AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT02357069

A Study Comparing LBEC0101 to Enbrel® in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy

A Phase 3 study testing Enbrel and LBEC0101 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by LG Life Sciences at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of LBEC0101 compared to Enbrel in subjects with active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Methotrexate therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
Enbrel and LBEC0101
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
372 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Feb 2015to Dec 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female patients from 20 years to 75 years of age when signing Informed Consent.
  • Diagnosed as having RA according to the revised 1987 ACR criteria for at least 6 months prior to screening
  • Patients who have inadequate response to MTX administered for at least 12 weeks before the beginning of screening period and on a stable dose.

Who cannot join

  • patients with active tuberculosis or latent tuberculosis based on current clinical symptoms, chest X-ray test and IFN-γ release assay at screening
  • patients with any of the following concomitant diseases and/or history within 24 weeks before the first administration of investigational products in this study; Serious infectious disease, Opportunistic infection, Chronic or recurrent infectious disease
  • patients with any seropositive result for hepatitis B or hepatitis C or HIV
  • patients who have any of the following diseases; Sepsis, Demyelinating disorders, Lymphoproliferative disease, Infection with prosthetic joint, Autoimmune diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Japan1 site
  • Mochida Investigational site

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

South Korea1 site
  • LGLS Investigational site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Multi-center (in Korea and Japan), Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate Similarity of Efficacy and Safety of LBEC0101 50mg Subcutaneous Weekly Injection to Enbrel® 50mg Subcutaneous Weekly Injection, as Adjunctive Therapy to Methotrexate (MTX), in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Had an Inadequate Response to MTX

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter clinical study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of LBEC0101 compared to Enbrel in subjects with active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Methotrexate therapy.

Being tested
Enbrel, LBEC0101
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EnbrelDrug

    Etanercept

  • LBEC0101Drug

    Etanercept

Study groups in NCT02357069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LBEC0101ExperimentalEtanercept
Receives: Drug: LBEC0101
EnbrelActive comparatorEtanercept
Receives: Drug: Enbrel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease activity score based on a 28 joint count (DAS28)

    Measured: Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
372 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02357069
Sponsor's protocol ID
LG-ECCL002
Status last verified
Jan 2016
First submitted
29 Jan 2015
Last updated
6 Jan 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Matsuno H, Tomomitsu M, Hagino A, Shin S, Lee J, Song YW. Phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study to evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 and etanercept reference product in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;77(4):488-494. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212172. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

    PubMed 29259050

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Enbrel and LBEC0101 in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by LG Life Sciences at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Japan, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease activity score based on a 28 joint count (DAS28) (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02357069, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in