AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Atherosclerosis Due to Calcified Coronary LesionPhase 4NCT02360020

The XLIMUS-DES in Very Complex Lesions

A Phase 4 study testing XLimus in people with Coronary Atherosclerosis Due to Calcified Coronary Lesion and Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery, run by Clinica Mediterranea at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Stent delivery failure occurs in 4% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and >90% of these failures are due to vessel tortuosity and/or calcification. The XLIMUS eluting coronary stent (CARDIONOVUM GmbH, Bonn, Germany) is a new type of endovascular prostheses characterised by better mechanical properties… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
XLimus
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Aug 2014to May 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic total occlusion (CTO)
  • severe calcification
  • severe tortuosity

Who cannot join

  • coronary artery lesions non satisfying the inclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Clinica Mediterranea

    Naples, Naples, 80121

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Performance of the XLIMUS Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent In Very Complex Lesions

Stent delivery failure occurs in 4% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and >90% of these failures are due to vessel tortuosity and/or calcification. The XLIMUS eluting coronary stent (CARDIONOVUM GmbH, Bonn, Germany) is a new type of endovascular prostheses characterised by better mechanical properties than traditional DES. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center pilot study, aiming to evaluate the performance of the XLIMUS DES in severely complex coronary lesions in real-world clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

All consecutive patients who will undergo elective PCI in native coronary arteries at the Clinica Mediterranea (Naples, Italy) will be considered for eligility. Study participants wiil require to have symptomatic ischemic heart disease attributable to critical (that is, >70% visual estimate) stenotic lesions of native coronary arteries. Inclusion criteria in this pilot study are 1) chronic total occlusion (CTO), 2) severe target vessel calcification, and 3) severe target vessel tortuosity. CTO is defined as the presence of TIMI 0 flow within the occluded segment and angiographic or clinical evidence or high likelihood of an occlusion duration of ≥3 months. Calcification is defined severe when larger than 3x vessel diameter, and comprising the vessel wall totally in two perpendicular views. Tortuosity is defined severe when it satisfies the following criteria: one or more bends of 90° or more, or three or more bends of 45-90° proximal to the diseased segment.

200 patients will be enrolled into the study. Stents will be implanted according to current clinical practice. Techniques attempted for facilitating stent delivery in such a complex lesions are: maximize guide catheter support, optimize predilatation of the stenosis, use of a stiffer guidewire. Specific tricks include: a) buddy-wire; anchoring balloon; GuideLiner catheter. In case of severe calcification, rotational atherectomy will be electively performed with the Rotablator® system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, U.S.A.). Following stent implantation, postdilatation will be performed in all instances with a non-compliant balloon. All patients will receive aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) before stent deployment, with a loading dose (600 mg of clopidogrel) given to patients not pretreated. All patients will receive 70 IU/Kg intra-arterial bolus of unfractionated heparin in order to achieve and activated clotting time >250 seconds. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors will be administered according to operator preference. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) will be calculated by applying the Levey Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Chronic kidney disease was defined as a eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 .

XLIMUS eluting-stent is made of cobalt chromium L 605 and the stent is available in a 6-, 8-, or 10-cell structure design (closed cell architecture). The struts thickness is 73µm. The 6-cell design is for stenting of coronary artery diameter of 2.25mm-2.50mm, 8-cell structure is used for stenting of 2.75-3.50 mm artery diameters, and the 10-cell is for larger artery diameter lesions (up to 5mm). The XLIMUS has an innovative hydrophilic-coated shaft and an extra-low tip profile (crossing profile = 0.90 mm) to access the most tortuous lesions. The highly biocompatible polylactid acid (PLLA) drug containing release matrix degrades smoothly and provides an optimal release kinetic profile. Within 30 days, about 70% of the anti-proliferative drug is distributed into the surrounding arterial tissue of the stent struts, ensuring a highly effective inhibition of smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. Pharmacokinetic study result confirm sustained anti-proliferative drug efficacy up to 120 days.

The primary objective of the study is the assessment of the clinical performance of the XLILMUS DES, using the following criteria 1) device success, defined as the ability to insert the stent into the target lesion and the attainment of <20% residual stenosis (by visual estimate), 2) lesion success, defined as attainment of <20% residual stenosis of the target lesion using any percutaneous method, and 3) procedural success, defined as lesion success without any in-hospital and MACE.

Being tested
XLimus
Keywords
coronary stent, outcome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XLimusDevice

    Techniques attempted for facilitating stent delivery in such a complex lesions are: maximize guide catheter support, optimize predilatation of the stenosis, use of a stiffer guidewire. Specific tricks include: a) buddy-wire; anchoring balloon; GuideLiner catheter. In case of severe calcification, rotational atherectomy was electively performed with the Rotablator® system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, U.S.A.). Following stent implantation, postdilatation is performed in all instances with a non-compliant balloon

Study groups in NCT02360020
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XLimus patientsExperimentalparticipants must have symptomatic ischemic heart disease attributable to critical (that is, >70% visual estimate) stenotic lesions of native coronary arteries. Inclusion criteria are 1) chronic total occlusion (CTO), 2) severe calcification, and 3) severe tortuosity. CTO is defined as the presence of TIMI 0 flow within the occluded segment and angiographic or clinical evidence of an occlusion duration of ≥3 months. Calcification is defined severe when larger than 3x vessel diameter, and comprising the vessel wall totally in two perpendicular views. Tortuosity is defined severe when: one or more bends >= 90°, or three or more bends of 45-90° proximal to the diseased segment.
Receives: Device: XLimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stent Performance

    The primary objective of the study was the assessment of the clinical performance of the XLIMUS DES, using the following criteria 1) device success, defined as the ability to insert the stent into the target lesion and the attainment of <20% residual stenosis (by visual estimate), 2) lesion success, defined as attainment of <20% residual stenosis of the target lesion using any percutaneous method, and 3) procedural success, defined as lesion success without any in-hospital Man 30-day MACE

    Measured: up to 1 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Inhospital, 30-day and 1-year MACE

    Major adverse cardiac events included death of any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization by PCI or surgery occurring within 30-day and 1-year. Myocardial infarction was defined as the presence of pathological and new Q waves on an ECG or as an increase in creatine kinase-myocardial band level to >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Periprocedural myocardial infarction was defined as an increase of troponin I ≥5 times ULN. Target lesion revascularization was defined as a clinically-driven repeat percutaneous coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery. Stent thrombosis was defined according to the Academic Research Consortium definitions

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02360020
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCTCM03
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
2 Feb 2015
Last updated
10 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: We plan to present and publish the results in an international journal of interventional cardiology

Publications

  • Nikolsky E, Gruberg L, Pechersky S, Kapeliovich M, Grenadier E, Amikam S, Boulos M, Suleiman M, Markiewicz W, Beyar R. Stent deployment failure: reasons, implications, and short- and long-term outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jul;59(3):324-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10543.

    PubMed 12822150
  • Feldman T. Tricks for overcoming difficult stent delivery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Nov;48(3):285-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199911)48:33.0.co;2-3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10525229
  • Fernandes V, Kaluza GL, Godlewski B, Li G, Raizner AE. Novel technique for stent delivery in tortuous coronary arteries: report of three cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Apr;55(4):485-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10139.

    PubMed 11948896
  • Ashikaga T, Sakurai K, Satoh Y. Tools & Techniques: stent delivery in distal lesions. EuroIntervention. 2010 Nov;6(5):660-1. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I5A109. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21044922
  • Kumar S, Gorog DA, Secco GG, Di Mario C, Kukreja N. The GuideLiner "child" catheter for percutaneous coronary intervention - early clinical experience. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Oct;22(10):495-8.

    PubMed 20944191
  • Rieu R, Barragan P, Garitey V, Roquebert PO, Fuseri J, Commeau P, Sainsous J. Assessment of the trackability, flexibility, and conformability of coronary stents: a comparative analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Aug;59(4):496-503. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10583.

    PubMed 12891615
  • Schmidt W, Lanzer P, Behrens P, Topoleski LD, Schmitz KP. A comparison of the mechanical performance characteristics of seven drug-eluting stent systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 15;73(3):350-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21832.

    PubMed 19085917
  • Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, Serruys P, Tamburino C, Guagliumi G, Sousa E, Stoll HP; REALITY Trial Investigators. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Feb 22;295(8):895-904. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.8.895.

    PubMed 16493102
  • Lohavanichbutr K, Webb JG, Carere RG, Solankhi N, Jarochowski M, D'yachkova Y, Dodek A. Mechanisms, management, and outcome of failure of delivery of coronary stents. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 1;83(5):779-81, A9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00990-4.

    PubMed 10080438
  • Cantor WJ, Lazzam C, Cohen EA, Bowman KA, Dolman S, Mackie K, Natarajan MK, Strauss BH. Failed coronary stent deployment. Am Heart J. 1998 Dec;136(6):1088-95. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70168-1.

    PubMed 9842025
  • Mortier P, De Beule M, Segers P, Verdonck P, Verhegghe B. Virtual bench testing of new generation coronary stents. EuroIntervention. 2011 Jul;7(3):369-76. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I3A62.

    PubMed 21729840
  • Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Austrian Wiktor Stent Study Group and European Paragon Stent Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1580-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00570-2.

    PubMed 10807464
  • Briguori C, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Donahue M. Performance of the XLIMUS sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in very complex lesions. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2014 Feb;62(1):1-8.

    PubMed 24500212

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing XLimus in people with Coronary Atherosclerosis Due to Calcified Coronary Lesion and Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery, run by Clinica Mediterranea at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stent Performance (time frame: up to 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02360020, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in