AzTrials
AzTrials

Postherpetic NeuralgiaPhase 2(PHN)NCT02365636

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV 45070 Ointment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

A Phase 2 study testing TV-45070 in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 77 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postherpetic Neuralgia
What is being tested?
TV-45070
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
300 participants
Where
77 sitesUnited States
Study dates
26 Feb 2015to 9 May 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient has chronic Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN), defined as pain present for more than 6 months and less than 10 years after onset of herpes zoster skin rash affecting a single dermatome. Patients with more than 1 involved dermatome may also be included, provided the affected dermatomes are contiguous.
  • Patient is ≥18 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 34 kg/m2, inclusive, at the screening visit.
  • If the patient is a woman and is fertile, the patient is not pregnant and has negative pregnancy tests at both the screening and randomization visits, and agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
  • If the patient is a man and is capable of producing offspring, the patient must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception, unless the partner cannot become pregnant for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
  • Patient must sign the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the study and be willing to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
  • Patient must be judged by the investigator to be medically healthy (except for PHN) and able to participate in the study
  • Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information

Who cannot join

  • Patient has any other severe pain that might confound assessment or self-evaluation of pain due to PHN.
  • Patient has PHN affecting the face (trigeminal nerve distribution).
  • Patient has a history, in the judgment of the investigator, of inadequate response to more than 3 adequate courses of treatment with other medications used to treat neuropathic pain (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, anticonvulsants, topical lidocaine, and/or topical capsaicin).
  • Patient is taking oral analgesics (either opioid or non-opioid) or is receiving topical therapy such as the 5% topical lidocaine patch for the treatment of pain and is unwilling or unable to complete a washout period during which the patient will discontinue analgesic therapy or topical pain therapy.
  • Patient has been treated with topical capsaicin at any time in the past 6 months for neuropathic pain.
  • Patient has a history of fibromyalgia.
  • Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information

Trial locations and contacts

77 sites in 1 country.

77 sites in 1 country

United States77 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 13658

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • Teva Investigational Site 13066

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Teva Investigational Site 13330

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108-5129

  • Teva Investigational Site 13070

    Arlington, Texas, 76012

  • Teva Investigational Site 13053

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30331

  • Teva Investigational Site 13091

    Aurora, Illinois, 60506

  • Teva Investigational Site 13088

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Teva Investigational Site 13081

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Teva Investigational Site 13052

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35213

  • Teva Investigational Site 13072

    Bolingbrook, Illinois, 60490

  • Teva Investigational Site 13521

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • Teva Investigational Site 13094

    Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301

  • Teva Investigational Site 13334

    Brooklyn, New York, 11229

  • Teva Investigational Site 13085

    Brooksville, Florida, 34601

  • Teva Investigational Site 13060

    Calabash, North Carolina, 28467

  • Teva Investigational Site 13332

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Teva Investigational Site 13057

    Clearwater, Florida, 33761

  • Teva Investigational Site 13079

    Colton, California, 92324

  • Teva Investigational Site 13089

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Teva Investigational Site 13061

    Detroit, Michigan, 48235

  • Teva Investigational Site 13078

    Eugene, Oregon, 97404

  • Teva Investigational Site 13062

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • Teva Investigational Site 13093

    Evansville, Indiana, 47725

  • Teva Investigational Site 13049

    Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334

  • Teva Investigational Site 13084

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33912

  • Teva Investigational Site 13047

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • Teva Investigational Site 13046

    Homestead, Florida, 33030

  • Teva Investigational Site 13098

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Teva Investigational Site 13045

    Kissimmee, Florida, 34744

  • Teva Investigational Site 13095

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909

  • Teva Investigational Site 13065

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123

  • Teva Investigational Site 13333

    Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056

  • Teva Investigational Site 13661

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Teva Investigational Site 13063

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Teva Investigational Site 13340

    McKinney, Texas, 75071

  • Teva Investigational Site 13096

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Teva Investigational Site 13064

    Miami, Florida, 33126

  • Teva Investigational Site 13338

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • Teva Investigational Site 13044

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • Teva Investigational Site 13335

    Miami, Florida, 33183

  • Teva Investigational Site 13657

    Milford, Connecticut, 06460

  • Teva Investigational Site 13086

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Teva Investigational Site 13074

    Monroe, Louisiana, 71201

  • Teva Investigational Site 13522

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Teva Investigational Site 13058

    New Port Richey, Florida, 34652

  • Teva Investigational Site 13054

    New York, New York, 10128

  • Teva Investigational Site 13090

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • Teva Investigational Site 13083

    North Massapequa, New York, 11758-1802

  • Teva Investigational Site 13075

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Teva Investigational Site 13328

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Teva Investigational Site 13516

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Teva Investigational Site 13076

    Oldsmar, Florida, 34677

  • Teva Investigational Site 13073

    Orlando, Florida, 32801

  • Teva Investigational Site 13048

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Teva Investigational Site 13659

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024

  • Teva Investigational Site 13339

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146

  • Teva Investigational Site 13514

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85018

  • Teva Investigational Site 13520

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85023

  • Teva Investigational Site 13327

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206

  • Teva Investigational Site 13050

    Plano, Texas, 75093

  • Teva Investigational Site 13331

    Pomona, California, 91767

  • Teva Investigational Site 13337

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Teva Investigational Site 13068

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • Teva Investigational Site 13341

    Sacramento, California, 95821

  • Teva Investigational Site 13518

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124

  • Teva Investigational Site 13051

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Teva Investigational Site 13336

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

  • Teva Investigational Site 13519

    Seminole, Florida, 33708

  • Teva Investigational Site 13660

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105

  • Teva Investigational Site 13099

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Teva Investigational Site 13056

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713

  • Teva Investigational Site 13059

    Tampa, Florida, 33603

  • Teva Investigational Site 13055

    Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

  • Teva Investigational Site 13100

    Torrance, California, 90505

  • Teva Investigational Site 13329

    Venice, Florida, 34292

  • Teva Investigational Site 13513

    Virginia Gardens, Florida, 33172

  • Teva Investigational Site 13082

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV-45070 (4% and 8% w/w Ointment) in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia.

This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN

Being tested
TV-45070, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia, Postherpetic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TV-45070Drug

    Also called funapide, XEN402

    TV-45070 is an ointment applied topically twice daily to area of pain.

  • PlaceboDrug

    The matching placebo ointment contained only the excipients of the active treatment; also applied topically twice daily to area of pain.

Study groups in NCT02365636
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TV-45070 4%ExperimentalTV-45070 ointment in a 4% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28.
Receives: Drug: TV-45070
TV-45070 8%ExperimentalTV-45070 ointment in a 8% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28.
Receives: Drug: TV-45070
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo ointment applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 4 in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores. The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The daily average NRS scores is the average of the 2 NRS scores (recorded in the morning and evening) of average pain, defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. At least 1 of the 2 daily scores had to be recorded (non-missing) or the daily average was considered missing. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the daily average NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The NRS pain scores recorded in the evening is defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the evening NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the evening NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Morning Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The NRS pain scores recorded in the morning is defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the evening NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of morning NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Worst Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The worst pain is defined as the patient-reported worst pain intensity over the prior 24 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the worst pain NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the evening NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)

  4. Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Week 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    The NRS is a 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The daily average NRS scores is the average of the 2 NRS scores (recorded in the morning and evening) of average pain, defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Percent improvement is calculated as 100 × (the weekly average of the daily average NRS pain score at week 4 - weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline /weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline. Patients missing a week 4 average are considered non-responders (<50% improvement or <30% improvement). The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the daily average NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.

    Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)

  5. Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

    NPSI is a patient-reported questionnaire to evaluate the severity of different symptoms of neuropathic pain. The questionnaire contains 10 descriptors representing 5 distinct dimensions of pain: burning pain, deep pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia, plus 2 temporal items. Descriptors are scored from 0 through 10, where higher scores represent worse pain. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 10 descriptors (Bouhassira et al 2004). The total score ranges from 0 (no pain) through 100 (worst pain imaginable). If the score for one question was missing the total score was computed as 10 times sum of scores of 9 descriptors divided by 9. If more than one question was missing then the total score was missing. Negative change from baseline scores indicated less pain.

    The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.

    Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) Total Score

    NePIQoL is a questionnaire that contains 41 items to evaluate quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain. Each question has responses ranging from strongly agree or always to strongly disagree or never. Questions are scored on a 5-point scale from 1 through 5, where higher scores represent greater pain-related interference in quality of life. Total range is 41 (great quality of life) to 205 (worst quality of life). Negative change from baseline scores indicated an improving quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (day 1), Week 4 (day 29)

  7. Participants' Global Assess of Treatment as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Weeks 2 and 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

    PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of treatment on 7-point scale (Hurst and Bolton 2004). The 7-point scale is defined as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.

    The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.

    Measured: Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)

  8. Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

    DSIS is an 11-point scale that asks the patient to "select the number that best describes how much your pain has interfered with your sleep during the past 24 hours." Response options range from 0 (Did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (Completely interfered with sleep/unable to sleep due to pain). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of how much pain interfered with sleep.

    The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.

    Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)

  9. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for First Time to Reach 30% or More Sustained Improvement in Weekly Average of the Daily Average NRS Pain Scores

    Percent improvement is calculated as 100*(the weekly average of the daily average NRS pain score - weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline [days -7 to -1])/weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline. Patients who do not reach >= 30% improvement are censored at their last non-missing weekly average. Patients who reach >= 30% improvement, but the improvement is not sustained through the end of the treatment period are censored at their last non-missing weekly average. For patients who reach >= 30% improvement that is sustained through the end through the end of the of the treatment, the time >= 30% improvement is first reached is used.

    Measured: Baseline (days -7 to -1), Week 1 (days 1-7), Week 2 (day 8-14), Week 3 (days 15-21), Week 4 (days 22-29)

  10. Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Brush-Evoked Allodynia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

    Allodynia refers to central pain sensitization (increased response of neurons) following normally non-painful, often repetitive, stimulation. In this case, pain evoked by innocuous brush is measured on an 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 11=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of pain.

    Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)

  11. Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Punctate-Evoked Hyperalgesia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)

    Hyperalgesia refers to increased pain from a stimulus that normally provokes pain. In this case, pain is evoked by punctate skin stimulation using a Medipin® and is measured on an 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 11=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of pain.

    The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor. The unstructured covariance matrix for repeated observations within patients was used.

    Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)

  12. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

    Measured: day 1 up to day 57

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Feb 2015
  3. Primary completion9 May 2017
  4. Study completion9 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02365636
Sponsor's protocol ID
TV-45070-CNS-20013
Acronym
(PHN)
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
13 Feb 2015
Last updated
9 Nov 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Fetell M, Sendel M, Li T, Marinelli L, Vollert J, Ruggerio E, Houk G, Dockum M, Albrecht PJ, Rice FL, Baron R. Cutaneous nerve fiber and peripheral Nav1.7 assessment in a large cohort of patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Pain. 2023 Nov 1;164(11):2435-2446. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002950. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

    PubMed 37366590

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing TV-45070 in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 77 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 77 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02365636, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in