Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT02345161
A Comparison Study Between the Fixed Dose Triple Combination of Fluticasone Furoate/ Umeclidinium/ Vilanterol Trifenatate (FF/UMEC/VI) With Budesonide/Formoterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 3 study testing Triple FF/UMEC/VI, Budesonide/Formoterol and Albuterol/salbutamol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 159 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase IIIa, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group multicenter study evaluating once daily FF/UMEC/VI (100 microgram [mcg]/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) inhalation powder versus twice daily budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Triple FF/UMEC/VI, Budesonide/Formoterol and Albuterol/salbutamol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,811 participants
- Where
- 159 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2015to 7 Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed Consent: A signed and dated written informed consent prior to study participation.
- Type of subject: Outpatient.
- Age: Subjects 40 years of age or older at Screening (Visit 1).
- Gender: Male or female subjects. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-child bearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, >45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy. OR Child bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to one of the following acceptable contraceptive methods used consistently and correctly (i.e. in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study - screening to safety follow-up contact): Abstinence, Oral Contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone, Injectable progestogen, Implants of levonorgestrel, Estrogenic vaginal ring, Percutaneous contraceptive patches, Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. For this definition, "documented" refers to the outcome of the investigator's/designee's medical examination of the subject or review of the subject's medical history for study eligibility, as obtained via a verbal interview with the subject or from the subject's medical records.; Double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)
- COPD Diagnosis: An established clinical history of COPD in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society.
- Smoking History: Current or former cigarette smokers with a history of cigarette smoking of >10 pack-years at Screening (Visit 1) [number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day / 20) x number of years smoked (e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years)]. Previous smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. Note: Pipe and/or cigar use cannot be used to calculate pack-year history.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Severity of COPD symptoms: A score of >=10 on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) at Screening (Visit 1).
- Severity of Disease: Subjects must demonstrate at Screening: <a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% predicted normal OR a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted normal and a documented history of >=2 moderate exacerbations or one severe (hospitalized) exacerbation in the previous 12 months. Subjects must also have a measured post albuterol/salbutamol FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 at screening. Note: Percent predicted will be calculated using the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations. Note: A documented history of a COPD exacerbation (e.g., medical record verification) is a medical record of worsening COPD symptoms that required systemic/oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (for a moderate exacerbation) or hospitalization (for a severe exacerbation). Prior use of antibiotics alone does not qualify as an exacerbation history unless the use was associated with treatment of worsening symptoms of COPD, such as increased dyspnoea, sputum volume, or sputum purulence (colour). Subject verbal reports are not acceptable.
- Existing COPD maintenance treatment: Subject must be receiving daily maintenance treatment for their COPD for at least 3 months prior to Screening. Note: Subjects receiving only as required (PRN) COPD medications are not eligible.
- Liver function tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <2x upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase <=1.5xULN; bilirubin <=1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35%).
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study.
- Asthma: Subjects with a current diagnosis of asthma. (Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD). Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: Subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD.
- Other respiratory disorders: Subjects with active tuberculosis, lung cancer, significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases.
- Lung resection: Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery within the 12 months prior to Screening.
- Risk Factors for Pneumonia: immune suppression (e.g. Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], Lupus) or other risk factors for pneumonia (e.g. neurological disorders affecting control of the upper airway, such as Parkinson's Disease, Myasthenia Gravis). Subjects at potentially high risk (e.g. very low Body mass index [BMI], severely malnourished, or very low FEV1) will only be included at the discretion of the investigator.
- Pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation that has not resolved at least 14 days prior to Screening and at least 30 days following the last dose of oral/systemic corticosteroids (if applicable). In addition, any subject that experiences pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation during the run-in period will be excluded.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Respiratory tract infection that has not resolved at least 7 days prior to Screening.
- Abnormal Chest X-ray (CXR): Chest X-ray (posteroanterior and lateral) reveals evidence of pneumonia or a clinically significant abnormality not believed to be due to the presence of COPD, or another condition that would hinder the ability to detect an infiltrate on CXR (e.g. significant cardiomegaly, pleural effusion or scarring). All subjects will have a CXR at Screening Visit 1) (or historical radiograph or Computed Tomography [CT] scan obtained within 3 months prior to screening) that will be over-read by a central vendor. Note: Subjects who have experienced pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation within 3 months of screening must provide a post pneumonia/exacerbation CXR to be over-read by the central vendor or have a CXR conducted at Screening. For sites in Germany: If a chest x-ray (or CT scan) within 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) is not available, approval to conduct a diagnostic CXR will need to be obtained from the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS).
- Other diseases/abnormalities: Subjects with historical or current evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, gastrointestinal, urogenital, nervous system, musculoskeletal, skin, sensory, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease) or haematological abnormalities that are uncontrolled. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study. For subjects taking part in the physical activity monitor subset: Orthopaedic, neurological or other complaints that significantly impair normal biomechanical movement patterns and limit the ability to walk/cycle, as judged by the Investigator.
- Unstable liver disease as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice, cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). Note: Chronic stable hepatitis B and C are acceptable if the subject otherwise meets entry criteria.
- Unstable or life threatening cardiac disease: subjects with any of the following at Screening (Visit 1) would be excluded: Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months; Unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention in the last 3 months; New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV Heart failure
- Abnormal and clinically significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) finding: Investigators will be provided with ECG reviews conducted by a centralized independent cardiologist to assist in evaluation of subject eligibility. The Principal Investigator (PI) will determine the clinical significance of each abnormal ECG finding in relation to the subject's medical history and exclude subjects who would be at undue risk by participating in the trial. An abnormal and clinically significant finding that would preclude a subject from entering the trial is defined as a 12-lead tracing that is interpreted as, but not limited to, any of the following: Atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular rate >120 Beats Per Minute (BPM); sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT); Second degree heart block Mobitz type II and third degree heart block (unless pacemaker or defibrillator had been inserted); QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >=500 milliseconds (msec) in subjects with QRS <120 msec and QTcF >=530 msec in subjects with QRS >=120 msec.
- Contraindications: A history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any corticosteroid, anticholinergic/muscarinic receptor antagonist, beta2-agonist, lactose/milk protein or magnesium stearate or a medical condition such as narrow-angle glaucoma, prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction that, in the opinion of the Investigator, contraindicates study participation.
- Cancer: Subjects with carcinoma that has not been in complete remission for at least 5 years. Subjects who have had carcinoma in situ of the cervix, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin would not be excluded based on the 5 year waiting period if the subject has been considered cured by treatment.
- Oxygen therapy: Use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) described as resting oxygen therapy >3litres/minute (L/min) (Oxygen use <=3L/min flow is not exclusionary.)
- Medication prior to spirometry: Subjects who are medically unable to withhold their albuterol/salbutamol for the 4-hour period required prior to spirometry testing at each study visit.
- Pulmonary rehabilitation: Subjects who have participated in the acute phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program within 4 weeks prior to Screening or subjects who plan to enter the acute phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program during the study. Subjects who are in the maintenance phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program are not excluded.
- Drug/alcohol abuse: Subjects with a known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years.
- Non-compliance: Subjects at risk of non-compliance, or unable to comply with the study procedures. Any infirmity, disability, or geographic location that would limit compliance for scheduled visits.
- Questionable validity of consent: Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent to participate in the study.
- Affiliation with investigator site: study investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, employees of a participating investigator or study site, or immediate family members of the aforementioned that is involved with this study.
- Inability to read: In the opinion of the investigator, any subject who is unable to read and/or would not be able to complete study related materials.
- Medication prior to screening: No use of the following medications within the following time intervals prior to Screening or during the study. Long term antibiotic therapy: Subjects receiving antibiotics for long term therapy are not eligible for the study (Antibiotics are allowed for the short term treatment of an exacerbation or for short term treatment of other acute infections); Systemic, Oral, parenteral corticosteroids: 30 days (Except during the study oral/systemic corticosteroids may be used to treat COPD exacerbations/pneumonia). Intra-articular injections are allowed. Any other investigational drug: 30 days or 5 half lives whichever is longer.
Trial locations and contacts
159 sites in 15 countries.
159 sites in 15 countries
Russia21 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barnaul, 656 045
GSK Investigational Site
Izhevsk, 426063
GSK Investigational Site
Kemerovo, 650000
GSK Investigational Site
Kemerovo, 650002
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 115409
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 123 182
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Pertersburg, 196247
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194291
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 198216
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 198260
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petesburg, 195030
GSK Investigational Site
Saratov, 410028
GSK Investigational Site
Saratov, 410053
GSK Investigational Site
Sestroretsk, 197706
GSK Investigational Site
Stavropol, 355017
GSK Investigational Site
Tomsk, 634 050
GSK Investigational Site
Tver', 170036
GSK Investigational Site
Ufa, 450000
GSK Investigational Site
Voronezh, 394018
GSK Investigational Site
Yaroslavl, 150003
GSK Investigational Site
Yekaterinburg, 620137
Germany17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10717
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10787
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12157
GSK Investigational Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 51069
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01069
GSK Investigational Site
Elsterwerda, Brandenburg, 04910
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60596
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20354
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30159
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzg, Saxony, 04109
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23552
GSK Investigational Site
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39112
GSK Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg, Hesse, 63263
GSK Investigational Site
Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, 49074
GSK Investigational Site
Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 19055
GSK Investigational Site
Warendorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48231
GSK Investigational Site
Wiesbaden, Hesse, 65187
Mexico17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chihuahua City, 31238
GSK Investigational Site
Cuautitlán Izcalli, State of Mexico, 54769
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44500
GSK Investigational Site
México, 14080
GSK Investigational Site
Mexico City, 07760
GSK Investigational Site
Mexico City, 6700
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64000
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64020
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710
GSK Investigational Site
Monterrey NL, Nuevo León, 64718
GSK Investigational Site
Oaxaca City, 68000
GSK Investigational Site
Puebla, Pue, Puebla, 72000
GSK Investigational Site
Tlanepantla, State of Mexico, 54055
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45070
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45200
Ukraine17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chernivtsi, 58005
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49074
GSK Investigational Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61035
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61039
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61124
GSK Investigational Site
Kiev, 03680
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 01114
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 02091
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03038
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03680
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv
GSK Investigational Site
Poltava, 36024
GSK Investigational Site
Poltava, 36038
GSK Investigational Site
Ternopil, 46002
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21018
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21029
Czechia10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Boskovice, 680 01
GSK Investigational Site
Brandýs nad Labem, 250 01
GSK Investigational Site
Cvikov, 471 54
GSK Investigational Site
Karlovy Vary, 360 17
GSK Investigational Site
Kralupy nad Vltavou, 278 01
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 140 46
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 169 00
GSK Investigational Site
Rokycany, 337 01
GSK Investigational Site
Tábor, 390 19
GSK Investigational Site
Teplice, 415 10
Greece10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 106 76
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 115 27
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 124 62
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 151 26
GSK Investigational Site
Heraklion, Crete, 71110
GSK Investigational Site
Kavala, 65500
GSK Investigational Site
Rethymnon, Crete, 74100
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 56403
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 56429
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 57010
Bulgaria9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dimitrovgrad, 6400
GSK Investigational Site
Lovech, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Pleven, 5800
GSK Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4002
GSK Investigational Site
Rousse, 7000
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1202
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1407
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1606
GSK Investigational Site
Vidin, 3700
China9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, 100029
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, 100050
GSK Investigational Site
Chongqing, 400037
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
GSK Investigational Site
Haikou, Hainan, 570311
GSK Investigational Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
GSK Investigational Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004
GSK Investigational Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110015
GSK Investigational Site
Wuxi, 214023
Estonia8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Haapsalu, 90502
GSK Investigational Site
Kohtla-Järve, 31025
GSK Investigational Site
Pärnu, 80010
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 10117
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 10138
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13419
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13619
GSK Investigational Site
Tartu, 51014
Hungary8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Balassagyarmat, 2660
GSK Investigational Site
Budaörs, 2040
GSK Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4031
GSK Investigational Site
Gödöllő, 2100
GSK Investigational Site
Hatvan, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Szeged, 6722
GSK Investigational Site
Szikszó, 3800
GSK Investigational Site
Törökbálint, 2045
Romania8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 030303
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 050159
GSK Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400371
GSK Investigational Site
Codlea, 505100
GSK Investigational Site
Galati, 800189
GSK Investigational Site
Piteşti, 110084
GSK Investigational Site
Suceava, 720284
GSK Investigational Site
Timișoara, 300310
Italy7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Eboli (SA), Campania, 84025
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20121
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Palermo, Sicily, 90146
GSK Investigational Site
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43125
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
GSK Investigational Site
Varese, Lombardy, 21100
Poland7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-003
GSK Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-044
GSK Investigational Site
Elblag, 82-300
GSK Investigational Site
Grudziądz, 86-300
GSK Investigational Site
Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400
GSK Investigational Site
Skierniewice, 96-100
GSK Investigational Site
Słupsk, 76-200
South Korea6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chuncheon, 200-722
GSK Investigational Site
Incheon, 403-720
GSK Investigational Site
Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-Do, 561-712
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 100-032
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 130-709
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 138-736
Slovakia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bojnice, 972 01
GSK Investigational Site
Levice, 934 01
GSK Investigational Site
Liptovský Hrádok, 033 01
GSK Investigational Site
Poprad, 058 01
GSK Investigational Site
Prešov, 080 01
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, 24 Week, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study (With an Extension to 52 Weeks in a Subset of Subjects) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI Administered Once Daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler With Budesonide/Formoterol 400mcg/12mcg Administered Twice-Daily Via a Reservoir Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
This is a phase IIIa, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group multicenter study evaluating once daily FF/UMEC/VI (100 microgram [mcg]/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) inhalation powder versus twice daily budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg). The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate improvements in lung function and health status for subjects treated with FF/UMEC/VI compared with budesonide/formoterol for 24 weeks. Once-daily 'closed' triple therapy of a Inhaled Corticosteroid/ Long-acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists/ Long Acting Beta-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) combination FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) in a single device is being developed with the aim of providing a new treatment option for the management of advanced (GOLD Group D) COPD which will reduce the exacerbation frequency, allow for a reduced burden of polypharmacy, convenience, and increase the potential for improvement in lung function, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and symptom control over established dual/monotherapies.
Subjects meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria and who have successfully completed all protocol procedures at the Screening Visit will enter the two-week run-in period. Following the run-in period, eligible subjects will be randomised (1:1) to one of the following double-blind treatment groups: FF/UMEC/VI 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg via the ELLIPTA™ dry powder inhaler (DPI) once daily in the morning and placebo via reservoir inhaler twice daily OR Budesonide/formoterol 400 mcg/12 mcg via reservoir inhaler twice daily and placebo via the ELLIPTA DPI once daily in the morning.
Read more
The target enrollment is 1800 randomised subjects at approximately 200 study centers globally. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 27 weeks, consisting of a 2-week run-in period, 24-week treatment period and a 1-week follow-up period. Subjects will run-in on their existing COPD medications for 2 weeks and in addition will be provided with short acting albuterol/salbutamol to be used on an as-needed basis (rescue medication) throughout the study. Subjects will discontinue all existing COPD medications during the randomised treatment period but may continue their study supplied rescue albuterol/salbutamol. A sub-set of approximately 400 subjects will remain on blinded study treatment for up to a total of 52 weeks to provide additional long term safety data.
ELLIPTA and NUBULES are a trade marks of the GlaxoSmithKline Group of Companies. Other company or product names mentioned herein may be the property of their respective owners
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- Triple FF/UMEC/VI, Placebo to match FF/UMEC/VI, Budesonide/Formoterol, Placebo to match Budesonide/Formoterol combination, Albuterol/salbutamol
- Keywords
- Triple Therapy, Formoterol, Respiratory, COPD, Budesonide, Vilanterol, Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium, Lung Function
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Triple FF/UMEC/VIDrug
The combination will be provided as inhalation via an ELLIPTA DPI having 30 doses (2 strips with 30 blisters per strip). It will have 100 mcg of FF (blended with lactose) per blister, 62.5 mcg of UMEC (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) per blister and 25 mcg of VI (blended with lactose) per blister.
Placebo to match FF/UMEC/VIDrug
The placebo (Lactose) will be provided as inhalation via an ELLIPTA DPI having 30 doses (2 strips with 30 blisters per strip).
Budesonide/FormoterolDrug
The combination (400 mcg Budesonide/12 mcg Formoterol) will be provided as inhalation via TURBOHALER with 60 doses.
Placebo to match Budesonide/Formoterol combinationDrug
The placebo (Lactose) will be provided as inhalation via TURBOHALER with 60 doses.
Albuterol/salbutamolDrug
Albuterol/salbutamol will be available as an inhalation via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer and will be issued for reversibility testing at Visit 1 Albuterol/salbutamol MDI or NEBULES™ for as needed (prn) use throughout the study will be provided starting at Visit 1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) | Experimental | Each subject will inhale once from their ELLIPTA DPI and once from the reservoir inhaler in the morning and once from the reservoir inhaler in the evening, for 24 weeks (or 52 weeks for subjects participating in the extension part of the study). Subjects will receive FF/UMEC/VI (100mcg/62.5mcg/25mcg) via the ELLIPTA DPI and placebo via reservoir inhaler. Receives: Drug: Triple FF/UMEC/VI; Drug: Placebo to match FF/UMEC/VI; Drug: Albuterol/salbutamol |
| Budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg) | Experimental | Each subject will inhale once from their ELLIPTA DPI and once from the reservoir inhaler in the morning and once from the reservoir inhaler in the evening, for 24 weeks (or 52 weeks for subjects participating in the extension part of the study). Subjects will receive Budesonide/formoterol (400mcg/12mcg) via reservoir inhaler and placebo via the ELLIPTA DPI. Receives: Drug: Budesonide/Formoterol; Drug: Placebo to match Budesonide/Formoterol combination; Drug: Albuterol/salbutamol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. ITT Population comprised of all randomized subjects excluding those who were randomized in error. Only participants with analyzable data at the given time point were analyzed.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 52
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 52 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Extension Population: all participants in the ITT Population who were enrolled into the subset of participants with extension to 52 weeks.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; SGRQ) Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 24
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD; SGRQ Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 52
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions.
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (45)
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 24
The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Week 4 and Week 24. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions.
Measured: Week 24
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 52
The TDI measures change in the participant's dyspnoea from Baseline. The scores in both indexes depend on ratings for three different categories: functional impairment; magnitude of task; and magnitude of effort. Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 (major deterioration) to +6 (major improvement). TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of the three individual scores and then divided by 2 (so the range of the TDI focal score is -9 to +9). TDI was measured at Weeks 4, 24 and 52. Analysis performed using a repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, BDI focal score, BDI focal score by visit and treatment by visit interactions
Measured: Week 52
Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 24
Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as part of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 52
Participants were asked to complete the daily activity question as aprt of the eDiary, which included the following options: 0: fewer activities, 1: no affect on my activities, and 2: more activities than usual. Daily activity question percentage of days with score of 2 over Weeks 1-24 was analysed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region and baseline.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 24
The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1).
Measured: Up to Week 24
Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 52
The mean annual moderate and severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment (trt) period (per participant [par.] per year) was assessed. The event rate for exacerbations was calculated as the number of events x 1000 divided by the total participant exposure during the time-period of interest. An exacerbation of COPD, is defined as the worsening of two or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, sputum purulence [color]) for at least two consecutive days; or the worsening of any one major symptom together with any one of the minor symptoms (sore throat, cold, fever without other cause, increased cough, increased wheeze) for at least two consecutive days. Analysis performed using a generalised linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution and covariates of treatment group, exacerbation history (0, 1, >=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (day 1).
Measured: Up to Week 52
Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)-RS Scores up to Week 24
The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title).
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean EXACT-RS Scores up to Week 52
The EXACT-PRO is a 14 item instrument designed to capture information on the occurrence, frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations of disease in participants with COPD. EXACT-RS consists of 11 items from the 14 item EXACT-PRO instrument and has a scoring range of 0-40. Three subscales are used to describe different symptoms; dyspnoea (range 0-17), cough and sputum (range 0-11) and chest symptoms (range 0-12). Baseline was defined as the mean value during the period between Visits 1 and 2. Mean scores were calculated for each four weekly period and change from Baseline was calculated as four weekly score minus the Baseline value. Four weekly intervals were analyzed using a MMRM method with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, time period, baseline, baseline by time period and treatment by time period interactions. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title).
Measured: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Treatment Period
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment AE/SAEs in the Extension Part of the Study
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. These included an exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury. Abnormal and clinically significant laboratory test results were also recorded as an AE or SAE. COPD exacerbations were an expected disease-related outcome and were not to be recorded as an AE, unless they met the definition of an SAE. Participants were not to be withdrawn from the study due to COPD exacerbations and their evaluation was an efficacy endpoint.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Treatment Period
All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray and at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated white blood cells (WBC) (>10,000/millimeter [mm^3] or >15 percent immature forms) or Hypoxemia (hemoglobin/oxygen [HbO2] saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value).
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Extension Part of the Study
All suspected pneumonias required confirmation as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray AND at least 2 of the following signs and symptoms: Increased cough, Increased sputum purulence (colour) or production, Auscultatory findings of adventitious sounds , Dyspnea or tachypnea, Fever (oral temperature > 37.5 °C), Elevated WBC (>10,000/mm3 or >15 percent immature forms) orr Hypoxemia (HbO2 saturation <88 percent or at least 2 percent lower than Baseline value).
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Cardiovascular (CV) Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Treatment Period
Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction].
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment CV Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Extension Part of the Study
Cardiovascular safety was monitored via AE reporting with categorization and analysis of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions. In addition, ECGs and vital signs were measured in all subjects and24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in a predefined subset. Pre-specified MACE analysis was conducted based on adjudicated CV deaths and investigator-reported non-fatal AEs. Number of participants with any of the following MACE events were to be included per the broad and narrow analyses: Broad MACE criteria (ischemic heart disease standardized MedDRA query [SMQ; myocardial infarction SMQ and other ischemic diseases]) and narrow MACE criteria (myocardial infarction [acute myocardial infarction]
Measured: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24
A single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 52
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG heart rate was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) and PR Interval at Week 24
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in QTcF and PR Interval at Week 52
Single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in ECG QTcF and PR interval was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) at Week 24
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4 and Week 24 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in QTcB at Week 52
A single 12-lead ECG and rhythm strip were recorded after measurement of vital signs and spirometry. Recordings were made at Screening (Visit 1) and approximately 15-45 minutes after dosing on treatment Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or IP Discontinuation Visit. Change from Baseline in QTcB was summarized for each post-Baseline assessment up to Week 52. Change from Baseline was calculated as the individual post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). All ECG measurements were made with the participants in a supine position having rested in this position for approximately 5 minutes before each reading.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 24
Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were collected taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 52
Vital signs were obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation Visit. A single set of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) measurements were taken after the participant had rested for 5 minutes in the sitting position. Change from Baseline values for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) at Week 52 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization which records both systolic and diastolic BP (generally Screening but could be a test repeat).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Week 24
The 24-hour holter measurements were obtained at Screening and 24 hours prior to Week 24 (Visits 1 and 6). The number of participants with clinically significant change (abnormal) were reported. Holter Monitoring Population: all participants in the ITT Population who had at least one holter monitoring evaluation.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24
Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4 and Week 24 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 24 were summarised and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52
Pulse rate was obtained at the Screening Visit and prior to taking the morning dose of study treatment and prior to conducting spirometry at Week 4, Week 24, and Week 52 or at the Study Treatment Discontinuation. Pulse rate was measured in a sitting position after the participant was kept at rest for at least 5 minutes. Change from Baseline values for pulse rate at Week 52 were summarized and these data were analyzed using MMRM analysis. Baseline was defined as the values from most recent assessment prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 24
Hematology laboratory assessments included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a repeat test). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 52
Hematology laboratory assessments included Basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes,neutrophils, total neutrophil, leukocytes, and platelets; parameters were measured at Baseline (BL), Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 24
Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 24. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 52
Hematology laboratory assessments included erythrocytes and was measured at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-dose value at Week 52. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit (proportion of red blood cells in blood) at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline (BL) was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). The maximum post BL values have been presented. Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and protein at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Aminotransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, and Creatine Kinase at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, and GGT at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, CO2, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of Glucose, calcium, CO2, chloride, magnesium, phophate, potassium, sodium, and urea at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 for the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 24
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat). Only participants with data available at the analysis time point were analyzed (represented as n=X, X in category title). The maximum post-Baseline values have also been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 52
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of bilirubin, creatinine, and urate at Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 52 of the extension part of the study. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the most recent individual value prior to randomization (generally Screening but could be a test repeat).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Treatment Period
Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, Candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants Reporting an AESI of Oropharyngeal Origin in the Extension Part of the Study
Oropharyngeal examinations for clinical evidence of infection (e.g., Candida albicans) were performed at each clinic visit. All suspected cases of candidiasis were reported as AEs. The number of participants with oral candidiasis, candida infection, oral fungal infection, and oropharyngeal candidiasis were reported.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Treatment Period
To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With at Least One On-treatment Bone Fracture Incident in the Extension Part of the Study
To evaluate the potential for bone systemic corticosteroid effects, the incidence of bone fractures was assessed. It was categorized as an adverse event of special interest.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start23 Jan 2015
- Primary completion1 Apr 2016
- Study completion7 Apr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,811 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02345161
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 116853
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Lipson DA, Birk R, Brealey N, Zhu CQ. 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Dec;37(12):4894-4909. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01496-7. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
PubMed 33011864Schroeder M, Benjamin N, Atienza L, Biswas C, Martin A, Whalen JD, Izquierdo Alonso JL, Riesco Miranda JA, Soler-Cataluna JJ, Huerta A, Ismaila AS. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using the FULFIL Trial: A Spanish Perspective. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 10;15:1621-1632. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S240556. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32764908Mehta R, Farrell C, Hayes S, Birk R, Okour M, Lipson DA. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jan;59(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00794-w.
PubMed 31321713Naya I, Compton C, Ismaila AS, Birk R, Brealey N, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Lipson DA, Criner G. Preventing clinically important deterioration with single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2018 Oct 3;4(4):00047-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00047-2018. eCollection 2018 Oct.
PubMed 30302335Tabberer M, Lomas DA, Birk R, Brealey N, Zhu CQ, Pascoe S, Locantore N, Lipson DA. Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life. Adv Ther. 2018 Jan;35(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0650-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
PubMed 29313286Ismaila AS, Birk R, Shah D, Zhang S, Brealey N, Risebrough NA, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Lipson DA. Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with Advanced COPD: Healthcare Resource Utilization Data and Associated Costs from the FULFIL Trial. Adv Ther. 2017 Sep;34(9):2163-2172. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0604-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
PubMed 28875459Lipson DA, Barnacle H, Birk R, Brealey N, Locantore N, Lomas DA, Ludwig-Sengpiel A, Mohindra R, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Pascoe SJ. FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 15;196(4):438-446. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0449OC.
PubMed 28375647
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, 24 Week, Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study (With an Extension to 52 Weeks in a Subset of Subjects) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI Administered Once Daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler With Budesonide/Formoterol 400mcg/12mcg Administered Twice-Daily Via a Reservoir Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02345161
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 116853
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Keywords
- Triple Therapy, Formoterol, Respiratory, COPD, Budesonide, Vilanterol, Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,811 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jul 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase IIIa, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group multicenter study evaluating once daily FF/UMEC/VI (100 microgram [mcg]/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) inhalation powder versus twice daily budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg). The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate improvements in lung function and health status for subjects treated with FF/UMEC/VI compared with budesonide/formoterol for 24 weeks. Once-daily 'closed' triple therapy of a Inhaled Corticosteroid/ Long-acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists/ Long Acting Beta-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) combination FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) in a single device is being developed with the aim of providing a new treatment option for the management of advanced (GOLD Group D) COPD which will reduce the exacerbation frequency, allow for a reduced burden of polypharmacy, convenience, and increase the potential for improvement in lung function, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and symptom control over established dual/monotherapies.
Subjects meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria and who have successfully completed all protocol procedures at the Screening Visit will enter the two-week run-in period. Following the run-in period, eligible subjects will be randomised (1:1) to one of the following double-blind treatment groups: FF/UMEC/VI 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg via the ELLIPTA™ dry powder inhaler (DPI) once daily in the morning and placebo via reservoir inhaler twice daily OR Budesonide/formoterol 400 mcg/12 mcg via reservoir inhaler twice daily and placebo via the ELLIPTA DPI once daily in the morning.
The target enrollment is 1800 randomised subjects at approximately 200 study centers globally. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 27 weeks, consisting of a 2-week run-in period, 24-week treatment period and a 1-week follow-up period. Subjects will run-in on their existing COPD medications for 2 weeks and in addition will be provided with short acting albuterol/salbutamol to be used on an as-needed basis (rescue medication) throughout the study. Subjects will discontinue all existing COPD medications during the randomised treatment period but may continue their study supplied rescue albuterol/salbutamol. A sub-set of approximately 400 subjects will remain on blinded study treatment for up to a total of 52 weeks to provide additional long term safety data.
ELLIPTA and NUBULES are a trade marks of the GlaxoSmithKline Group of Companies. Other company or product names mentioned herein may be the property of their respective owners
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) | Experimental | Drug: Triple FF/UMEC/VI, Drug: Placebo to match FF/UMEC/VI, Drug: Albuterol/salbutamolEach subject will inhale once from their ELLIPTA DPI and once from the reservoir inhaler in the morning and once from the reservoir inhaler in the evening, for 24 weeks (or 52 weeks for subjects participating in the extension part of the study). Subjects will receive FF/UMEC/VI (100mcg/62.5mcg/25mcg) via the ELLIPTA DPI and placebo via reservoir inhaler. |
| Budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg) | Experimental | Drug: Budesonide/Formoterol, Drug: Placebo to match Budesonide/Formoterol combination, Drug: Albuterol/salbutamolEach subject will inhale once from their ELLIPTA DPI and once from the reservoir inhaler in the morning and once from the reservoir inhaler in the evening, for 24 weeks (or 52 weeks for subjects participating in the extension part of the study). Subjects will receive Budesonide/formoterol (400mcg/12mcg) via reservoir inhaler and placebo via the ELLIPTA DPI. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Informed Consent: A signed and dated written informed consent prior to study participation.
- Type of subject: Outpatient.
- Age: Subjects 40 years of age or older at Screening (Visit 1).
- Gender: Male or female subjects. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-child bearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, >45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy. OR Child bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to one of the following acceptable contraceptive methods used consistently and correctly (i.e. in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study - screening to safety follow-up contact): Abstinence, Oral Contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone, Injectable progestogen, Implants of levonorgestrel, Estrogenic vaginal ring, Percutaneous contraceptive patches, Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. For this definition, "documented" refers to the outcome of the investigator's/designee's medical examination of the subject or review of the subject's medical history for study eligibility, as obtained via a verbal interview with the subject or from the subject's medical records.; Double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)
- COPD Diagnosis: An established clinical history of COPD in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society.
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study.
- Asthma: Subjects with a current diagnosis of asthma. (Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD). Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: Subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD.
- Other respiratory disorders: Subjects with active tuberculosis, lung cancer, significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases.
- Lung resection: Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery within the 12 months prior to Screening.
- Risk Factors for Pneumonia: immune suppression (e.g. Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], Lupus) or other risk factors for pneumonia (e.g. neurological disorders affecting control of the upper airway, such as Parkinson's Disease, Myasthenia Gravis). Subjects at potentially high risk (e.g. very low Body mass index [BMI], severely malnourished, or very low FEV1) will only be included at the discretion of the investigator.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Triple FF/UMEC/VIThe combination will be provided as inhalation via an ELLIPTA DPI having 30 doses (2 strips with 30 blisters per strip). It will have 100 mcg of FF (blended with lactose) per blister, 62.5 mcg of UMEC (blended with lactose and magnesium stearate) per blister and 25 mcg of VI (blended with lactose) per blister. | Drug | FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) |
| Placebo to match FF/UMEC/VIThe placebo (Lactose) will be provided as inhalation via an ELLIPTA DPI having 30 doses (2 strips with 30 blisters per strip). | Drug | FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) |
| Budesonide/FormoterolThe combination (400 mcg Budesonide/12 mcg Formoterol) will be provided as inhalation via TURBOHALER with 60 doses. | Drug | Budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg) |
| Placebo to match Budesonide/Formoterol combinationThe placebo (Lactose) will be provided as inhalation via TURBOHALER with 60 doses. | Drug | Budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg) |
| Albuterol/salbutamolAlbuterol/salbutamol will be available as an inhalation via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer and will be issued for reversibility testing at Visit 1 Albuterol/salbutamol MDI or NEBULES™ for as needed (prn) use throughout the study will be provided starting at Visit 1. | Drug | Budesonide/formoterol (400 mcg/12 mcg), FF/UMEC/VI (100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. ITT Population comprised of all randomized subjects excluding those who were randomized in error. Only participants with analyzable data at the given time point were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 52 was defined as the FEV1 values obtained prior to morning dose of the study treatment. Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose (0 minutes) on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the pre-dose measurement at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Extension Population: all participants in the ITT Population who were enrolled into the subset of participants with extension to 52 weeks.
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; SGRQ) Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD; SGRQ Total Score for COPD Participants at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
The SGRQ-C is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure the impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SGRQ-C total score was converted to SGRQ total score (ranging from 0-100) according to manual. In addition to an overall summary (total) score, scores for the individual domains of Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts (each ranging from 0-100) are produced. A decrease in score indicated improvement in quality of life. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Baseline was defined as the value obtained predose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus the Baseline value. The analysis for SGRQ total score was performed using a MMRM method including covariates of treatment group, smoking status (screening), geographical region, visit, baseline, baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions.
45 secondary outcomes
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score Expressed as Least Square Mean at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 24
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Daily Activity Question Percentage of Days Reporting a Score of 2 up to Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 24
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Mean Annual On-treatment Moderate and/or Severe COPD Exacerbations up to Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT)-RS Scores up to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms by Change From Baseline in 4-weekly Mean EXACT-RS Scores up to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment AE/SAEs in the Extension Part of the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With an On-treatment Penumonia Event in the Extension Part of the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment Cardiovascular (CV) Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Any On-treatment CV Events (Including Supraventricular Arrhythmia and Non Fatal Myocardial Infarction) in the Extension Part of the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) and PR Interval at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in QTcF and PR Interval at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate According to Bazett's Formula (QTcB) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in QTcB at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (BP) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Holter Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Week 24
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, and Platelets at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Aminotransferase (GGT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, ALP, and Creatine Kinase at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Glucose, Calcium, CO2, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium, and Urea at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33011864Lipson DA, Birk R, Brealey N, Zhu CQ. 24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Dec;37(12):4894-4909. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01496-7. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32764908Schroeder M, Benjamin N, Atienza L, Biswas C, Martin A, Whalen JD, Izquierdo Alonso JL, Riesco Miranda JA, Soler-Cataluna JJ, Huerta A, Ismaila AS. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using the FULFIL Trial: A Spanish Perspective. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jul 10;15:1621-1632. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S240556. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31321713Mehta R, Farrell C, Hayes S, Birk R, Okour M, Lipson DA. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jan;59(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00794-w.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30302335Naya I, Compton C, Ismaila AS, Birk R, Brealey N, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Lipson DA, Criner G. Preventing clinically important deterioration with single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2018 Oct 3;4(4):00047-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00047-2018. eCollection 2018 Oct.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29313286Tabberer M, Lomas DA, Birk R, Brealey N, Zhu CQ, Pascoe S, Locantore N, Lipson DA. Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life. Adv Ther. 2018 Jan;35(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0650-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28875459Ismaila AS, Birk R, Shah D, Zhang S, Brealey N, Risebrough NA, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Lipson DA. Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with Advanced COPD: Healthcare Resource Utilization Data and Associated Costs from the FULFIL Trial. Adv Ther. 2017 Sep;34(9):2163-2172. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0604-x. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28375647Lipson DA, Barnacle H, Birk R, Brealey N, Locantore N, Lomas DA, Ludwig-Sengpiel A, Mohindra R, Tabberer M, Zhu CQ, Pascoe SJ. FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 15;196(4):438-446. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0449OC.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
RecruitingPhase 2
PRA-216 COPD Safety and Biomarker Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Solrikitug in Participants With COPD (ZION)
COPD
RecruitingPhase 2
To Evaluate the Effect of EXPD-101/FXS7553 Compared With Placebo in Patients With COPD Over 52 Weeks of Treatment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
159 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Triple FF/UMEC/VI, Budesonide/Formoterol and Albuterol/salbutamol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 159 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 159 sites in Russia, Germany, Mexico, Ukraine, Czechia and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline to Week 24). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02345161, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2018.