AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationNCT02345577

Whole-body Vibration Physiotherapy in Kidney Transplantation

A study testing Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical intervention in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Kidney recipients loose significant amounts of muscle mass and skeleton minerals in the early post-transplantation period and suffer from increasing abnormalities of neuromuscular functions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplantation
What is being tested?
Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
16 Dec 2014to 17 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Kidney transplantation in the last 12 months
  • Stable kidney function (eGFR>20 ml/min)
  • No episode of acute rejection during the last 2 months
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Inability to posture or to perform whole-body vibration therapy or MRS after transplantation
  • Treatment with anabolic medication, fluorine, bisphosphonates, or hormone replacement therapy (estrogens, selective modulators of the estrogenic receptors) within the previous 3 months
  • Treatment with high-dose steroid therapy due to acute rejection episode during the last 2 months before study inclusion
  • Implanted devices (pacemakers, defibrillators, stents, etc.)
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous ophthalmic cataract surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Previous history of epilepsy
  • Previous recent spine of leg fracture (last 3 months)
  • Other individuals especially in need of protection (according to the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, Bern University Hospital

    Bern, 3010 Bern

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Effects of Stochastic Whole-body Vibration Physiotherapy-WBV (Stochastic Resonance Physiotherapy-SRT) on Muscle Strength in Patients After Kidney Transplantation: a Pilot Study

Kidney recipients loose significant amounts of muscle mass and skeleton minerals in the early post-transplantation period and suffer from increasing abnormalities of neuromuscular functions.

Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy is a relatively new form of movement physiotherapy that is used for strength training. Various clinical studies have shown that in addition to muscle function, WBV also improved body balance and bone mineral density. To study the impact of stochastic WBV physiotherapy on musculoskeletal parameters after renal transplantation, kidney transplant recipients will be enrolled and undergo WBV. The investigators hypothesize that WBV physiotherapy improves both maximum muscle strength and muscular performance

Read the detailed description

Background

The increasing incidence of muscular wasting, bone disease, falls and related fractures are the price for excellent survival rates in transplanted patients. Kidney recipients loose significant amounts of muscle mass and skeleton minerals in the early post-transplantation period and suffer from increasing abnormalities of neuromuscular functions.

Recently, stochastic whole-body vibration (WBV) has received much attention as a potential muscle-anabolic and anti-osteoporotic intervention. It is suggested that the randomized low-frequency signals produced during such training can activate otherwise high threshold afferent and efferent motor-neurons and thus may result in a considerable neuromuscular activation. Additionally, there data supporting peripherally-induced central biochemical activation, that meaning the production of CNS modulators due to application of mechanical exercise such as stochastic WBV. The result is a rapid (within minutes), transient force increase. Due to the high number of stimuli-repetitions, it is possible to increase muscle strength using shorter training times (<5 min) than with conventional physiotherapeutic methods (> 30 min). Several experimental and clinical studies have shown that in addition to muscle function, WBV also improved body balance and bone mineral density.

Moreover, a population of renal transplant recipients has not yet been studied elsewhere.

WBV is a very appealing approach, foremost in subjects with limited physical activity; it represents a potentially simple and efficient training method for skeletal muscle and better functional performance, thus preventing falls and consequently fractures.

Objective

Primary:

  • To determine the effect of post-transplantation stochastic WBV therapy on preservation of functional muscle strength.

Secondary:

To assess a) the efficacy of post-transplantation stochastic WBV on body balance b) the efficacy of post-transplantation stochastic WBV on preservation of lean muscle mass determined by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) c) the changes in bone turnover markers in renal transplant recipients under stochastic WBV therapy d) the short-term safety of stochastic WBV therapy in renal transplant recipients.

Methods

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled setting.

Recruited individuals will be randomized in Group 1 (intervention) and in Group 2 (placebo). All participants will be evaluated monthly for occurrence of falls and fractures, and treatment-associated side effects. Testing will be performed upon study entry and at 3 and 6 months according to the following schedule:

Visit 1 (Baseline):

  • Muscle strength measurement
  • Neuromuscular tests (SPPBT)
  • Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)
  • Turnover Markers (blood) Visits 2 and 3 (after 3 and 6 months respectively): Identical to visit 1
Being tested
Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical intervention, Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Sham physiotherapeutical intervention
Keywords
Kidney transplantation, Stochastic whole body vibration therapy, Muscle strength, Intramuscular lipid content, Intramyocellular lipid content, Short Physical Performance Battery Test, Prospective, randomised , double blind,placebo-controlled trial, Physical Therapy Modalities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical interventionOther

    Physiotherapeutical intervention

  • Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Sham physiotherapeutical interventionOther

    Sham physiotherapeutical intervention

Study groups in NCT02345577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Physiotherapeutical interventionActive comparator3 WBV-sessions per week for 3 consecutive months. Each session consists of 5 series with a duration of 60 sec with 60 sec rest-time with vibration of increasing frequency starting at 1Hz / Noise 4 going up to 6Hz / Noise 5 depending on patients' tolerability and with a fixed 3mm amplitude.
Receives: Other: Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical intervention
Sham physiotherapeutical interventionSham comparator3 WBV-sessions per week for 3 consecutive months. Each session consists of 5 series with a duration of 60 sec with 60 sec rest-time at 1 Hz / Noise 1 and 3mm amplitude.
Receives: Other: Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Sham physiotherapeutical intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in maximal isometric strength of the leg extensors from baseline to 3 and 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change of neuromuscular test (SPPBT)-score from baseline to 3 and 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Change of muscle mass from baseline to 3 and 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Change of intramuscular lipid content from baseline to 3 and 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Change of intramyocellular (calf) lipid content from baseline to 3 and 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Falls during study period

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Fractures during study period

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion17 Jul 2017

Why it stopped: Due to low recruitment rate

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02345577
Sponsor's protocol ID
176/14
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
19 Jan 2015
Last updated
25 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Streja E, Molnar MZ, Kovesdy CP, Bunnapradist S, Jing J, Nissenson AR, Mucsi I, Danovitch GM, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Associations of pretransplant weight and muscle mass with mortality in renal transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jun;6(6):1463-73. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09131010. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

    PubMed 21415312
  • Lai CL, Tseng SY, Chen CN, Liao WC, Wang CH, Lee MC, Hsu PS. Effect of 6 months of whole body vibration on lumbar spine bone density in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1603-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S53591. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

    PubMed 24348029
  • Rogan S, Hilfiker R, Schmid S, Radlinger L. Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration training for chair rising performance on untrained elderly: a pilot study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Sep-Oct;55(2):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

    PubMed 22425243
  • Rogan S, Hilfiker R, Herren K, Radlinger L, de Bruin ED. Effects of whole-body vibration on postural control in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2011 Nov 3;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-72.

    PubMed 22054046
  • Calendo LR, Taeymans J, Rogan S. [Does muscle activation during whole-body vibration induce bone density improvement in postmenopausal women?--A systematic review]. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2014 Sep;28(3):125-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366545. Epub 2014 May 14. German.

    PubMed 24828509

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stochastic whole body vibration (WBV) therapy - Physiotherapeutical intervention in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to low recruitment rate). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in maximal isometric strength of the leg extensors from baseline to 3 and 6 months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02345577, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in