Esophageal CarcinomaPhase 3NCT02355249
Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing MIE and OE in people with Esophageal Carcinoma, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 13 sites in China.
Trial summary
This study is a multi-center, randomized, and open-label trial to compare the safety and feasibility of traditional three incisions and minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- MIE and OE
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 648 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologic diagnosis of intrathoracic esophageal carcinoma of Stage I to III, which is potentially resectable judged by MDT
- 18≤age≤75
- cT1b-4a,N0-2,M0 confirmed by chest CT, EUS, or EUS-FNA in four weeks;
- ECOG PS scores≤2
- Laboratory findings in 14 days before operation:normal blood test of basic metabolism panel
- European Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0,1 or 2
Show all 9Show fewer
- More than 12 months of expected survival
- Tolerance of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Carcinoma of the cervical esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ)
- Prior thoracic surgery which may effect this study
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Inability to tolerance of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia
- PS >2
- unstable disease
- Poor compliance
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
Jie He, MD contact
13 sites in 1 country
China13 sites, 13 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021
Jie He, MD
Jie He, MD
- Recruiting
China-japan friendship hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029
Deruo Liu, MD
Deruo Liu, MD
- Recruiting
Peking University Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Keneng Chen, MD
Keneng Chen, MD
- Recruiting
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
Tiansheng Yan, MD
Tiansheng Yan, MD
- Recruiting
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 10020
Hui Li, MD
Hui Li, MD
- Recruiting
Hunan Cancer Hospital
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
Jianping Liang, MD
Jianping Liang, MD
- Recruiting
The Second People's Hospital of Sichuan
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Yongtao Han
Yongtao Han
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 630014
Ming Du, MD
Ming Du
- Recruiting
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
Quan Xu
Quan Xu
- Recruiting
The People's Hospital Of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021
Zhaoke Wen
Zhaoke Wen
- Recruiting
Nantong Tumor Hospital
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226361
Minxin Shi
Minxin Shi
- Recruiting
Quanzhou First Hospital
Quanzhou, Fujian, 362002
Rongyu Xu
Rongyu Xu
- Recruiting
The First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001
Shun Xu
Shun Xu
About this study
Official title: Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Multi-center, Randomized, and Open-label Trial
This study is a multi-center, randomized, and open-label trial to compare the safety and feasibility of traditional three incisions and minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- MIE, OE
- Keywords
- traditional three incisions, minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy, MIE, esophageal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MIEProcedure or surgery
Minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be performed in this group.
OEProcedure or surgery
Patients will be treated with traditional three incisions esophagectomy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A group (MIE) | Experimental | Via minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy. Receives: Procedure: MIE |
| B group (OE) | Active comparator | Via traditional three incisions esophagectomy. Receives: Procedure: OE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The incidence of respiratory complications
Respiratory complications including respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, atelectasis needs suctioning of bronchoscopy, lung infection needs medication, adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Measured: 1 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Short-term Effects of Traditional Three Incisions Surgery vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
To observe differences of short-term effects(bleeding volume during operation,operation time, hospital mortality, 2 years DFS) between two groups.
Measured: 2 years
The incidence of postoperative complications except respiratory complications
Surgical Complications except respiratory complications(such as infection, esophageal fistula, etc.) will be measured by the Clavien-Dindo Classification
Measured: 1 months
lung function
lung function will be measured by VC,FVC,FEV1,DLCO
Measured: before operation, 1, 3 months after surgery
Pain Scores after surgery
Pain Scores will be measured by Brief pain inventory(BPI)
Measured: before operation, 1, 3 days and 1, 3, 6 months after surgery
Health-related quality of life scores(HRQoL)
HRQoL will be measured by EORTC QLO-C30, QLQ-OES18
Measured: before operation, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 648 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Sichuan, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China, First Hospital of China Medical University, Quanzhou First Hospital, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hopital, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jie He, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Jie He, MD, Principal investigator, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02355249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201412
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mu J, Gao S, Mao Y, Xue Q, Yuan Z, Li N, Su K, Yang K, Lv F, Qiu B, Liu D, Chen K, Li H, Yan T, Han Y, Du M, Xu R, Wen Z, Wang W, Shi M, Xu Q, Xu S, He J. Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 17;5(11):e008328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008328.
PubMed 26576807
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Multi-center, Randomized, and Open-label Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02355249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201412
- Conditions
- Esophageal Carcinoma
- Keywords
- traditional three incisions, minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy, MIE, esophageal cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 648 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, The Second People's Hospital of Sichuan, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China, First Hospital of China Medical University, Quanzhou First Hospital, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hopital, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a multi-center, randomized, and open-label trial to compare the safety and feasibility of traditional three incisions and minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A group (MIE) | Experimental | Procedure: MIEVia minimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy. |
| B group (OE) | Active comparator | Procedure: OEVia traditional three incisions esophagectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Histologic diagnosis of intrathoracic esophageal carcinoma of Stage I to III, which is potentially resectable judged by MDT
- 18≤age≤75
- cT1b-4a,N0-2,M0 confirmed by chest CT, EUS, or EUS-FNA in four weeks;
- ECOG PS scores≤2
- Laboratory findings in 14 days before operation:normal blood test of basic metabolism panel
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Carcinoma of the cervical esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ)
- Prior thoracic surgery which may effect this study
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Inability to tolerance of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia
- PS >2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MIEMinimally invasive thoracol-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be performed in this group. | Procedure or surgery | A group (MIE) |
| OEPatients will be treated with traditional three incisions esophagectomy. | Procedure or surgery | B group (OE) |
Primary outcome
The incidence of respiratory complications
Time frame: 1 months
Respiratory complications including respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, atelectasis needs suctioning of bronchoscopy, lung infection needs medication, adult respiratory distress syndrome.
5 secondary outcomes
Short-term Effects of Traditional Three Incisions Surgery vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence of postoperative complications except respiratory complications
Time frame: 1 months
lung function
Time frame: before operation, 1, 3 months after surgery
Pain Scores after surgery
Time frame: before operation, 1, 3 days and 1, 3, 6 months after surgery
Health-related quality of life scores(HRQoL)
Time frame: before operation, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15,18, 21, 24 months after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26576807Mu J, Gao S, Mao Y, Xue Q, Yuan Z, Li N, Su K, Yang K, Lv F, Qiu B, Liu D, Chen K, Li H, Yan T, Han Y, Du M, Xu R, Wen Z, Wang W, Shi M, Xu Q, Xu S, He J. Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 17;5(11):e008328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008328.
Related trials for Esophageal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jie He, MD contact
Jie He, MD principal investigator
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing MIE and OE in people with Esophageal Carcinoma, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 13 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jie He, MD (mietrials@126.com;mjwtrials@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The incidence of respiratory complications (time frame: 1 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02355249, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.