StrokePhase 4NCT02346630
Combining Robotic-Assisted Therapy and Pharmacotherapy in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
A Phase 4 study testing Levodopa / Carbidopa and Armeo in people with Stroke, run by Ross D. Zafonte, MD at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Stroke is the leading cause of acquired long-term disability in adults in developed countries. Despite aggressive rehabilitation, lasting upper extremity impairment remains in the majority of stroke survivors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Levodopa / Carbidopa and Armeo
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female, community dwelling, age 18-85.
- First episode of stroke.
- Diagnosis of chronic ischemic stroke at least six months before study enrollment resulting in objective motor upper-extremity impairment as demonstrated during physical/neurological examination.
- Score of 15-55 out of 66 on the arm motor Fugl-Meyer scale.
- The ability to extend ≥ 10 degrees at metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint of all digits.
- Signed written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Intracranial hemorrhages.
- Pregnancy, planning to become pregnant or breast-feeding.
- History of seizures within the previous six months.
- Previous residual motor deficit in the affected side.
- Treatment with Botox injections in the affected arm in the previous 6 months.
- Cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding instructions for motor tasks and assessment tools.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Other major neurologic disorder (Parkinson's disease).
- Major depression defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire, other major psychiatric pathology, dementia, agitation (defined as a score of >21 on the Agitated Behavior Scale) or another uncooperative behavior.
- Inability to operate the Armeo system (which will be assessed during the calibration process). Subjects must have sufficient range of movement to enable calibration of the virtual workspace.
- Contraindications for Levodopa/ Carbidopa:
- Hypersensitivity to levodopa, carbidopa or any component of the formulation.
- Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within prior 14 days. Treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics, sapropterin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), pimozide, benzodiazepines, amantadine, methylphenidate, dopamine-agonists or neuroleptic drugs when inclusion or the month before.
- Narrow-angle glaucoma.
- Suspicious, undiagnosed skin lesions or a history of melanoma.
- Presence of metallic hardware in close contact to the discharging coil (cochlear implants, aneurism clips, brain implants, internal pulse generator, medication pumps).
- Contemporary participation in another interventional trial focused on the impaired arm recovery.
- Drug or alcohol abuse in the last 3 years.
- A terminal medical diagnosis with survival < 1 year.
- End-stage or uncompensated hepatic, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, endocrine, renal, digestive, hematologic or pulmonary disease. Active ulcer disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Combining Robotic-Assisted Therapy With Levodopa/Carbidopa in Chronic Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Hemiparesis
Stroke is the leading cause of acquired long-term disability in adults in developed countries. Despite aggressive rehabilitation, lasting upper extremity impairment remains in the majority of stroke survivors. It is hypothesized that enhancing neuroplasticity through the combination of drug therapy and physical therapy could enhance outcomes for stroke survivors. The combination of levodopa and intensive physical therapy shows promise in enhancing the functional motor recovery of stroke patients during the sub-acute and chronic period without reported significant side effects. Robotic-aided training is a promising tool that has the potential to deliver high-intensity, task-oriented, reproducible therapy that can decrease the burden on a therapist. Since the evidence behind dopaminergic potentiation of neuroplasticity and stroke recovery is promising, it is the investigators aim to combine dopaminergic drug therapy with highly intensive robotic-assisted therapy to provide superior upper extremity functional recovery over traditional stroke rehabilitation.
Read the detailed description
Every year, approximately 795,000 people suffer a new or recurrent stroke in the United States, meaning that every 40 seconds someone has a stroke. In the United States, stroke is the third most frequent cause of death and the leading cause of lasting hemiparesis and adult disability. Since the prevalence of stroke increases with age, and since the world population is aging, the incidence of stroke is expected to rise in the coming years. This will become a significant societal burden since the care of stroke survivors is costly, to the individual and to society.
Post-stroke upper extremity (UE) impairment usually implies initial weakness, with subsequent diminished dexterity and limitation or incapacity for reaching, transport and grasping movements since the onset. Survivors may regain partial or, less often, complete muscle strength in the affected UE during the recovery process. However, a persistent degree of weakness and evolution to secondary complications as spasticity (characterized by increased flexor hypertonia), shoulder pain and contractures is frequent. These additional issues are associated with greater impairment, worse function and lower health-related quality of life. Treatment interventions for hemiparesis after stroke usually include stretching, strengthening of antagonist muscles, splinting, oral medications, and focal injections (phenol or botulinum toxin) and intrathecal baclofen. However, the amount, intensity and length of therapies still need further investigation. Despite adequate traditional treatment, a high number of patients are still permanently limited as a consequence of stroke. Based on motor learning theories, recent studies have demonstrated that intensive, repetitive, task-oriented therapies can help the paretic extremity "relearn" how to perform movements that were lost after brain damage.
ROBOTIC-ASSISTED UPPER-LIMB TRAINING WITH ARMEO®
Current evidence has shown that rehabilitation without specific training will not result in measurable outcomes. Factors such as intensity and specificity of motor training are important to achieve recovery of motor function, especially in the chronic phase of the stroke. There is robust evidence that highly-repetitive movement rehabilitation could improve motor and functional ability, based on its role in motor learning processes.Robotic devices have become a very important area of research because of their capacity to achieve high-intensity and specificity therapies.
In this proposed project, we plan to use the Armeo robotic system to deliver motor training therapy. The Armeo system is an adjustable arm orthosis that has received FDA 510k exemption. It passively counterbalances the weight of the arm, thereby reducing the effort required by the paretic arm to overcome gravity. The device is able to augment feedback through a virtual environment (i.e. computer games). The tasks presented in the virtual environment are designed to achieve functional movements, i.e. the subject has to perform tasks such as reaching for objects as part of the game. Gravity compensation, which can reduce the level of difficulty of performing an activity, facilitates active arm movement, especially when it involves training in grasping and reaching. By using the Armeo system, we hope to achieve repetitive training of reach, grasp, and release in an engaging environment that can be adapted to individual capabilities. We also expect to enable stroke survivors whose motor weakness may have excluded them from performing repetitive therapy tasks to participate in this study.
LEVODOPA Several agents have widely proved their influence on neuronal plasticity. Among these agents, pharmacological drugs increasing the availability of Central Nervous System (CNS) neurotransmitters (dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, acetylcholine and hista mine) have shown the ability to modulate excitability in cortical neurons and exert a subsequent facilitator effect in neuroplasticity. In this regard, several studies have been conducted in the past two decades investigating, among other agents, the effects of amphetamines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, donepezil, psychostimulants as methylphenidate and dopaminergic agents. Levodopa (LD) is a desirable drug to evaluate because of its safe action profile. This oral medication is a precursor of dopamine (DA) that is actively transported across the blood-brain barrier and is converted to DA in the CNS and peripheral tissues. Approximately 95% of LD is converted to DA, stimulating dopaminergic neurotransmission, and the remaining 5% is converted to norepinephrine and affects adrenergic neurotransmission. DA plays a role in the formation of motor memories and thereby facilitates neuroplasticity, through the strengthening (long term potentiation, LTP) or weakening (long term depression, LTD) of the neuronal synapses, thereby generating neuroplasticity. DA has an inverted U-shape concentration curve effect to facilitate LTP. In previous studies doses of 100mg generated a facilitator effect, and 25 mg and 200 mg exerted an inhibitor effect on human cortex. This pharmacological agent has shown promising results in the treatment of stroke by enhancing functional motor recovery in the sub-acute and chronic period, in combination with intensive physical therapy, without reported significant side effects. In the acute and sub-acute phases, LD was demonstrated to improve functional motor skills that were maintained at three weeks follow up. LD also showed an additional benefit on the activities of daily living and in the severity of the stroke. In the chronic period, a single dose of LD combined with physical therapy for five weeks enhanced the formation of training-dependent elementary motor memory while improving UE dexterity.
COMBINING LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA WITH THE ARMEO SYSTEM
It is our hypothesis that the intake of levodopa/carbidopa LD/CD in combination with intensive robotic-assisted therapy will provide better outcomes in functional recovery tests than the same training alone. We also hypothesize that these improvements could be correlated with changes in motor cortex excitability. Current strategies to improve motor recovery after stroke focus on neuroplasticity and neuromodulation. There is growing interest in the combination of therapies and strategies to enhance plasticity and thereby functional recovery through the rehabilitation process. It is frequently hypothesized that the combination of drug therapy and physical rehabilitation could provide better outcomes by enhancing neuroplasticity phenomenon
We propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LD/CD in combination with repetitive upper-extremity functional task-oriented and robotic-aided training.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Placebo, Levodopa / Carbidopa, Armeo
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Also called Negative control
Placebo capsules daily for 3 weeks.
Levodopa / CarbidopaDrug
Also called Sinemet
Levodopa / Carbidopa drug 100/25 mg once a day for 3 weeks.
ArmeoDevice
Armeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Levodopa / Carbidopa + Armeo | Active comparator | Levodopa / Carbidopa drug 100/25 mg once a day for 3 weeks. Armeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks. Receives: Drug: Levodopa / Carbidopa; Device: Armeo |
| Placebo + Armeo | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsules daily for 3 weeks. Armeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Device: Armeo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Upper Extremity Score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM-UE) at 1 month
FM-UE is an ordinal scale with scores ranging from 0 to 66 for upper-limb motor performance. It is composed of 33 items. FM-UE is a measure of upper-extremity motor impairment including coordination and speed.
Measured: month 1
Secondary outcomes (8)
Computer Measures on the Armeo Robot
Speed, movement accuracy and efficiency
Measured: month 1
Analysis of Muscle Activation Patterns During Upper Extremity Movements
Electromyography Camera-based motion analysis
Measured: month 1
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Assessment (TMS)
TMS is a non-invasive and non-painful method to evaluate changes in cortical brain excitability, which has been used in several studies in recent years to assess the response of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies in stroke survival patients.
Measured: month 1
Veteran's Rand 36
This is a generic health-related quality of life assessment comprised of 36 items.
Measured: month 1
Hand Dynamometry
We will measure the grip strength of both hands using the Jamar® Hand Dynamometer. The time required is estimated to be less than 1 minute per hand.
Measured: month 1
Physical Examination
Arm range of motion and muscle strength (Manual Muscle Testing).
Measured: week 1
Modified Ashworth Scale
This scale represents a clinical measure of muscle spasticity.
Measured: month 1
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
WMFT consists of 17 items that are UE motor tasks that can assess movement components required for daily tasks. Tasks are sequenced to progressively use more upper-extremity joints and include movements that range from simple patterns of motion to complex ones. Performance time, strength and quality of motor function are assessed.
Measured: month 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2017 (estimated)
Why it stopped: We didn't receive the expected funding to support the study.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ross D. Zafonte, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ross D. Zafonte, MD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
- Investigators
- Ross Zafonte, DO, Principal investigator, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)Paolo Bonato, PhD, Study chair, Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalDuc A Tran, MD PhD, Study director, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02346630
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013-P-002440
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No sharing of IPD
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Combining Robotic-Assisted Therapy With Levodopa/Carbidopa in Chronic Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Hemiparesis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02346630
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2013-P-002440
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: We didn't receive the expected funding to support the study.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ross D. Zafonte, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is the leading cause of acquired long-term disability in adults in developed countries. Despite aggressive rehabilitation, lasting upper extremity impairment remains in the majority of stroke survivors. It is hypothesized that enhancing neuroplasticity through the combination of drug therapy and physical therapy could enhance outcomes for stroke survivors. The combination of levodopa and intensive physical therapy shows promise in enhancing the functional motor recovery of stroke patients during the sub-acute and chronic period without reported significant side effects. Robotic-aided training is a promising tool that has the potential to deliver high-intensity, task-oriented, reproducible therapy that can decrease the burden on a therapist. Since the evidence behind dopaminergic potentiation of neuroplasticity and stroke recovery is promising, it is the investigators aim to combine dopaminergic drug therapy with highly intensive robotic-assisted therapy to provide superior upper extremity functional recovery over traditional stroke rehabilitation.
Detailed description
Every year, approximately 795,000 people suffer a new or recurrent stroke in the United States, meaning that every 40 seconds someone has a stroke. In the United States, stroke is the third most frequent cause of death and the leading cause of lasting hemiparesis and adult disability. Since the prevalence of stroke increases with age, and since the world population is aging, the incidence of stroke is expected to rise in the coming years. This will become a significant societal burden since the care of stroke survivors is costly, to the individual and to society.
Post-stroke upper extremity (UE) impairment usually implies initial weakness, with subsequent diminished dexterity and limitation or incapacity for reaching, transport and grasping movements since the onset. Survivors may regain partial or, less often, complete muscle strength in the affected UE during the recovery process. However, a persistent degree of weakness and evolution to secondary complications as spasticity (characterized by increased flexor hypertonia), shoulder pain and contractures is frequent. These additional issues are associated with greater impairment, worse function and lower health-related quality of life. Treatment interventions for hemiparesis after stroke usually include stretching, strengthening of antagonist muscles, splinting, oral medications, and focal injections (phenol or botulinum toxin) and intrathecal baclofen. However, the amount, intensity and length of therapies still need further investigation. Despite adequate traditional treatment, a high number of patients are still permanently limited as a consequence of stroke. Based on motor learning theories, recent studies have demonstrated that intensive, repetitive, task-oriented therapies can help the paretic extremity "relearn" how to perform movements that were lost after brain damage.
ROBOTIC-ASSISTED UPPER-LIMB TRAINING WITH ARMEO®
Current evidence has shown that rehabilitation without specific training will not result in measurable outcomes. Factors such as intensity and specificity of motor training are important to achieve recovery of motor function, especially in the chronic phase of the stroke. There is robust evidence that highly-repetitive movement rehabilitation could improve motor and functional ability, based on its role in motor learning processes.Robotic devices have become a very important area of research because of their capacity to achieve high-intensity and specificity therapies.
In this proposed project, we plan to use the Armeo robotic system to deliver motor training therapy. The Armeo system is an adjustable arm orthosis that has received FDA 510k exemption. It passively counterbalances the weight of the arm, thereby reducing the effort required by the paretic arm to overcome gravity. The device is able to augment feedback through a virtual environment (i.e. computer games). The tasks presented in the virtual environment are designed to achieve functional movements, i.e. the subject has to perform tasks such as reaching for objects as part of the game. Gravity compensation, which can reduce the level of difficulty of performing an activity, facilitates active arm movement, especially when it involves training in grasping and reaching. By using the Armeo system, we hope to achieve repetitive training of reach, grasp, and release in an engaging environment that can be adapted to individual capabilities. We also expect to enable stroke survivors whose motor weakness may have excluded them from performing repetitive therapy tasks to participate in this study.
LEVODOPA Several agents have widely proved their influence on neuronal plasticity. Among these agents, pharmacological drugs increasing the availability of Central Nervous System (CNS) neurotransmitters (dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, acetylcholine and hista mine) have shown the ability to modulate excitability in cortical neurons and exert a subsequent facilitator effect in neuroplasticity. In this regard, several studies have been conducted in the past two decades investigating, among other agents, the effects of amphetamines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, donepezil, psychostimulants as methylphenidate and dopaminergic agents. Levodopa (LD) is a desirable drug to evaluate because of its safe action profile. This oral medication is a precursor of dopamine (DA) that is actively transported across the blood-brain barrier and is converted to DA in the CNS and peripheral tissues. Approximately 95% of LD is converted to DA, stimulating dopaminergic neurotransmission, and the remaining 5% is converted to norepinephrine and affects adrenergic neurotransmission. DA plays a role in the formation of motor memories and thereby facilitates neuroplasticity, through the strengthening (long term potentiation, LTP) or weakening (long term depression, LTD) of the neuronal synapses, thereby generating neuroplasticity. DA has an inverted U-shape concentration curve effect to facilitate LTP. In previous studies doses of 100mg generated a facilitator effect, and 25 mg and 200 mg exerted an inhibitor effect on human cortex. This pharmacological agent has shown promising results in the treatment of stroke by enhancing functional motor recovery in the sub-acute and chronic period, in combination with intensive physical therapy, without reported significant side effects. In the acute and sub-acute phases, LD was demonstrated to improve functional motor skills that were maintained at three weeks follow up. LD also showed an additional benefit on the activities of daily living and in the severity of the stroke. In the chronic period, a single dose of LD combined with physical therapy for five weeks enhanced the formation of training-dependent elementary motor memory while improving UE dexterity.
COMBINING LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA WITH THE ARMEO SYSTEM
It is our hypothesis that the intake of levodopa/carbidopa LD/CD in combination with intensive robotic-assisted therapy will provide better outcomes in functional recovery tests than the same training alone. We also hypothesize that these improvements could be correlated with changes in motor cortex excitability. Current strategies to improve motor recovery after stroke focus on neuroplasticity and neuromodulation. There is growing interest in the combination of therapies and strategies to enhance plasticity and thereby functional recovery through the rehabilitation process. It is frequently hypothesized that the combination of drug therapy and physical rehabilitation could provide better outcomes by enhancing neuroplasticity phenomenon
We propose a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LD/CD in combination with repetitive upper-extremity functional task-oriented and robotic-aided training.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Levodopa / Carbidopa + Armeo | Active comparator | Drug: Levodopa / Carbidopa, Device: ArmeoLevodopa / Carbidopa drug 100/25 mg once a day for 3 weeks. Armeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks. |
| Placebo + Armeo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Device: ArmeoPlacebo capsules daily for 3 weeks. Armeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male and female, community dwelling, age 18-85.
- First episode of stroke.
- Diagnosis of chronic ischemic stroke at least six months before study enrollment resulting in objective motor upper-extremity impairment as demonstrated during physical/neurological examination.
- Score of 15-55 out of 66 on the arm motor Fugl-Meyer scale.
- The ability to extend ≥ 10 degrees at metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint of all digits.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Intracranial hemorrhages.
- Pregnancy, planning to become pregnant or breast-feeding.
- History of seizures within the previous six months.
- Previous residual motor deficit in the affected side.
- Treatment with Botox injections in the affected arm in the previous 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboAlso: Negative controlPlacebo capsules daily for 3 weeks. | Drug | Placebo + Armeo |
| Levodopa / CarbidopaAlso: SinemetLevodopa / Carbidopa drug 100/25 mg once a day for 3 weeks. | Drug | Levodopa / Carbidopa + Armeo |
| ArmeoArmeo Robotic Assisted Intensive Upper Extremity Therapy every weekday for 3 weeks. | Device | Levodopa / Carbidopa + Armeo, Placebo + Armeo |
Primary outcome
Change in Upper Extremity Score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM-UE) at 1 month
Time frame: month 1
FM-UE is an ordinal scale with scores ranging from 0 to 66 for upper-limb motor performance. It is composed of 33 items. FM-UE is a measure of upper-extremity motor impairment including coordination and speed.
8 secondary outcomes
Computer Measures on the Armeo Robot
Time frame: month 1
Analysis of Muscle Activation Patterns During Upper Extremity Movements
Time frame: month 1
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Assessment (TMS)
Time frame: month 1
Veteran's Rand 36
Time frame: month 1
Hand Dynamometry
Time frame: month 1
Physical Examination
Time frame: week 1
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: month 1
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Time frame: month 1
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No sharing of IPD
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ross Zafonte, DO principal investigator
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Paolo Bonato, PhD study chair
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Duc A Tran, MD PhD study director
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Levodopa / Carbidopa and Armeo in people with Stroke, run by Ross D. Zafonte, MD at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Upper Extremity Score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM-UE) at 1 month (time frame: month 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2021.