AzTrials
AzTrials

Inherited Ophthalmic DiseasesPhase 1/2NCT02338973

Interferon Gamma-1b Administered Topically for Macular Edema/Intraretinal Schisis Cysts in Rod-Cone Dystrophy (RCD) and Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome (ESCS)

A Phase 1/2 study testing Interferon gamma-1b in people with Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases and Inherited Retinal Degeneration, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: People with rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) or enhanced S-cone syndrome (ESCS) have excess fluid under the retina of their eye. This can cause vision loss. The medicine interferon gamma-1b may help people with these diseases. Objectives: To see if interferon gamma-1b eyedrops are safe for people with RCD or ESCS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
What is being tested?
Interferon gamma-1b
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Jan 2015to 26 Jul 2018
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met, where applicable.
  • Participant must be 12 years of age or older.
  • Participant (or legal guardian or legal representative) must understand and sign the protocol informed consent.
  • Participant is willing to comply with the study procedures and is expected to be able to return for all study visits.
  • Participant must carry a clinical diagnosis of RCD or ESCS.
  • ESCS participant must have molecular confirmation with two alleles for NR2E3 gene mutations
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Female participant of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding, must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must be willing to undergo pregnancy tests at scheduled study visits.
  • Female participant of childbearing potential, and any male participant able to father children must have (or have a partner who has) had a hysterectomy or vasectomy, be completely abstinent from intercourse or must agree to practice two reliable methods of contraception while taking the IP and six weeks after completion. Acceptable methods of contraception include:
  • Hormonal contraception (i.e., birth control pills, injected hormones, dermal patch or vaginal ring);
  • Intrauterine device;
  • Barrier methods (diaphragm, condom) with spermicide; or
  • Surgical sterilization (tubal ligation).

Who cannot join

  • A participant is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present.
  • Participant has a history of other ocular disease likely to contribute significantly to visual disruption (e.g., optic neuropathy, glaucoma, uveitis, or other retinal disease).
  • Participant has had diagnosis or treatment of a malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) within the previous five years.
  • Participant has received investigational treatment in another clinical study related to an ocular condition in the last six months.
  • Participant is pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant (or father a child) during the study follow-up period.
  • Participant is allergic to fluorescein dye.
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Participant has a systemic condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., multiple sclerosis (MS), as IFN gamma may cause MS exacerbations).
  • Study Eye Eligibility Criteria
  • A participant must have at least one eye meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria listed below.
  • Study Eye Inclusion Criteria
  • The study eye must retain adequate fixation to allow for completion of protocol assessments.
  • The study eye must have macular cystic changes (>275 microns and/or disruption of foveal contour on OCT).
  • Study Eye Exclusion Criteria
  • The study eye has lens, cornea, or other media opacities that preclude adequate visualization and testing of the retina.
  • The study eye has undergone intraocular surgery within 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • The study eye has a disease that may confound the outcome of the study [e.g., choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the fovea or parafoveal area].
  • Participant is unwilling to discontinue wearing a contact lens in the study eye during IP administration.
  • Study Eye Selection Criteria in Cases of Bilateral Disease
  • RCD and ESCS usually affect both eyes to a similar degree. In case both eyes of a participant meet the study eye eligibility criteria, the following criteria will be used to select the study eye:
  • The eye with more intraretinal fluid will be selected as the study eye;
  • If both eyes have similar levels of intraretinal fluid, the eye with worse visual acuity will be selected as the study eye;
  • If both eyes have the similar levels of intraretinal fluid and visual acuities, the right eye will be selected as the study eye.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Phase I/II Study of the Evaluation of Interferon Gamma-1b Administered Topically for Macular Edema/Intraretinal Schisis Cysts in Rod-Cone Dystrophy (RCD) and Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome (ESCS)

Background:

  • People with rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) or enhanced S-cone syndrome (ESCS) have excess fluid under the retina of their eye. This can cause vision loss. The medicine interferon gamma-1b may help people with these diseases.
Read more

Objectives:

  • To see if interferon gamma-1b eyedrops are safe for people with RCD or ESCS. To see if the medicine can decrease retina fluid and help prevent vision loss.

Eligibility:

  • People at least 12 years old with RCD or ESCS. Those with ESCS must have two mutations in the NR2E3 gene.

Design:

  • Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exam, eye exam, and blood tests.
  • Participants will stay at NIH for 3 days and get the first eyedrops.
  • Participants will give themselves 4 study eyedrops 4 times daily for 2 weeks and keep a diary.
  • Participants will have 5 outpatient visits over 8 weeks, 2 of which are telephone assessments. They may have:
  • Repeats of screening tests.
  • Questionnaires.
  • Small piece of skin removed.
  • Eye exams, including eye dilation and tasks on computer screens.
  • Fluorescein angiography. A dye injected into an arm vein will travel to the blood vessels in the eyes. A camera will take pictures.
  • Electroretinography. Participants will sit in the dark wearing eyepatches. A small electrode will be taped to the forehead. After 30 minutes, researchers will remove the eyepatches and put in numbing eyedrops and contact lenses. Participants will watch flashing lights.
  • Electrooculography. Electrodes will be attached outside of the eyes and eye function will be measured in the dark and the light.
  • Participants will have a follow-up visit after 52 weeks.
Read the detailed description

Objective:

Rod-cone dystrophy (RCD) is a term applied to a number of genetically heterogenous diseases presenting with night vision abnormalities, visual field defects and reduced rod electroretinography responses. Enhanced S-Cone syndrome (ESCS) is a rare autosomal recessive retinal disease with a developmental and a degenerative aspect. Macular cystic changes, often florid and usually resulting in a reduction of central acuity, are frequently associated with both diseases. The reason for this association is not well understood. Acetazolamide (Diamox) and Dorzolamide (Trusopt) have been reported to have variable success in reducing these cystic changes but the effect is frequently inadequate. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of Interferon (IFN) gamma-1b administered topically for macular edema/retinal schisis cysts in RCD and ESCS. Possible disease-related pathophysiologic mechanisms will be explored using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) protocols leading to iPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor generation.

Study Population:

Up to five participants with RCD with significant macular cystic changes and up to five participants with ESCS with significant macular cystic changes will be enrolled to receive IFN gamma-1b administered topically in one eye. However, up to an additional two participants may be enrolled in order to obtain the five participants in each disease group to be included in the primary analysis if any participants withdraw from the study prior to receiving five days of treatment.

Design:

This is a single-center, prospective, uncontrolled, unmasked pilot Phase I/II study of the safety, tolerability and possible efficacy of IFN gamma-1b in participants with RCD and ESCS and macular cystic changes. One eye of up to five participants with RCD with significant macular cystic changes and up to five participants with ESCS with significant macular cystic changes [evidenced by optical coherence tomography (OCT) >275 microns central macular thickness and/or disruption of foveal contour] will receive topical IFN gamma-1b instilled as drops on the cornea. The initial stage of the study will include two participants from each disease category. Once all four participants have completed the 8-week visit, enrollment will be halted. Safety Adverse Event Review Committee members unaffiliated with the study will review the data as a preliminary assessment of safety and efficacy and to determine whether enrollment should continue. If the committee determines enrollment will continue, three additional participants with RCD and three participants with ESCS will be enrolled. The study will be completed once the final participant has received one year of follow-up.

Outcome Measures:

The primary outcome measure related to the safety and tolerability of IFN gamma-1b administered topically at the prescribed dosage for macular cystic changes in participants with RCD and ESCS will be assessed by the number and severity of adverse events related to the IP and the number of withdrawals at 52 weeks (one year) post-administration. Additional safety of IFN gamma-1b administered topically in participants with RCD and ESCS will be determined from the assessment of retinal function, ocular structure and occurrence of adverse events at all time points. Secondary outcomes include changes in visual function including visual acuity and microperimetry, and retinal imaging with OCT and fluorescein angiography.

Being tested
Interferon gamma-1b
Keywords
Macular Edema, Rod-Cone Dystrophy, Inherited Retinal Degeneration, Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome, Interferon Gamma
Medical subject headings
Macular Edema, Cone-Rod Dystrophies, Enhanced S-Cone Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interferon gamma-1bDrug

Study groups in NCT02338973
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interferon Gamma-1bExperimentalTopical interferon (IFN) gamma-1b, 112 µg dose, administered in study eye daily for two weeks
Receives: Drug: Interferon gamma-1b

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number and Severity of IP-related AEs

    The number and severity of adverse events related to the investigation product (IP).

    Measured: Study duration, up to 52 weeks

  2. Number of Participants Who Withdrew

    The number of participants who withdrew early.

    Measured: Study duration, up to 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 2

  3. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 3

  4. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 2

  5. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 5

  6. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 8

  7. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

    Change in BCVA from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 52

  8. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 1

  9. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 2

  10. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 3

  11. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 2

  12. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 5

  13. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 8

  14. Change in Maximum Subretinal Fluid Volume From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

    Change in maximum subretinal fluid volume as measured on OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 52

  15. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 1

  16. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 2

  17. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 3

  18. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 2

  19. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 5

  20. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 8

  21. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Cirrus OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Cirrus OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 52

  22. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 1

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 1 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 1

  23. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 2

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 2

  24. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Day 3

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Day 3 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 3

  25. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 2

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 2 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 2

  26. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 5

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 5 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 5

  27. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 8

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 8 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 8

  28. Change in Central Retinal Thickness as Measured on Spectralis OCT From Baseline as Compared to Week 52

    Change in central retinal thickness as measured on Spectralis OCT from baseline as compared to Week 52 by participant in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Week 52

  29. Change in Central Visual Field Sensitivity at Day 2 and Week 5 Compared to Baseline.

    Change in central visual field sensitivity as measured by microperimetry testing at Day 2 and Week 5 compared to baseline in both study and fellow eyes.

    Measured: Day 2 and Week 5

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start14 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2018
  4. Study completion26 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02338973
Sponsor's protocol ID
150052
Other IDs
15-EI-0052
Status last verified
26 Jul 2018
First submitted
14 Jan 2015
Last updated
13 Aug 2019
FDA-regulated drug
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Interferon gamma-1b in people with Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases and Inherited Retinal Degeneration, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number and Severity of IP-related AEs (time frame: Study duration, up to 52 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in