PONVPhase 3NCT02337062
Phase IIIb Study of APD421 in Combination as PONV Prophylaxis
A Phase 3 study testing APD421 in people with PONV, run by Acacia Pharma Ltd at 25 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo when combined with a standard anti-emetic in the prevention of PONV in patients at high risk of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- PONV
- What is being tested?
- APD421
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,147 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Patients undergoing elective surgery (open or laparoscopic technique) under general anaesthesia, expected to last at least one hour from induction of anaesthesia to wound closure
- Patients with at least 3 "Apfel" risk factors for PONV
Who cannot join
- Patients scheduled to undergo transplant surgery
- Patients scheduled to receive only a local anaesthetic/regional neuraxial (intrathecal or epidural) block
- Patients who are expected to remain ventilated for a period after surgery
- Patients who are expected to need a naso- or orogastric tube in situ after surgery is completed
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 3 countries.
25 sites in 3 countries
United States14 sites
Albany Medical Center Hospital
Albany, New York, 12208
First Street Surgical Center
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Victory Medical Center Houston
Houston, Texas, 77004
Memorial Hermann-Memorial City Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77024
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33136
UCSF School of Medicine
San Francisco, California, 94143
Helen Keller Hospital
Sheffield, Alabama, 35660
Stony Brook Medicine
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Germany6 sites
HELIOS Klinikum Aue
Aue, 08280
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Klinikum Ludwigshafen
Ludwigshafen, 67063
Universitätsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Philipps University
Marburg, 35033
University Hospitals of Würzburg
Würzburg
France5 sites
University Hospital
Besançon, 25030
Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Lyon, 69495
Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse
Mulhouse, 68051
Hopital Foch
Paris
CHU de Hautepierre
Strasbourg
About this study
Official title: Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of APD421 (Amisulpride for IV Injection) as Combination Prophylaxis Against Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in High-risk Patients
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo when combined with a standard anti-emetic in the prevention of PONV in patients at high risk of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).
- Conditions
- PONV
- Being tested
- APD421, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
APD421Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 + standard anti-emetic | Experimental | Single dose of IV APD421 Receives: Drug: APD421 |
| Placebo + standard anti-emetic | Placebo comparator | Single dose of IV placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Complete Response
Complete response defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medication in the 24 hour period after end of surgery (defined as wound closure)
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of Participants With Emesis
Emesis is defined as vomiting (production of even the smallest amount of stomach contents) or retching (muscular movements of vomiting but without expulsion of stomach contents, usually because of an empty stomach)
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants Receiving Rescue Medication
Rescue medication defined as an antiemetic (or other medication) given with the intention of relieving nausea and/or emesis, or any incidental use of a drug known to have antiemetic potential
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants With Any Nausea
Nausea (defined as the desire to vomit without the presence of expulsive muscular movements) measured on a 0-10 verbal response scale, where 0=no nausea at all and 10=the worst nausea imaginable. "Any nausea" means a score ≥ 1.
Measured: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants With Significant Nausea
Nausea (defined as the desire to vomit without the presence of expulsive muscular movements) measured on a 0-10 verbal response scale, where 0=no nausea at all and 10=the worst nausea imaginable. "Significant nausea" means a score ≥ 4.
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Time to First Violation of Criteria for PONV
Criteria for PONV are any episode of emesis or use of rescue medication in the 24 hours after the end of surgery
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PONVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,147 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acacia Pharma Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter Kranke, MD, Principal investigator, Würzburg University Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02337062
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DP10017
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of APD421 (Amisulpride for IV Injection) as Combination Prophylaxis Against Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting in High-risk Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02337062
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DP10017
- Conditions
- PONV
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,147 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Acacia Pharma LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo when combined with a standard anti-emetic in the prevention of PONV in patients at high risk of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 + standard anti-emetic | Experimental | Drug: APD421Single dose of IV APD421 |
| Placebo + standard anti-emetic | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSingle dose of IV placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Patients undergoing elective surgery (open or laparoscopic technique) under general anaesthesia, expected to last at least one hour from induction of anaesthesia to wound closure
- Patients with at least 3 "Apfel" risk factors for PONV
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients scheduled to undergo transplant surgery
- Patients scheduled to receive only a local anaesthetic/regional neuraxial (intrathecal or epidural) block
- Patients who are expected to remain ventilated for a period after surgery
- Patients who are expected to need a naso- or orogastric tube in situ after surgery is completed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 | Drug | APD421 + standard anti-emetic |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo + standard anti-emetic |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Complete Response
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Complete response defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medication in the 24 hour period after end of surgery (defined as wound closure)
5 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Emesis
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants Receiving Rescue Medication
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants With Any Nausea
Time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery
Number of Participants With Significant Nausea
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Time to First Violation of Criteria for PONV
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for PONV
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Volume and PONV in Pediatric Appendectomy Cases
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruiting
Amisulpride Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
PONV
Not yet recruiting
Binaural Beats and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Active, not recruiting
Advancing Strategies to Optimize the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) Trial
Postoperative Nausea, Postoperative Vomiting
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Sedatives on PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Kranke, MD principal investigator
Würzburg University Hospitals
25 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing APD421 in people with PONV, run by Acacia Pharma Ltd at 25 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in United States, Germany, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Complete Response (time frame: 24 hours after the end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2019.