AzTrials
AzTrials

eHealthSUPFASTEHEALTHNCT02355808

Do Superfast Broadband and Tailored Interventions Improve Use of E-health and Reduce Health Related Travel?

A study testing Tailored Leaflet and GP visit in people with eHealth, run by University of Plymouth.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Lack of internet infrastructure, personal skills, and service provision have been identified as potential barriers to e-health but as yet there is no good evidence of the impact of interventions to improve them. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
eHealth
What is being tested?
Tailored Leaflet and GP visit
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,044 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2012to Oct 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 16+ and member of randomly selected household within Cornwall

Who cannot join

  • Non Cornish households

About this study

Lack of internet infrastructure, personal skills, and service provision have been identified as potential barriers to e-health but as yet there is no good evidence of the impact of interventions to improve them. This study aims to assess impact on e-health uptake of three interventions (i) superfast broadband, (ii) a tailored leaflet to help participants improve personal internet skills and support, (iii) GP interventions to improve health service provision of e-health. In a cluster randomised factorial controlled trial, 1388 households from 78 postcodes were randomly selected from the 20088 Cornish postcodes and allocated to the 8 (2X2X2) arms of the study. Comparison of 'e-health readiness' and 'miles travelled' from baseline to 18 month follow-up between the 8 arms of the study, will be used to assess the effects of interventions, singly and in combination.

Conditions
eHealth
Being tested
Tailored Leaflet, GP visit

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tailored LeafletBehavioural

  • GP visitBehavioural

Study groups in NCT02355808
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non SuperfastNo interventionNot described
Non Superfast GP interventionOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: GP visit
Non Superfast Tailored LeafletOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Tailored Leaflet
Non Superfast GP + Tailored LeafletOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Tailored Leaflet; Behavioral: GP visit
SuperfastNo interventionNot described
Non Superfast GPOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: GP visit
Superfast Tailored LeafletOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Tailored Leaflet
Superfast GP + Tailored LeafletOtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Tailored Leaflet; Behavioral: GP visit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PERQ Ehealth score

    Measured: 18 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,044 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02355808
Sponsor's protocol ID
12/13-144
Acronym
SUPFASTEHEALTH
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
30 Jan 2015
Last updated
4 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Abbott-Garner P, Richardson J, Jones RB. The Impact of Superfast Broadband, Tailored Booklets for Households, and Discussions With General Practitioners on Personal Electronic Health Readiness: Cluster Factorial Quasi-Randomized Control Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 11;21(3):e11386. doi: 10.2196/11386.

    PubMed 30855234

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tailored Leaflet and GP visit in people with eHealth, run by University of Plymouth.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PERQ Ehealth score (time frame: 18 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02355808, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in