InfertilityPhase 3NCT02342197
Comparative Study Between Minidose Long Protocol and Microdose Flare Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation
A Phase 3 study testing Decapeptyl in people with Infertility, run by Kasr El Aini Hospital.
Trial summary
Objective: To compare two stimulation protocols, the minidose long protocol and the microdose flare protocol designed for low responders undergoing ICSI. Design: Randomized prospective study. Setting: University hospital IVF unit. Patients: 60 poor responder patients coming for IVF center for ICSI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 42 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility
- What is being tested?
- Decapeptyl
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 42 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 35 years
- Day 3 serum FSH level > 10m IU/ml
- Number of antral follicles measuring 4-8mm during the early phase < 6
- Small ovarian volume
- AMH < 1
- Prior poor ovarian response to COH (oocytes < 5)
Who cannot join
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome patients
- Patients with Endometriosis
- Normal responders to ovulation induction
- Patients having ovarian cyst
- Patients receiving ovulation induction in the preceding cycle
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study Between Minidose Long Protocol and Microdose Flare Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for Poor Responders in ICSI Cycles
Objective: To compare two stimulation protocols, the minidose long protocol and the microdose flare protocol designed for low responders undergoing ICSI.
Design: Randomized prospective study. Setting: University hospital IVF unit. Patients: 60 poor responder patients coming for IVF center for ICSI. Interventions: Minidose long protocol in which half the dose of agonist was administered from the mid luteal phase until the day of HCG administration was compared with microdose flare protocol in which half the dose of GnRH was administered from the second day of the cycle until the day of HCG administration. Both groups received Gn stimulation from the second day of the cycle (300-450 IU).
Main outcome measures: Number of oocytes retrieved.
Read the detailed description
Patients and methods:
60 patients expected to have poor response for ovarian stimulation attending kasr EL-Aini hospital IVF center planning for ICSI during the year 2011 were randomized to receive ovulation induction for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by either one of two protocols: Minidose long protocol and microdose flare protocol.
Inclusion criteria:
All patients included were classified as poor responders when one of the following criteria was present:
- Age > 35 years.
- Day 3 serum FSH level > 10m IU/ml.
- Number of antral follicles measuring 4-8mm during the early phase < 6.
- Small ovarian volume.
- AMH < 1.
- Prior poor ovarian response to COH (oocytes < 5).
Exclusion criteria:
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome patients.
- Patients with Endometriosis.
- Normal responders to ovulation induction.
- Patients having ovarian cyst.
- Patients receiving ovulation induction in the preceding cycle. The study was approved by Kasr El-Aini IVF center research committee. Each patient had given informed consent after full explanation of the procedure. Randomization was performed according to a computer generated list. The patients were randomized to two groups.
The Minidose long protocol:
Decapeptyl 50µg/ day was administered SC from cycle day 21 until menstruation. On the second day of the cycle, patients were assessed for downregulation; E2 level < 50 pg/ml, endometrial thickness less than 5 mm, no follicles > 15mm. Once patient downregulation was confirmed, Gn dose was commenced at an initial dose of 300-450 IU/day for the first 5 days followed by individual adjustment in Gn dose according to ovarian response and the dose of Decapeptyl 50µg/day was continued until day of HCG administration.
The microdose flare protocol:
Administration of OCP's at the prior menses followed by Decapeptyl 50µg/day SC started on the second day of the cycle and continued until the day of HCG administration. Gn was started concomitantly on the second day of the cycle as described above.
Cycle monitoring:
Monitoring consisted of several ultrasound examination and serum E2 level in both protocols. The starting Gn dosage was determined by a combination of factors including patient age, ovarian reserve testing, prior stimulation response and was adjusted according to individual response. Serum LH levels were measured from day 6 of stimulation to exclude premature luteinization (LH > 15 IU/L).
10,000 IU HCG was administered intramuscular when at least two leading follicles were 18mm in diameter. Oocyte retrieval was performed 35 hours after HCG administration by ultrasound guided transvaginal aspiration.
Laboratory procedures:
The ICSI procedure was performed 4 hours after oocyte aspiration for all the mature oocytes. Fertilization was assessed 16-18 hours after ICSI and was considered normal only when two distinct pronuclei were present. The embryos obtained were categorized on day 2-3 into 3 grades depending on their morphological appearance, zonal thickness, cytoplasmic fragmentation and blastomere size.
Transfer procedure and luteal support:
Depending on patient age, embryo quality and the number of embryos available, 1-4 embryos were transferred 2-3 days after oocyte collection under transabdominal ultrasound guidance using a cook catheter.
The luteal phase was supported with micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily administered vaginally until a pregnancy test was performed.
Outcome measures:
To assess a difference in pregnancy rates between the two protocols, a sample size of 100's of patients should be considered but considering the size of our work, it would be many years before such large samples could be recruited. We therefore chose to focus on oocyte number as a main outcome measure.
The data recorded for analysis included: age, infertility history and etiology, day 3 FSH, duration of stimulation, number of gonadotrophin ampoules required, E2 level on the day of HCG administration, number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized and number of embryos transferred.
The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcome measures were implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. A clinical pregnancy was defined as a normal gestational sac measured with transvaginal ultrasound after 5 weeks.
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Being tested
- Decapeptyl
- Keywords
- Low responders, Minidose long protocol, Microdose flare protocol, Oocyte yield
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DecapeptylDrug
Also called GnRH agonist
half the dose of Gn agonist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minidose long protocol | Active comparator | Half dose of GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 0.05) was started in the midluteal phase and Gn's was started from the second day of the cycle. Receives: Drug: Decapeptyl |
| Microdose flare protocol | Active comparator | Half the dose of GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 0.05) was started on the second day of the cycle together with Gn's Receives: Drug: Decapeptyl |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Oocytes Retrieved
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kasr El Aini Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nawara Mohamed Hashish, Kasr El Aini Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02342197
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 610012011
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study Between Minidose Long Protocol and Microdose Flare Protocol in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for Poor Responders in ICSI Cycles
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02342197
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 610012011
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Keywords
- Low responders, Minidose long protocol, Microdose flare protocol, Oocyte yield
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kasr El Aini HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jan 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: To compare two stimulation protocols, the minidose long protocol and the microdose flare protocol designed for low responders undergoing ICSI.
Design: Randomized prospective study. Setting: University hospital IVF unit. Patients: 60 poor responder patients coming for IVF center for ICSI. Interventions: Minidose long protocol in which half the dose of agonist was administered from the mid luteal phase until the day of HCG administration was compared with microdose flare protocol in which half the dose of GnRH was administered from the second day of the cycle until the day of HCG administration. Both groups received Gn stimulation from the second day of the cycle (300-450 IU).
Main outcome measures: Number of oocytes retrieved.
Detailed description
Patients and methods:
60 patients expected to have poor response for ovarian stimulation attending kasr EL-Aini hospital IVF center planning for ICSI during the year 2011 were randomized to receive ovulation induction for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation by either one of two protocols: Minidose long protocol and microdose flare protocol.
Inclusion criteria:
All patients included were classified as poor responders when one of the following criteria was present:
- Age > 35 years.
- Day 3 serum FSH level > 10m IU/ml.
- Number of antral follicles measuring 4-8mm during the early phase < 6.
- Small ovarian volume.
- AMH < 1.
- Prior poor ovarian response to COH (oocytes < 5).
Exclusion criteria:
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome patients.
- Patients with Endometriosis.
- Normal responders to ovulation induction.
- Patients having ovarian cyst.
- Patients receiving ovulation induction in the preceding cycle. The study was approved by Kasr El-Aini IVF center research committee. Each patient had given informed consent after full explanation of the procedure. Randomization was performed according to a computer generated list. The patients were randomized to two groups.
The Minidose long protocol:
Decapeptyl 50µg/ day was administered SC from cycle day 21 until menstruation. On the second day of the cycle, patients were assessed for downregulation; E2 level < 50 pg/ml, endometrial thickness less than 5 mm, no follicles > 15mm. Once patient downregulation was confirmed, Gn dose was commenced at an initial dose of 300-450 IU/day for the first 5 days followed by individual adjustment in Gn dose according to ovarian response and the dose of Decapeptyl 50µg/day was continued until day of HCG administration.
The microdose flare protocol:
Administration of OCP's at the prior menses followed by Decapeptyl 50µg/day SC started on the second day of the cycle and continued until the day of HCG administration. Gn was started concomitantly on the second day of the cycle as described above.
Cycle monitoring:
Monitoring consisted of several ultrasound examination and serum E2 level in both protocols. The starting Gn dosage was determined by a combination of factors including patient age, ovarian reserve testing, prior stimulation response and was adjusted according to individual response. Serum LH levels were measured from day 6 of stimulation to exclude premature luteinization (LH > 15 IU/L).
10,000 IU HCG was administered intramuscular when at least two leading follicles were 18mm in diameter. Oocyte retrieval was performed 35 hours after HCG administration by ultrasound guided transvaginal aspiration.
Laboratory procedures:
The ICSI procedure was performed 4 hours after oocyte aspiration for all the mature oocytes. Fertilization was assessed 16-18 hours after ICSI and was considered normal only when two distinct pronuclei were present. The embryos obtained were categorized on day 2-3 into 3 grades depending on their morphological appearance, zonal thickness, cytoplasmic fragmentation and blastomere size.
Transfer procedure and luteal support:
Depending on patient age, embryo quality and the number of embryos available, 1-4 embryos were transferred 2-3 days after oocyte collection under transabdominal ultrasound guidance using a cook catheter.
The luteal phase was supported with micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily administered vaginally until a pregnancy test was performed.
Outcome measures:
To assess a difference in pregnancy rates between the two protocols, a sample size of 100's of patients should be considered but considering the size of our work, it would be many years before such large samples could be recruited. We therefore chose to focus on oocyte number as a main outcome measure.
The data recorded for analysis included: age, infertility history and etiology, day 3 FSH, duration of stimulation, number of gonadotrophin ampoules required, E2 level on the day of HCG administration, number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized and number of embryos transferred.
The primary outcome measure was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcome measures were implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. A clinical pregnancy was defined as a normal gestational sac measured with transvaginal ultrasound after 5 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minidose long protocol | Active comparator | Drug: DecapeptylHalf dose of GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 0.05) was started in the midluteal phase and Gn's was started from the second day of the cycle. |
| Microdose flare protocol | Active comparator | Drug: DecapeptylHalf the dose of GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 0.05) was started on the second day of the cycle together with Gn's |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 42 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age > 35 years
- Day 3 serum FSH level > 10m IU/ml
- Number of antral follicles measuring 4-8mm during the early phase < 6
- Small ovarian volume
- AMH < 1
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome patients
- Patients with Endometriosis
- Normal responders to ovulation induction
- Patients having ovarian cyst
- Patients receiving ovulation induction in the preceding cycle
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DecapeptylAlso: GnRH agonisthalf the dose of Gn agonist | Drug | Microdose flare protocol, Minidose long protocol |
Primary outcome
Number of Oocytes Retrieved
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Infertility
Active, not recruiting
Automation of the In Vitro Fertilization Laboratory
Infertility, ART
RecruitingObservational study
Inherited Reproductive Disorders
Genetic Disorder, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Implementing IVM for Fertility Treatment in Clinical Practice
Infertility
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Novel Aromatase Inhibitor, Leflutrozole, for Treatment of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
Infertility Due to Azoospermia, Infertility, Male
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Decapeptyl in people with Infertility, run by Kasr El Aini Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jan 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Oocytes Retrieved (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.