AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer DiseaseNCT02333942

Dementia Signal Development Study of Nautilus NeuroWave TM for the Detection of Dementia

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Jan Medical, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being performed to generate data regarding brain vibration /oscillation differences between individuals with dementia and normal controls. The purpose of this study is to compare signal patterns generated from the impact on the scalp from these brain oscillation patterns from individuals with Alzheimer's… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
41 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2014to Feb 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects with Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Age-Matched Controls.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects 18 years of age or older
  • Have undergone some neurologic imaging
  • Age match normal subjects and subjects with symptoms consistent with MCI, FTLD or Alzheimer's disease
  • Able to understand and provide signed informed consent, or have a legally authorized representative willing to provide informed consent on subject's behalf

Who cannot join

  • Psychologically unstable and not able to cooperate
  • Not suitable for participation in this study in the opinion of the PI
  • Patients with history of other cerebral pathologies including, head trauma or prior ICH

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Californa San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Non-Blinded, Non-Significant Risk Study With a Non-Invasive, Passive Pressure Wave Method of Diagnosing Brain Pathologies to Develop a Diagnostic Algorithm for Alzheimer Disease and Other Dementias.

This study is being performed to generate data regarding brain vibration /oscillation differences between individuals with dementia and normal controls. The purpose of this study is to compare signal patterns generated from the impact on the scalp from these brain oscillation patterns from individuals with Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Age-Matched Normal Controls.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-blinded study in subjects who present to the UCSF Memory and Aging Clinic (MAC) with neurodegenerative disease and cognitive dysfunction. The primary objective of this non-significant risk study is signature development. The goal is to develop a signal algorithm using the Nautilus NeuroWaveTM for dementia. This is accomplished by analyzing and processing Nautilus NeuroWave recordings from a patient with confirmed dementia. All subjects will be enrolled until recordings are obtained from at least 10 of each of the following subject cohorts: Moderate or Severe Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTDL), Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Age Matched Normal Controls.

As this study is a feasibility study intended to determine whether the Nautilus NeuroWave is able to generate distinctive signals correlated with dementia, statistical analysis will not be required. Similarly, the study has not been powered to attain any particular level of statistical significance. Subsequent studies will measure sensitivity and specificity of any resulting dementia signal pattern generated by this study. These future studies will be subject to statistical analysis.

The Jan Medical Nautilus NeuroWaveTM (NNW) is a non-invasive device designed to evaluate brain oscillation patterns or the brain's pulse, generated by cardiac cycle induced intracranial blood flow. The objective of the evaluation is to determine whether the oscillation pattern is normal, whether it has been disrupted, and, if disrupted, what particular disruption pattern is evident. Various cerebral pathologies studied to date with the NNW demonstrate distinct disruption patterns. These pathologies include vasospasm, concussion and arterio-venous malformation (AVM). The objective of this study is to evaluate the brain oscillation patterns from subjects with MCI, Frontotemporal dementia, AD and from a small cohort of age matched normal controls and determine whether they exhibit pattern disruption and, if so, to quantify and categorize the distinct disruption patterns. How the Nautilus NeuroWave accomplishes this is explained later in the device description section of the protocol.

Being tested
Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System
Keywords
Aging, Diagnostic Equipment
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Memory Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nautilus NeuroWaveTM SystemDevice

    A noninvasive device to detect dementia utilizing headset and sensors

Study groups in NCT02333942
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alzheimer's DiseaseNautilus NeuroWaveTM System'
Receives: Device: Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System
Mild Cognitive ImpairmentNautilus NeuroWaveTM System'
Receives: Device: Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System
Frontotemporal Lobar DegenerationNautilus NeuroWaveTM System'
Receives: Device: Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System
Age-Matched ControlsNautilus NeuroWaveTM System'
Receives: Device: Nautilus NeuroWaveTM System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity as a diagnostic aid in detecting Dementia (identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI)

    Efficacy at identifying Dementia through identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI and any objective measures the PI uses to arrive at assessment.

    Measured: one year

  2. Specificity as a diagnostic aid in detecting Dementia (Rate of false positives as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI)

    Rate of false positives as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI and any objective measures the PI uses to arrive as assessment.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Sensitivity and specificity measures for MCI and Alzheimer's disease (Efficacy and rate of false positives as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI)

    Efficacy and rate of false positives as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI and any objective measures the PI uses to arrive as assessment.

    Measured: one year

  2. Sensitivity and specificity measures between MCI and FTDL. (distinguish between MCI and FTDL using efficacy and rate of false positives from the identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI)

    To distinguish between MCI and FTDL using efficacy and rate of false positives from the identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI and any objective measures the PI uses to arrive as assessment.

    Measured: one year

  3. Sensitivity and specificity measures between FTDL and Alzheimer's disease (distinguish between FTLD and Alzheimer's disease using efficacy and rate of false positives from the identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI)

    To distinguish between FTLD and Alzheimer's disease using efficacy and rate of false positives from the identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI and any objective measures the PI uses to arrive as assessment.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02333942
Sponsor's protocol ID
082189
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
9 Dec 2014
Last updated
13 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by Jan Medical, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity as a diagnostic aid in detecting Dementia (identified signatures as compared with the clinical assessment made by the PI) (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in