AzTrials
AzTrials

End Stage Renal DiseaseIMPROVANCT02334696

Improving Outcomes in Vascular Access

An observational study of End Stage Renal Disease, run by University Hospital Birmingham.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The IMPROVA study is designed to identify novel predictors of vascular access success or failure. Clinical assessment complimented by Doppler ultrasound is the only currently employed methods of assessing suitability for placement of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
End Stage Renal Disease
How many people
32 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2015to Mar 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients with end stage renal disease referred for assessment in vascular access clinic.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or more. All patients referred to the vascular access clinic. Able to give valid informed consent.
  • Exclusion criteria Unable to give informed consent. <18 years old Prisoners

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

The IMPROVA study is designed to identify novel predictors of vascular access success or failure. Clinical assessment complimented by Doppler ultrasound is the only currently employed methods of assessing suitability for placement of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). These techniques are not capable of predicting vascular access outcomes suggesting that other potentially measurable factors may play a part.

Despite efforts to improve placement of AVF in both the haemodialysis incident and prevalent population, many patients continue to dialyse through a central venous catheter (CVC), exposing them to higher risks of infection, co morbidity and mortality than dialysing via an AVF. Furthermore, AVF primary failure rates are reportedly as high in 20-50% in published series confirming that ultrasound cannot inform the clinician sufficiently to accurately predict success or failure.

The aim of this study is to perform enhanced assessments of arterial health preoperatively and correlate these measurements with early AVF outcome. We intend to perform pulse wave analysis and velocity; measure advanced glycation end products and assess endothelial function using a vascular occlusion test. We also aim to assess whether patient reported symptoms of hand function can predict AVF outcome. These non-invasive measurements will provide a more accurate picture of overall vascular health prior to AVF formation with the ultimate intention of informing the clinician as to the likelihood of success or failure.

Read the detailed description

Purpose of proposed investigation The IMPROVA study will utilise novel non-invasive methods of arterial health assessment and correlate these measurements with the early outcomes of AVF formation. The development of new techniques to inform the clinician pre-operatively will aid in a more tailored approach to fistula planning, predict inevitable failures and consequently improve success rate. The ultimate aim is to identify novel methods of predicting fistula failure to prevent patients from developing into a cycle of consecutive failure, catheter dependence and therefore worse overall outcomes.

Background Despite the merits of autologous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), failure rates remain high with 20-50% failing to mature. As a consequence many patients will suffer multiple attempts at establishing arteriovenous access and initiate dialysis on a Central Venous Catheter (CVC) thereby extending this risk of subsequent failure and increasing the risk of mortality and serious comorbidity.

Predictors of maturation have been reported in a number of studies. The mainstay is pre-operative vascular mapping by duplex ultrasonography (DUS) which relies on vessel size and site. Whilst this has demonstrated improved patency and decreased early failure rate vascular measurements are unable to independently predict outcome of fistula success suggesting other contributing factors.

The process of maturation can be modelled around changes in blood flow, flow patterns and subsequent vessel dilatation and remodelling. The ability of the artery and vein to dilate is essential to fistula maturation.

Factors that influence vessel remodelling following fistula formation have been under investigated in this important aspect in the management of kidney disease. Arterial stiffness refers to the distensability, compliance and elastic modulus of the arterial vascular system. It is found to increase with age, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and end stage renal disease. Aortic pulse wave velocity is considered the gold standard for assessing arterial stiffness and the pulse wave Vicorder©Skidmore Medical is a non-invasive, easy to learn and reproducible method of assessing stiffness. Increased aortic pulse wave velocity has been independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome in large prospective studies including specifically patients with end stage renal failure. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have also been implicated in the development of vascular pathology resulting in AVF failure. The measurement of advanced glycation end products, using the AGE reader©Diagnoptics Technologies, offers a new avenue to establish the association between AGE levels and AVF outcomes. Furthermore, potential therapeutic options exist for improving the AGE-related vascular biology of AVFs with evidence that aminoguanine, ALT-946, ALT-711, statins, pyrodoxamine and dietary modifications can reduce AGE levels. Endothelial function is another aspect of arterial health that has been under reported in vascular access research. The INVOS® spectra machine uses near infrared spectroscopy to measure the mixed arteriovenous saturations of deep tissues as a reflection of perfusion. Manipulation of this environment using a vascular occlusion test can provide invaluable information regarding endothelial responsiveness. Patient reported symptoms of vascular health may also provide important information in the search for novel predictors of AVF outcomes. Many vascular diseases have associated symptoms that reflect severity and direct questioning of patients regarding the vascular health of their upper limbs may offer further guidance in the placement of AVF.

The combination of these non-invasive, easy to learn and reproducible tests offers an exciting opportunity to identify predictors of and improve outcomes in AVF formation.

Keywords
Vascular Access
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Early patency

    A successful fistula is defined as any fistula which at early postoperative review shows:

    Fistula flow rates >600ml/min Fistula vein diameter >6mm Distance of fistula vein from skin <6mm

    • 10% allowable for flow rates and vein diameter A failed fistula is defined as any fistula which does not meet this definition.

    Measured: 2 - 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Unassisted clinical maturation

    Use of fistula with 2 needles for 75% of dialysis sessions during a 4-wk period with either:

    1. 4 consecutive dialysis sessions with mean blood pump speed >300 mL/min, or
    2. single-pool Kt/V >1.4 or urea reduction ratio >70%

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Why it stopped: similar study in USA published with same protocol

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02334696
Sponsor's protocol ID
RRK5258
Acronym
IMPROVA
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
6 Jan 2015
Last updated
26 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of End Stage Renal Disease, run by University Hospital Birmingham.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: similar study in USA published with same protocol). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Early patency (time frame: 2 - 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in