AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstructive Sleep ApneaNCT02364375

Usability Evaluation of Menai CPAP Masks

A study testing Menai mask (full face), Menai Standard mask (full face) and Menai mask (nasal) in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by ResMed at 1 site in Australia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the subjective performance of the Menai mask systems (full face, nasal, and pillows variants), compared against Comparison mask systems. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
What is being tested?
Menai mask (full face), Menai Standard mask (full face) and Menai mask (nasal)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
May 2015to Jul 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants willing to provide written informed consent
  • Participants who can read and comprehend written and spoken English
  • Participants who are over 18 years of age
  • Participants who have been diagnosed with OSA
  • Participants who have been established on CPAP for ≥ 6 months
  • Participants who are currently using the same mask type/variant as the interventional mask system to be evaluated

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are not able to provide written informed consent
  • Participants who are unable to comprehend written and spoken English
  • Participants who are pregnant
  • Participants who are unsuitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the researcher
  • Participants with a pre-existing lung disease or a condition that would predispose them to pneumothorax (e.g. COPD, lung cancer; fibrosis of the lungs; recent (< 2years) case of pneumonia or lung infection, lung injury)
  • Participants who cannot participate for the duration of the trial
  • Participants who are established on bi-level support therapy
  • Participants who are not currently using the same mask type/variant as the interventional mask system to be evaluated

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • ResMed Sleep Research Centre

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2153

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Menai Mask Systems - Clinical Study 1

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the subjective performance of the Menai mask systems (full face, nasal, and pillows variants), compared against Comparison mask systems.

Read the detailed description

The study will evaluate the subjective seal, comfort, stability, usability, and humidification performance of the prototype mask systems in CPAP established patients. The performance of the prototype Menai mask systems (full face, nasal, and pillows variants) will be subjectively assessed through user questionnaires based on an 11-point Likert scale, and will be compared against Comparison masks.

The prototype masks share the same parts (cushion, frame, headgear), with the difference being that the Menai masks feature a novel vent and humidification system.

Being tested
Menai mask (full face), Menai Standard mask (full face), Menai mask (nasal), Menai Standard mask (nasal), Menai mask (pillows)
Keywords
sleep, apnea, OSA, CPAP
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Apnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Menai mask (full face)Device

    Prototype mask system (full face variant) with novel vent and humidification system

  • Menai Standard mask (full face)Device

    Prototype mask system (full face variant) with conventional vent and humidification system

  • Menai mask (nasal)Device

    Prototype mask system (nasal variant) with novel vent and humidification system

  • Menai Standard mask (nasal)Device

    Prototype mask system (nasal variant) with conventional vent and humidification system

  • Menai mask (pillows)Device

    Prototype mask system (pillows variant) with conventional vent and humidification system

  • Menai Standard mask (pillows)Device

    Prototype mask system (pillows variant) with conventional vent and humidification system

Study groups in NCT02364375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Full FaceExperimentalParticipants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (full face) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (full face) for 7 nights each.
Receives: Device: Menai mask (full face); Device: Menai Standard mask (full face)
NasalExperimentalParticipants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (nasal) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (nasal) for 7 nights each.
Receives: Device: Menai mask (nasal); Device: Menai Standard mask (nasal)
PillowsExperimentalParticipants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (pillows) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (pillows) for 7 nights each.
Receives: Device: Menai mask (pillows); Device: Menai Standard mask (pillows)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Usability Performance Evaluation

    Evaluation of the usability performance (seal, comfort, etc) of the Menai masks, compared to the Comparison Menai Standard masks.

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Humidification Performance Evaluation

    Evaluation of the humidification performance of the Menai masks (passive humidification), compared to the Comparison Menai Standard masks (active humidification).

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02364375
Sponsor's protocol ID
MA220115
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
1 Feb 2015
Last updated
4 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Menai mask (full face), Menai Standard mask (full face) and Menai mask (nasal) in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by ResMed at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Usability Performance Evaluation (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in