AzTrials
AzTrials

Colles' FractureSONARNCT02353065

Sonographic Assessment of Reduction in Colles' Fracture

A study testing Ultrasound imaging and Bedside x-ray in people with Colles' Fracture, run by Simon Richards at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Colles fractures are a common type of wrist fracture that often requires manipulation in the Emergency Department. Currently xrays are used to assess whether this has been successful, which are done once the plaster cast has been applied. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colles' Fracture
What is being tested?
Ultrasound imaging and Bedside x-ray
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jan 2015to Jul 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults with isolated fractures of the distal radius undergoing manipulation in the Emergency Department with Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia (Biers Block)

Who cannot join

  • Age under 16
  • Contraindication to Biers block
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Multiple injuries
  • Open fracture
  • Prisoners

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Royal Preston Hospital

    Preston, Lancashire, PR2 9HT

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Colles fractures are a common type of wrist fracture that often requires manipulation in the Emergency Department. Currently xrays are used to assess whether this has been successful, which are done once the plaster cast has been applied. This study will assess whether ultrasound can be used immediately after the manipulation to check the position, before the plaster cast is applied. This would then be followed by an xray as normal.

The aim is to assess the feasibility of a full study to determine which method is faster, causes less pain, and also to assess if either approach reduces the need for repeat attempts at manipulation and surgical repair.

Read the detailed description

Fractures of the distal radius are a frequent cause for presentation to United Kingdom (UK) Emergency Departments, and the Colles' fracture is the most commonly encountered type. These injuries frequently occur in isolation, or associated with only minor injuries, and reduction of displaced fractures is typically performed by Emergency Physicians at the time of first attendance to the hospital.

The usually sequence of events is clinical examination, x-ray imaging to confirm the fracture, then the reduction is performed with appropriate analgesia or anaesthesia, the arm placed in a plaster backslab, and repeat imaging is taken to confirm adequacy of reduction. If the reduction is not satisfactory, repeat manipulation is required.

Haematoma block and Biers block permit x-ray imaging of the manipulated wrist while the anaesthetic action is still effective, permitting re-manipulation without further administration of local anaesthetic. Sedation is usually kept to as short a time as possible, and is not usually maintained while imaging is performed. There is usually some degree of delay while x-rays are taken and made available for viewing, and this wait prolongs the procedure for the patient and the treating clinician. In addition, Biers block cannot be tolerated for long by most patients, so any delay makes it less likely that a re-manipulation can be achieved within the time the patient can tolerate. If a patient has been sedated, a re-manipulation will require a further sedative (or alternative) procedure with the concomitant risks that entails.

Ideally, imaging would be performed rapidly, immediately at the end of the manipulation, prior to application of plaster, allowing confirmation of the reduction or immediate re-manipulation if necessary. This description of imaging provided at the point of care by the treating clinician, aimed at answering a clearly defined question ('is this an adequate reduction?') matches the description of focussed emergency ultrasound in other applications. If ultrasound could be used to assess fracture reduction, it would have potential to save clinician time, patient time and discomfort, and reduced the need for repeated manipulations and surgical repair.

This study intends to assess the feasibility of a full trial of efficacy comparing ultrasound with x-ray to guide the reduction of these fractures.

Being tested
Ultrasound imaging, Bedside x-ray
Keywords
Colles' Fracture, ultrasonography
Medical subject headings
Colles' Fracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound imagingProcedure or surgery

    Point of care ultrasound of fracture site during and post-reduction

  • Bedside x-rayRadiation

    Portable x-ray of fracture post-reduction

Study groups in NCT02353065
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorAssessment of adequacy of reduction by bedside x-ray during period of intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biers block)
Receives: Radiation: Bedside x-ray
UltrasoundExperimentalAssessment of adequacy of reduction by bedside ultrasound performed by the treating clinician during period of intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biers block)
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The total inflation time of the tourniquet used during the Biers Block

    The total inflation time of tourniquet used for Biers block

    Measured: The duration the tourniquet is inflated; complete within 30 minutes of the procedure commencing

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The total number of manipulations required per patient within the Emergency Department

    Number of attempts at manipulation within Emergency Department

    Measured: The duration of the manipulation procedure; complete within 30 minutes of procedure commencing

  2. Does the use of ultrasound reduce the need for surgical reduction?

    Need for surgical reduction/fixation

    Measured: Four weeks from visit

  3. Does the use of ultrasound reduce the time spent within the Emergency Department?

    Total time spent within Emergency Department

    Measured: End of initial ED visit, within twelve hours of initial arrival to the hospital

  4. Does the use of ultrasound reduce the pain score during the reduction?

    Patient reported pain score at the end of the fracture reduction

    Measured: End of procedure - within 30 minutes of the procedure commencing

  5. Does the use of ultrasound increase the patient satisfaction?

    Patient reported satisfaction with reduction of fracture

    Measured: Four weeks after visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02353065
Sponsor's protocol ID
141/13
Acronym
SONAR
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
25 Jan 2015
Last updated
2 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound imaging and Bedside x-ray in people with Colles' Fracture, run by Simon Richards at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Simon Richards (+44 1642 342589, s.richards@tees.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The total inflation time of the tourniquet used during the Biers Block (time frame: The duration the tourniquet is inflated; complete within 30 minutes of the procedure commencing). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in