) Knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth: Six items (two per self-worth domain) from the Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (Huberty et al., 2013) Physical self-worth: Two items from the Physical Self-Perception Profile (Fox \& Corbin, 1989)
Measured: 28 days
Physical Activity - Accelerometer
GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Exercise Self-Efficacy
One item from the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (McAuley, 1993)
Measured: 28 days
Current Activity
One item from a recent EMA study by Dunton et al. (2012)
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Self EsteemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer Huberty, PhD, Principal investigator, Arizona State Unversity
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332746
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1308009564
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.
PubMed 18091006White SM, Wojcicki TR, McAuley E. Social cognitive influences on physical activity behavior in middle-aged and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr064. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
PubMed 21743038Huberty JL, Ransdell LB, Sidman C, Flohr JA, Shultz B, Grosshans O, Durrant L. Explaining long-term exercise adherence in women who complete a structured exercise program. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008 Sep;79(3):374-84. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599501.
PubMed 18816949Segar ML, Eccles JS, Richardson CR. Type of physical activity goal influences participation in healthy midlife women. Womens Health Issues. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 May 12.
PubMed 18468920Pettee Gabriel K, McClain JJ, Schmid KK, Storti KL, Ainsworth BE. Reliability and convergent validity of the past-week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar;14(3):435-42. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002612. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PubMed 20843404McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993 Feb;16(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00844757.
PubMed 8433355Dunton GF, Liao Y, Kawabata K, Intille S. Momentary assessment of adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior: feasibility and validity. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 30;3:260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00260. eCollection 2012.
PubMed 22866046Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):1085-93. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820513be.
PubMed 21088628Huberty J, Vener J, Gao Y, Matthews JL, Ransdell L, Elavsky S. Developing an instrument to measure physical activity related self-worth in women: Rasch analysis of the Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (WPASWI). Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14(1): 111-121, 2013.
Messer BJ, Harter S. Manual for the adult self-perception profile. University of Denver, 1986.
Fox KR, Corbin CB. The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11: 408-430, 1989.
Ehlers DK, Huberty J, Buman M, Hooker S, Todd M, de Vreede GJ. A Novel Inexpensive Use of Smartphone Technology for Ecological Momentary Assessment in Middle-Aged Women. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Mar;13(3):262-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0059. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
PubMed 26284689
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Novel Exploration of Temporal Relationships Between Self-worth and Physical Activity in Middle-aged Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332746
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1308009564
- Conditions
- Self Esteem, Physical Activity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to explore temporal relationships between self-worth and physical activity (PA) participation in middle-aged women (aged 35-64 years). We are particularly interested in the predictive role of self-worth on women's daily PA participation.
This study will include two phases: a pilot phase to test the procedures and a test phase to assess self-worth and PA. During the test phase, Women will receive text message prompts in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 28 days on their cell phones. Each prompt will include a link to an 11-item mobile Internet-based survey assessing momentary PA, self-worth, and self-efficacy. Women will also concurrently wear an activity monitor (GENEActiv) to objectively measure their activity levels throughout the study.
Detailed description
Using ecological momentary assessment, the purpose of this study is to explore temporal relationships between self-worth and physical activity (PA) participation in middle-aged women (aged 35-64 years).
This study will occur in two phases. During an initial pilot phase ten women will be asked to test the instruments and procedures for this study. During the second phase, the test phase, 60-100 women will be asked to complete daily surveys assessing their self-worth, self-efficacy, and PA participation. The results of the pilot phase will be used to modify instruments and procedures before the test phase commences.
During the pilot phase, 10 women will be asked to participate in an initial intake appointment to sign the informed consent form, complete baseline questionnaires, receive an activity monitor, and receive instructions on completing the daily surveys and wearing the activity monitor. Women will also be asked to provide their typical daily wake times and bedtimes during this appointment to guide the sampling schedule. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in which women receive two or three daily prompts to complete a short survey will be used in this study. Women will be asked to answer seven questions assessing their momentary activity (1), self-efficacy (1), and self-worth (5) twice per day for one week and three times per day for one week. Five women will be assigned to each condition each week so that half of the sample receives the twice per day condition during the first week and half receives the twice per day condition during the second week of the pilot phase. Women sampled twice per day will be prompted to complete assessments 1) 15 minutes after their typical wake time reported during their intake appointment and 2) 90 minutes prior to their typical bedtime. Women sampled three times per day will be prompted one additional time during the afternoon (random time between 2:00 and 3:00pm). Women will be prompted to complete the survey via text message. A link will be provided in each text message to direct women to a mobile compatible Qualtrics survey containing seven items assessing women's current activity, self-efficacy, general self-worth, knowledge self-worth, emotional self-worth, social self-worth, and physical self-worth. At the end of the two week pilot phase, women will be asked to complete a survey to provide feedback on the sampling scheme and the usability of the mobile survey. Results of the survey will inform modifications to the test phase.
During the test phase, 60-100 women will be asked to participate in an initial intake appointment to sign the informed consent form, complete baseline questionnaires, receive an activity monitor, and receive instructions on completing the daily surveys and wearing the activity monitor. Women will be asked to answer eleven questions assessing their current activity (1), self-efficacy (1), and self-worth (9) three times per day for 28 days, depending upon the results of the pilot phase. The three-times daily sampling scheme will be adopted for the test phase. Therefore, women will receive text message prompts with a link to the mobile compatible Qualtrics survey daily in the morning, afternoon, and evening.
Current activity will be measured using an item modified from a recent EMA study by Dunton and colleagues (2012). Using a list of options, this item assesses the activity in which the participant was engaged immediately prior to receiving the prompt. One item from the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (McAuley, 1993) will be used to assess women's confidence in their ability to participate in daily PA on a scale of 0% to 100% - "I am able to participate in physical activity at a moderate intensity for 30+ minutes today without quitting." General self-worth will be measured using one item from the general self-worth subscale of the Adult Self-Perception Profile (Messer \& Harter, 1986). Women will choose among four statements to indicate how they feel about themselves: "Which of the following statements is most true of how you feel RIGHT NOW? It is REALLY TRUE that I am dissatisfied with myself It is SORT OF TRUE that I am dissatisfied with myself It is SORT OF TRUE that I am satisfied with myself It is REALLY TRUE that I am satisfied with myself"
The Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (WPASWI) (Huberty et al., 2013) will be used to measure knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth. Women will be asked the extent to which they agree (strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree) with statements describing their knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth. One WPASWI item from each of the self-worth domains was chosen for the pilot phase. Based upon results of the pilot phase, the EMA survey was modified for the test phase and two items were chosen to assess each domain, for a total of six items from the WPASWI. Examples include: "RIGHT NOW - My knowledge about physical activity affects the way I feel about myself." (knowledge self-worth) "RIGHT NOW - I feel it is important to take time to be physically active today." (emotional self-worth) "RIGHT NOW - I need to know I have friends or family to support my commitment to exercise in order to feel good about myself." (social self-worth)
Two items from the Physical Self-Perception Profile (Fox \& Corbin, 1989) will be used to measure perceived body attractiveness and physical condition, both important subdomains of physical self-worth. Women will be asked the extent to which they agree (strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree) with the following statements:
"RIGHT NOW - I feel confident about the appearance of my body." (body attractiveness) "RIGHT NOW - I am confident in my level of physical conditioning and fitness." (physical condition)
In summary, the EMA survey used in the test phase of this study will include eleven items assessing momentary activity (1) (Dunton et al., 2012); self-efficacy (1) (McAuley, 1993), general self-worth (1) (Messer \& Harter, 1986); knowledge (2), emotional (2), and social (2) self-worth (Huberty et al., 2013); and physical self-worth (2) (Fox \& Corbin, 1989).
Women will also be asked to wear a GENEActiv accelerometer for the duration of their participation in the study (14 days for the pilot phase and 28 days for the test phase). All participants will receive their GENEActiv during the initial intake appointment and will return the device during a schedule appointment with a researcher. Women not local to the Phoenix area will receive and return their GENEActiv by mail. As part of wearing the activity monitor, women will also be asked to log their wear time, wake time, and bedtime. All participants will receive comprehensive feedback on their time spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activity each day.
During the intake appointment, women will also be asked to complete the full-length questionnaires upon which the EMA survey was developed (i.e., Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale [McAuley, 1993], Adult Self-Perception Profile [Messer \& Harter, 1986], WPASWI [Huberty et al., 2013], Physical Self-Perception Profile [Fox \& Corbin, 1989]), a demographics questionnaire, and a regular PA questionnaire (Past-Week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire [Gabriel et al., 2010]).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Middle-aged women | – | –Middle-aged women (35-64 years) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 64 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Nationally recruited sample of active and inactive middle-aged women (35-64 years-old)
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 35-64 years of age
- English speaking
- Able to ambulate
- Own a mobile phone with access to text messaging and cellular Internet
- Able to receive text messages from a short code
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Males
- Not within age range; children
- Non-English speaking
- Unable to ambulate
- Do not own a mobile phone with access to text messaging or cellular Internet
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Self-Worth
Time frame: 28 days
General self-worth: One item from the general self-worth subscale of the Adult Self-Perception Profile (Messer \& Harter, 1986) Knowledge, emotional, and social self-worth: Six items (two per self-worth domain) from the Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (Huberty et al., 2013) Physical self-worth: Two items from the Physical Self-Perception Profile (Fox \& Corbin, 1989)
Physical Activity - Accelerometer
Time frame: 28 days
GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer
2 secondary outcomes
Exercise Self-Efficacy
Time frame: 28 days
Current Activity
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2015.
- Background: PubMed 18091006Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.
- Background: PubMed 21743038White SM, Wojcicki TR, McAuley E. Social cognitive influences on physical activity behavior in middle-aged and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):18-26. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr064. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 18816949Huberty JL, Ransdell LB, Sidman C, Flohr JA, Shultz B, Grosshans O, Durrant L. Explaining long-term exercise adherence in women who complete a structured exercise program. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008 Sep;79(3):374-84. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599501.
- Background: PubMed 18468920Segar ML, Eccles JS, Richardson CR. Type of physical activity goal influences participation in healthy midlife women. Womens Health Issues. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 20843404Pettee Gabriel K, McClain JJ, Schmid KK, Storti KL, Ainsworth BE. Reliability and convergent validity of the past-week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar;14(3):435-42. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002612. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 8433355McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. J Behav Med. 1993 Feb;16(1):103-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00844757.
- Background: PubMed 22866046Dunton GF, Liao Y, Kawabata K, Intille S. Momentary assessment of adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior: feasibility and validity. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 30;3:260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00260. eCollection 2012.
- Background: PubMed 21088628Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jun;43(6):1085-93. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820513be.
- BackgroundHuberty J, Vener J, Gao Y, Matthews JL, Ransdell L, Elavsky S. Developing an instrument to measure physical activity related self-worth in women: Rasch analysis of the Women's Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (WPASWI). Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14(1): 111-121, 2013.
- BackgroundMesser BJ, Harter S. Manual for the adult self-perception profile. University of Denver, 1986.
- BackgroundFox KR, Corbin CB. The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11: 408-430, 1989.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26284689Ehlers DK, Huberty J, Buman M, Hooker S, Todd M, de Vreede GJ. A Novel Inexpensive Use of Smartphone Technology for Ecological Momentary Assessment in Middle-Aged Women. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Mar;13(3):262-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0059. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
Related trials for Self Esteem
Recruiting
The Effects of Weight and Nutrition Education on Weight Control Beliefs, Body Image, Self-Esteem and Eating Patterns in Undergraduate Dieters
Dietary Restraint
RecruitingObservational study
Adapted Boxing and Photography in Haematology: Body Image and Self-Esteem
Haematological Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Psychological Benefits of a Normalized Camping Experience for Children With Cancer
Pediatric Cancer
Recruiting
Enhancing Self-Esteem in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomised Controlled Trial of the Lexical Association Technique
Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life (QOL)
Recruiting
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Virtual Reality on Gait and Self-Esteem in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Huberty, PhD principal investigator
Arizona State Unversity
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Self Esteem and Physical Activity, run by Arizona State University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-Worth (time frame: 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02332746, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2015.