Lung CancerHIPPO-SNCT02341170
HS-PCI in Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
A study testing HS-PCI in people with Lung Cancer and Adenocarcinoma, run by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim.
Trial summary
The primary aim of this study is evaluate the impact of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HS-PCI) on survival status in patients with nodal-positive (locally advanced) adenocarcinoma by comparing overall survival rates of patients undergoing HS-PCI to that of patients without this intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis
- What is being tested?
- HS-PCI
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the lung
- Clinical Stage III with lymph node stage N1-N3
- Stable disease or any response after definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (defined by local standards)
- No more than 8 weeks after completion of prior radio(chemo)therapy
- Any acute/subacute ≥ grade 3 toxicities from previous therapy must have resolved to ≤ grade 2 at the time of study entry
- Age ≥ 18 years and < 75 years
- ECOG Performance Status ≤ 1
- Signed study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- Stage III with T4 N0
- Evidence of progressive disease at the time of study entry
- Brain or leptomeningeal metastases (cMRI not older than 2 weeks)
- Evidence of extracranial distant metastatic disease
- Prior cranial irradiation
- Patients enrolled in other clinical studies that apply or test lung cancer-directed investigational agents/procedures
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients with synchronous or prior malignancy, other than non-melanomatous skin cancer unless disease free greater than 3 years
- Pregnant women are ineligible as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the participant and to the embryo or fetus; patients with childbearing potential must practice appropriate contraception.
- Patients that are unable to undergo repetitive MRI scans
- Medical conditions that contra-indicate intensive neurocognitive testing (e.g., history of mental retardation, aphasia of any kind, hearing impairment)
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Trial of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (HS-PCI) in Locally Advanced (Stage IIIA/IIIB) Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
The primary aim of this study is evaluate the impact of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HS-PCI) on survival status in patients with nodal-positive (locally advanced) adenocarcinoma by comparing overall survival rates of patients undergoing HS-PCI to that of patients without this intervention. In addition, this study aims to investigate whether HS-PCI is detrimental on neurocognitive function and to evaluate its impact on the patient's quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have an increased risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases during the course of their disease. The brain is the most common site of failure after first-line therapies (independent of combined sequential or consolidation chemotherapy). Recent studies employing multimodal therapy have reported overall brain metastasis rates ranging from 22% to 55%, and the rates for brain as first site of relapse range from 16% to 43%.
Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) results in a 2-3 fold lower incidence of brain metastasis. However, randomized studies have failed to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) after PCI.
One of the major weaknesses of these trials is the unselected mixed pool of stage III patients (stage III A and B, lymph node status N0 to N2, squamous and non-squamous histology etc.). A broad variety of studies have shown that a certain subset of patients with NSCLC (e.g. cancers with adenocarcinoma histology, multilevel nodal involvement) are at highest risk for brain metastases. Furthermore, the risk for brain metastases appears to be specifically higher in younger patients (age <60 years), although this collective commonly undergoes more frequently chemotherapy and/or more aggressive regimens than elderly patients.
Prevention of CNS metastases, even for LA-NSCLC patients with other sites of failure, will improve quality of life and, for patients controlled extracranially, will improve survival. Meta analyses performed on data from several Radiation Treatment Oncology Group (RTOG) studies have shown that longer survival for patients with LA-NSCLC treated with either radiation alone or radiochemotherapy is associated with an increased incidence of CNS metastases. Although the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy reduces extracranial distant metastases and improves survival it does not alter brain relapse rates. Even though the addition of modern targeted therapy using small-molecules or antibodies may further improve the outcome, the CNS remains the most common site of failure under targeted therapy, although no evidence for resistance in histological workups of metastases has been found. This emphasizes the urgent need for treatment directed at chemotherapeutically inaccessible (or dormant) micrometastases that are a priori dispersed within the brain. As the median time for relapse in the CNS is approximately 6 months after first-line therapy, the treatment of micrometastases should be meaningfully initiated even during or shortly after first-line therapy.
Irradiation of the brain does not only bear the risk of inducing acute (partially mass-associated) side effects such as nausea, vomiting and fatigue, but also causes long-term neurocognitive deficits. Although neurocognitive disorders after PCI/Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) also have a multifactorial etiology based on a patient's individual medical history (preceding chemotherapy, pre-existing vascular damage e.g. from smoking, local reactions/edema), it is currently believed that they are mostly caused by a loss of neural stem cells in the hippocampal areas. Multipotent and self-renewing neural stem cells are found in the subgranular zone of the adult hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles. The hippocampus plays an important role in memory consolidation and emotional learning (contextual fear conditioning). The disruption of neurogenesis in the subgranular zone or damage to the hippocampus can lead to impaired short- and long-term memory, learning and contextual fear conditioning. In line with this, irradiating the brain decreases neurogenesis in the hippocampus which leads to impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and memory.
To prevent radiation-induced loss of neuronal stem cells, hippocampus-sparing (HS) radiation techniques have been developed and efficacy has been demonstrated in the recently published phase II RTOG 0933 study. The trial included patients with brain metastases and a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of 70%. Following HS-WBRT the patients showed a relative neurocognitive function (NCF) decline of 7% four months after HS-WBRT, which is more than four times less than observed in studies with conventional WBRT (30%; p<0.001).
Since the study was a one-arm study without a control, the reported hippocampal failure rate of 4.5% remains controversially discussed. Multiple studies described the hippocampus and limbic circuit to be a generally rare site of brain metastases in many cancers. NSCLC shows a specifically low rate of hippocampal brain metastasis (2.8% of all brain metastases) and risk modelling revealed a only slightly increased absolute risk (+0.2%) after HS-WBRT. Thus, since in the treatment of NSCLC, the efficient prevention of BM and potential CNS micrometastases is currently outweighed by the associated neurotoxicity and a lack of survival benefit, HS-WBRT may provide a possibility to tip the scale toward prophylactic WBRT, at least for a specific subgroup at high risk.
Radiation regimens for PCI that have influenced patterns of CNS failures in NSCLC have included total doses of 20-36 Gy and fraction sizes of 2-3 Gy. A fraction size of 2 Gy and a total dose of 30 Gy was chosen for the RTOG 0214 study of PCI in LA-NSCLC. This regimen has been shown to decrease CNS metastases from 54% to 13% with no difference in NCF decline in PCI versus non-PCI patients at 4 years. In addition, although there is paucity of clinical data from WBRT with doses in the EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) range of 10-20 Gy, a dose-response curve providing a 'best fit' model suggests an only minimal benefit from doses above 30 Gy (EQD2).
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis
- Being tested
- HS-PCI
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HS-PCIRadiation
Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HS-PCI | Experimental | Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions) Receives: Radiation: HS-PCI |
| Observation | No intervention | Observation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1-year overall survival rate
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (8)
Overall survival (OS)
Measured: 1 year
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of brain metastasis
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of brain metastases within the hippocampal avoidance volume
Measured: 1 year
Adverse events
Measured: 1 year
Neurocognitive function (NCF), measured by Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT)
Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT)
Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Index
Measured: 1 year
Quality of Life (QoL), measured by Quality of Life Questionnaires / core and brain module (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20)
Quality of Life Questionnaires / core and brain module (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20)
Measured: 1 year
Activities of Daily Living (ADL), measured by Barthel Index
Barthel Index
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionMar 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2019 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Lack of Funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frederik Wenz, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
- Investigators
- Frederik Wenz, MD, Study chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre MannheimFrank A. Giordano, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02341170
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HIPPO-S
- Acronym
- HIPPO-S
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, Caine C, Corn B, Kanner A, Rowley H, Kundapur V, DeNittis A, Greenspoon JN, Konski AA, Bauman GS, Shah S, Shi W, Wendland M, Kachnic L, Mehta MP. Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3810-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
PubMed 25349290Ghia A, Tome WA, Thomas S, Cannon G, Khuntia D, Kuo JS, Mehta MP. Distribution of brain metastases in relation to the hippocampus: implications for neurocognitive functional preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
PubMed 17446005Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L, Siebenlist K, Herskind C, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PubMed 24100152Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, Schild SE, Gaspar LE, Bogart JA, Werner-Wasik M, Choy H. Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1609. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
PubMed 21135270Giordano FA, Welzel G, Abo-Madyan Y, Wenz F. Potential toxicities of prophylactic cranial irradiation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012 Dec;1(4):254-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.03.
PubMed 25806190
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Trial of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (HS-PCI) in Locally Advanced (Stage IIIA/IIIB) Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02341170
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HIPPO-S / HIPPO-S
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Adenocarcinoma, Lymphatic Metastasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of Funding
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsmedizin MannheimUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim of this study is evaluate the impact of hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (HS-PCI) on survival status in patients with nodal-positive (locally advanced) adenocarcinoma by comparing overall survival rates of patients undergoing HS-PCI to that of patients without this intervention. In addition, this study aims to investigate whether HS-PCI is detrimental on neurocognitive function and to evaluate its impact on the patient's quality of life.
Detailed description
Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have an increased risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases during the course of their disease. The brain is the most common site of failure after first-line therapies (independent of combined sequential or consolidation chemotherapy). Recent studies employing multimodal therapy have reported overall brain metastasis rates ranging from 22% to 55%, and the rates for brain as first site of relapse range from 16% to 43%.
Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) results in a 2-3 fold lower incidence of brain metastasis. However, randomized studies have failed to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) after PCI.
One of the major weaknesses of these trials is the unselected mixed pool of stage III patients (stage III A and B, lymph node status N0 to N2, squamous and non-squamous histology etc.). A broad variety of studies have shown that a certain subset of patients with NSCLC (e.g. cancers with adenocarcinoma histology, multilevel nodal involvement) are at highest risk for brain metastases. Furthermore, the risk for brain metastases appears to be specifically higher in younger patients (age <60 years), although this collective commonly undergoes more frequently chemotherapy and/or more aggressive regimens than elderly patients.
Prevention of CNS metastases, even for LA-NSCLC patients with other sites of failure, will improve quality of life and, for patients controlled extracranially, will improve survival. Meta analyses performed on data from several Radiation Treatment Oncology Group (RTOG) studies have shown that longer survival for patients with LA-NSCLC treated with either radiation alone or radiochemotherapy is associated with an increased incidence of CNS metastases. Although the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy reduces extracranial distant metastases and improves survival it does not alter brain relapse rates. Even though the addition of modern targeted therapy using small-molecules or antibodies may further improve the outcome, the CNS remains the most common site of failure under targeted therapy, although no evidence for resistance in histological workups of metastases has been found. This emphasizes the urgent need for treatment directed at chemotherapeutically inaccessible (or dormant) micrometastases that are a priori dispersed within the brain. As the median time for relapse in the CNS is approximately 6 months after first-line therapy, the treatment of micrometastases should be meaningfully initiated even during or shortly after first-line therapy.
Irradiation of the brain does not only bear the risk of inducing acute (partially mass-associated) side effects such as nausea, vomiting and fatigue, but also causes long-term neurocognitive deficits. Although neurocognitive disorders after PCI/Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) also have a multifactorial etiology based on a patient's individual medical history (preceding chemotherapy, pre-existing vascular damage e.g. from smoking, local reactions/edema), it is currently believed that they are mostly caused by a loss of neural stem cells in the hippocampal areas. Multipotent and self-renewing neural stem cells are found in the subgranular zone of the adult hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles. The hippocampus plays an important role in memory consolidation and emotional learning (contextual fear conditioning). The disruption of neurogenesis in the subgranular zone or damage to the hippocampus can lead to impaired short- and long-term memory, learning and contextual fear conditioning. In line with this, irradiating the brain decreases neurogenesis in the hippocampus which leads to impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and memory.
To prevent radiation-induced loss of neuronal stem cells, hippocampus-sparing (HS) radiation techniques have been developed and efficacy has been demonstrated in the recently published phase II RTOG 0933 study. The trial included patients with brain metastases and a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of 70%. Following HS-WBRT the patients showed a relative neurocognitive function (NCF) decline of 7% four months after HS-WBRT, which is more than four times less than observed in studies with conventional WBRT (30%; p<0.001).
Since the study was a one-arm study without a control, the reported hippocampal failure rate of 4.5% remains controversially discussed. Multiple studies described the hippocampus and limbic circuit to be a generally rare site of brain metastases in many cancers. NSCLC shows a specifically low rate of hippocampal brain metastasis (2.8% of all brain metastases) and risk modelling revealed a only slightly increased absolute risk (+0.2%) after HS-WBRT. Thus, since in the treatment of NSCLC, the efficient prevention of BM and potential CNS micrometastases is currently outweighed by the associated neurotoxicity and a lack of survival benefit, HS-WBRT may provide a possibility to tip the scale toward prophylactic WBRT, at least for a specific subgroup at high risk.
Radiation regimens for PCI that have influenced patterns of CNS failures in NSCLC have included total doses of 20-36 Gy and fraction sizes of 2-3 Gy. A fraction size of 2 Gy and a total dose of 30 Gy was chosen for the RTOG 0214 study of PCI in LA-NSCLC. This regimen has been shown to decrease CNS metastases from 54% to 13% with no difference in NCF decline in PCI versus non-PCI patients at 4 years. In addition, although there is paucity of clinical data from WBRT with doses in the EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) range of 10-20 Gy, a dose-response curve providing a 'best fit' model suggests an only minimal benefit from doses above 30 Gy (EQD2).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HS-PCI | Experimental | Radiation: HS-PCIHippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions) |
| Observation | No intervention | –Observation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the lung
- Clinical Stage III with lymph node stage N1-N3
- Stable disease or any response after definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (defined by local standards)
- No more than 8 weeks after completion of prior radio(chemo)therapy
- Any acute/subacute ≥ grade 3 toxicities from previous therapy must have resolved to ≤ grade 2 at the time of study entry
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Stage III with T4 N0
- Evidence of progressive disease at the time of study entry
- Brain or leptomeningeal metastases (cMRI not older than 2 weeks)
- Evidence of extracranial distant metastatic disease
- Prior cranial irradiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HS-PCIHippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions | Radiation | HS-PCI |
Primary outcome
1-year overall survival rate
Time frame: 1 year
8 secondary outcomes
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 1 year
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of brain metastasis
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of brain metastases within the hippocampal avoidance volume
Time frame: 1 year
Adverse events
Time frame: 1 year
Neurocognitive function (NCF), measured by Verbal Learning Memory Test (VLMT)
Time frame: 1 year
Quality of Life (QoL), measured by Quality of Life Questionnaires / core and brain module (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20)
Time frame: 1 year
Activities of Daily Living (ADL), measured by Barthel Index
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 25349290Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, Caine C, Corn B, Kanner A, Rowley H, Kundapur V, DeNittis A, Greenspoon JN, Konski AA, Bauman GS, Shah S, Shi W, Wendland M, Kachnic L, Mehta MP. Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3810-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
- Background: PubMed 17446005Ghia A, Tome WA, Thomas S, Cannon G, Khuntia D, Kuo JS, Mehta MP. Distribution of brain metastases in relation to the hippocampus: implications for neurocognitive functional preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 24100152Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L, Siebenlist K, Herskind C, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 21135270Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, Schild SE, Gaspar LE, Bogart JA, Werner-Wasik M, Choy H. Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1609. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 25806190Giordano FA, Welzel G, Abo-Madyan Y, Wenz F. Potential toxicities of prophylactic cranial irradiation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012 Dec;1(4):254-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.03.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frederik Wenz, MD study chair
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim
Frank A. Giordano, MD principal investigator
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HS-PCI in people with Lung Cancer and Adenocarcinoma, run by Universitätsmedizin Mannheim.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1-year overall survival rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02341170, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.