Breast CancerPhase 3SANDPIPERNCT02340221
A Study of Taselisib + Fulvestrant Versus Placebo + Fulvestrant in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Disease Recurrence or Progression During or After Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Taselisib and Fulvestrant in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 157 sites in 28 countries.
Trial summary
This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of taselisib + fulvestrant with that of placebo + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Taselisib and Fulvestrant
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 631 participants
- Where
- 157 sitesin 28 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Apr 2015to 29 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Postmenopausal women with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Participants for whom endocrine therapy (example [e.g.], fulvestrant) is recommended and treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is not indicated at time of entry into the study
- Radiologic/objective evidence of recurrence or progression to the most recent systemic therapy for breast cancer
- Radiologic/objective evidence of breast cancer recurrence or progression while on or within 12 months of the end of adjuvant treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), or progression while on or within 1 month of the end of prior AI treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Measurable disease via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) or non-measurable, evaluable disease with at least one evaluable bone lesion via RECIST v1.1
Show all 9Show fewer
- Consent to provide a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue block (preferred) or a minimum of 20 (25 preferred) freshly cut unstained tumor slides from the most recently collected, available tumor tissue for oncogene that encodes for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PIK3CA)-mutation testing
- A valid cobas PIK3CA mutation result by central testing is required
- Adequate hematologic and end-organ function within 28 days prior to treatment initiation
Who cannot join
- Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease by local laboratory testing (immunohistochemistry 3 positive [IHC 3+] staining or in situ hybridization positive)
- Prior treatment with fulvestrant
- Prior treatment with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (e.g. everolimus), or protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitor
- Prior anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
- Prior radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
- All acute treatment-related toxicity must have resolved to Grade less than or equal to (</=) 1 or be deemed stable by the Investigator
Show all 13Show fewer
- Prior treatment with greater than (>) 1 cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer
- Concurrent hormone replacement therapy
- Known untreated or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring anti-hyperglycemic medications
- History of inflammatory bowel disease or active bowel inflammation
- Clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction
- Clinically significant history of liver disease, including cirrhosis, current alcohol abuse, or current known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or C virus
Trial locations and contacts
157 sites in 28 countries.
157 sites in 28 countries
United States16 sites
Georgia Cancer Specialists - Northside
Atlanta, Georgia, 30341
MSKCC at Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920
Oregon Health & Science University; Knight Cancer Institute, Community Hematology Oncology
Beaverton, Oregon, 97006
Dana Farber Can Ins
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Memorial Sloan-Kettering; Cancer Center
Commack, New York, 11725
John Theurer Cancer Ctr at Hackensack Univ Medical Ctr
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Memorial Sloan Kettering; at Westchester
Harrison, New York, 10604
Ingalls Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of WellStar Cobb Hospital
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Maryland Oncology Hematology
Rochville, Maryland, 20850
Mercy Hospitals East Communities d/b/a Mercy Hospital St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Arizona Oncology
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Arizona Oncology Associates, P.C.
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau
Uniondale, New York, 11553
Spain11 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Clínic i Provincial; Servicio de Hematología y Oncología
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital de Cruces; Servicio de Oncologia
Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48903
Centro Oncologico MD Anderson Internacional; Servicio de Oncologia
Madrid, 28033
Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia
Madrid, 28034
HOSPITAL DE MADRID NORTE SANCHINARRO- CENTRO INTEGRAL ONCOLOGICO CLARA CAMPAL; Servicio de Oncologia
Madrid, 28050
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro; Servicio de Oncologia
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
Hospital Universitario de Canarias;servicio de Oncologia
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, 38320
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS) ; Servicio de Oncologia
Santiago de Compostela, LA Coruña, 15706
Fundación IVO
Valencia, 46980
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Servicio Oncologia
Zaragoza, 50009
France10 sites
Centre Jean Perrin; Hopital De Semaine
Clermont-Ferrand, 63011
Centre Georges François Leclerc; Service Pharmacie, Bp 77980
Dijon, 21000
Hopital Prive Drome Ardeche; Chir 2A 2B
Guilherand-Granges, 07500
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85025
Hopital Dupuytren; Oncologie Medicale
Limoges, 87042
Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier
Montpellier, 34298
Institut Curie; Oncologie Medicale
Paris, 75231
Ch Lyon Sud; Onco Secteur Jules Courmont
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Pole de Cancerologie Prive Strasbourgeois
Strasbourg, 67000
Centre Alexis Vautrin; Oncologie Medicale
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519
Italy10 sites
Centro Catanese Di Oncologia; Oncologia Medica
Catania, Sicily, 95126
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi; SOD Radioterapia
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Per La Ricerca Sul Cancro (IST); Oncologia Medica A
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
Azienda USL 9 Grosseto; Dipartimento Politiche del Farmaco
Grosseto, Tuscany, 58100
AZ. Usll12 Veneziana-Ospedale Dell'angelo;Oncologia Medica
Mestre, Veneto, 30174
Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia
Milan, Lombardy, 20141
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Irccs Fondazione g. PASCALE;U.O.C. Oncologia Medica Senologica
Naples, Campania, 80131
Azienda usl 5 Di Pisa-Ospedale Di Pontedera;U.O. Oncologia
Pontedera, Tuscany, 56025
ARCISPEDALE S. MARIA NUOVA - REGGIO EMILIA; Struttura Semplice Coordinamento Breast Unit Integrata
Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, 42100
A.O. Universitaria S. Maria Della Misericordia Di Udine; Oncologia
Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33100
Poland10 sites
Bialostockie Centrum Onkologii; Oddzial Onkologii Klinicznej
Bialystok, 15-027
Centrum Onkologii w Bydgoszczy; Oddzial Kliniczny Onkologii
Bydgoszcz, 85-796
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii
Gdansk, 80-214
Przychodnia Lekarska KOMED, Roman Karaszewski
Konin, 62-500
Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie, Oddział Kliniczny Kliniki Onkologii
Krakow, 30-688
Woj.Wielospecjalistyczne Centrum Onkologii i Traumatologii; Oddz.Hematologii Pododz.Chemioterapii
Lodz, 93-513
Centrum Onkologii Ziemi LUBELSKIEJ im. Sw Jana z Dukli, I oddz. Chemioterapii
Lublin, 20-090
Zachodniopomorskie Centrum Onkologii, Osrodek Innowacyjnosci, Rozwoju i Badan Klinicznych
Szczecin, 71-730
Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie Klinika Nowotworów Piersi i Chirurgii
Warsaw, 02-781
Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny; Osrodek Badawczo-Rozwojowy, Oddzial Chemioterapii
Wroclaw, 51-124
South Korea9 sites
Inje university Haeundae Paik Hospital
Busan, 48108
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si, 28644
National Cancer Center
Goyang-si, 10408
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, 02841
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
Ulsan University Hosiptal
Ulsan, 44033
Australia7 sites
Mater Hospital; Oncology
Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Austin Hospital; Medical Oncology
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Liverpool Hospital; Cancer Therapy Centre
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
Macquarie University Hospital
Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109
St John of God Murdoch Hospital; Oncology West
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Sunshine Hospital; Oncology Research
St Albans, Victoria
Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital; Oncology
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
Canada7 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Grand River Hospital
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3
McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre; Oncology
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Hospital Du Saint-Sacrement
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
British Columbia Cancer Agency (Bcca) - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Germany7 sites
Hochwaldkrankenhaus; Abt.Gynäkologie Geburtshilfe u.Senologie
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen / Brustzentrum (Dres. Kittel/Klare)
Berlin, 10367
Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm
Berlin, 10707
Universitätsklinikum Essen; Zentrum Für Frauenheilkunde
Essen, 45122
Kooperatives Mammazentrum Hamburg Krankenhaus Jerusalem
Hamburg, 20357
Klinikum der Universität München; Frauenklinik - Onkologie II
München, 80337
Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen, Innere Medizin I
Trier, 54290
Greece6 sites
Alexandras General Hospital of Athens; Oncology Department
Athens, 115 28
IASO General Hospital of Athens
Athens, 155 62
Univ General Hosp Heraklion; Medical Oncology
Heraklion, 711 10
University Hospital of Patras Medical Oncology
Pátrai, 265 04
Euromedical General Clinic of Thessaloniki; Oncology Department
Thessaloniki, 546450
Papageorgiou General Hospital; Medical Oncology
Thessaloniki, 564 29
Russia6 sites
Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary; Surgery Dept, Thoracic
Arkhangelsk, 163045
Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary
Ivanovo, 153040
Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health of Tatarstan
Kazan', 420029
Moscow City Oncology Hospital #62
Moscovskaya Oblast, Moscow Oblast, 143423
State Inst. Of Healthcare Orenburg Regional Clinical Oncology Dis
Orenburg, 460021
S-Pb clinical scientific practical center of specialized kinds of medical care (oncological)
Saint Petersburg, 197758
China5 sites
the First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 130021
Jilin Cancer Hospital
Changchun, 132013
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital
Nanjing, 211100
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, 200120
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Zhejiang, 310022
Mexico5 sites
Iem-Fucam
D.F., 04980
Instituto Nacional De Cancerologia; Oncology; Tumores Mamarios
Distrito Federal, 14000
Consultorio de Medicina Especializada; Dentro de Condominio San Francisco
Mexico City, 03100
Hospital San Jose Del Tec. de Monterrey; Oncology
Monterrey, 64020
Oaxaca Site Management Organization
Oaxaca City, 68000
Portugal5 sites
Hospital Garcia de Orta; Servico de Oncologia Medica
Almada, 2801-951
IPO de Lisboa; Servico de Oncologia Medica
Lisbon, 1099-023
Hospital da Luz; Departamento de Oncologia Medica
Lisbon, 1500-650
Hospital de Santa Maria; Servico de Oncologia Medica
Lisbon, 1649-035
IPO do Porto; Servico de Oncologia Medica
Porto, 4200-072
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Baskent University Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Practice and Research Hospital; Medical Oncology
Adana, 01230
Trakya University Medical Faculty Research And Practice Hospital Medical Oncology Department
Edirne, 22770
Istanbul Uni Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital; Medical Oncology
Istanbul, 34300
Ege Uni Medical Faculty; Oncology Dept
Izmir, 35100
Hacettepe Uni Medical Faculty Hospital; Oncology Dept
Sihhiye/Ankara, 06230
Austria4 sites
Lkh-Univ. Klinikum Graz; Klinik Für Innere Medizin I
Graz, 8036
Tiroler Landeskrankenanstalten Ges.M.B.H.; Abt. Für Gynäkologie
Innsbruck, 6020
Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern; Abt. fur Innere Medizin 1
Linz, 4010
Medizinische Universität Wien; Univ.Klinik für Innere Medizin I
Vienna, 1090
Bulgaria4 sites
Complex Oncological Center - Plovdiv, EOOD
Plovdiv, 4004
MHAT Nadezhda
Sofia, 1330
SHATO - Sofia
Sofia, 1756
SHATOD Dr. Marko Antonov Markov-Varna, EOOD
Varna, 9010
Peru4 sites
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas
Lima, Lima 34
Clinica Internacional, Sede San Borja; Unidad de Investigacion de Clínica Internacional
Lima, Lima 41
Oncocenter Peru S.A.C.; Oncosalud
Lima, Lima 41
Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas - IREN Norte
Trujillo, 13014
Romania4 sites
Institut of Oncology Al. Trestioreanu Bucharest; Oncology Department
Bucharest, 022328
Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
Cluj-Napoca, 400015
Oncology Center Sf. Nectarie
Craiova, 200347
Euroclinic Center of Oncology SRL
Iași, 700106
Taiwan4 sites
VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL; Department of General Surgery
Taipei, 00112
National Taiwan Uni Hospital; General Surgery
Taipei, 100
Mackay Memorial Hospital; Dept of Surgery
Taipei, 104
Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center; Hemato-Oncology
Taipei, 11259
Czechia3 sites
University Hospital; Oncology and Radiotherapy
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc; Onkologicka klinika
Olomouc, 779 00
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
Prague, 128 08
Sweden3 sites
Uni Hospital Linkoeping; Dept. of Oncology
Linköping, 58185
Sodersjukhuset; Onkologkliniken
Stockholm, 118 83
Akademiska sjukhuset, Onkologkliniken
Uppsala, 751 85
Thailand3 sites
Department of Surgery, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, 10330
Ramathibodi Hospital; Dept of Med.-Div. of Med. Onc
Bangkok, 10400
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital; Department of Surgery/Head Neck and Breast Unit; Clinical Trial
Chiang Mai, 50200
Bosnia and Herzegovina2 sites
University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska
Banja Luka, 78000
Clinic of Oncology, University Clinical Center Sarajevo
Sarajevo, 7100
Colombia2 sites
Clinica del Country
Bogotá, 11001
Oncomedica S.A.
Montería, 230002
Finland2 sites
KYS Sadesairaala; Syopatautien poliklinikka
Kuopio, 70210
Turku Uni Central Hospital; Oncology Clinics
Turku, 20520
Netherlands2 sites
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar, 1815 JD
Ziekenhuis Rijnstate
Arnhem, 6815 AD
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Taselisib Plus Fulvestrant Versus Placebo Plus Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Disease Recurrence or Progression During or After Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of taselisib + fulvestrant with that of placebo + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, oncogene that encodes for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PIK3CA)-mutant, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after recurrence or progression during or after an aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. There will be a 2:1 randomization to the taselisib arm versus the placebo arm. Enrollment will be enriched for participants with PIK3CA mutant tumors via central testing. The anticipated duration of the study is approximately 3.5 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Taselisib, Placebo, Fulvestrant
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TaselisibDrug
Also called GDC-0032, RO5537381
Taselisib 4 mg was administered as two tablets of 2 mg each as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching to taselisib was administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
FulvestrantDrug
Also called Faslodex
Fulvestrant 500 mg was administered as two IM injections of 250 mg each as per the schedule specified in the respective arms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Taselisib + Fulvestrant | Experimental | Participants received taselisib 4 milligrams (mg) taken orally QD beginning at Cycle 1, Day 1 and fulvestrant 500 mg by IM injection at Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination by the Sponsor. Receives: Drug: Taselisib; Drug: Fulvestrant |
| Placebo + Fulvestrant | Placebo comparator | Participants received placebo taken orally once daily (QD) beginning at Cycle 1, Day 1, and fulvestrant 500 mg administered by intramuscular (IM) injection at Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination by the Sponsor. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Fulvestrant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) at Primary Analysis
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
PFS as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Secondary outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Partial Response [PR] Plus Complete Response [CR]), as Assessed Using RECIST v.1.1 at Primary Analysis
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions).
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (PR Plus CR), as Assessed Using RECIST v.1.1 at Final Analysis
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions).
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: From randomization up to death from any cause (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
OS at Final Analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: From randomization up to death from any cause (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit, as Assessed According to RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
Clinical benefit was defined as objective response (PR+CR), or no disease progression lasting for more than or equal to (>/=) 24 weeks since randomization. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions). Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit, as Assessed According to RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Clinical benefit was defined as objective response (PR+CR), or no disease progression lasting for more than or equal to (>/=) 24 weeks since randomization. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions). Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
Duration of objective response: the time from the first tumor assessment that supported the participant's objective response (CR or PR, whichever was first recorded) to first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Disease progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: Time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Duration of objective response: the time from the first tumor assessment that supported the participant's objective response (CR or PR, whichever was first recorded) to first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker levels (as applicable to non-target lesions). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Disease progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: Time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
PFS as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Using RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by BICR with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
PFS as Assessed by BICR Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by BICR with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Measured: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events at Primary Analysis
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution.
Measured: From randomization up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events at Final Analysis
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution.
Measured: From randomization up to approximately 6.2 years
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Taselisib
Measured: 1 to 4 hours (hrs) post-dose on Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose and 2 to 6 hrs post dose on Cycle 2, Day 1 (each cycle=28 days)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Taselisib
Measured: 1 to 4 hrs post-dose on Cycle 1, Day 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose and 2 to 6 hrs post dose on Cycle 2, Day 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose on Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle=28 days)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions that comprise aspects of participant's functioning assessment (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social); symptom scales (fatigue; nausea, vomiting, and pain; the global health/quality of life [QoL]); and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties), within a recall period of "the past week." Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much; two questions used a 7-point scale (1=Very poor to 7=Excellent). Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning; a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, C2D1 up to C7D1 (each cycle=28 days)
Change From Baseline in Modified EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module 23 (QLQ-BR23) Score
EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of functional scales (body image, sexual enjoyment, sexual functioning, future perspective [FP]) and symptom scales (systemic side effects [SE], upset by hair loss, arm symptoms, breast symptoms). Questions used a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the functional scales indicated a higher/better level of functioning/healthy functioning. Higher scores for the symptom scales indicated worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, C2D1 up to C7D1 (each cycle=28 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start9 Apr 2015
- Primary completion29 Jun 2021
- Study completion29 Jun 2021
Why it stopped: The Sponsor discontinued the manufacturing and development of taselisib due to modest clinical benefit and limited tolerability.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 631 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02340221
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GO29058
- Other IDs
- 2014-003185-25, 2014
- Acronym
- SANDPIPER
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Moein A, Jin JY, Wright MR, Wong H. Quantitative characterization of the effects of fulvestrant alone or in combination with taselisib (PI3Kinase inhibitor) on longitudinal tumor growth in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;94(3):421-436. doi: 10.1007/s00280-024-04690-4. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
PubMed 38937298Dent S, Cortes J, Im YH, Dieras V, Harbeck N, Krop IE, Wilson TR, Cui N, Schimmoller F, Hsu JY, He J, De Laurentiis M, Sousa S, Drullinsky P, Jacot W. Phase III randomized study of taselisib or placebo with fulvestrant in estrogen receptor-positive, PIK3CA-mutant, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: the SANDPIPER trial. Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.596. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PubMed 33186740
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Taselisib Plus Fulvestrant Versus Placebo Plus Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Disease Recurrence or Progression During or After Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02340221
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SANDPIPER / GO29058
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The Sponsor discontinued the manufacturing and development of taselisib due to modest clinical benefit and limited tolerability.
- Enrolment
- 631 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jan 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This international, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of taselisib + fulvestrant with that of placebo + fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, oncogene that encodes for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PIK3CA)-mutant, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after recurrence or progression during or after an aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. There will be a 2:1 randomization to the taselisib arm versus the placebo arm. Enrollment will be enriched for participants with PIK3CA mutant tumors via central testing. The anticipated duration of the study is approximately 3.5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Taselisib + Fulvestrant | Experimental | Drug: Taselisib, Drug: FulvestrantParticipants received taselisib 4 milligrams (mg) taken orally QD beginning at Cycle 1, Day 1 and fulvestrant 500 mg by IM injection at Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination by the Sponsor. |
| Placebo + Fulvestrant | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: FulvestrantParticipants received placebo taken orally once daily (QD) beginning at Cycle 1, Day 1, and fulvestrant 500 mg administered by intramuscular (IM) injection at Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15, and then on Day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study termination by the Sponsor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Postmenopausal women with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Participants for whom endocrine therapy (example [e.g.], fulvestrant) is recommended and treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is not indicated at time of entry into the study
- Radiologic/objective evidence of recurrence or progression to the most recent systemic therapy for breast cancer
- Radiologic/objective evidence of breast cancer recurrence or progression while on or within 12 months of the end of adjuvant treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), or progression while on or within 1 month of the end of prior AI treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease by local laboratory testing (immunohistochemistry 3 positive [IHC 3+] staining or in situ hybridization positive)
- Prior treatment with fulvestrant
- Prior treatment with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (e.g. everolimus), or protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitor
- Prior anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
- Prior radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TaselisibAlso: GDC-0032, RO5537381Taselisib 4 mg was administered as two tablets of 2 mg each as per the schedule specified in the respective arm. | Drug | Taselisib + Fulvestrant |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching to taselisib was administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm. | Drug | Placebo + Fulvestrant |
| FulvestrantAlso: FaslodexFulvestrant 500 mg was administered as two IM injections of 250 mg each as per the schedule specified in the respective arms. | Drug | Placebo + Fulvestrant, Taselisib + Fulvestrant |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
PFS as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, disease progression was defined as unequivocal progression of existing lesions. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
16 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Partial Response [PR] Plus Complete Response [CR]), as Assessed Using RECIST v.1.1 at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (PR Plus CR), as Assessed Using RECIST v.1.1 at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization up to death from any cause (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
OS at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization up to death from any cause (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit, as Assessed According to RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit, as Assessed According to RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
Duration of Objective Response, as Assessed by Investigator Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Time frame: Time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
PFS as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Using RECIST v1.1 at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)
PFS as Assessed by BICR Using RECIST v1.1 at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to approximately 6.2 years)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events at Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events at Final Analysis
Time frame: From randomization up to approximately 6.2 years
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Taselisib
Time frame: 1 to 4 hours (hrs) post-dose on Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose and 2 to 6 hrs post dose on Cycle 2, Day 1 (each cycle=28 days)
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Taselisib
Time frame: 1 to 4 hrs post-dose on Cycle 1, Day 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose and 2 to 6 hrs post dose on Cycle 2, Day 1; 0 to 3 hrs pre-dose on Cycle 6, Day 1 (each cycle=28 days)
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score
Time frame: Baseline, C2D1 up to C7D1 (each cycle=28 days)
Change From Baseline in Modified EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module 23 (QLQ-BR23) Score
Time frame: Baseline, C2D1 up to C7D1 (each cycle=28 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38937298Moein A, Jin JY, Wright MR, Wong H. Quantitative characterization of the effects of fulvestrant alone or in combination with taselisib (PI3Kinase inhibitor) on longitudinal tumor growth in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;94(3):421-436. doi: 10.1007/s00280-024-04690-4. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33186740Dent S, Cortes J, Im YH, Dieras V, Harbeck N, Krop IE, Wilson TR, Cui N, Schimmoller F, Hsu JY, He J, De Laurentiis M, Sousa S, Drullinsky P, Jacot W. Phase III randomized study of taselisib or placebo with fulvestrant in estrogen receptor-positive, PIK3CA-mutant, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: the SANDPIPER trial. Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.596. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
157 sites in 28 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Taselisib and Fulvestrant in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 157 sites in 28 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 157 sites in United States, Spain, France, Italy, Poland and 23 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) at Primary Analysis (time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier (up to the 15 Oct 2017 data cutoff, approximately 2.5 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02340221, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2022.