Breast CancerOPTIMALNCT02335957
OPTimizing Irradiation Through Molecular Assessment of Lymph Node (OPTIMAL)
A study testing Irradiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterapia at 50 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study is to show the non-inferiority of the incidental irradiation, as compared to intentional irradiation of the axillary nodes, in terms of 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) of early stage breast cancer patients with limited affectation of sentinel node assessed by OSNA (250 to 15,000… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Irradiation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 489 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Infiltrating, ductal carcinoma of the breast.
- Treated with conservative surgery (tumorectomy or quadrantectomy) without lymphadenectomy.
- Sentinel lymph node assessed by OSNA, with TTL in the range 250 - 15,000 copies/μL.
- Age ≥ 18 yrs old.
- Karnofsky Index ≥ 70 %.
- Signed Informed Consent.
Who cannot join
- Other types of breast cancer different from infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
- Bilateral breast cancer.
- Males.
- Mastectomy or axillary homolateral lymph node dissection.
- Previous thoracic irradiation therapy.
- Systemic neoadjuvant therapy previous to surgery.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Contraindications of radiotherapy (pregnancy, severe collagen diseases).
- Other neoplasms.
- Severe associated comorbidities that, according to the investigator criteria, may interfere with the study evaluations.
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 3 countries.
50 sites in 3 countries
Spain46 sites
Centro Onoclógico de Galicia
A Coruña
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete
Albacete
Hospital Universitario de la Ribera
Alzira
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
Badajoz
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Bilbao
Centro Médico Teknon
Barcelona
Clínica Platon
Barcelona
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
ICO Duran i Reynals
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
Cadiz
Hospital General Universitario de Santa Lucía
Cartagena, Murcia
Hospital Provincial de Castellón
Castelló
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real
Hospital de Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Fuenlabrada, Madrid
Fundación Hospital de Jove
Gijón, Principality of Asturias
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands
Hospital Universitario de León
León
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida
Hospital Clínico Universitario de San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Madrid
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid
Hospital Universitario la Paz
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda, Madrid
Hospital General Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Murcia
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre
Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus
Reus
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela
Hospital Virgen de la Macarena
Seville
Hospital Virgen del Rocío
Seville
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic la Fe
Valencia
Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO)
Valencia
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
Vigo
Hospital Universitario de Araba
Vitoria-Gasteiz
Hospital Virgen de la Concha
Zamora
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza
Portugal3 sites
Hospital Espírito Santo
Evora
Centro Hospitalar De São João
Porto
Hospital Distrital de Santarém
Santarém
About this study
The main purpose of this study is to show the non-inferiority of the incidental irradiation, as compared to intentional irradiation of the axillary nodes, in terms of 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) of early stage breast cancer patients with limited affectation of sentinel node assessed by OSNA (250 to 15,000 copies/uL), treated with breast-conservative surgery without axillary lymphadenectomy.
Read the detailed description
Since long, the standard loco-regional treatment of the early-stage breast cancer is breast conservative surgery (tumorectomy) followed by a selective biopsy of the sentinel lymph node and, if positive, lymphadenectomy of axillary levels I and II. Complementary irradiation of the breast and ganglionar areas has shown to reduce disease-specific mortality. Therefore, adjuvant radiotherapy of the whole breast is currently indicated after conservative surgery.
The recommendation to irradiate axillary lymph nodes is clear in patients with more than three affected nodes. The standard volumes to irradiate after lymphadenectomy include supraclavicular and level III axillary regions, while axillary levels I and II, and the internal breast lymph node chain, are reserved for cases of cumbersome axillary affectation, patients who have not undergone lymphadenectomy or it was insufficient, or affectation of the internal breast lymph node chain.
However, when only 1 to 3 nodes are affected, there is no unanimity on the recommendation of radiotherapy, despite some studies have shown that irradiation improves survival. In addition, the National Cancer Institute of Canada trial (NCIC-CTGMA20), high risk patients with negative lymph nodes and patients with positive lymph nodes (most of them with 1 to 3 affected nodes) showed that local irradiation with or without regional lymph node irradiation improved disease-free survival, as well as loco-regional and distant disease control. Moreover, a systematic review including more than 20,000 patients from 45 studies concludes that the irradiation of the breast reduced the loco-regional relapse, even in patients without affected lymph nodes.
One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) is a technique developed by Sysmex Corporation that allows a readily and complete analysis of sentinel lymph nodes during surgery. OSNA provides a quantification of the Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) tumour cell marker in the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) of the sentinel node, the result being expressed as "total tumour load" (TTL), which is a discrete number of copies per microliter. This technique has shown ability to discriminate macrometastasis, micrometastasis or negativity, and to predict affectation of non-sentinel lymph nodes. According to previous results, a TTL < 15,000 is associated with a 85% probability of non-affectation of (non-sentinel) axillar lymph nodes.
The therapeutic value of the axillary lymphadenectomy has been questioned since long, and the recent publication of the Z0011 study proposes solely a selective biopsy of the sentinel lymph node. This has impacted clinical practice guidelines as prestigious as those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network; however, irradiation is always considered in these cases.
In summary, the amount of nodal volumes to irradiate in early stages of breast cancer is under discussion, particularly in the case of patients not submitted to axillar lymphadenectomy despite affectation of sentinel lymph nodes. In most cases, the irradiation of the breast implies "incidental" irradiation of the axillary level I, and in some cases the level II. For this reason, some groups have decided not to irradiate these axillary regions intentionally, while others advocate irradiating these regions intentionally.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Irradiation
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IrradiationRadiation
Intentional versus incidental irradiation of lymphatic node areas, administered using a lineal accelerator, after 3D delimitation of the supraclavicular and axillary levels I, II and III. In both treatment arms, further tumoral bed boost will be allowed according to the investigator criteria, whether dose contribution to the nodal areas can be calculated. Due to its nature, interventions cannot be asked.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intentional irradiation of lymph nodes | Other | Patients will receive a total dose of 50 Gy in the whole breast and nodal areas(axillary I, II, III, and supraclavicular) with optimization of the technique, in daily fractions of 2 Gy and 5 fractions/week during 5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: Irradiation |
| Incidental irradiation of lymph nodes | Experimental | Patients will receive a total dose of 50 Gy in the whole breast, but not aimed at nodal areas, with optimization of the technique, in daily fractions of 2 Gy and 5 fractions/week during 5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: Irradiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease Free Survival
The primary outcome will be the 5-years DFS. DFS is defined as the time from randomization to any breast cancer-related event, including local, regional or distant recurrence, or death from breast cancer.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time to loco-regional recurrence up 5-years
Loco-regional recurrence during the 5-years follow-up, defined as clinical or image-based detection of tumour in treated breast (local recurrence) or in the ipsilateral axilla or supraclavicular fossa (regional recurrence).
Measured: 5 years
Time to distant recurrence up 5-years
Distant recurrence occuring during the 5-years follow-up, defined as defined as clinical or image-based detection of neoplastic affectation of other organs or tissues different from the treated breast, ipsilateral axilla or supraclavicular fossa.
Measured: 5 years
Number of patients with acute toxicity, defined as any adverse event appearing up to one month after finalization of radiotherapy.
Acute toxicity, assessed by a selected subset of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)
Measured: 7 years
Number of patients with chronic toxicity, defined as any adverse event appearing during follow-up, up to 5 years.
Chronic toxicity , assessed by a selected subset of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)
Measured: 7 years
Total irradiation dose (Gy) received in axillary levels I, II and III, supraclavicular fossa, and internal mammary chain volumes, at the end of radiotherapy.
Total dose (Gy) received in axillary levels I, II,and II, supraclavicular, and internal mammary chain volumes.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionJul 2021
- Study completionJul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 489 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterapia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Esther Prats, Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterapia
- Investigators
- Manuel Algara López, Medicine, Principal investigator, Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterápica (GICOR)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02335957
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GIC-RAD-2014-02
- Acronym
- OPTIMAL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kiluk JV, Ly QP, Meade T, Ramos D, Reintgen DS, Dessureault S, Davis M, Shamehdi C, Cox CE. Axillary recurrence rate following negative sentinel node biopsy for invasive breast cancer: long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 3:S339-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0704-1. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
PubMed 19777181Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7.
PubMed 16360786Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J, Gray R, Pierce L, Whelan T, Wang Y, Peto R. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
PubMed 22019144Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ, Phillips N, Jackson SM, Wilson KS, Knowling MA, Coppin CM, Weir L, Gelmon K, Le N, Durand R, Coldman AJ, Manji M. Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 19;97(2):116-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh297.
PubMed 15657341Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J. Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials. Radiother Oncol. 2007 Mar;82(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
PubMed 17306393van Wely BJ, Teerenstra S, Schinagl DA, Aufenacker TJ, de Wilt JH, Strobbe LJ. Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):326-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7360. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
PubMed 21254004Peg V, Espinosa-Bravo M, Vieites B, Vilardell F, Antunez JR, de Salas MS, Delgado-Sanchez JJ, Pinto W, Gozalbo F, Petit A, Sansano I, Del Mar Tellez M, Rubio IT. Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node: a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2524-z. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
PubMed 23576079Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, Gatti G, D'Aiuto G, Cataliotti L, Paolucci R, Piccolo P, Massaioli N, Sismondi P, Rulli A, Lo Sardo F, Recalcati A, Terribile D, Acerbi A, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P. Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi089. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
PubMed 15668261Martelli G, Boracchi P, De Palo M, Pilotti S, Oriana S, Zucali R, Daidone MG, De Palo G. A randomized trial comparing axillary dissection to no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: results after 5 years of follow-up. Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):1-6; discussion 7-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167759.15670.14.
PubMed 15973094Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Tereffe W, Liu DD, Hunt KK. Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):723-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22847.
PubMed 17587208Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Hansen NM, Bethke KP, Rademaker AW, Ko CY, Winchester DP, Winchester DJ. Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2946-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5750. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
PubMed 19364968Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Intra M, Maisonneuve P, Zucca F, Gatti G, Mazzarol G, De Cicco C, Vezzoli D. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):595-600. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e92a.
PubMed 20195151Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Meric-Bernstam F, Lucci A, Bedrosian I, Babiera GV, Hwang RF, Ross MI, Feig BW, Hoffman K, Litton JK, Sahin AA, Yang W, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA, Mittendorf EA. Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;18(9):2407-12. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1593-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 21327455Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M, Ballman K. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):426-32; discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32.
PubMed 20739842Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.
PubMed 21304082
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OPTimizing Irradiation Through Molecular Assessment of Lymph Node (OPTIMAL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02335957
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMAL / GIC-RAD-2014-02
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 489 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología RadioterapiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study is to show the non-inferiority of the incidental irradiation, as compared to intentional irradiation of the axillary nodes, in terms of 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) of early stage breast cancer patients with limited affectation of sentinel node assessed by OSNA (250 to 15,000 copies/uL), treated with breast-conservative surgery without axillary lymphadenectomy.
Detailed description
Since long, the standard loco-regional treatment of the early-stage breast cancer is breast conservative surgery (tumorectomy) followed by a selective biopsy of the sentinel lymph node and, if positive, lymphadenectomy of axillary levels I and II. Complementary irradiation of the breast and ganglionar areas has shown to reduce disease-specific mortality. Therefore, adjuvant radiotherapy of the whole breast is currently indicated after conservative surgery.
The recommendation to irradiate axillary lymph nodes is clear in patients with more than three affected nodes. The standard volumes to irradiate after lymphadenectomy include supraclavicular and level III axillary regions, while axillary levels I and II, and the internal breast lymph node chain, are reserved for cases of cumbersome axillary affectation, patients who have not undergone lymphadenectomy or it was insufficient, or affectation of the internal breast lymph node chain.
However, when only 1 to 3 nodes are affected, there is no unanimity on the recommendation of radiotherapy, despite some studies have shown that irradiation improves survival. In addition, the National Cancer Institute of Canada trial (NCIC-CTGMA20), high risk patients with negative lymph nodes and patients with positive lymph nodes (most of them with 1 to 3 affected nodes) showed that local irradiation with or without regional lymph node irradiation improved disease-free survival, as well as loco-regional and distant disease control. Moreover, a systematic review including more than 20,000 patients from 45 studies concludes that the irradiation of the breast reduced the loco-regional relapse, even in patients without affected lymph nodes.
One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) is a technique developed by Sysmex Corporation that allows a readily and complete analysis of sentinel lymph nodes during surgery. OSNA provides a quantification of the Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) tumour cell marker in the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) of the sentinel node, the result being expressed as "total tumour load" (TTL), which is a discrete number of copies per microliter. This technique has shown ability to discriminate macrometastasis, micrometastasis or negativity, and to predict affectation of non-sentinel lymph nodes. According to previous results, a TTL < 15,000 is associated with a 85% probability of non-affectation of (non-sentinel) axillar lymph nodes.
The therapeutic value of the axillary lymphadenectomy has been questioned since long, and the recent publication of the Z0011 study proposes solely a selective biopsy of the sentinel lymph node. This has impacted clinical practice guidelines as prestigious as those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network; however, irradiation is always considered in these cases.
In summary, the amount of nodal volumes to irradiate in early stages of breast cancer is under discussion, particularly in the case of patients not submitted to axillar lymphadenectomy despite affectation of sentinel lymph nodes. In most cases, the irradiation of the breast implies "incidental" irradiation of the axillary level I, and in some cases the level II. For this reason, some groups have decided not to irradiate these axillary regions intentionally, while others advocate irradiating these regions intentionally.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intentional irradiation of lymph nodes | Other | Radiation: IrradiationPatients will receive a total dose of 50 Gy in the whole breast and nodal areas(axillary I, II, III, and supraclavicular) with optimization of the technique, in daily fractions of 2 Gy and 5 fractions/week during 5 weeks. |
| Incidental irradiation of lymph nodes | Experimental | Radiation: IrradiationPatients will receive a total dose of 50 Gy in the whole breast, but not aimed at nodal areas, with optimization of the technique, in daily fractions of 2 Gy and 5 fractions/week during 5 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Infiltrating, ductal carcinoma of the breast.
- Treated with conservative surgery (tumorectomy or quadrantectomy) without lymphadenectomy.
- Sentinel lymph node assessed by OSNA, with TTL in the range 250 - 15,000 copies/μL.
- Age ≥ 18 yrs old.
- Karnofsky Index ≥ 70 %.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Other types of breast cancer different from infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
- Bilateral breast cancer.
- Males.
- Mastectomy or axillary homolateral lymph node dissection.
- Previous thoracic irradiation therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IrradiationIntentional versus incidental irradiation of lymphatic node areas, administered using a lineal accelerator, after 3D delimitation of the supraclavicular and axillary levels I, II and III. In both treatment arms, further tumoral bed boost will be allowed according to the investigator criteria, whether dose contribution to the nodal areas can be calculated. Due to its nature, interventions cannot be asked. | Radiation | Incidental irradiation of lymph nodes, Intentional irradiation of lymph nodes |
Primary outcome
Disease Free Survival
Time frame: 5 years
The primary outcome will be the 5-years DFS. DFS is defined as the time from randomization to any breast cancer-related event, including local, regional or distant recurrence, or death from breast cancer.
5 secondary outcomes
Time to loco-regional recurrence up 5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Time to distant recurrence up 5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Number of patients with acute toxicity, defined as any adverse event appearing up to one month after finalization of radiotherapy.
Time frame: 7 years
Number of patients with chronic toxicity, defined as any adverse event appearing during follow-up, up to 5 years.
Time frame: 7 years
Total irradiation dose (Gy) received in axillary levels I, II and III, supraclavicular fossa, and internal mammary chain volumes, at the end of radiotherapy.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 19777181Kiluk JV, Ly QP, Meade T, Ramos D, Reintgen DS, Dessureault S, Davis M, Shamehdi C, Cox CE. Axillary recurrence rate following negative sentinel node biopsy for invasive breast cancer: long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 3:S339-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0704-1. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 16360786Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7.
- Background: PubMed 22019144Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG); Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Davies C, Ewertz M, Godwin J, Gray R, Pierce L, Whelan T, Wang Y, Peto R. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
- Background: PubMed 15657341Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ, Phillips N, Jackson SM, Wilson KS, Knowling MA, Coppin CM, Weir L, Gelmon K, Le N, Durand R, Coldman AJ, Manji M. Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 19;97(2):116-26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh297.
- Background: PubMed 17306393Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J. Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials. Radiother Oncol. 2007 Mar;82(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 21254004van Wely BJ, Teerenstra S, Schinagl DA, Aufenacker TJ, de Wilt JH, Strobbe LJ. Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Br J Surg. 2011 Mar;98(3):326-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7360. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 23576079Peg V, Espinosa-Bravo M, Vieites B, Vilardell F, Antunez JR, de Salas MS, Delgado-Sanchez JJ, Pinto W, Gozalbo F, Petit A, Sansano I, Del Mar Tellez M, Rubio IT. Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node: a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2524-z. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 15668261Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, Gatti G, D'Aiuto G, Cataliotti L, Paolucci R, Piccolo P, Massaioli N, Sismondi P, Rulli A, Lo Sardo F, Recalcati A, Terribile D, Acerbi A, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P. Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi089. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 15973094Martelli G, Boracchi P, De Palo M, Pilotti S, Oriana S, Zucali R, Daidone MG, De Palo G. A randomized trial comparing axillary dissection to no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: results after 5 years of follow-up. Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242(1):1-6; discussion 7-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167759.15670.14.
- Background: PubMed 17587208Hwang RF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Yi M, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Tereffe W, Liu DD, Hunt KK. Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection. Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):723-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22847.
- Background: PubMed 19364968Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Hansen NM, Bethke KP, Rademaker AW, Ko CY, Winchester DP, Winchester DJ. Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and completion axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2946-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5750. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 20195151Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V, Veronesi P, Intra M, Maisonneuve P, Zucca F, Gatti G, Mazzarol G, De Cicco C, Vezzoli D. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):595-600. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e92a.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Copper Cu 64-DOTA-Trastuzumab PET in Predicting Response to Treatment With Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine in Patients With Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
Bone Metastases, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A ReaL World Study of DS-8201
Breast Cancer Metastatic, Treatment Efficacy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan to Treat Breast Cancer (MK-1022-016)
Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles in Breast Cancer Patients
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Acceptability of a Phytotherapy Combining Devil's Claw, Blackcurrant and Meadowsweet for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Arthralgia in Patients Treated for Localized Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant Setting
Hormone Therapy-induced Arthralgia, Phytotherapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manuel Algara López, Medicine principal investigator
Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterápica (GICOR)
50 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Irradiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterapia at 50 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 50 sites in Spain, Portugal, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease Free Survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02335957, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.