Pancreatic CystRADIOCYST01NCT02343692
A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas
A study testing EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas in people with Pancreatic Cyst, run by University College, London at 13 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Up to 13.5% of patients that undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of their abdomen without pancreatic symptoms are found to have an incidental pancreatic cyst, with the frequency increasing with age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cyst
- What is being tested?
- EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 97 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour based on multidisciplinary review of imaging, for which further surveillance with non-invasive imaging is indicated.
- Pancreatic cystic tumour between 0.5 and 3cm in size. Cysts greater than 3cm or with mural nodules can be included only if patients are unsuitable for surgical resection.
- ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2.
- Estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
- Age >18 years.
- Capable of giving written informed consent.
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (qualitative serum hCG) in the week before treatment, AND be using an adequate contraception method, which must be continued for at least 1 week after RF.
Who cannot join
- A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour where surgical resection is indicated.
- Pancreatic cysts greater than 3cm or less than 0.5cm in size.
- Benign pancreatic cysts (e.g. pseudocyst).
- Serous cystadenomas.
- Pancreatic cysts with malignant transformation.
- Cysts involving or in close proximity to vessels or the biliary tree where the zone of ablation is likely to compromise these structures.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Cysts arising from the main pancreatic duct.
- History of active or prior malignancy that will interfere with the response evaluation (exceptions include in-situ carcinoma of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy/resection, nonmetastatic basal and/or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, any early stage (stage l) malignancy adequately resected for cure greater than 5 years previously).
- Acute pancreatitis within the previous 4 weeks.
- Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases or laboratory finding that in the view of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial.
- Any psychiatric disorder making reliable informed consent impossible.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- ECOG performance status 3 or 4
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 2 countries.
Bina Shah contact
Chris Brew-Graves contact
13 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom12 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Birmingham NHS FoundationTrust
Birmingham, B15 2TH
Brinder Mahon, MD
- Recruiting
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow
Lyn Smith, MD
- Recruiting
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Leeds
Matthew Huggett, MD
- Recruiting
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW1 2PG
Stephen P Periera, MB BS, FRCP
- Recruiting
Royal Free London
London, NW3 2QG
Stephen P Pereira, MB BS, FRCP
- Recruiting
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W2 1NY
Nagy Habib, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Barts Health NHS Trust
London
Patrick Wilson, MD
- Recruiting
Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London
Ray Shidrawi, MD
- Recruiting
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London
John Devlin, MD
Mayur Kumar, MD
- Not yet recruiting
The London Clinic
London
Steve Pereira, MD
- Not yet recruiting
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Kofi Oppong, MD
- Recruiting
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, NG7 2UH
Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy, MD
Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Royal Melbourne Hospital, Epworth Richmond
Melbourne
Andrew Metz
Andrew Metz, MBBS, FRACP
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (RADIOCYST01)
Up to 13.5% of patients that undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of their abdomen without pancreatic symptoms are found to have an incidental pancreatic cyst, with the frequency increasing with age. In a post-mortem series, 25% of patients had a pancreatic cyst, of which 32% were potentially premalignant and 3% malignant. Premalignant cysts are currently either observed or removed surgically according to international guidelines. Observation is associated with significant anxiety for patients and a growing cost to the National Health Service, while surgery for this usually benign condition is associated with not insignificant morbidity and mortality. Premalignant pancreatic cysts may be indolent for a number of years before malignant transformation, creating a window of opportunity for minimally invasive intervention and cure. New early treatment options for premalignant tumours are urgently required. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pancreatic cystic tumours; endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUSRFA).
If successful it will offer an alternative to long term observation or surgery for patients with this condition.
Read the detailed description
Pancreatic cystic tumours are an emerging and growing diagnostic challenge for the clinician. Due to the widespread use of high quality crosssectional imaging techniques, between 1.2 to 2.6% of patients that undergo a CT for a nonpancreatic indication are found to have an incidental pancreatic cystic tumour. Pancreatic cysts encompass a range of pathologies from benign to malignant. Premalignant pancreatic cysts are known to be indolent for a number of years before transforming into an invasive cancer, creating a window of opportunity for intervention and cure. There is a strong correlation between pancreatic cysts and age. In a recent series of patients with incidental pancreatic cystic tumours, no cases were found in patients less than 40 years of age, while 8.7 percent of the patients aged 80 to 89 years had a pancreatic cyst. The natural history of pancreatic cystic tumours remains poorly understood, so significant uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate diagnostic workup, how to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions and choice of therapy.
Characterisation of pancreatic cystic lesions is usually made by a combination of noninvasive cross sectional imaging and where necessary, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) of tissue and/or cyst fluid. In those undergoing EUSFNA, fluid aspirates for cytology are obtained in up to 80% of cases but samples frequently have a low cellularity so sensitivity for diagnostic cytology ranges between 31% and 85%. Pancreatic EUSFNA is a safe test, with complication rates (mainly pancreatitis, rarely infection and bleeding) occurring in approximately 12.4%. Our own published complication rates demonstrated a 0% mortality and 0.6% morbidity (mild acute pancreatitis).
To guide treatment a consensus document was published by the International Association of Pancreatology in 2006 and updated in 2012. The guidelines recommend the surgical resection of all pancreatic cysts that cause symptoms or are larger than 3 cm, contain a mural nodule or are associated with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. If the cyst is less than 3cm and does not have any of these features the guidelines recommend that the lesions can be safely followed up with serial imaging. They recommended annual imaging for lesions <10mm, 6 monthly imaging for lesions 1020mm and 3 monthly imaging for lesions >20mm. How long patients should be followed up for or when they should be referred for surgical resection is unclear and is associated with a growing surveillance cost to the NHS.
Surgical resection of the pancreas is a considerable undertaking and is associated with a significant morbidity (21 to 59%) and mortality (07%). In addition, many elderly patients have significant comorbidity and will not be fit enough to undergo pancreatic surgery. To date, there have been only a few small studies using ablative techniques as an alternative to surgical resection. EUSguided injection of alcohol has been associated with cyst ablation rates of 35 to 62%, on short term follow up. However, this technique did not achieve total cyst ablation in cysts with septations and was associated with complication rates (pain and pancreatitis) of 4 to 20%. A major potential advantage of EUS guided RFA is that ablation of septated cystic tumours is feasible and that treatment effects can be monitored under realtime EUS control.
Radiofrequency ablation:
Radiofrequency ablation is achieved through a high frequency alternating current which generates high temperatures causing a coagulative necrosis. It has been used widely, percutaneously and intraoperatively, to treat primary and secondary cancers in the liver, lung, kidney, bone, pancreas and oesophagus. The Habib EUS RFA catheter is a single use sterile catheter for use during endoscopic ultrasound. It is an endoscopic monopolar catheter that has been designed to ablate cystic tumours of the pancreas and has European Conformity approval for this purpose. Following identification and puncture of the pancreatic cyst, the EUS RFA catheter can be introduced through a standard 19G EUSFNA needle. The catheter has an active metallic electrode which will be placed at the most distal part of the pancreatic cyst under EUSguidance. The catheter can be used with a variety of commercially available RF Generators, such as the RITA 1500, RITA 1500X, or ERBE VIO200D/300D. A dose of 10W for 90 seconds will be administered to each cystic tumour. EUSguided needle placement into pancreatic cysts is a standard technique, and will be performed by experienced (at least 5 years) endoscopists carrying out regular EUS interventions (at least 150 cases per year).
Animal studies of pancreatic RFA:
The safety and efficacy of the monopolar Habib EUS RFA catheter to be used in this study has been examined in the porcine model. The pancreas was visualized in all five cases and in four cases multiple punctures of the pancreas was possible. Each animal received up to 12 minutes of EUSguided RFA to the pancreas at a variety of currents (46W), catheter exposure (610mm) and length of time (0.25 minutes). Following the procedure, blood tests did not reveal any evidence of pancreatitis but at post mortem on day 7, three pigs had focal fat necrosis surrounding the pancreas. Analysis of the size of the area of ablation in the normal porcine pancreas found it to be proportionally related to the catheter length, power or time to which the tissue was exposed.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cyst
- Being tested
- EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Cyst
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreasProcedure or surgery
Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency abalation | Experimental | Intervention: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cystic tumours of the pancreas
Device: An RFA generator (ERBE VIO 300D, Dolby medical products, Scotland)
Procedure: Delivery of sequential doses of electrical energy at 10W for a total of up to 4 minutes 30 seconds (3 x 90 second applications) to ablate the cystic lesion.
Ablation of cystic tumours of the pancreas Receives: Procedure: EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of pancreatic cyst
To evaluate pancreatic cyst ablation at 12 months following EUSguided radiofrequency ablation therapy in patients with pre-diagnosed cystic tumours of the pancreas.
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mortality
Measured: One year
Morbidity
Measured: One year
Progression following treatment
Measured: One year
Rate of surgical resection
Measured: One year
Local complication rate
Measured: One year
Evaluation of surrogate markers of response (Imaging (CT, MRI, EUS) and serum markers.)
Measured: One year
Preliminary health economics analysis from questionnaires and cost diaries (Self-completed EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and cost diary.)
Self-completed EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and cost diary.
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionJun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CystStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephen P Pereira, MB BS, FRCP, Principal investigator, Royal Free London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02343692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13/0427
- Acronym
- RADIOCYST01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (RADIOCYST01)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02343692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RADIOCYST01 / 13/0427
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cyst
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Up to 13.5% of patients that undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of their abdomen without pancreatic symptoms are found to have an incidental pancreatic cyst, with the frequency increasing with age. In a post-mortem series, 25% of patients had a pancreatic cyst, of which 32% were potentially premalignant and 3% malignant. Premalignant cysts are currently either observed or removed surgically according to international guidelines. Observation is associated with significant anxiety for patients and a growing cost to the National Health Service, while surgery for this usually benign condition is associated with not insignificant morbidity and mortality. Premalignant pancreatic cysts may be indolent for a number of years before malignant transformation, creating a window of opportunity for minimally invasive intervention and cure. New early treatment options for premalignant tumours are urgently required. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pancreatic cystic tumours; endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUSRFA).
If successful it will offer an alternative to long term observation or surgery for patients with this condition.
Detailed description
Pancreatic cystic tumours are an emerging and growing diagnostic challenge for the clinician. Due to the widespread use of high quality crosssectional imaging techniques, between 1.2 to 2.6% of patients that undergo a CT for a nonpancreatic indication are found to have an incidental pancreatic cystic tumour. Pancreatic cysts encompass a range of pathologies from benign to malignant. Premalignant pancreatic cysts are known to be indolent for a number of years before transforming into an invasive cancer, creating a window of opportunity for intervention and cure. There is a strong correlation between pancreatic cysts and age. In a recent series of patients with incidental pancreatic cystic tumours, no cases were found in patients less than 40 years of age, while 8.7 percent of the patients aged 80 to 89 years had a pancreatic cyst. The natural history of pancreatic cystic tumours remains poorly understood, so significant uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate diagnostic workup, how to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions and choice of therapy.
Characterisation of pancreatic cystic lesions is usually made by a combination of noninvasive cross sectional imaging and where necessary, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) of tissue and/or cyst fluid. In those undergoing EUSFNA, fluid aspirates for cytology are obtained in up to 80% of cases but samples frequently have a low cellularity so sensitivity for diagnostic cytology ranges between 31% and 85%. Pancreatic EUSFNA is a safe test, with complication rates (mainly pancreatitis, rarely infection and bleeding) occurring in approximately 12.4%. Our own published complication rates demonstrated a 0% mortality and 0.6% morbidity (mild acute pancreatitis).
To guide treatment a consensus document was published by the International Association of Pancreatology in 2006 and updated in 2012. The guidelines recommend the surgical resection of all pancreatic cysts that cause symptoms or are larger than 3 cm, contain a mural nodule or are associated with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. If the cyst is less than 3cm and does not have any of these features the guidelines recommend that the lesions can be safely followed up with serial imaging. They recommended annual imaging for lesions <10mm, 6 monthly imaging for lesions 1020mm and 3 monthly imaging for lesions >20mm. How long patients should be followed up for or when they should be referred for surgical resection is unclear and is associated with a growing surveillance cost to the NHS.
Surgical resection of the pancreas is a considerable undertaking and is associated with a significant morbidity (21 to 59%) and mortality (07%). In addition, many elderly patients have significant comorbidity and will not be fit enough to undergo pancreatic surgery. To date, there have been only a few small studies using ablative techniques as an alternative to surgical resection. EUSguided injection of alcohol has been associated with cyst ablation rates of 35 to 62%, on short term follow up. However, this technique did not achieve total cyst ablation in cysts with septations and was associated with complication rates (pain and pancreatitis) of 4 to 20%. A major potential advantage of EUS guided RFA is that ablation of septated cystic tumours is feasible and that treatment effects can be monitored under realtime EUS control.
Radiofrequency ablation:
Radiofrequency ablation is achieved through a high frequency alternating current which generates high temperatures causing a coagulative necrosis. It has been used widely, percutaneously and intraoperatively, to treat primary and secondary cancers in the liver, lung, kidney, bone, pancreas and oesophagus. The Habib EUS RFA catheter is a single use sterile catheter for use during endoscopic ultrasound. It is an endoscopic monopolar catheter that has been designed to ablate cystic tumours of the pancreas and has European Conformity approval for this purpose. Following identification and puncture of the pancreatic cyst, the EUS RFA catheter can be introduced through a standard 19G EUSFNA needle. The catheter has an active metallic electrode which will be placed at the most distal part of the pancreatic cyst under EUSguidance. The catheter can be used with a variety of commercially available RF Generators, such as the RITA 1500, RITA 1500X, or ERBE VIO200D/300D. A dose of 10W for 90 seconds will be administered to each cystic tumour. EUSguided needle placement into pancreatic cysts is a standard technique, and will be performed by experienced (at least 5 years) endoscopists carrying out regular EUS interventions (at least 150 cases per year).
Animal studies of pancreatic RFA:
The safety and efficacy of the monopolar Habib EUS RFA catheter to be used in this study has been examined in the porcine model. The pancreas was visualized in all five cases and in four cases multiple punctures of the pancreas was possible. Each animal received up to 12 minutes of EUSguided RFA to the pancreas at a variety of currents (46W), catheter exposure (610mm) and length of time (0.25 minutes). Following the procedure, blood tests did not reveal any evidence of pancreatitis but at post mortem on day 7, three pigs had focal fat necrosis surrounding the pancreas. Analysis of the size of the area of ablation in the normal porcine pancreas found it to be proportionally related to the catheter length, power or time to which the tissue was exposed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency abalation | Experimental | Procedure: EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreasIntervention: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cystic tumours of the pancreas Device: An RFA generator (ERBE VIO 300D, Dolby medical products, Scotland) Procedure: Delivery of sequential doses of electrical energy at 10W for a total of up to 4 minutes 30 seconds (3 x 90 second applications) to ablate the cystic lesion. Ablation of cystic tumours of the pancreas |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour based on multidisciplinary review of imaging, for which further surveillance with non-invasive imaging is indicated.
- Pancreatic cystic tumour between 0.5 and 3cm in size. Cysts greater than 3cm or with mural nodules can be included only if patients are unsuitable for surgical resection.
- ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2.
- Estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
- Age >18 years.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour where surgical resection is indicated.
- Pancreatic cysts greater than 3cm or less than 0.5cm in size.
- Benign pancreatic cysts (e.g. pseudocyst).
- Serous cystadenomas.
- Pancreatic cysts with malignant transformation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreasEndoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts | Procedure or surgery | Radiofrequency abalation |
Primary outcome
Presence of pancreatic cyst
Time frame: One year
To evaluate pancreatic cyst ablation at 12 months following EUSguided radiofrequency ablation therapy in patients with pre-diagnosed cystic tumours of the pancreas.
7 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: One year
Morbidity
Time frame: One year
Progression following treatment
Time frame: One year
Rate of surgical resection
Time frame: One year
Local complication rate
Time frame: One year
Evaluation of surrogate markers of response (Imaging (CT, MRI, EUS) and serum markers.)
Time frame: One year
Preliminary health economics analysis from questionnaires and cost diaries (Self-completed EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and cost diary.)
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2019.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cyst
RecruitingObservational study
Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium
Pancreas Cancer, Pancreas Cyst
Recruiting
Determination of Pancreatic Steatosis Prevalence and Correlation With High-risk Cyst Features
Pancreatic Steatosis, Pancreatic Cyst
Recruiting
EUS Examination Using EndoSound Vision System vs. Standard Echoendoscope
Pancreatic Disease, Pancreatic Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy as an Imaging Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
Pancreatic Cyst
RecruitingPhase 1
Chemoprevention With Tamoxifen in Pre-Invasive Pancreas Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms Not Undergoing Immediate Resection
Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bina Shah contact
Chris Brew-Graves contact
Stephen P Pereira, MB BS, FRCP principal investigator
Royal Free London
13 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas in people with Pancreatic Cyst, run by University College, London at 13 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United Kingdom, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bina Shah (situ.radiocyst@ucl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of pancreatic cyst (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.