AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT02341976

Whole Body Vibration Training for Pelvic Floor Muscle

A study testing Vibratory platform exercises in people with Healthy, run by University of Minnesota.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study which position on the whole body vibrator machine would stimulate the pelvic floor muscles. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Vibratory platform exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2015to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women over 18 years of age

Who cannot join

  • Criteria exclusion like unhealthy condition, acute thrombosis, acute inflammations, implants, fractures, acute tendinopathies, kidney or bladder stones, gallstones, lung disease, heart disease, skin disease, hypertension, any medication or disease known to affect muscle mass or strength and pregnant will be evaluated

About this study

Official title: Study of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Urinary Sphincter Activity by Electromyography During Whole Body Vibration Training

To study which position on the whole body vibrator machine would stimulate the pelvic floor muscles.

Read the detailed description

Urinary incontinence is a common problem due to a weak pelvic floor muscle associated with decrease quality of life. The vibration exercises have been associated with improvements of the muscle component. Due to this, some researches have proposed that this technique could be applied to weak pelvic floor. However, it is unknown which vibration trainings have the highest impact on the pelvic floor muscle and urinary sphincter, more objectives studies to validate these data are necessary.

The purpose of our research is to evaluate the activity in the urinary sphincter and the pelvic floor muscle by vibratory platform training in women.

Subjects will be recruited, criteria exclusion will be evaluated, age, and BMI will be recorded. Each subject will exercise on the vibratory platform in 3 different positions, each one with 2 different frequencies and 1 minute each position and frequency. Pelvic electromyography (EMG) will assess the activity of the urinary sphincter and pelvic floor muscle with vibratory exercise. Data will be collected during all procedures.

According to our purpose and anticipating the impact of this research extrapolating whole body vibration (WBV) training as program to improve the strength of the pelvic floor muscle elaborating a guided plan to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients suffering from urinary incontinence with this new nonsurgical treatment approach to women with mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, as well as this research allow us to increase our knowledge in urinary continence and the pelvic floor.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Vibratory platform exercises
Keywords
whole body vibration, pelvic floor muscle, urinary incontinence, Urinary sphincter
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vibratory platform exercisesOther

    Different positions on vibratory platform with different frequencies

Study groups in NCT02341976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vibratory platform exercisesOtherVibratory platform exercises: different positions on a vibratory platform in different frequencies
Receives: Other: Vibratory platform exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peak average of the pelvic floor activity (measured by Electromyography (EMG)

    The primary assessment that will be reported will evaluate the mean of the peak activity measured by Electromyography (EMG) reached by the different exercises

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion of the Maximum Voluntary contraction (MVC) peak average reached by the peak average of the muscle contraction with each Whole Body Vibration (WBV) exercise

    The second assessment that will also be reported will evaluate the proportion of the MVC peak average reached by the peak average of the muscle contraction with each WBV exercise. A positive impact of the exercise will be considered if this reaches over 60% of the MVC. On the other hand, the investigators will define as no impact when below 60% of the MVC is reached.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2015 (estimated)

Why it stopped: PI left University and no study was ever done

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02341976
Sponsor's protocol ID
1405M50481
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
27 May 2014
Last updated
27 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1993;153:1-93. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8108659
  • Marin PJ, Ferrero CM, Menendez H, Martin J, Herrero AJ. Effects of whole-body vibration on muscle architecture, muscle strength, and balance in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;92(10):881-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318292336c.

    PubMed 23636085
  • Maikala RV, King S, Bhambhani YN. Acute physiological responses in healthy men during whole-body vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Feb;79(2):103-14. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0029-8. Epub 2005 Sep 21.

    PubMed 16175416
  • Mikhael M, Orr R, Fiatarone Singh MA. The effect of whole body vibration exposure on muscle or bone morphology and function in older adults: a systematic review of the literature. Maturitas. 2010 Jun;66(2):150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

    PubMed 20171817
  • Machado A, Garcia-Lopez D, Gonzalez-Gallego J, Garatachea N. Whole-body vibration training increases muscle strength and mass in older women: a randomized-controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Apr;20(2):200-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00919.x. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

    PubMed 19422657

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vibratory platform exercises in people with Healthy, run by University of Minnesota.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peak average of the pelvic floor activity (measured by Electromyography (EMG) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02341976, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in