AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerHIPPO-SNCT02341170

HS-PCI in Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

A study testing HS-PCI in people with Lung Cancer and Adenocarcinoma, run by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of this study is evaluate the impact of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HS-PCI) on survival status in patients with nodal-positive (locally advanced) adenocarcinoma by comparing overall survival rates of patients undergoing HS-PCI to that of patients without this intervention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis
What is being tested?
HS-PCI
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2016to Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the lung
  • Clinical Stage III with lymph node stage N1-N3
  • Stable disease or any response after definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (defined by local standards)
  • No more than 8 weeks after completion of prior radio(chemo)therapy
  • Any acute/subacute ≥ grade 3 toxicities from previous therapy must have resolved to ≤ grade 2 at the time of study entry
  • Age ≥ 18 years and < 75 years
  • ECOG Performance Status ≤ 1
  • Signed study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.

Who cannot join

  • Stage III with T4 N0
  • Evidence of progressive disease at the time of study entry
  • Brain or leptomeningeal metastases (cMRI not older than 2 weeks)
  • Evidence of extracranial distant metastatic disease
  • Prior cranial irradiation
  • Patients enrolled in other clinical studies that apply or test lung cancer-directed investigational agents/procedures
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with synchronous or prior malignancy, other than non-melanomatous skin cancer unless disease free greater than 3 years
  • Pregnant women are ineligible as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the participant and to the embryo or fetus; patients with childbearing potential must practice appropriate contraception.
  • Patients that are unable to undergo repetitive MRI scans
  • Medical conditions that contra-indicate intensive neurocognitive testing (e.g., history of mental retardation, aphasia of any kind, hearing impairment)

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Trial of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (HS-PCI) in Locally Advanced (Stage IIIA/IIIB) Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

The primary aim of this study is evaluate the impact of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HS-PCI) on survival status in patients with nodal-positive (locally advanced) adenocarcinoma by comparing overall survival rates of patients undergoing HS-PCI to that of patients without this intervention. In addition, this study aims to investigate whether HS-PCI is detrimental on neurocognitive function and to evaluate its impact on the patient's quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have an increased risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases during the course of their disease. The brain is the most common site of failure after first-line therapies (independent of combined sequential or consolidation chemotherapy). Recent studies employing multimodal therapy have reported overall brain metastasis rates ranging from 22% to 55%, and the rates for brain as first site of relapse range from 16% to 43%.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) results in a 2-3 fold lower incidence of brain metastasis. However, randomized studies have failed to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) after PCI.

One of the major weaknesses of these trials is the unselected mixed pool of stage III patients (stage III A and B, lymph node status N0 to N2, squamous and non-squamous histology etc.). A broad variety of studies have shown that a certain subset of patients with NSCLC (e.g. cancers with adenocarcinoma histology, multilevel nodal involvement) are at highest risk for brain metastases. Furthermore, the risk for brain metastases appears to be specifically higher in younger patients (age <60 years), although this collective commonly undergoes more frequently chemotherapy and/or more aggressive regimens than elderly patients.

Prevention of CNS metastases, even for LA-NSCLC patients with other sites of failure, will improve quality of life and, for patients controlled extracranially, will improve survival. Meta analyses performed on data from several Radiation Treatment Oncology Group (RTOG) studies have shown that longer survival for patients with LA-NSCLC treated with either radiation alone or radiochemotherapy is associated with an increased incidence of CNS metastases. Although the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy reduces extracranial distant metastases and improves survival it does not alter brain relapse rates. Even though the addition of modern targeted therapy using small-molecules or antibodies may further improve the outcome, the CNS remains the most common site of failure under targeted therapy, although no evidence for resistance in histological workups of metastases has been found. This emphasizes the urgent need for treatment directed at chemotherapeutically inaccessible (or dormant) micrometastases that are a priori dispersed within the brain. As the median time for relapse in the CNS is approximately 6 months after first-line therapy, the treatment of micrometastases should be meaningfully initiated even during or shortly after first-line therapy.

Irradiation of the brain does not only bear the risk of inducing acute (partially mass-associated) side effects such as nausea, vomiting and fatigue, but also causes long-term neurocognitive deficits. Although neurocognitive disorders after PCI/Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) also have a multifactorial etiology based on a patient's individual medical history (preceding chemotherapy, pre-existing vascular damage e.g. from smoking, local reactions/edema), it is currently believed that they are mostly caused by a loss of neural stem cells in the hippocampal areas. Multipotent and self-renewing neural stem cells are found in the subgranular zone of the adult hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles. The hippocampus plays an important role in memory consolidation and emotional learning (contextual fear conditioning). The disruption of neurogenesis in the subgranular zone or damage to the hippocampus can lead to impaired short- and long-term memory, learning and contextual fear conditioning. In line with this, irradiating the brain decreases neurogenesis in the hippocampus which leads to impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and memory.

To prevent radiation-induced loss of neuronal stem cells, hippocampus-sparing (HS) radiation techniques have been developed and efficacy has been demonstrated in the recently published phase II RTOG 0933 study. The trial included patients with brain metastases and a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of 70%. Following HS-WBRT the patients showed a relative neurocognitive function (NCF) decline of 7% four months after HS-WBRT, which is more than four times less than observed in studies with conventional WBRT (30%; p<0.001).

Since the study was a one-arm study without a control, the reported hippocampal failure rate of 4.5% remains controversially discussed. Multiple studies described the hippocampus and limbic circuit to be a generally rare site of brain metastases in many cancers. NSCLC shows a specifically low rate of hippocampal brain metastasis (2.8% of all brain metastases) and risk modelling revealed a only slightly increased absolute risk (+0.2%) after HS-WBRT. Thus, since in the treatment of NSCLC, the efficient prevention of BM and potential CNS micrometastases is currently outweighed by the associated neurotoxicity and a lack of survival benefit, HS-WBRT may provide a possibility to tip the scale toward prophylactic WBRT, at least for a specific subgroup at high risk.

Radiation regimens for PCI that have influenced patterns of CNS failures in NSCLC have included total doses of 20-36 Gy and fraction sizes of 2-3 Gy. A fraction size of 2 Gy and a total dose of 30 Gy was chosen for the RTOG 0214 study of PCI in LA-NSCLC. This regimen has been shown to decrease CNS metastases from 54% to 13% with no difference in NCF decline in PCI versus non-PCI patients at 4 years. In addition, although there is paucity of clinical data from WBRT with doses in the EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) range of 10-20 Gy, a dose-response curve providing a 'best fit' model suggests an only minimal benefit from doses above 30 Gy (EQD2).

Being tested
HS-PCI
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HS-PCIRadiation

    Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions

Study groups in NCT02341170
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HS-PCIExperimentalHippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions)
Receives: Radiation: HS-PCI
ObservationNo interventionObservation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 1-year overall survival rate

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Incidence of brain metastasis

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Incidence of brain metastases within the hippocampal avoidance volume

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Adverse events

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Neurocognitive function (NCF), measured by Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT)

    Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT)

    Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Index

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Quality of Life (QoL), measured by Quality of Life Questionnaires / core and brain module (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20)

    Quality of Life Questionnaires / core and brain module (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20)

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Activities of Daily Living (ADL), measured by Barthel Index

    Barthel Index

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Lack of Funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02341170
Sponsor's protocol ID
HIPPO-S
Acronym
HIPPO-S
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
7 Jan 2015
Last updated
17 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, Caine C, Corn B, Kanner A, Rowley H, Kundapur V, DeNittis A, Greenspoon JN, Konski AA, Bauman GS, Shah S, Shi W, Wendland M, Kachnic L, Mehta MP. Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3810-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

    PubMed 25349290
  • Ghia A, Tome WA, Thomas S, Cannon G, Khuntia D, Kuo JS, Mehta MP. Distribution of brain metastases in relation to the hippocampus: implications for neurocognitive functional preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

    PubMed 17446005
  • Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L, Siebenlist K, Herskind C, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

    PubMed 24100152
  • Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, Schild SE, Gaspar LE, Bogart JA, Werner-Wasik M, Choy H. Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1609. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

    PubMed 21135270
  • Giordano FA, Welzel G, Abo-Madyan Y, Wenz F. Potential toxicities of prophylactic cranial irradiation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012 Dec;1(4):254-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.03.

    PubMed 25806190

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HS-PCI in people with Lung Cancer and Adenocarcinoma, run by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

1-year overall survival rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02341170, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in