AzTrials
AzTrials

Tricuspid RegurgitationPhase 3HOVERNCT02339974

Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (HOVER)

A Phase 3 study testing Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tricuspid Regurgitation
What is being tested?
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2015to Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be at least 21 years old.
  • The patient must have severe, symptomatic (ACC/AHA Stage D symptoms) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as assessed by 2D echocardiogram with evidence of peripheral and central venous congestion (specifically lower extremity edema and abdominal ascites requiring diuretics.)
  • The patient must be evaluated by a "heart team" of physicians including an interventional cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, heart failure specialist, and imaging specialist, and presented for review at a local multi-disciplinary conference. By consensus, the heart team must agree (and verify in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
  • The heart team must agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Also, other factors which may increase the patients perceived surgical risk for inclusion in the trial will be clearly delineated if they are present. These include, but are not limited to the following as defined by VARC 2: Frailty, Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, IMA or other critical conduit crossing the midline or adherent to the posterior table of sternum, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The surgeons' consultation notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion. At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have interviewed and examined the patient.
  • The study patient provides informed consent and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits, including annual visits up to 5 years.

Who cannot join

  • Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient to be a good surgical candidate).
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
  • Untreated, severe, left sided valvular heart disease including mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and aortic regurgitation or stenosis.
  • Mean pulmonary artery pressures ≥40mmHG and PVR >4 woods units as assessed by right heart catheterization.
  • Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure. Examples of permanent implant would include any new heart valve. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is excluded.
  • Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL).
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure.
  • A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
  • Recent CVA clinically confirmed (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure.
  • Estimated life expectancy < 1 year from conditions other than TR.
  • Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of tricuspid regurgitation
  • Currently participating in another investigational cardiac device study or any other clinical trial, including drugs or biologics. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
  • Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.
  • Patients with signs or symptoms of SVC syndrome, or hepatic cirrhosis not felt due to passive congestion from TR.
  • 20: Subject unable to personally provide informed consent 21. FEV1<30% of predicted 22. Model for End State Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥21 (calculated per reference study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Henry Ford Hosptial

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation HOVER Trial

The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective multi-center, non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT or S3 valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.

Being tested
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
Medical subject headings
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna CavaDevice

Study groups in NCT02339974
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Severe Tricuspid RegurgitationExperimentalThis is a non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.
Receives: Device: Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedural Success

    Procedural success will include both device success and no device/procedure related SAE's including: all death, all stroke, MI, new AKI grade 3, life threatening bleeding, major vascular complications (arterial or venous-requiring unplanned intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, SVC syndrome.

    Safety as defined by successful vascular access without unplanned major vascular complication as defined by VARC-2, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system, correct position of both the vascular stent(s) and transcatheter valve in the IVC, a single valve placed within the IVC, and no need for additional surgery or re-intervention (including drainage of pericardial effusion) with the patient being alive at 30-days.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Individual Patient Success

    Individual patient success is defined by device success and the following: no re-hospitalizations for right sided heart failure or right sided heart failure equivalents including drainage of ascites or pleural effusions, new listing for heart transplant, VAD, or other mechanical support; improvement in one of three variables: KCCQ improvement>15 vs. baseline; 6MWT improvement> 70 meters vs. baseline; or VO2 peak improvement > 6% vs baseline..

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Lower Extremity Edema

    Measure of improvement in lower extremity (LE) edema measured by the Villalta Scale. The Villalta Scale is used to assess patients with lower extremity signs and symptoms of swelling, discoloration, or ulceration. The scale evaluates 5 patient reported items (pain, cramps, heaviness, paresthesia, pruritus) and 6 clinician-observed items (pretibial edema, skin induration, hyperpigmentation, pain during calf compression, venous ectasia, redness). Each item is graded on a four-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). All points are added, resulting in an overall score from 0 to 33. The final Villalta score of 5-9 is mild disease, 10-14 is moderate, and ≥15 is severe disease. A 3.1 point reduction in this scale between time points is associated with improved quality of life.

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year

  2. Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

    Occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 diagnostic criteria defines stroke as a duration of a focal or global neurological deficit ≥ 24 hours; OR <24 hours if available neuroimaging documents a new hemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death. VARC-2 diagnostic criteria defines TIA as a duration of a focal or global neurological deficit <24 hours, any variable neuroimaging does not demonstrate a new hemorrhage or infarct.

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year

  3. Mortality

    Mortality by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 criteria separate All-cause mortality into 'Cardiovascular mortality' and 'Noncardiovascular mortality'. Cardiovascular mortality is defined as any of the following criteria: Death due to proximate cardiac cause (eg, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, worsening heart failure); Death caused by noncoronary vascular conditions such as neurological events, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular disease; All procedure-related deaths, including those related to a complication of the procedure or treatment for a complication of the procedure; All valve-related deaths including structural or nonstructural valve dysfunction or other valve-related adverse events; Sudden or unwitnessed death; Death of unknown cause. Noncardiovascular mortality is defined as any death in which the primary cause of death is clearly related to another condition (eg, trauma, cancer, suicide)

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year

  4. Myocardial Infarction

    Myocardial Infarction (MI) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 defines MI as either periprocedural MI (new ischemic symptoms or signs AND elevated cardiac biomarkers within 72 hours after the index procedure), or spontaneous MI (>72hours after the index procedure, any 1 of the following: detection of rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile, together with the evidence of myocardial ischemia with either symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes indicative of new ischemia, new pathological Q-waves in at least two contiguous leads, or imaging evidence of a new loss of viable myocardium or new wall motion abnormality; Sudden, unexpected cardiac death involving cardiac arrest, accompanied by new ST elevation or new LBBB, and/or evidence of fresh thrombus by coronary angiogram or at autopsy, or at a time before the appearance of cardiac biomarker in the blood; or Pathological findings of an acute MI).

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year

  5. Acute Kidney Injury

    Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 criteria defines AKI as any of the following: [Stage 1] Increase in serum creatinine to 150-199% OR Urine output <0.5mL/kg/h for >6 but <12hours; [Stage 2] Increase in serum creatinine to 200-299% OR Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for >6 but <12hours; or [Stage 3] Increase in serum creatinine to ≥300% OR Urine output <0.3mL/kg/h for ≥24hours OR Anuria for ≥12hours.

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year

  6. Major Vascular Complications

    Major Vascular Complications by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 defines major vascular complications as: any aortic dissection aortic rupture, annulus rupture, left ventricle perforation, or new apical aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm; Access site or access-related vascular injury leading to death, life threatening or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, or neurological impairment; Distal embolization from a vascular source requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; The use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention associated with death, major bleeding, visceral ischemia or neurological impairment; Any new ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia documented by patient symptoms, physical exam, and/or decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram; surgery for access site-related nerve injury; or Permanent access site-related nerve injury.

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2024
  4. Study completionJun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02339974
Sponsor's protocol ID
G140131
Acronym
HOVER
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
13 Jan 2015
Last updated
18 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedural Success (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in