Myocardial InfarctionNCT02356510
Which One Should be Treated in the Setting of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Culprit Lesion or Culprit Vessel?
An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital.
Trial summary
The current guidelines still recommend emergent PCI of the culprit lesion and state that primary PCI should be limited to the culprit vessel with the exception of cardiogenic shock and persistent ischaemia after PCI of the supposed culprit lesion. This recommendation is based on a high number of studies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Primary PCI
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 637 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This multi-centre retrospective study included patients from 3 high-volume primary PCI centres in Turkey. A total number of 5512 patients underwent emergent PCI for acute STEMI between January 2011 and December 2013. From this patient population, patients were looked for the presence of an additional lesion to the culprit lesion (CL). Additional lesion was defined as the presence of an angiographically severe (≥70%) lesion other than the CL either proximal or distal to it in the same coronary artery after the distal flow was observed most commonly as a result of guide-wire passage or PTCA of the total occlusion.
Who may be able to join
- Patients who underwent primary PCI for acute STEMI and had >1 lesion in the culprit artery
Who cannot join
- Presence of LMCA lesion
- Cardiogenic shock
- Previous CABG operation
- Decision for CABG operation after primary PCI
- Severe valvular disease including aortic stenosis of mitral insufficiency
- Severe kidney disease (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl or patients on maintenance hemodialysis)
- Rejection of second PCI by the patient after the index event
About this study
The current guidelines still recommend emergent PCI of the culprit lesion and state that primary PCI should be limited to the culprit vessel with the exception of cardiogenic shock and persistent ischaemia after PCI of the supposed culprit lesion. This recommendation is based on a high number of studies. However, several studies are present about the safety and efficacy of non-culprit vessel PCI during acute MI. Nowadays, the debate is increasingly going on about the PCI of the non-culprit arteries during the index event with newer prospective randomized studies. Besides, it is still unclear for the culprit artery whether to treat only the culprit lesion or all the other lesions in the culprit vessel during the index event. The present report describes a retrospective comparison between the two strategies during primary PCI for STEMI, looking for their influence on the clinical and angiographic course of the patients.
Read the detailed description
Patient selection: This multi-centre retrospective study included patients from 3 high-volume primary PCI centres in Turkey. A total number of 5512 patients underwent emergent PCI for acute STEMI between January 2011 and December 2013. From this patient population, patients were looked for the presence of an additional lesion to the culprit lesion (CL). Additional lesion was defined as the presence of an angiographically severe (≥70%) lesion other than the CL either proximal or distal to it in the same coronary artery after the distal flow was observed most commonly as a result of guide-wire passage or PTCA of the total occlusion.
Exclusion criteria: - Presence of LMCA lesion
- Cardiogenic shock
- Previous CABG operation
- Decision for CABG operation after primary PCI
- Severe valvular disease including aortic stenosis of mitral insufficiency
- Severe kidney disease (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl or patients on maintenance hemodialysis)
- Rejection of second PCI by the patient after the index event
The eligible patients were retrospectively sought from the database of the relevant hospital. The basal characteristics of the patients like age, sex, presence of coronary risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia), vital signs and location of STEMI at admission were noted. The emergent coronary angiograms of the patients were then examined and several angiographic and post-PCI features which are defined in detail in the following sections were addressed. Follow-up of these patients were succeeded either by phone call, routine polyclinic visits or from the database of hospital.
Study groups: Patients were grouped into 2 according to the PCI strategy; culprit vessel (CV) group including patients who underwent emergent PCI of all severe (≥70 stenosis in CAG) lesions in the culprit vessel and culprit lesion (CL) group including patients who underwent emergency PCI only for the CL and staged PCI in 2 weeks for the other additional lesions in the CV. Both groups underwent staged PCI for the severe lesion(s) in non-culprit vessel(s) if necessary in a different session in 28 days after the index event. Staged PCI was the preferred strategy in both groups if necessary because staged PCI has been found to be at least non-inferior to other strategies in several studies [3, 4, 10, 13].
Definition of acute STEMI: The criteria for diagnosis of STEMI were: (1) chest pain within 24 h before admission that lasted for more than 30 min and was not relieved by sublingual nitroglycerin; (2) ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram; and (3) elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) or troponin levels.
Emergent coronary angiography and PCI procedure: All patients were routinely treated with heparin, clopidogrel, aspirin, statin and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker unless contraindicated.
Coronary angioplasty and stent implantation were performed according to standard percutaneous techniques through the femoral artery. Standard selective coronary angiography with at least 4 views of the left coronary system and 2 views of the right coronary artery was performed using the Judgkins technique.
All the patients with the diagnosis of acute STEMI underwent emergent PCI with bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Stent implantation was performed at an inflation pressure of 10 to 16 atm. When suboptimal stent deployment was observed, angiographic optimization was performed using high-pressure noncompliant balloon dilatation to achieve <20% residual stenosis by visual estimation. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon was diagnosed if a significant coronary flow decrease (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade <3 flow) without mechanical obstruction was noticed in final cineangiograms obtained at completion of the PCI procedure [14, 15].
Staged PCI: Staged PCI procedure was performed either to the culprit vessel in CL group and/or to the non-culprit lesion(s) in non-culprit vessel(s) in both groups in 14 days after the index event. In the CL group, it was performed to culprit and non-culprit vessels during same intervention. In the CV group, it was performed to non-culprit vessels if necessary.
Follow-up of patients: The investigators collected follow-up information from the database of the hospitals and/or during telephone calls with patients. Follow-up included screening for major outcomes including death (in-hospital, cardiac and non-cardiac), non-fatal myocardial infarction, and need for surgical or percutaneous revas¬cularisation.
Myocardial infarction was defined as a troponin level above the 99th percentile and symptoms of cardiac ischemia. For patients with re-infarction, the definition required ≥20% increase of cardiac markers (Troponin) with ischemic symptoms or ECG findings or angiographic evidence of coronary artery occlusion including early stent thrombosis. Early stent thrombosis was defined as acute myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis in 30 days after implantation, usually during index hospitalization.
Statistical analysis: The analysis of the results was performed using the Predictive Analytics SoftWare (PASW) Statistics 18.0 for Windows (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Data were tested for a normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The categorical variables were shown as numbers of cases with percentages and the normally distributed continuous variables were shown as mean ± SD. Student's t-test was used for the analysis of the continuous variables that were normally distributed and the χ2 test for the categorical variables. The Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test was used for the variables that were not normally distributed. Statistical significance was defined as p value less than 0.05.
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Primary PCI
- Keywords
- myocardial infarction, TIMI flow, culprit lesion, culprit vessel
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Primary PCIProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Culprit lesion | Patients who underwent culprit lesion only PCI during primary intervention Receives: Procedure: Primary PCI | |
| Culprit vessel | Patients who underwent culprit lesion only PCI during primary intervention Receives: Procedure: Primary PCI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MACE
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 637 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsun Education and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ugur ARSLAN, Samsun Education and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02356510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SamsunERH
- Status last verified
- Feb 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Which One Should be Treated in the Setting of Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Culprit Lesion or Culprit Vessel?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02356510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SamsunERH
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- myocardial infarction, TIMI flow, culprit lesion, culprit vessel
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 637 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsun Education and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current guidelines still recommend emergent PCI of the culprit lesion and state that primary PCI should be limited to the culprit vessel with the exception of cardiogenic shock and persistent ischaemia after PCI of the supposed culprit lesion. This recommendation is based on a high number of studies. However, several studies are present about the safety and efficacy of non-culprit vessel PCI during acute MI. Nowadays, the debate is increasingly going on about the PCI of the non-culprit arteries during the index event with newer prospective randomized studies. Besides, it is still unclear for the culprit artery whether to treat only the culprit lesion or all the other lesions in the culprit vessel during the index event. The present report describes a retrospective comparison between the two strategies during primary PCI for STEMI, looking for their influence on the clinical and angiographic course of the patients.
Detailed description
Patient selection: This multi-centre retrospective study included patients from 3 high-volume primary PCI centres in Turkey. A total number of 5512 patients underwent emergent PCI for acute STEMI between January 2011 and December 2013. From this patient population, patients were looked for the presence of an additional lesion to the culprit lesion (CL). Additional lesion was defined as the presence of an angiographically severe (≥70%) lesion other than the CL either proximal or distal to it in the same coronary artery after the distal flow was observed most commonly as a result of guide-wire passage or PTCA of the total occlusion.
Exclusion criteria: - Presence of LMCA lesion
- Cardiogenic shock
- Previous CABG operation
- Decision for CABG operation after primary PCI
- Severe valvular disease including aortic stenosis of mitral insufficiency
- Severe kidney disease (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl or patients on maintenance hemodialysis)
- Rejection of second PCI by the patient after the index event
The eligible patients were retrospectively sought from the database of the relevant hospital. The basal characteristics of the patients like age, sex, presence of coronary risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia), vital signs and location of STEMI at admission were noted. The emergent coronary angiograms of the patients were then examined and several angiographic and post-PCI features which are defined in detail in the following sections were addressed. Follow-up of these patients were succeeded either by phone call, routine polyclinic visits or from the database of hospital.
Study groups: Patients were grouped into 2 according to the PCI strategy; culprit vessel (CV) group including patients who underwent emergent PCI of all severe (≥70 stenosis in CAG) lesions in the culprit vessel and culprit lesion (CL) group including patients who underwent emergency PCI only for the CL and staged PCI in 2 weeks for the other additional lesions in the CV. Both groups underwent staged PCI for the severe lesion(s) in non-culprit vessel(s) if necessary in a different session in 28 days after the index event. Staged PCI was the preferred strategy in both groups if necessary because staged PCI has been found to be at least non-inferior to other strategies in several studies [3, 4, 10, 13].
Definition of acute STEMI: The criteria for diagnosis of STEMI were: (1) chest pain within 24 h before admission that lasted for more than 30 min and was not relieved by sublingual nitroglycerin; (2) ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram; and (3) elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) or troponin levels.
Emergent coronary angiography and PCI procedure: All patients were routinely treated with heparin, clopidogrel, aspirin, statin and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker unless contraindicated.
Coronary angioplasty and stent implantation were performed according to standard percutaneous techniques through the femoral artery. Standard selective coronary angiography with at least 4 views of the left coronary system and 2 views of the right coronary artery was performed using the Judgkins technique.
All the patients with the diagnosis of acute STEMI underwent emergent PCI with bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Stent implantation was performed at an inflation pressure of 10 to 16 atm. When suboptimal stent deployment was observed, angiographic optimization was performed using high-pressure noncompliant balloon dilatation to achieve <20% residual stenosis by visual estimation. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon was diagnosed if a significant coronary flow decrease (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade <3 flow) without mechanical obstruction was noticed in final cineangiograms obtained at completion of the PCI procedure [14, 15].
Staged PCI: Staged PCI procedure was performed either to the culprit vessel in CL group and/or to the non-culprit lesion(s) in non-culprit vessel(s) in both groups in 14 days after the index event. In the CL group, it was performed to culprit and non-culprit vessels during same intervention. In the CV group, it was performed to non-culprit vessels if necessary.
Follow-up of patients: The investigators collected follow-up information from the database of the hospitals and/or during telephone calls with patients. Follow-up included screening for major outcomes including death (in-hospital, cardiac and non-cardiac), non-fatal myocardial infarction, and need for surgical or percutaneous revas¬cularisation.
Myocardial infarction was defined as a troponin level above the 99th percentile and symptoms of cardiac ischemia. For patients with re-infarction, the definition required ≥20% increase of cardiac markers (Troponin) with ischemic symptoms or ECG findings or angiographic evidence of coronary artery occlusion including early stent thrombosis. Early stent thrombosis was defined as acute myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis in 30 days after implantation, usually during index hospitalization.
Statistical analysis: The analysis of the results was performed using the Predictive Analytics SoftWare (PASW) Statistics 18.0 for Windows (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Data were tested for a normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The categorical variables were shown as numbers of cases with percentages and the normally distributed continuous variables were shown as mean ± SD. Student's t-test was used for the analysis of the continuous variables that were normally distributed and the χ2 test for the categorical variables. The Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test was used for the variables that were not normally distributed. Statistical significance was defined as p value less than 0.05.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Culprit lesion | – | Procedure: Primary PCIPatients who underwent culprit lesion only PCI during primary intervention |
| Culprit vessel | – | Procedure: Primary PCIPatients who underwent culprit lesion only PCI during primary intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This multi-centre retrospective study included patients from 3 high-volume primary PCI centres in Turkey. A total number of 5512 patients underwent emergent PCI for acute STEMI between January 2011 and December 2013. From this patient population, patients were looked for the presence of an additional lesion to the culprit lesion (CL). Additional lesion was defined as the presence of an angiographically severe (≥70%) lesion other than the CL either proximal or distal to it in the same coronary artery after the distal flow was observed most commonly as a result of guide-wire passage or PTCA of the total occlusion.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who underwent primary PCI for acute STEMI and had >1 lesion in the culprit artery
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Presence of LMCA lesion
- Cardiogenic shock
- Previous CABG operation
- Decision for CABG operation after primary PCI
- Severe valvular disease including aortic stenosis of mitral insufficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Primary PCI | Procedure or surgery | Culprit lesion, Culprit vessel |
Primary outcome
MACE
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2015.
Related trials for Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Enrolling by invitation
The DANE-HEART Trial - Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Primary Prevention
Coronary Atherosclerosis and Other Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MACE (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2015.