AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematoma, Subdural, ChronicPhase 4NCT02362321

Role of Dexamethasone in the Conservative Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

A Phase 4 study testing Dexamethasone in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Current opinion regarding the use of steroids in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas are mostly based on observational studies. Here we present data from a prospective randomized pilot study of twenty chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients treated with dexamethasone or placebo for 30 days. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
What is being tested?
Dexamethasone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2007to May 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years and older
  • evidence of subacute or chronic supratentorial subdural hematoma by CT (computerized tomography) scan or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging)
  • classified between 0 and 2 using the Markwalder grading scale

Who cannot join

  • contraindications or intolerance to corticosteroid therapy
  • patients already undergoing steroid treatment for any other indication
  • previous neurological surgery up to one year prior to being considered for the study
  • concomitant cerebral pathology of neoplastic or presumed infectious origin
  • anticoagulant therapy that could not be stopped for 6 months
  • refusal to participate in the study

About this study

Official title: Role of Dexamethasone in the Conservative Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Current opinion regarding the use of steroids in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas are mostly based on observational studies. Here we present data from a prospective randomized pilot study of twenty chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients treated with dexamethasone or placebo for 30 days.

Twenty patients with computed tomography (CT)- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed CSDH were recruited from a single center and randomized in order to receive dexamethasone or placebo as a conservative treatment. Patients affected to the treatment group received oral dexamethasone 12mg/day for three weeks followed by tapering. These patients were followed for 6 months and the rate of success of conservative treatment versus placebo was measured. Parameters such as hematoma thickness and global impression of change were also compared before and after treatment with chi-square tests. Adverse events and complications were documented.

Read the detailed description

Patients Recruitment for this single-center double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study was performed between January 2007 and May 2009. Patients were enrolled based on the following inclusion criteria: 18 years and older with evidence of subacute or chronic supratentorial subdural hematoma by CT (computerized tomography) scan or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and classified between 0 and 2 using the Markwalder grading scale (17) (Grade 0 for normal neurological status, grade 1 for no neurological deficits but mild symptoms, grade 2 for focal or variable neurological deficits, grade 3 for several focal neurological signs, and grade 4 for comatose). Exclusion criteria included contraindications or intolerance to corticosteroid therapy or patients already undergoing steroid treatment for any other indication, previous neurological surgery up to one year prior to being considered for the study, concomitant cerebral pathology of neoplastic or presumed infectious origin, anticoagulant therapy that could not be stopped for 6 months and refusal to participate in the study. If at any time, patients developed a sudden increase in hematoma volume, a midline displacement of greater than 1cm or a deterioration of their level of consciousness, they were removed from the conservative study protocol in order to undergo surgery.

This study was approved by the research ethics board at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Quebec. Written and fully informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Randomization Allocation to each group was done in a 1:1 ratio with block sizes ranging from 4 to 6, to one of the two arms ; a treatment arm in which participants received dexamethasone according to the protocol, and a control group in which they received placebo. Randomization was performed via a web-based service by a pharmacist, which was not involved in any other part of the study. Both investigators and participants were blind to treatment allocation.

Treatment Participants allocated to the treatment group received a daily dosage of 12mg (4mg three times a day) of dexamethasone for three weeks. Corticosteroid treatment was then tapered off over the next week (8mg for 48 hrs, 4mg for 48 hrs, 2mg for 48 hrs and 1mg for 24 hrs). Identical oral capsules filled with lactose were administered to the control (placebo) group for 28 days. Participants were returned at home with blister packs containing their medication for each day of the trial and were asked to return empty packs to ensure compliance with the assigned treatment. The treatment (placebo or dexamethasone) was discontinued if a patient required surgical drainage of its hematoma or suffered from significant side effects.

Evaluation and follow-up The primary outcome of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy of dexamethasone as compared with placebo in reducing the rate of surgical intervention for CSDH graded 0 to 2 on the Markwalder grading scale (Grade 0 for normal neurological status, grade 1 for no neurological deficits but mild symptoms, grade 2 for focal or variable neurological deficits, grade 3 for several focal neurological signs, and grade 4 for comatose).

Eligible patients who consented for the study underwent the routine standard of care. This included 1) a complete medical history review and neurological physical exam ; 2) head computerized tomography (CT) or MRI with measurement of maximal hematoma thickness (in mm), midline shift ; 3) and a check of blood and vital parameters. In addition, patients were asked to complete detailed questionnaires measuring symptoms typically associated with subdural hematomas.

Follow-up appointments were scheduled 2 weeks, 1, 2 and 6 months after initiation of treatment. At each visit, the three components of the clinical evaluation described above were repeated. Moreover, a seven point categorical scale was used to evaluate patient's global impression of change relative to the initial state (unchanged , very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse). Treatment-related side effects were also inquired about and collected.

The rate of success of conservative management was defined as the percentage of patients not requiring surgery in each treatment group during the 6 months following enrollment. Radiological progression of the hematoma in terms of thickness and magnitude of midline shift, hematoma-related symptoms and medication-related side effects were carefully collected.

Statistical analyses Demographical characteristics, baseline neurological status and hematoma size and location were compared for both groups using a Mann-Whitney test for continuous variable and a χ2 test for categorical variables.

To compare the rate of success, a categorical frequency comparison with the Fisher's exact test was used. For the other outcome measures we used Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t-test for normally distributed variables and χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical frequencies. All statistical tests were done with the Statistical package for Social Sciences software version 16.0 and the significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

Being tested
Dexamethasone, Placebo
Keywords
[C10.228.140.300.535.450.400.120]
Medical subject headings
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    Also called Corticosteroid, Decadron

    Patients received a daily dosage of 12mg (4mg three times a day) of dexamethasone for three weeks. Corticosteroid treatment was then tapered off over the next week (8mg for 48 hrs, 4mg for 48 hrs, 2mg for 48 hrs and 1mg for 24 hrs).

  • PlaceboOther

    Identical oral capsules filled with lactose were administered to the control (placebo) group for 28 days.

Study groups in NCT02362321
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DexamethasoneExperimentalParticipants allocated to the treatment group received a daily dosage of 12mg (4mg three times a day) of dexamethasone for three weeks. Corticosteroid treatment was then tapered off over the next week (8mg for 48 hrs, 4mg for 48 hrs, 2mg for 48 hrs and 1mg for 24 hrs).
Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone
ControlPlacebo comparatorIdentical oral capsules filled with lactose were administered to the control (placebo) group for 28 days.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Need for Surgery Drainage

    The rate of success of conservative management was defined as the number of patients not requiring surgery in each treatment group during the 6 months following enrollment.

    Measured: Within 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2009

Why it stopped: Due to serious adverse events

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02362321
Sponsor's protocol ID
PEJ-370
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
9 Feb 2015
Last updated
29 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Dexamethasone in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Need for Surgery Drainage (time frame: Within 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in