AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal WoundPhase 1/2NCT02350179

Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Caesarean Section

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tranexamic Acid and Glucose in people with Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after elective C.S. The Research Question Is Tranexamic acid effective in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section? The Research Hypothesis The TXA could be able to reduce blood loss during and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Tranexamic Acid and Glucose
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jun 2014to May 2015
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant women aged 20-40 with singleton fetus 38 or more weeks
  • Uncomplicated pregnancy, up to 3rd parity
  • Women undergoing scheduled elective C.S

Who cannot join

  • Causes of uterine over-distention such as polyhydramnios or macrosomia
  • Grand multi parity
  • Previous PPH (3 x risk) or previous history of retained placenta
  • Pre-eclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension
  • Maternal hypertension
  • Pre-existing maternal hemorrhagic conditions
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Maternal diabetes mellitus
  • Abnormal placenta
  • Sensitivity to TXA
  • Women taking anticoagulant therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zarafshan M Raqeeb, MS contact

zarafzubair@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Ain Shams University

    Cairo

    Zarafshan M Raqeeb, MS, zarafzubair@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after elective C.S.

The Research Question Is Tranexamic acid effective in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section?

The Research Hypothesis The TXA could be able to reduce blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section.

The null hypothesis will therefore state that:

There will be no difference between TXA and placebo in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section.

Read the detailed description

Caesarean Section (C.S) is the most common major surgical procedure performed on women worldwide and its rates continue to rise steadily in both developed and developing countries (Gibbons et al., 2012).

Caesarean Section is associated with more blood loss than vaginal delivery; there is a trend for increasing rates in both developed and developing countries (Betra´n, 2007).

The National US Caesarean section rate leveled off at 32.8% in 2010 and 2011 (Hamilton et al., 2012).

Caesarean Section accounts for 20-25% of all deliveries in the UK (Fairley Dundas, 2011).

C.S rates have increased to as high as 25-30 % in many areas of the world, in Pakistan the (C.S) rate is 25% (Najmi, 2000).

In many areas of China the (C.S) rate is as high as 40-50% (Zhang, 2008). The main causes of death following a (C.S) are infection, hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, and anesthesia - associated complications, caesarean section has been an important underlying cause of death in Norway and contributed to the increased maternal death ratio in the last decade (Vangen and Bergsjo, 2003).

Delivery by (C.S) can cause more complications than normal vaginal delivery and one of the most common complications is primary or secondary postpartum hemorrhage up to 20% (Lu et al., 2005).

Obstetric hemorrhage can be life threatening, therefore to reduce the morbidity and mortality due to obstetric hemorrhage we need to reduce the bleeding at C.S (Bingham, 2012).

Postpartum hemorrhage is a major cause of maternal mortality, especially in under-resourced countries, accounting for nearly one - quarter of all maternal deaths worldwide (WHO, 2007). Recent studies from developed countries reported an increase in the rate of postpartum hemorrhage, which has been attributed (at least in part) to arise in the rate of C.S (Bateman et al., 2010).

As the incidence of Caesarean Section is increasing, and the average blood loss during Caesarean Section is (1000 ml) is double the amount of lost during vaginal delivery (500 ml) (Magann, 2005).

The hematocrit falls by 10 % and blood transfusion is required in 6% of woman undergoing Caesarean Section, Compared with 4% of woman who have a vaginal birth (RCOG, 2004).

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic derivative of the amino acid lysine that exerts its anti-fibrin lytic effect through the reversible blockade of lysine binding sites on plasminogen molecules. It has been in used for many years for reducing the blood loss in surgeries (Astedt, 1987).

TXA has been shown to be very useful in reducing blood loss and incidence of blood transfusion in many surgeries.In gynecology and obstetrics, TXA is most commonly used to treat idiopathic menorrhagia and is an effective and well - tolerated treatment when administered orally. Bleeding associated with pregnancy (placental abruption, placenta previa) has also been treated with TXA (Dunn, 1999).

Furthermore, some randomized controlled studies have shown that TXA reduces blood loss after C.S (As et al., 1996).

No large randomized controlled trail of the efficacy of TXA in controlling blood loss during C.S has been reported, This randomized double blind, placebo controlled study will evaluates the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss during and after C.S.

Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss during and after elective C.S.

The Research Question Is Tranexamic acid effective in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section?

The Research Hypothesis The TXA could be able to reduce blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section.

The null hypothesis will therefore state that:

There will be no difference between TXA and placebo in reducing blood loss during and after elective Caesarean section.

Patients and Methods This will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial that will be carried at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital.

The study will include 100 pregnant women with singleton fetus 38 or more weeks gestation who will be divided in to two groups.

Study group will include 50 women and control group will include 50 women. Women assigned to the study group will receive 1 gr of TXA injection (Kapron, AMOUN Pharmaceutical co.) given slowly I.V over 10 minutes before the operation.

The control group will receive 30ml of 5% glucose. Both provider and patient will be double-blinded until the conclusion of the study.

The type of anesthesia will be decided by the surgeon and anesthetist after counseling the patient.

The inclusion criteria for the trial include:

  • Pregnant women aged 20-40 with singleton fetus 38 or more weeks.
  • Uncomplicated pregnancy, up to 3rd parity.
  • Women undergoing scheduled elective C.S.

Exclusion criteria will include:

  • Causes of uterine over-distention such as polyhydramnios or macrosomia
  • Grand multi parity
  • Previous PPH (3 x risk) or previous history of retained placenta
  • Pre-eclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension
  • Maternal hypertension.
  • Pre-existing maternal hemorrhagic conditions
  • Maternal diabetes mellitus.
  • Abnormal placenta
  • Sensitivity to TXA.
  • Women taking anticoagulant therapy.

Assessment of the intraoperative blood loss will be started after the uterine incision by collection of the suctioned blood and by weighing surgical towels.

Post-operative blood loss will be assessed during the first 24 hour by weighingthe pads. HB level \& Hematocrit will be investigated before and 24 hours after surgery.

The weight of the dry towels will be subtract from the weight of wet towels and the weight of the blood will be change in to volume using the formula {density of blood is 1060/m3; slightly denser then water so volume of the blood = weight multiply 0,9}).

Sample size determination:

Assuming a rate of intraoperative blood loss ranging between 650ml in group 1 \& 450ml in group 2 with a SD of 300ml, a sample size of 48 patients in each group is enough to detect such difference, if true, at 0,05 alpha error and 0,09 power of the test (Kemal, 2010).

Randomization and allocation:

Interventional randomized controlled trial will be conducted using systemic random sampling allocation.

Dark sealed envelopes containing the intervention and taken from a table of numbers, created by a third party not involved in the allocation process.

Randomization will be performed by picking one envelope for each patient from sequentially numbered envelopes on the day of intervention initiation, by a nurse not involved in the study and the patient will informed about the allocation arm.

Blinding: This will be a randomized double blind trial, both the provider and researcher will be blinded to reduce bias; double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, neither the provider nor the researchers know who is getting a placebo and who is getting the treatment to avoid information and calculation bias.

Ethical consideration and informed consent This clinical trial will be proposed to the ethical and review committee of Ain Shams University for approval.

An informed consent explaining the clinical trial and possible side effects of TXA will be obtained from each patient included in the trial.

Being tested
Tranexamic Acid, Glucose

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tranexamic AcidDrug

    Also called Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid

    This will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial that will be carried at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital.

    The study will include 100 pregnant women with singleton fetus 38 or more weeks gestation who will be divided in to two groups.

    Study group will include 50 women and control group will include 50 women. Women assigned to the study group will receive 1 gr of TXA injection (Kapron, AMOUN Pharmaceutical co.) given slowly I.V over 10 minutes before the operation.

    The control group will receive 30ml of 5% glucose. Both provider and patient will be double-blinded until the conclusion of the study.

  • GlucoseDrug

    The control group will receive 30ml of 5% glucose. Both provider and patient will be double-blinded until the conclusion of the study.

Study groups in NCT02350179
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
casesExperimentalWomen assigned to the study group will receive 1 gr of Tranexamic acid injection (Kapron, AMOUN Pharmaceutical co.) given slowly I.V over 10 minutes before the operation.
Receives: Drug: Tranexamic Acid
controlPlacebo comparatorThe control group will receive 30ml of 5% glucose. Both provider and patient will be double-blinded until the conclusion of the study.
Receives: Drug: Glucose

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amount of blood loss calculated using statistical measurements to determine the total decrease in HB and Hematocrit levels following the CS

    Assessment of the intra-operative blood loss will be started after the uterine incision by collection of the suctioned blood and by weighing surgical towels.

    Post-operative blood loss will be assessed during the first 24 hour by weighing the pads. HB level \& Hematocrit will be investigated before and 24 hours after surgery.

    The weight of the dry towels will be subtracted from the weight of wet towels and the weight of the blood will change in to volume using the formula {density of blood is 1060/m3; slightly denser then water so volume of the blood = weight multiply 0,9}).

    Sample size determination:

    Assuming a rate of intraoperative blood loss ranging between 650ml in group 1 \& 450ml in group 2 with a SD of 300ml, a sample size of 48 patients in each group is enough to detect such difference, if true, at 0,05 alpha error and 0,09 power of the test (Kemal, 2010).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02350179
Sponsor's protocol ID
ASU1115
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
1 Jan 2015
Last updated
10 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):1039-47. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200610000-00046.

    PubMed 17012482
  • As AK, Hagen P, Webb JB. Tranexamic acid in the management of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Dec;103(12):1250-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09638.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8968245
  • Astedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;137:22-5.

    PubMed 3321402
  • Bateman BT, Berman MF, Riley LE, Leffert LR. The epidemiology of postpartum hemorrhage in a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Anesth Analg. 2010 May 1;110(5):1368-73. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d74898. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

    PubMed 20237047
  • Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x.

    PubMed 17302638
  • Bingham D. Obstetric hemorrhage-related maternal mortality and morbidity. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Sep;21(9):901-2. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3873. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22928671
  • Bick D; National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health; National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health: commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):198-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04060.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17163898
  • Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications. Drugs. 1999 Jun;57(6):1005-32. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00017.

    PubMed 10400410
  • Lu MC, Fridman M, Korst LM, Gregory KD, Reyes C, Hobel CJ, Chavez GF. Variations in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage across hospitals in California. Matern Child Health J. 2005 Sep;9(3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0009-3.

    PubMed 16132205
  • Magann EF, Evans S, Hutchinson M, Collins R, Lanneau G, Morrison JC. Postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean delivery: an analysis of risk factors. South Med J. 2005 Jul;98(7):681-5. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000163309.53317.B8.

    PubMed 16108235
  • Najmi RS, Rehan N. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in a teaching hospital of Pakistan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Sep;20(5):479-83. doi: 10.1080/014436100434640.

    PubMed 15512631
  • Queenan JT. How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):199-200. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182266682. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21775834
  • Vangen S, Bergsjo P. [Do women die from pregnancy these days?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 Dec 23;123(24):3544-5. Norwegian.

    PubMed 14691495
  • Mathai M, Gulmezoglu AM, Hill S. Saving womens lives: evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Apr;85(4):322-3. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.041962. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17546315
  • Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, Zheng J, Sun W, Li Z. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1077-82. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816e349e.

    PubMed 18448738

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tranexamic Acid and Glucose in people with Hemorrhage of Cesarean Section and/or Perineal Wound, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zarafshan M Raqeeb, MS (zarafzubair@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amount of blood loss calculated using statistical measurements to determine the total decrease in HB and Hematocrit levels following the CS (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02350179, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in