Postherpetic NeuralgiaPhase 2(PHN)NCT02365636
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV 45070 Ointment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
A Phase 2 study testing TV-45070 in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 77 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- What is being tested?
- TV-45070
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 77 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2015to 9 May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has chronic Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN), defined as pain present for more than 6 months and less than 10 years after onset of herpes zoster skin rash affecting a single dermatome. Patients with more than 1 involved dermatome may also be included, provided the affected dermatomes are contiguous.
- Patient is ≥18 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 34 kg/m2, inclusive, at the screening visit.
- If the patient is a woman and is fertile, the patient is not pregnant and has negative pregnancy tests at both the screening and randomization visits, and agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
- If the patient is a man and is capable of producing offspring, the patient must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception, unless the partner cannot become pregnant for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
- Patient must sign the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the study and be willing to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
- Patient must be judged by the investigator to be medically healthy (except for PHN) and able to participate in the study
- Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Who cannot join
- Patient has any other severe pain that might confound assessment or self-evaluation of pain due to PHN.
- Patient has PHN affecting the face (trigeminal nerve distribution).
- Patient has a history, in the judgment of the investigator, of inadequate response to more than 3 adequate courses of treatment with other medications used to treat neuropathic pain (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, anticonvulsants, topical lidocaine, and/or topical capsaicin).
- Patient is taking oral analgesics (either opioid or non-opioid) or is receiving topical therapy such as the 5% topical lidocaine patch for the treatment of pain and is unwilling or unable to complete a washout period during which the patient will discontinue analgesic therapy or topical pain therapy.
- Patient has been treated with topical capsaicin at any time in the past 6 months for neuropathic pain.
- Patient has a history of fibromyalgia.
- Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
Trial locations and contacts
77 sites in 1 country.
77 sites in 1 country
United States77 sites
Teva Investigational Site 13658
Albany, New York, 12208
Teva Investigational Site 13066
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Teva Investigational Site 13330
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108-5129
Teva Investigational Site 13070
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Teva Investigational Site 13053
Atlanta, Georgia, 30331
Teva Investigational Site 13091
Aurora, Illinois, 60506
Teva Investigational Site 13088
Austin, Texas, 78731
Teva Investigational Site 13081
Bellevue, Washington, 98007
Teva Investigational Site 13052
Birmingham, Alabama, 35213
Teva Investigational Site 13072
Bolingbrook, Illinois, 60490
Teva Investigational Site 13521
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Teva Investigational Site 13094
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
Teva Investigational Site 13334
Brooklyn, New York, 11229
Teva Investigational Site 13085
Brooksville, Florida, 34601
Teva Investigational Site 13060
Calabash, North Carolina, 28467
Teva Investigational Site 13332
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Teva Investigational Site 13057
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Teva Investigational Site 13079
Colton, California, 92324
Teva Investigational Site 13089
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Teva Investigational Site 13061
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
Teva Investigational Site 13078
Eugene, Oregon, 97404
Teva Investigational Site 13062
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Teva Investigational Site 13093
Evansville, Indiana, 47725
Teva Investigational Site 13049
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Teva Investigational Site 13084
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912
Teva Investigational Site 13047
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Teva Investigational Site 13046
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Teva Investigational Site 13098
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Teva Investigational Site 13045
Kissimmee, Florida, 34744
Teva Investigational Site 13095
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Teva Investigational Site 13065
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123
Teva Investigational Site 13333
Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056
Teva Investigational Site 13661
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Teva Investigational Site 13063
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Teva Investigational Site 13340
McKinney, Texas, 75071
Teva Investigational Site 13096
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Teva Investigational Site 13064
Miami, Florida, 33126
Teva Investigational Site 13338
Miami, Florida, 33135
Teva Investigational Site 13044
Miami, Florida, 33176
Teva Investigational Site 13335
Miami, Florida, 33183
Teva Investigational Site 13657
Milford, Connecticut, 06460
Teva Investigational Site 13086
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Teva Investigational Site 13074
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201
Teva Investigational Site 13522
Naples, Florida, 34102
Teva Investigational Site 13058
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Teva Investigational Site 13054
New York, New York, 10128
Teva Investigational Site 13090
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Teva Investigational Site 13083
North Massapequa, New York, 11758-1802
Teva Investigational Site 13075
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Teva Investigational Site 13328
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Teva Investigational Site 13516
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Teva Investigational Site 13076
Oldsmar, Florida, 34677
Teva Investigational Site 13073
Orlando, Florida, 32801
Teva Investigational Site 13048
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Teva Investigational Site 13659
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Teva Investigational Site 13339
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146
Teva Investigational Site 13514
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Teva Investigational Site 13520
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Teva Investigational Site 13327
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Teva Investigational Site 13050
Plano, Texas, 75093
Teva Investigational Site 13331
Pomona, California, 91767
Teva Investigational Site 13337
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Teva Investigational Site 13068
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Teva Investigational Site 13341
Sacramento, California, 95821
Teva Investigational Site 13518
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
Teva Investigational Site 13051
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Teva Investigational Site 13336
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Teva Investigational Site 13519
Seminole, Florida, 33708
Teva Investigational Site 13660
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
Teva Investigational Site 13099
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Teva Investigational Site 13056
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33713
Teva Investigational Site 13059
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Teva Investigational Site 13055
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Teva Investigational Site 13100
Torrance, California, 90505
Teva Investigational Site 13329
Venice, Florida, 34292
Teva Investigational Site 13513
Virginia Gardens, Florida, 33172
Teva Investigational Site 13082
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV-45070 (4% and 8% w/w Ointment) in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia.
This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN
- Conditions
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- Being tested
- TV-45070, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia, Postherpetic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TV-45070Drug
Also called funapide, XEN402
TV-45070 is an ointment applied topically twice daily to area of pain.
PlaceboDrug
The matching placebo ointment contained only the excipients of the active treatment; also applied topically twice daily to area of pain.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TV-45070 4% | Experimental | TV-45070 ointment in a 4% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. Receives: Drug: TV-45070 |
| TV-45070 8% | Experimental | TV-45070 ointment in a 8% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. Receives: Drug: TV-45070 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo ointment applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 4 in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores. The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The daily average NRS scores is the average of the 2 NRS scores (recorded in the morning and evening) of average pain, defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. At least 1 of the 2 daily scores had to be recorded (non-missing) or the daily average was considered missing. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the daily average NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The NRS pain scores recorded in the evening is defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the evening NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the evening NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Morning Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The NRS pain scores recorded in the morning is defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the evening NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of morning NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Worst Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The worst pain is defined as the patient-reported worst pain intensity over the prior 24 hours. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the worst pain NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the evening NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Week 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The NRS is a 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The daily average NRS scores is the average of the 2 NRS scores (recorded in the morning and evening) of average pain, defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. Percent improvement is calculated as 100 × (the weekly average of the daily average NRS pain score at week 4 - weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline /weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline. Patients missing a week 4 average are considered non-responders (<50% improvement or <30% improvement). The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the daily average NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
Measured: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
NPSI is a patient-reported questionnaire to evaluate the severity of different symptoms of neuropathic pain. The questionnaire contains 10 descriptors representing 5 distinct dimensions of pain: burning pain, deep pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia, plus 2 temporal items. Descriptors are scored from 0 through 10, where higher scores represent worse pain. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 10 descriptors (Bouhassira et al 2004). The total score ranges from 0 (no pain) through 100 (worst pain imaginable). If the score for one question was missing the total score was computed as 10 times sum of scores of 9 descriptors divided by 9. If more than one question was missing then the total score was missing. Negative change from baseline scores indicated less pain.
The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.
Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) Total Score
NePIQoL is a questionnaire that contains 41 items to evaluate quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain. Each question has responses ranging from strongly agree or always to strongly disagree or never. Questions are scored on a 5-point scale from 1 through 5, where higher scores represent greater pain-related interference in quality of life. Total range is 41 (great quality of life) to 205 (worst quality of life). Negative change from baseline scores indicated an improving quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (day 1), Week 4 (day 29)
Participants' Global Assess of Treatment as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Weeks 2 and 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of treatment on 7-point scale (Hurst and Bolton 2004). The 7-point scale is defined as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.
The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.
Measured: Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
DSIS is an 11-point scale that asks the patient to "select the number that best describes how much your pain has interfered with your sleep during the past 24 hours." Response options range from 0 (Did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (Completely interfered with sleep/unable to sleep due to pain). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of how much pain interfered with sleep.
The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor.
Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for First Time to Reach 30% or More Sustained Improvement in Weekly Average of the Daily Average NRS Pain Scores
Percent improvement is calculated as 100*(the weekly average of the daily average NRS pain score - weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline [days -7 to -1])/weekly average of the daily average NRS pain scores at baseline. Patients who do not reach >= 30% improvement are censored at their last non-missing weekly average. Patients who reach >= 30% improvement, but the improvement is not sustained through the end of the treatment period are censored at their last non-missing weekly average. For patients who reach >= 30% improvement that is sustained through the end through the end of the of the treatment, the time >= 30% improvement is first reached is used.
Measured: Baseline (days -7 to -1), Week 1 (days 1-7), Week 2 (day 8-14), Week 3 (days 15-21), Week 4 (days 22-29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Brush-Evoked Allodynia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Allodynia refers to central pain sensitization (increased response of neurons) following normally non-painful, often repetitive, stimulation. In this case, pain evoked by innocuous brush is measured on an 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 11=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of pain.
Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Punctate-Evoked Hyperalgesia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Hyperalgesia refers to increased pain from a stimulus that normally provokes pain. In this case, pain is evoked by punctate skin stimulation using a Medipin® and is measured on an 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 11=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement (lessening) of pain.
The MMRM used pooled study center, week, treatment, and treatment by week interaction as fixed factors and patient as a random factor. The unstructured covariance matrix for repeated observations within patients was used.
Measured: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Measured: day 1 up to day 57
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study start26 Feb 2015
- Primary completion9 May 2017
- Study completion9 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postherpetic NeuralgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Teva Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02365636
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TV-45070-CNS-20013
- Acronym
- (PHN)
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Fetell M, Sendel M, Li T, Marinelli L, Vollert J, Ruggerio E, Houk G, Dockum M, Albrecht PJ, Rice FL, Baron R. Cutaneous nerve fiber and peripheral Nav1.7 assessment in a large cohort of patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Pain. 2023 Nov 1;164(11):2435-2446. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002950. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
PubMed 37366590
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV-45070 (4% and 8% w/w Ointment) in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02365636
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- (PHN) / TV-45070-CNS-20013
- Conditions
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TV-45070 4% | Experimental | Drug: TV-45070TV-45070 ointment in a 4% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. |
| TV-45070 8% | Experimental | Drug: TV-45070TV-45070 ointment in a 8% strength applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo ointment applied topically twice daily to the area of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) pain during the treatment period from days 1 through 28. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient has chronic Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN), defined as pain present for more than 6 months and less than 10 years after onset of herpes zoster skin rash affecting a single dermatome. Patients with more than 1 involved dermatome may also be included, provided the affected dermatomes are contiguous.
- Patient is ≥18 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 34 kg/m2, inclusive, at the screening visit.
- If the patient is a woman and is fertile, the patient is not pregnant and has negative pregnancy tests at both the screening and randomization visits, and agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
- If the patient is a man and is capable of producing offspring, the patient must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception, unless the partner cannot become pregnant for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
- Patient must sign the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the study and be willing to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient has any other severe pain that might confound assessment or self-evaluation of pain due to PHN.
- Patient has PHN affecting the face (trigeminal nerve distribution).
- Patient has a history, in the judgment of the investigator, of inadequate response to more than 3 adequate courses of treatment with other medications used to treat neuropathic pain (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, anticonvulsants, topical lidocaine, and/or topical capsaicin).
- Patient is taking oral analgesics (either opioid or non-opioid) or is receiving topical therapy such as the 5% topical lidocaine patch for the treatment of pain and is unwilling or unable to complete a washout period during which the patient will discontinue analgesic therapy or topical pain therapy.
- Patient has been treated with topical capsaicin at any time in the past 6 months for neuropathic pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TV-45070Also: funapide, XEN402TV-45070 is an ointment applied topically twice daily to area of pain. | Drug | TV-45070 4%, TV-45070 8% |
| PlaceboThe matching placebo ointment contained only the excipients of the active treatment; also applied topically twice daily to area of pain. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 4 in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores. The NRS is a widely-used, standard one-dimensional 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable as reported by patients. The daily average NRS scores is the average of the 2 NRS scores (recorded in the morning and evening) of average pain, defined as the patient-reported average pain intensity over the prior 12 hours. At least 1 of the 2 daily scores had to be recorded (non-missing) or the daily average was considered missing. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of pain. The Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily average NRS scores at week 4 as the dependent variable; week, pooled study center, treatment, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed factors, baseline weekly average of the daily average NRS scores as covariate; and patient as a random effect.
12 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Morning Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Worst Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Week 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Time frame: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Week 4 (day 29)
Participants' Global Assess of Treatment as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Weeks 2 and 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Time frame: Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for First Time to Reach 30% or More Sustained Improvement in Weekly Average of the Daily Average NRS Pain Scores
Time frame: Baseline (days -7 to -1), Week 1 (days 1-7), Week 2 (day 8-14), Week 3 (days 15-21), Week 4 (days 22-29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Brush-Evoked Allodynia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Time frame: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Punctate-Evoked Hyperalgesia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
Time frame: Baseline (day 1 prior to dosing), Weeks 2 (day 15) and Week 4 (day 29)
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: day 1 up to day 57
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37366590Fetell M, Sendel M, Li T, Marinelli L, Vollert J, Ruggerio E, Houk G, Dockum M, Albrecht PJ, Rice FL, Baron R. Cutaneous nerve fiber and peripheral Nav1.7 assessment in a large cohort of patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Pain. 2023 Nov 1;164(11):2435-2446. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002950. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Related trials for Postherpetic Neuralgia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Simultaneous Engagement of Networks for Alleviating Pain (SENAP)
Neuropathic Pain, Postherpetic Neuralgia
Active, not recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Post-Stroke Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Obesity and Obesity-Related Factors and Risk of Herpes Zoster (Shingles) and Postherpetic Neuralgia
Herpes Zoster (HZ)
Recruiting
The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Venlafaxine for Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients With Acute Herpes Zoster
Herpes Zoster, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Dexamethasone Palmitate Treatments in Acute and Subacute Herpes Zoster Pain
Herpes Zoster Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teva Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
77 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing TV-45070 in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 77 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 77 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (time frame: Baseline (day -7 to day -1), Week 4 (day 22 to day 28)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02365636, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2021.