ArrythmiaCARATNCT02341768
Clinical and Device Functional Assessment of Real World ICD Patients
An observational study of Arrythmia and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, run by MicroPort CRM at 102 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The primary requirement of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is to preserve life by terminating life-threatening arrhythmias (VT/VF). The treatment options vary in terms of techniques and medical devices, based on the patient's condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arrythmia, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
- What is being tested?
- ICD
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 2,056 participants
- Where
- 102 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to 26 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The aim of this study is to include all patients from a global "real world" (standard of care) population at participating centers and will reference the indication and the contra-indications specified in the guidelines and IFUs.
Who may be able to join
- Patient Implanted (first implant, replacement, upgrade) with a Sorin Group ICD/CRT-D device, according to current available guidelines and IFU
- Signed and dated informed consent (in accordance to local regulation)
Who cannot join
- Already included in another clinical study that could confound the results of this study
- Not available for routine follow-up visits
- Minor age
- Drug addiction or abuse
Trial locations and contacts
102 sites in 12 countries.
102 sites in 12 countries
France32 sites
CHU Angers
Angers
CH Annecy Genevois
Annecy
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux
CHU de Brest
Brest
CHU de Caen
Caen
H.I.A Percy
Clamart
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble
CH de Marne la Vallée
Jossigny
Hôpital Louis Pasteur
Le Coudray
CHRU de Lille
Lille
CH St Joseph St Luc
Lyon
Hôpital la Timone
Marseille
Hôpital Nord Marseille
Marseille
Hôpital Jacques Cartier
Massy
CHU A de Villeneuve
Montpellier
Clinique du Millénaire
Montpellier
CHRU de Nancy
Nancy
CHU de Nantes
Nantes
Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises
Nantes
CHU de Nimes
Nîmes
HEGP
Paris
La Pitié Salpétrière
Paris
CHU François Mitterand
Pau
CH Perpignan
Perpignan
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers
CHRU de Pontchaillou
Rennes
CHRU de Rouen
Rouen
CHU de Valence
Valence
CH de Villefranche sur Saone
Villefranche-sur-Saône
Germany15 sites
Kardiologische Praxis
Altentreptow
HGZ Bad Bevensen
Bad Bevensen
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum
Bad Oeynhausen
Evangelisches Krankenhaus
Bielefeld
Universitatskliniken
Bonn
Kardiologie Darmstadt
Darmstadt
Universitatskliniken Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf
Albertinen-Krankenhaus
Hamburg
Cardiologicum Hamburg
Hamburg
Universität Kiel
Kiel
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig Holstein
Lübeck
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg
Magdeburg
Kardiologische Praxis
Markkleeberg
Dietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum
Neubrandenburg
Universitatsklinikum
Würzburg
Italy11 sites
Ospedale Garibaldi Centro
Catania
Ospedale Pol SS Annunziata
Chieti
Presidio Ospedaliero di Chioggia
Chioggia
Ospital San Luca
Lucca
Ospedale Civile
Mirano
Osp S Giovanni Bosco
Naples
Ospedale Cardarelli
Naples
Ospedale Policlinico Federico II
Naples
Policlinico Casilino
Rome
Osp. G. Mazzini
Teramo
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
Trieste
Spain11 sites
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
Granada
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
Majadahonda
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga
Hospital Central de Asturias
Oviedo
Hospital Son Llàtzer
Palma de Mallorca
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario
Santiago de Compostela
H.U La Fe
Valencia
CHU de Vigo
Vigo
United Kingdom10 sites
Barnet General Hospital
Barnet
Edgbaston
Birmingham
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge
Dorget County Hospital
Dorchester
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh
Wye Valley NHS Trust
Hereford
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester
King's College Hospital
London
Northampton General Hospital
Northampton
Northern General Hospital
Sheffield
Canada6 sites
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton
HDM (CHUM) Montreal
Montreal
HSCM Montreal
Montreal
IUCPQ Quebec
Québec
Sherbrooke
Québec
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center
Toronto, Ontario
Austria4 sites
LKH Feldkirch
Feldkirchen bei Mattighofen
LKH Innsbruck
Innsbruck
Kepler Universitatsklinikum GmbH
Linz
LKH St. Polten
Pölten
Portugal4 sites
Hospital Garcia de Orta
Almada
Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca
Amadora
CHLC Hospital de Santa Marta
Lisbon
H. Santa Maria
Lisbon
Czechia3 sites
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
Brno
Fakultni Nemocnice U svaté Anny v Brno
Brno
Fakultni Nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc
Slovakia3 sites
Susch Hospital
Banská Bystrica
Nusch Hospital
Bratislava
Vusch Hospital
Košice
About this study
The primary requirement of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is to preserve life by terminating life-threatening arrhythmias (VT/VF). The treatment options vary in terms of techniques and medical devices, based on the patient's condition.
It is extremely important in the clinical practice to identify which patients' subgroup benefits the most from the ICD therapy, which comorbidity has a major impact on the patients' prognosis, or which pre-intra-post procedural behaviors provoke less complications, and affect the patient's outcome (including prolonged or unwanted hospitalizations).
Read the detailed description
For these reasons, it is very important to observe the clinical practice on a large variety of centers and countries, with the objective to collect long term safety and performance data in patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D device implantation (first implant, replacement or upgrade).
The safety and performance of the ICDs can be evaluated through the collection of multiple parameters such as, but not limited to:
- Clinical parameters, like patient demographics and history, procedural and hospital discharge data, as well as the short and long term serious adverse events (death and hospitalization)
- Device parameters, such as delivered shocks, ATP, or other device therapies
Worldwide selected centers will be invited to participate in this prospective study and include their "real-world" patients treated with Sorin Group commercially available ICDs and CRT-Ds devices.
- Conditions
- Arrythmia, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
- Being tested
- ICD
- Keywords
- clinical and device functional information, "real world" ICD patient population
- Medical subject headings
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ICDDevice
ICD single, dual or triple chamber, upgrade, replacement or primo implant
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate clinical and device functional information from "real world" ICD patient population following standard of care at participating centers w/in the different participating countries (Incidence of all death, device,cardiac related hospitalization)
Incidence of all death, device and/or cardiac related hospitalization at 24 months post implant
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Serious procedural complications or other SAE at implantation or hospital discharge. The data analyzed are those collected from the day of implantation to the day of hospital discharge, with an expected average of 1 week.
as reported by the sites on the AE eCRF
Measured: at implantation or hospital discharge
The incidence of all death, device and/or cardiac related hospitalization at 12 months post implant (evaluated with a survival curve)
as reported by the sites with AE
Measured: at 12 months
The predictors of mortality and cardiac related hospitalization at 12 and 24 months
as reported by the sites with AE and medical history information
Measured: at 12 and 24 months
The predictors of appropriate or inappropriate therapies (ATP and shocks) at 12 and 24 months, as verified by a dedicated committee
based on therapies delivered recorder on device file, and verified by a dedicated committee
Measured: at 12 and 24 months
The evolution of the indication for implant according to guideline (based on the patient's medical history and reason for implant as reported by the investigators)
based on the patient's medical history and reason for implant as reported by the investigators
Measured: at implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completion26 Nov 2019
- Study completion26 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ArrythmiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,056 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MicroPort CRM
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Javier Moreno, Dr, Principal investigator, Hospital Ramón y Cajal Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02341768
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTSY03
- Acronym
- CARAT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Device Functional Assessment of Real World ICD Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02341768
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARAT / RTSY03
- Conditions
- Arrythmia, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
- Keywords
- clinical and device functional information, "real world" ICD patient population
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,056 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MicroPort CRMIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary requirement of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is to preserve life by terminating life-threatening arrhythmias (VT/VF). The treatment options vary in terms of techniques and medical devices, based on the patient's condition.
It is extremely important in the clinical practice to identify which patients' subgroup benefits the most from the ICD therapy, which comorbidity has a major impact on the patients' prognosis, or which pre-intra-post procedural behaviors provoke less complications, and affect the patient's outcome (including prolonged or unwanted hospitalizations).
Detailed description
For these reasons, it is very important to observe the clinical practice on a large variety of centers and countries, with the objective to collect long term safety and performance data in patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D device implantation (first implant, replacement or upgrade).
The safety and performance of the ICDs can be evaluated through the collection of multiple parameters such as, but not limited to:
- Clinical parameters, like patient demographics and history, procedural and hospital discharge data, as well as the short and long term serious adverse events (death and hospitalization)
- Device parameters, such as delivered shocks, ATP, or other device therapies
Worldwide selected centers will be invited to participate in this prospective study and include their "real-world" patients treated with Sorin Group commercially available ICDs and CRT-Ds devices.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The aim of this study is to include all patients from a global "real world" (standard of care) population at participating centers and will reference the indication and the contra-indications specified in the guidelines and IFUs.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient Implanted (first implant, replacement, upgrade) with a Sorin Group ICD/CRT-D device, according to current available guidelines and IFU
- Signed and dated informed consent (in accordance to local regulation)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Already included in another clinical study that could confound the results of this study
- Not available for routine follow-up visits
- Minor age
- Drug addiction or abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ICDICD single, dual or triple chamber, upgrade, replacement or primo implant | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Evaluate clinical and device functional information from "real world" ICD patient population following standard of care at participating centers w/in the different participating countries (Incidence of all death, device,cardiac related hospitalization)
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of all death, device and/or cardiac related hospitalization at 24 months post implant
5 secondary outcomes
Serious procedural complications or other SAE at implantation or hospital discharge. The data analyzed are those collected from the day of implantation to the day of hospital discharge, with an expected average of 1 week.
Time frame: at implantation or hospital discharge
The incidence of all death, device and/or cardiac related hospitalization at 12 months post implant (evaluated with a survival curve)
Time frame: at 12 months
The predictors of mortality and cardiac related hospitalization at 12 and 24 months
Time frame: at 12 and 24 months
The predictors of appropriate or inappropriate therapies (ATP and shocks) at 12 and 24 months, as verified by a dedicated committee
Time frame: at 12 and 24 months
The evolution of the indication for implant according to guideline (based on the patient's medical history and reason for implant as reported by the investigators)
Time frame: at implant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2020.
Related trials for Arrythmia
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Enrolling by invitation
EDEN Intracardiac Electrogram Recording and Classifying System
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Javier Moreno, Dr principal investigator
Hospital Ramón y Cajal Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
102 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arrythmia and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, run by MicroPort CRM at 102 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 102 sites in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate clinical and device functional information from "real world" ICD patient population following standard of care at participating centers w/in the different participating countries (Incidence of all death, device,cardiac related hospitalization) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2020.