ARDSNCT02361840
Predictive Value of Troponin I for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Children With Shock
An observational study of ARDS, run by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
Shock is one of the five leading causes of income and mortality in emergencies. It generates a decrease in the availability of oxygen to the tissues, resulting in ischemia, pulmonary involvement and tissue reperfusion syndrome. This pathologies can trigger Syndrome of Acute Respiratory Distress (ARDS) and death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ARDS
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: The sample size Calculated sample size for study of prospective cohort with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, 80% power. Exposed non-exposed 2:1 relation. Probability of occurring event in the cohort exposed 72% and 32% in the unexposed. We calculated that 41 patients of unexposed cohort and 21 of the exposed are required to observed differences. Total number of 62 patients (n=62). The sample size was calculated through the Epi Info version 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta. Population Population was taken from the room of emergency Pediatrics of the Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde (HCFAA).
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent signed by the parent to participate in the study.
- Children admitted to EUP the HCFAA of 1 month old 14 years showing shock with less than 24 hour evolution.
- Need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Who cannot join
- Intake of toxic tricyclic antidepressants, cocaine and methamphetamines that increase value of TI per se.
- Transfusion three or more concentrated erythrocyte / plasma before entering UP.
- Pregnant girls
- Children with a previous diagnosis of uremic kidney injury
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mexico1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Karla Isis Aviles Martinez
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280
KARLA ISIS AVILES MARTINEZ, MD, 0443331068136, draisispediatra@yahoo.com.mx
About this study
Shock is one of the five leading causes of income and mortality in emergencies. It generates a decrease in the availability of oxygen to the tissues, resulting in ischemia, pulmonary involvement and tissue reperfusion syndrome. This pathologies can trigger Syndrome of Acute Respiratory Distress (ARDS) and death.
Troponin I (TI) has been reported as early marker for ischemia and mortality other than coronary syndromes in critical patients.
Read more
Objective. Set the increase of TI as a predictor of ARDS in children with shock.
Null hypothesis. Increase serum in children with shock predicts the onset of ARDS.
Methodology. Prospective cohort type test diagnostic. Displays institutional. Sampling non-probability, consecutive inclusion. Calculation of the sample size: interval of confidence (IC) 95%, power - 80%; ratio non-exposed: exposed 2:1; n = 62.
Inclusion criteria: informed consent signed by the parent; children admitted to pediatric emergency (PEU) 1 month to 14 years with shock requiring mechanical ventilation.
Exclusion criteria: intake of toxic (TI value increment per will), ≥3 concentrated erythrocyte transfusion or plasma prior to entering PEU.
The investigators call exposure to the increase of TI≥0 05ng/ml and event to the development of ARDS. Determine TI value in plasma serum in the first 24 h, through Enzyme Immunoassay for the Quantitative Determination of Cardiac-Specific Troponin-I in Human Serum (cTnI ELISA), (reported as cardiac triage). Monitoring for 7 days.
Study was approved by Hospital Ethics Committee (Research record 003/12)
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present study is to establish a Troponin I (TI) in peripheral blood as a prognostic indicator in the emergence of the syndrome of acute respiratory difficulty (ARDS) in children with shock.
It should be noted that both shock and ARDS are life-threatening disease and one can trigger another (shock first then ARDS or ARDS then shock). Both involve abnormalities in blood flow (perfusion) tissues that leads to cellular stress, reduction of oxygen suplly (hypoxia), nutrients, consenquently generating an increase in tissue´s metabolic demands. This set of events is called ischemia.
The shock is a dynamic clinical syndrome of acute and complex circulatory dysfunction, caused by severe illness or trauma. To perpetuate itself generates multiple organ dysfunction and death. Regardless of its cause, it is conceptualized as a state of acute oxygen deficiency that prevents cell sustainability. The shock is one of the five leading causes of admission to emergency Pediatrics unit (EPU) of the Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde" (HCFAA).
Shock is the second cause of mortality in patients in the EPU. ARDS is an acute and diffuse, pulmonary inflammatory lesion characterized by increased pulmonary vascular permeability, weight and the decrease ventilation on the lung tissue. The specific clinical elements are hypoxemia and bilateral radiographic opacities associated with increases in the mixture of venous blood, physiological dead space and reduction of the pulmonary compliance. Diffuse alveolar damage is the morphological element that is in the acute phase (e.g. swelling, inflammation, hyaline membrane or bleeding). It has a mortality rate of 30-50% in the world.
TI is a protein that is determined in blood only under pathological conditions; mainly increases when there is myocardial ischemia. It was used in the first instance to diagnose acute coronary syndromes as ischemia, coronary angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction.
It has been documented increase of TI in patients in critical condition without coronary disease, mainly in individuals with sepsis, septic shock, hypovolemic shock and children with respiratory failure by respiratory syncytial virus; in addition, has interpreted as a prognostic marker for mortality.
TI seems to anticipate the clinical signs of events persistent with hypoxia that may lead to ischemia. The elevation of serum levels of TI indicate myocardial damage, but they do not explain the underlying mechanism.
The addition of ARDS shock generates a troubling circumstance. However, not all children presentig shock develop ARDS; so it is necessary to predict ARDS or diagnose it in its earliest stage; This will impact on the implementation of strategies to avoid the severe form of the disease. With this foundation the investigators propose to use TI as a prognostic indicator of ARDS in children with shock.
To validate our hypothesis we conduct a study of dynamic and prospective cohort, type diagnostic test.
The exposed cohort is represented by children with shock that took TI increased during follow-up; of these patients was analyzed ARDS (event) who presented with TI high (exhibition) and those who develop ARDS with normal TI.
Determine a sample peripheral blood in the first 24 hours, taken from infants who presented shock without ARDS joining EPU sign consent of the parents who accepted the participation of children in the study.
The quantitative results of the sample are obtained by ELISA test sandwich with immunofluorescence, carried out in the Emergency Robotic laboratory of Robotics of the HCFAA. The investigators will monitor patients daily for 7 days; the data obtained will be documented on the blog for this purpose.
The investigators determine as exposure to the increase of TI with a serum value equal or greater than 0. 05ng/ml.
The investigators believe the development of ARDS event . The diagnosis of ARDS will be established in those children who met the criteria specified in the definition of Berlin for ARDS in 2012, within seven days after the onset shock.
The statistical analysis plan will consist in each case and as a whole, establish initial comparability of groups, will estimate the magnitude of the effect through partnership and finally, the investigators will make adjustments to the potential confounding factors.
The investigators will begin with descriptive statistics and will apply the Shapiro (for being a small sample) test to determine the normality of the distribution of the variables that define the type of statistical analysis to follow (parametric or free distribution).
Test Chi2 allows the comparison of proportions and risks for qualitative variables. Will use R Pearson or Spearman Rho tests to establish correlations between quantitative variables. Test Student's T or Mann-Whitney (according to the found data distribution) U will be used for the comparison of independent medium.
The investigators will consider significant value of p < 0.05.The estimate of the magnitude of the effect was carried out through determination of relative risk (RR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR).
The primary clinical research studies are represented by cross-sectional studies, cases and controls, cohort and clinical trials.
TI diagnostic test, we will calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, probability indexes and elaborate COR (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve for optimum cutting of TI (quantitative variable expressed in ng/ml) to determine the approach of sensitivity and specificity.
QUESTION OF RESEARCH Does the increase in Troponin I serum in children with shock in Emergency Room can predict ARDS? General Objective. Establish increase TI value as a predictor of ARDS in children with shock.
Specific objectives. 1. To determine the incidence of children with shock that develops ARDS. 2. Establish correlation of TI with ARDS by Kirby oxygenation index. 3. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of TI in ARDS in children with shock. 4. Establish the serum prognostic value of TI for ARDS in children with shock The sample size Calculated sample size for study of prospective cohort with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, 80% power. Exposed non-exposed 2:1 relation. Probability of occurring event in the cohort exposed 72% and 32% in the unexposed.
The investigators obtained 41 patients for unexposed cohort and 21 exposed are required to observe differences. Total number of 62 patients (n=62).
The sample size was calculated through the Epi Info version 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta.
Population Population was taken from the room of Emergency Pediatric Unit (EPU) of the Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde (HCFAA).
Inclusion criteria
- Informed consent signed by the parent to participate in the study.
- Children admitted to EPU of the HCFAA of 1 month old to 14 years old showing shock with less than 24 hour evolution.
- Need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria
- Intake of toxic tricyclic antidepressants, cocaine and methamphetamines 2. Transfusion three or more concentrated erythrocyte / plasma before entering EPU.
- Pregnant girls 4. Children with a previous diagnosis of uremic kidney injury. Criteria of elimination
- Parents or legal guardians of patients requesting to leave the study.
- Does not have gas analysis with lactate at the time of final categorization as shock.
Procedure The investigators included children with shock, categorized by instrument of Pediatric assessment consisting of General assessment, primary, secondary and tertiary assessment triangle.
The doctors who performed the final categorization of patients are pediatrician or pediatric residents certified under the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association Pediatric Advanced Life Support.
Physicians were trained to one hour in pediatric evaluation and management of the instrument prior their participation. For this purpose, the instrument was the admission of Hospital Triage sheet. The possibilities of categorization initial pathophysiological according to the triangle of General evaluation are as follow:
- Stable (three parts of the normal triangle)
- Primary Disfunction of Central Nervous System or metabolic (abnormal appearance)
- Shortness of breath (abnormal breathing)
- Respiratory failure (abnormal breathing with abnormal color or appearance).
- Shock (abnormal color)
- Cardiorespiratory failure / imminent death (three parts of abnormal triangle) disease.
Immediately after categorization was a primary evaluation;was performed corresponding of a placement of monitor and measurement of vital signs, as well as evaluating and giving an A-B-C-D-E type treatment: air-permeable (A), control and management of the breath (B), circulation (C), identification of neurological Deficit (D) and (E) exhibition.
Within the laboratory studies requested in the tertiary evaluation, held gases in arterial blood lactate measurement.
If the children meet the inclusion criteria, they entered the cohort study. One mililiter of blood sample from the first 24 hours of the onset of shock was collected in a special tube containing anticoagulant and specially marked with a purple lid by its manufacturer.
The samples were taken to the emergency laboratory of the HCFAA within 10 minutes of obtaining them, they were processed using ELISA test sandwich by immunofluorescence using the reagent Enzyme Immunoassay for the Quantitative Determination of Cardiac-Specific Troponin-I in Human Serum (cTnI) ELISA.
The results were reported by the laboratory within 30 minutes after delivery, reported as cardiac Triage.
The result of TI is expressed as it is within range when the value is less than 0. 05ng/ml and high or out of range when the value is equal to or greater than 0. 05ng/ml. Once obtained the results, were added to the document in the protocol's log.
Stroke ECG and Echocardiogram was performed to all patients, conducted by an MD., Pediatrician Certified Cardiologist.
The patients were followed for 7 days from the entry to the cohort. The investigators have described as exposure for this cohort, TI ≥0. 05ng/ml increase and consider the development of ARDS, according to the definition of 2012 Berlin, even the latter constituted a measuring instrument.
There is no conflict of interest. Equipment and reagent for the determination of TI were obtained through public tender by the officer of Administrative Hospital Subdirector of HCFAA.
Dependent (outcome) variable: ARDS Independent (Predictor) variables: Troponin I
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Keywords
- Troponin I, Pediatric shock
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exposed cohort: TI>0.05ng/ml | We call Exposed group to increased TI > or = 0.05ng/ml We call Event to the onset of ARDS | |
| No Exposed cohort: TI<0.05ng/ml | We cal no Exposed group to increased TI (<0.05ng/ml) We call Event to the onset of ARDS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determination of results of Primary study cohort
incidence of exposed , unexposed incidence , relative risk, attributable risk , absolute risk reduction
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Test
Sensibility, specificity, likelihoods ratio
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ARDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, KARLA ISIS AVILES MARTINEZ, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
- Investigators
- KARLA ISIS AVILES MARTINEZ, MD, Principal investigator, University of GuadalajaraMONICA CECILIA URIBE MERCADO, PhD., MD, Study director, Universidad de GudadalajaraIRAM ALBERTO VILLA MANZANO, PhD., MD, Study director, University of Guadalajara
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02361840
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCFAA 003/12
- Status last verified
- Feb 2015
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictive Value of Troponin I for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Children With Shock
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02361840
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCFAA 003/12
- Conditions
- ARDS
- Keywords
- Troponin I, Pediatric shock
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Civil de GuadalajaraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Shock is one of the five leading causes of income and mortality in emergencies. It generates a decrease in the availability of oxygen to the tissues, resulting in ischemia, pulmonary involvement and tissue reperfusion syndrome. This pathologies can trigger Syndrome of Acute Respiratory Distress (ARDS) and death.
Troponin I (TI) has been reported as early marker for ischemia and mortality other than coronary syndromes in critical patients.
Objective. Set the increase of TI as a predictor of ARDS in children with shock.
Null hypothesis. Increase serum in children with shock predicts the onset of ARDS.
Methodology. Prospective cohort type test diagnostic. Displays institutional. Sampling non-probability, consecutive inclusion. Calculation of the sample size: interval of confidence (IC) 95%, power - 80%; ratio non-exposed: exposed 2:1; n = 62.
Inclusion criteria: informed consent signed by the parent; children admitted to pediatric emergency (PEU) 1 month to 14 years with shock requiring mechanical ventilation.
Exclusion criteria: intake of toxic (TI value increment per will), ≥3 concentrated erythrocyte transfusion or plasma prior to entering PEU.
The investigators call exposure to the increase of TI≥0 05ng/ml and event to the development of ARDS. Determine TI value in plasma serum in the first 24 h, through Enzyme Immunoassay for the Quantitative Determination of Cardiac-Specific Troponin-I in Human Serum (cTnI ELISA), (reported as cardiac triage). Monitoring for 7 days.
Study was approved by Hospital Ethics Committee (Research record 003/12)
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present study is to establish a Troponin I (TI) in peripheral blood as a prognostic indicator in the emergence of the syndrome of acute respiratory difficulty (ARDS) in children with shock.
It should be noted that both shock and ARDS are life-threatening disease and one can trigger another (shock first then ARDS or ARDS then shock). Both involve abnormalities in blood flow (perfusion) tissues that leads to cellular stress, reduction of oxygen suplly (hypoxia), nutrients, consenquently generating an increase in tissue´s metabolic demands. This set of events is called ischemia.
The shock is a dynamic clinical syndrome of acute and complex circulatory dysfunction, caused by severe illness or trauma. To perpetuate itself generates multiple organ dysfunction and death. Regardless of its cause, it is conceptualized as a state of acute oxygen deficiency that prevents cell sustainability. The shock is one of the five leading causes of admission to emergency Pediatrics unit (EPU) of the Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde" (HCFAA).
Shock is the second cause of mortality in patients in the EPU. ARDS is an acute and diffuse, pulmonary inflammatory lesion characterized by increased pulmonary vascular permeability, weight and the decrease ventilation on the lung tissue. The specific clinical elements are hypoxemia and bilateral radiographic opacities associated with increases in the mixture of venous blood, physiological dead space and reduction of the pulmonary compliance. Diffuse alveolar damage is the morphological element that is in the acute phase (e.g. swelling, inflammation, hyaline membrane or bleeding). It has a mortality rate of 30-50% in the world.
TI is a protein that is determined in blood only under pathological conditions; mainly increases when there is myocardial ischemia. It was used in the first instance to diagnose acute coronary syndromes as ischemia, coronary angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction.
It has been documented increase of TI in patients in critical condition without coronary disease, mainly in individuals with sepsis, septic shock, hypovolemic shock and children with respiratory failure by respiratory syncytial virus; in addition, has interpreted as a prognostic marker for mortality.
TI seems to anticipate the clinical signs of events persistent with hypoxia that may lead to ischemia. The elevation of serum levels of TI indicate myocardial damage, but they do not explain the underlying mechanism.
The addition of ARDS shock generates a troubling circumstance. However, not all children presentig shock develop ARDS; so it is necessary to predict ARDS or diagnose it in its earliest stage; This will impact on the implementation of strategies to avoid the severe form of the disease. With this foundation the investigators propose to use TI as a prognostic indicator of ARDS in children with shock.
To validate our hypothesis we conduct a study of dynamic and prospective cohort, type diagnostic test.
The exposed cohort is represented by children with shock that took TI increased during follow-up; of these patients was analyzed ARDS (event) who presented with TI high (exhibition) and those who develop ARDS with normal TI.
Determine a sample peripheral blood in the first 24 hours, taken from infants who presented shock without ARDS joining EPU sign consent of the parents who accepted the participation of children in the study.
The quantitative results of the sample are obtained by ELISA test sandwich with immunofluorescence, carried out in the Emergency Robotic laboratory of Robotics of the HCFAA. The investigators will monitor patients daily for 7 days; the data obtained will be documented on the blog for this purpose.
The investigators determine as exposure to the increase of TI with a serum value equal or greater than 0. 05ng/ml.
The investigators believe the development of ARDS event . The diagnosis of ARDS will be established in those children who met the criteria specified in the definition of Berlin for ARDS in 2012, within seven days after the onset shock.
The statistical analysis plan will consist in each case and as a whole, establish initial comparability of groups, will estimate the magnitude of the effect through partnership and finally, the investigators will make adjustments to the potential confounding factors.
The investigators will begin with descriptive statistics and will apply the Shapiro (for being a small sample) test to determine the normality of the distribution of the variables that define the type of statistical analysis to follow (parametric or free distribution).
Test Chi2 allows the comparison of proportions and risks for qualitative variables. Will use R Pearson or Spearman Rho tests to establish correlations between quantitative variables. Test Student's T or Mann-Whitney (according to the found data distribution) U will be used for the comparison of independent medium.
The investigators will consider significant value of p < 0.05.The estimate of the magnitude of the effect was carried out through determination of relative risk (RR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR).
The primary clinical research studies are represented by cross-sectional studies, cases and controls, cohort and clinical trials.
TI diagnostic test, we will calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, probability indexes and elaborate COR (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve for optimum cutting of TI (quantitative variable expressed in ng/ml) to determine the approach of sensitivity and specificity.
QUESTION OF RESEARCH Does the increase in Troponin I serum in children with shock in Emergency Room can predict ARDS? General Objective. Establish increase TI value as a predictor of ARDS in children with shock.
Specific objectives. 1. To determine the incidence of children with shock that develops ARDS. 2. Establish correlation of TI with ARDS by Kirby oxygenation index. 3. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of TI in ARDS in children with shock. 4. Establish the serum prognostic value of TI for ARDS in children with shock The sample size Calculated sample size for study of prospective cohort with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, 80% power. Exposed non-exposed 2:1 relation. Probability of occurring event in the cohort exposed 72% and 32% in the unexposed.
The investigators obtained 41 patients for unexposed cohort and 21 exposed are required to observe differences. Total number of 62 patients (n=62).
The sample size was calculated through the Epi Info version 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta.
Population Population was taken from the room of Emergency Pediatric Unit (EPU) of the Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde (HCFAA).
Inclusion criteria
- Informed consent signed by the parent to participate in the study.
- Children admitted to EPU of the HCFAA of 1 month old to 14 years old showing shock with less than 24 hour evolution.
- Need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria
- Intake of toxic tricyclic antidepressants, cocaine and methamphetamines 2. Transfusion three or more concentrated erythrocyte / plasma before entering EPU.
- Pregnant girls 4. Children with a previous diagnosis of uremic kidney injury. Criteria of elimination
- Parents or legal guardians of patients requesting to leave the study.
- Does not have gas analysis with lactate at the time of final categorization as shock.
Procedure The investigators included children with shock, categorized by instrument of Pediatric assessment consisting of General assessment, primary, secondary and tertiary assessment triangle.
The doctors who performed the final categorization of patients are pediatrician or pediatric residents certified under the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association Pediatric Advanced Life Support.
Physicians were trained to one hour in pediatric evaluation and management of the instrument prior their participation. For this purpose, the instrument was the admission of Hospital Triage sheet. The possibilities of categorization initial pathophysiological according to the triangle of General evaluation are as follow:
- Stable (three parts of the normal triangle)
- Primary Disfunction of Central Nervous System or metabolic (abnormal appearance)
- Shortness of breath (abnormal breathing)
- Respiratory failure (abnormal breathing with abnormal color or appearance).
- Shock (abnormal color)
- Cardiorespiratory failure / imminent death (three parts of abnormal triangle) disease.
Immediately after categorization was a primary evaluation;was performed corresponding of a placement of monitor and measurement of vital signs, as well as evaluating and giving an A-B-C-D-E type treatment: air-permeable (A), control and management of the breath (B), circulation (C), identification of neurological Deficit (D) and (E) exhibition.
Within the laboratory studies requested in the tertiary evaluation, held gases in arterial blood lactate measurement.
If the children meet the inclusion criteria, they entered the cohort study. One mililiter of blood sample from the first 24 hours of the onset of shock was collected in a special tube containing anticoagulant and specially marked with a purple lid by its manufacturer.
The samples were taken to the emergency laboratory of the HCFAA within 10 minutes of obtaining them, they were processed using ELISA test sandwich by immunofluorescence using the reagent Enzyme Immunoassay for the Quantitative Determination of Cardiac-Specific Troponin-I in Human Serum (cTnI) ELISA.
The results were reported by the laboratory within 30 minutes after delivery, reported as cardiac Triage.
The result of TI is expressed as it is within range when the value is less than 0. 05ng/ml and high or out of range when the value is equal to or greater than 0. 05ng/ml. Once obtained the results, were added to the document in the protocol's log.
Stroke ECG and Echocardiogram was performed to all patients, conducted by an MD., Pediatrician Certified Cardiologist.
The patients were followed for 7 days from the entry to the cohort. The investigators have described as exposure for this cohort, TI ≥0. 05ng/ml increase and consider the development of ARDS, according to the definition of 2012 Berlin, even the latter constituted a measuring instrument.
There is no conflict of interest. Equipment and reagent for the determination of TI were obtained through public tender by the officer of Administrative Hospital Subdirector of HCFAA.
Dependent (outcome) variable: ARDS Independent (Predictor) variables: Troponin I
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exposed cohort: TI>0.05ng/ml | – | –We call Exposed group to increased TI > or = 0.05ng/ml We call Event to the onset of ARDS |
| No Exposed cohort: TI<0.05ng/ml | – | –We cal no Exposed group to increased TI (<0.05ng/ml) We call Event to the onset of ARDS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The sample size Calculated sample size for study of prospective cohort with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, 80% power. Exposed non-exposed 2:1 relation. Probability of occurring event in the cohort exposed 72% and 32% in the unexposed. We calculated that 41 patients of unexposed cohort and 21 of the exposed are required to observed differences. Total number of 62 patients (n=62). The sample size was calculated through the Epi Info version 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta. Population Population was taken from the room of emergency Pediatrics of the Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde (HCFAA).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Informed consent signed by the parent to participate in the study.
- Children admitted to EUP the HCFAA of 1 month old 14 years showing shock with less than 24 hour evolution.
- Need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Intake of toxic tricyclic antidepressants, cocaine and methamphetamines that increase value of TI per se.
- Transfusion three or more concentrated erythrocyte / plasma before entering UP.
- Pregnant girls
- Children with a previous diagnosis of uremic kidney injury
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Determination of results of Primary study cohort
Time frame: 2 years
incidence of exposed , unexposed incidence , relative risk, attributable risk , absolute risk reduction
1 secondary outcome
Diagnostic Test
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2015.
Related trials for ARDS
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
KARLA ISIS AVILES MARTINEZ, MD principal investigator
University of Guadalajara
MONICA CECILIA URIBE MERCADO, PhD., MD study director
Universidad de Gudadalajara
IRAM ALBERTO VILLA MANZANO, PhD., MD study director
University of Guadalajara
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ARDS, run by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact KARLA ISIS AVILES MARTINEZ, MD (0443331068136, draisispediatra@yahoo.com.mx), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determination of results of Primary study cohort (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2015.