AzTrials
AzTrials

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsPhase 1/2NCT02346617

Adoptive Transfer of pp65-specific T Cells for the Treatment of Refractory Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection

A Phase 1/2 study testing IFN-γ positive selected T-cells in people with Cytomegalovirus Infections, run by Yae-Jean Kim at 1 site in South Korea.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy for treatment of persistent CMV infection in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Cytomegalovirus Infections
What is being tested?
IFN-γ positive selected T-cells
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Less than 66 years old Allogeneic HCT recipients who received stem cells from related CMV positive serology donors
  • AND recipients have persistent CMV infection more than 2 weeks on antiviral treatment

Who cannot join

  • HCT recipients with severe graft versus host disease, grade 3 or more
  • OR organ dysfunction (brain, heart, lung, liver, and kidney): altered mentality, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilator, increased liver enzymes 5 times above upper normal values, bilirubin level >3 mg/dL, CrCl < 30 mL/min

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, Gangnam-Gu, 135-710

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Adoptive Transfer of pp65-specific T Cells for the Treatment of Refractory Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

To evaluate the safety and efficacy for treatment of persistent CMV infection in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients.

Read the detailed description

HCT recipients who are receiving immunosuppressive agents to control graft versus host diseases (GVHD) are at high risk for serious CMV infection due to CMV reactivation or reinfection during their post-transplant period.

Antiviral agents used to treat CMV infection have well-known side effects such as bone marrow suppression causing cytopenia and renal toxicities. Therefore, patients in a serious condition would have a higher probability of antiviral treatment-related toxicities and also increased possibility for prolonged antiviral treatment, thus development of antiviral resistance and risk of treatment failure.

Allogeneic HCT recipients are typically lack of these CMV-specific T cells during the post-transplant period and their immune function can be further repressed especially when they are on additional immunosuppressive agents to prevent GVHD. Therefore, these patients may benefit from CMV-specific T cell adoptive transfer.

Being tested
IFN-γ positive selected T-cells
Keywords
CMV, T cell therapy
Medical subject headings
Cytomegalovirus Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IFN-γ positive selected T-cellsBiological

    No intervention

Study groups in NCT02346617
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
allogeneic HSCTExperimentalThe present study will investigate in a single-center (Samsung Medical Center), open-label, single arm by direct infusions of donor-derived CMV-spefic IFN-γ positive T-cells for the treatment of refractory CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.
Receives: Biological: IFN-γ positive selected T-cells

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Level of enriched IFN-Υ+ T-cells upon pp65 stimulation

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment efficacy of CMV infection, defined as reduction of CMV viremia, ex vivo enrichment of CMV antigen (pp65) -specific T cells in peripheral blood.

    Treatment efficacy defined as reduction of CMV viremia, ex vivo enrichment of CMV antigen (pp65) -specific T cells in peripheral blood.

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Due to the KoreaFDA issue

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02346617
Sponsor's protocol ID
SMC 2010-08-129-008
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
13 Jan 2015
Last updated
20 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kim YJ, Boeckh M, Cook L, Stempel H, Jerome KR, Boucek R Jr, Burroughs L, Englund JA. Cytomegalovirus infection and ganciclovir resistance caused by UL97 mutations in pediatric transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;14(6):611-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2012.00760.x.

    PubMed 23198963
  • Feuchtinger T, Opherk K, Bethge WA, Topp MS, Schuster FR, Weissinger EM, Mohty M, Or R, Maschan M, Schumm M, Hamprecht K, Handgretinger R, Lang P, Einsele H. Adoptive transfer of pp65-specific T cells for the treatment of chemorefractory cytomegalovirus disease or reactivation after haploidentical and matched unrelated stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2010 Nov 18;116(20):4360-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262089. Epub 2010 Jul 12.

    PubMed 20625005
  • Peggs KS, Thomson K, Samuel E, Dyer G, Armoogum J, Chakraverty R, Pang K, Mackinnon S, Lowdell MW. Directly selected cytomegalovirus-reactive donor T cells confer rapid and safe systemic reconstitution of virus-specific immunity following stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq042.

    PubMed 21148519
  • Peggs KS, Verfuerth S, Pizzey A, Chow SL, Thomson K, Mackinnon S. Cytomegalovirus-specific T cell immunotherapy promotes restoration of durable functional antiviral immunity following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 15;49(12):1851-60. doi: 10.1086/648422.

    PubMed 19911966
  • Yi ES, Kim YJ. Cytomegalovirus infection according to cell source after hematopoietic cell transplantation in pediatric patients. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):393-400. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.393.

    PubMed 22318829
  • Tomblyn M, Chiller T, Einsele H, Gress R, Sepkowitz K, Storek J, Wingard JR, Young JA, Boeckh MJ; Center for International Blood and Marrow Research; National Marrow Donor program; European Blood and MarrowTransplant Group; American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients: a global perspective. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Oct;15(10):1143-238. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.06.019. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19747629
  • Boeckh M, Ljungman P. How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Blood. 2009 Jun 4;113(23):5711-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-143560. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

    PubMed 19299333
  • Vivier E, Ugolini S. Natural killer cells: from basic research to treatments. Front Immunol. 2011 Jun 3;2:18. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00018. eCollection 2011. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22566808
  • Hadaya K, Avila Y, Valloton L, de Rham C, Bandelier C, Ferrari-Lacraz S, Pascual M, Pantaleo G, Martin PY, Buhler L, Villard J. Natural killer cell receptor--repertoire and functions after induction therapy by polyclonal rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin in unsensitized kidney transplant recipients. Clin Immunol. 2010 Nov;137(2):250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

    PubMed 20719569
  • Vacher-Coponat H, Brunet C, Moal V, Loundou A, Bonnet E, Lyonnet L, Ravet S, Sampol-Manos E, Sampol J, Berland Y, George FD, Paul P. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil improved natural killer lymphocyte reconstitution one year after kidney transplant by reference to cyclosporine/azathioprine. Transplantation. 2006 Aug 27;82(4):558-66. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000229390.01369.4a.

    PubMed 16926601

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing IFN-γ positive selected T-cells in people with Cytomegalovirus Infections, run by Yae-Jean Kim at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Level of enriched IFN-Υ+ T-cells upon pp65 stimulation (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02346617, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in