Carcinoma, Small CellNCT02366741
Neurocognitive Function After Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation & Hippocampal Sparing in LD SCLC Patients - a Pilot Study
A study testing Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampi in people with Carcinoma, Small Cell, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) harbors a high risk for brain metastases. Prophylactic whole brain radiotherapy (PCI)) is the standard treatment for these patients after completing chemo-radiotherapy to the chest, with a 5% survival advantage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Small Cell
- What is being tested?
- Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampi
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with histologically confirmed LD SCLC and complete response (CR) of the primary lesion after chemo-radiotherapy to the chest and who are candidates for PCI will be accrued
Who cannot join
- A history of malignant disease other then SCLC
- Previous cranial irradiation
- Medical or social condition which limits the ability of the patient to undergo neuro-cognitive testing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Leor Zach, MD contact
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 5262100
Leor Zach, MD, +9725302290, leor@zach@sheba.health.gov.il
About this study
Official title: Neurocognitive Function Changes in Patients With LD Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Prophylactic Whole Brain Radiotherapy With Hippocampal Sparing - a Pilot Study
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) harbors a high risk for brain metastases. Prophylactic whole brain radiotherapy (PCI)) is the standard treatment for these patients after completing chemo-radiotherapy to the chest, with a 5% survival advantage. Recent data suggest minimal risk for hippocampal involvement in these patients. There is no published data thus far testing the effect of hippocampal sparing during WBRT on the patient's neuro-cognitive function, QOL, and survival.., The goals of the proposed study are to assess prospectively the neurocognitive changes in patients with LD SCLC who are candidates for PCI before, and periodically after PCI
Read the detailed description
Background and rational Prophylactic cranial irradiation Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive type of lung cancer, with high sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy but with high incidence of local and distant recurrences. The brain is a common site of metastases from SCLC with a risk of up to 70% for brain involvement [1]. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard treatment for patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC after completing chemo-radiotherapy to the chest. The treatment includes whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), reduces the incidence of brain metastases and improves overall survival (OS) by 5% [1]. The down side of WBRT is that the central nervous system (CNS) is vulnerable to radiotherapy (RT) and its related toxicity may be associated with irreversible cognitive dysfunction [2].
Radiotherapy and neuro-cognitive function It has been demonstrated that there are two main regions of human containing multipotent neural stem cells (NSCs): the subgranular zone (SGZ) within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and the subventricular zone (SVZ) on the lateral aspect of the lateral ventricles [3,4,5,6,7,8]. These NSCs are capable of replacing adult neuron loss caused by various forms of harm (e.g. local ischemia, brain trauma, and radiation exposure and neurodegenerative diseases). However, they are extremely sensitive to X-rays, and thus reduction of NSCs may play an important role in radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment [6,7,8]. Neurocognitive function (NCF) has a major impact on QOL and has been actively studied in brain tumor patients treated with radiotherapy. Many studies have evaluated the neurocognitive outcome of patients treated with radiation for brain metastases and primary brain tumors [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Radiation primarily causes coagulation necrosis of the white matter tracts and cerebral vasculature by axonal demyelination and damage to vascular endothelial cells. Radiation has been shown to negatively affect various neuropsychological domains. WBRT has been shown to have greater neuropsychological impairment than focused radiation treatment [14]. Correlation, between radiation dosage to the bilateral hippocampi and impairment of NCF, was found in adult patients with benign or low-grade brain tumors treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) [14].
An ongoing clinical trial of the radiation oncology group (RTOG) is testing the applicability of hippocampal sparing and its impact on neurocognitive changes in cancer patients with brain metastases.
Neuro-cognitive function testing Even though many studies have evaluated NCF in relation to radiation, there is no consensus regarding standardization of tests selection, time points for evaluation and correlations with biomarkers. Many studies use the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to assess neurocognitive function [15,16]. The MMSE is not a sensitive tool for detecting cognitive impairment and does not measure the cognitive functions affected by radiation. The NeuroTrax system is described elsewhere [17]. In brief, Mindstreams consists of custom software that resides on the local testing computer and serves as a platform for interactive cognitive tests that produce accuracy and reaction time (millisecond time-scale) data. In case of conducting several trails for a single patient, Mindstreams uses a different version of the tests in each trial, in order to avoid a learning bias. Tests are available in multiple languages, and equivalence among English and Hebrew versions has been shown [17]. After tests are run on the local computer, data are automatically uploaded to a central server, where calculation of outcome parameters from raw single-trial data and report generation occurs. All responses are made with the mouse or with the number pad on the keyboard. Participants are familiarized with these input devices at the beginning of the battery, and practice sessions prior to the individual tests instruct them regarding the particular responses required for each test.
Hippocampal sparing during PCI Recent data suggest minimal risk for hippocampal involvement in patients with SCLC and brain metastases suggesting that reduced radiation dose to these areas during PCI would not significantly compromise the control in the brain [18]. There is no published data thus far testing the effect of hippocampal sparing during PCI on the patient's neuro-cognitive function, QOL, and survival. Volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) use advanced radiation planning software with computerized algorithms of inverse planning to allow differential radiation dose distribution within the same radiation field. A preliminary dosimetric work in the radiation oncology unit at Sheba medical center has proved the feasibility of generating WBRT plans using these techniques while reducing the dose to the hippocampi. The investigators compared 3 radiotherapy plans (standard 2 lateral field plan, IMRT plan and a VMAT plan) aiming to give 30Gy to the brain, with 40Gy integrated boost to evident brain metastases (using magnetic resonance imaging - MRI scan) and reduced dose to the hippocampi (<10Gy) according to RTOG 0933 protocol. IMRT achieved better results in general then the VMAT plans, especially in patients with brain metastases located closer to the hippocampi. The work has been presented in the EANS European Association of Neuro-Surgeonsmeeting last year.
Serum biomarkers for CNS damage Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 are two serum tumor markers that may be used as a potential screening tool for brain injury caused by radiation [19-27]. NSE is a glycolytic enzyme found in the CNS, expressed by neural and neuroendocrine cells. Elevated levels of NSE have been found in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC. A multi-center retrospective study involving 231 NSCLC patients demonstrated that high serum levels of NSE indicated shorter survival and was a specific marker of metastases. It is thought that the rise in NSE in brain metastasis patients reflects the extent of neuronal damage, as seen following a cerebral stroke. S100 protein is a nervous-system-specific cytoplasmic protein found in astrocytes and released into the serum when the blood brain barrier (BBB) is breached. Brain metastases were shown to be associated with elevated levels of S100 in several malignancies. Serum S-100B has also been demonstrated to be useful in determining brain damage related to stroke.
Imaging biomarkers for CNS damage Although brain radiotherapy induces white matter changes which can be depicted in standard MRI scans, no correlation was found between these changes and cognitive impairment. BBB disruption is an early, readily recognizable pathophysiological event occurring after radiation injury. It is detectable in vivo/in vitro by MRI and other imaging modalities, and appears to precede white matter necrosis. Micro-vascular leakage (MVL), calculated from perfusion MRI, is more sensitive than conventional contrast-enhanced MRI to subtle BBB opening, reflecting abnormal permeability of immature vessels. Treatment response assessment maps (TRAM) is a novel methodology, based on T1-MRI acquired up to 90 min after contrast injection, which allows depiction of subtle BBB disruption [28]. The resulting calculated maps, depict BBB functioning of the full brain, with high spatial resolution and high sensitivity to subtle BBB abnormalities. Results in >200 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors demonstrate the high sensitivity for subtle BBB disruption and the ability of the investigators maps to depict and differentiate various BBB disruption patterns within the tumor and the irradiated area.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Small Cell
- Being tested
- Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampi
- Keywords
- SCLC, Neuro-cognitive function, PCI, Hippocampal sparing
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Small Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampiRadiation
VMAT plan to treat the whole brain while reducing the dose to the hippocampi.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot group | Other | Five eligible patients will undergo WBRT with reduced dose to the hippocampi and will be evaluated prospectively by neuro cognitive testing, MRI scans and blood tests. Receives: Radiation: Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampi |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients that complete a year of imaging, neuro-cognitive and clinical follow up after WBRT with HC sparing as a measure of feasibility to conduct a randomized study in this patient population.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of patients with no changes in the neurocognitive tests score and QOL as a measure for the correlation between NCT and HC sparing.
Measured: 1 year
Number of patients with no changes in serum markers for neuronal damage and as a measure for reduced damage due to hippocampal sparing
Measured: 1 year
Number of patients with changes in imaging biomarkers (TRAM) and neurocognitive tests score decline as a measure for a potential correlation between the two.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionJan 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Small CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sheba Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Leor Zach, MD, Sheba Medical Center
- Investigators
- Leor Zach, MD, Principal investigator, Director of the Neuro-Oncology service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02366741
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMC-1476-14
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurocognitive Function Changes in Patients With LD Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Prophylactic Whole Brain Radiotherapy With Hippocampal Sparing - a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02366741
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMC-1476-14
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Small Cell
- Keywords
- SCLC, Neuro-cognitive function, PCI, Hippocampal sparing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) harbors a high risk for brain metastases. Prophylactic whole brain radiotherapy (PCI)) is the standard treatment for these patients after completing chemo-radiotherapy to the chest, with a 5% survival advantage. Recent data suggest minimal risk for hippocampal involvement in these patients. There is no published data thus far testing the effect of hippocampal sparing during WBRT on the patient's neuro-cognitive function, QOL, and survival.., The goals of the proposed study are to assess prospectively the neurocognitive changes in patients with LD SCLC who are candidates for PCI before, and periodically after PCI
Detailed description
Background and rational Prophylactic cranial irradiation Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive type of lung cancer, with high sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy but with high incidence of local and distant recurrences. The brain is a common site of metastases from SCLC with a risk of up to 70% for brain involvement [1]. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard treatment for patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC after completing chemo-radiotherapy to the chest. The treatment includes whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), reduces the incidence of brain metastases and improves overall survival (OS) by 5% [1]. The down side of WBRT is that the central nervous system (CNS) is vulnerable to radiotherapy (RT) and its related toxicity may be associated with irreversible cognitive dysfunction [2].
Radiotherapy and neuro-cognitive function It has been demonstrated that there are two main regions of human containing multipotent neural stem cells (NSCs): the subgranular zone (SGZ) within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and the subventricular zone (SVZ) on the lateral aspect of the lateral ventricles [3,4,5,6,7,8]. These NSCs are capable of replacing adult neuron loss caused by various forms of harm (e.g. local ischemia, brain trauma, and radiation exposure and neurodegenerative diseases). However, they are extremely sensitive to X-rays, and thus reduction of NSCs may play an important role in radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment [6,7,8]. Neurocognitive function (NCF) has a major impact on QOL and has been actively studied in brain tumor patients treated with radiotherapy. Many studies have evaluated the neurocognitive outcome of patients treated with radiation for brain metastases and primary brain tumors [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Radiation primarily causes coagulation necrosis of the white matter tracts and cerebral vasculature by axonal demyelination and damage to vascular endothelial cells. Radiation has been shown to negatively affect various neuropsychological domains. WBRT has been shown to have greater neuropsychological impairment than focused radiation treatment [14]. Correlation, between radiation dosage to the bilateral hippocampi and impairment of NCF, was found in adult patients with benign or low-grade brain tumors treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) [14].
An ongoing clinical trial of the radiation oncology group (RTOG) is testing the applicability of hippocampal sparing and its impact on neurocognitive changes in cancer patients with brain metastases.
Neuro-cognitive function testing Even though many studies have evaluated NCF in relation to radiation, there is no consensus regarding standardization of tests selection, time points for evaluation and correlations with biomarkers. Many studies use the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to assess neurocognitive function [15,16]. The MMSE is not a sensitive tool for detecting cognitive impairment and does not measure the cognitive functions affected by radiation. The NeuroTrax system is described elsewhere [17]. In brief, Mindstreams consists of custom software that resides on the local testing computer and serves as a platform for interactive cognitive tests that produce accuracy and reaction time (millisecond time-scale) data. In case of conducting several trails for a single patient, Mindstreams uses a different version of the tests in each trial, in order to avoid a learning bias. Tests are available in multiple languages, and equivalence among English and Hebrew versions has been shown [17]. After tests are run on the local computer, data are automatically uploaded to a central server, where calculation of outcome parameters from raw single-trial data and report generation occurs. All responses are made with the mouse or with the number pad on the keyboard. Participants are familiarized with these input devices at the beginning of the battery, and practice sessions prior to the individual tests instruct them regarding the particular responses required for each test.
Hippocampal sparing during PCI Recent data suggest minimal risk for hippocampal involvement in patients with SCLC and brain metastases suggesting that reduced radiation dose to these areas during PCI would not significantly compromise the control in the brain [18]. There is no published data thus far testing the effect of hippocampal sparing during PCI on the patient's neuro-cognitive function, QOL, and survival. Volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) use advanced radiation planning software with computerized algorithms of inverse planning to allow differential radiation dose distribution within the same radiation field. A preliminary dosimetric work in the radiation oncology unit at Sheba medical center has proved the feasibility of generating WBRT plans using these techniques while reducing the dose to the hippocampi. The investigators compared 3 radiotherapy plans (standard 2 lateral field plan, IMRT plan and a VMAT plan) aiming to give 30Gy to the brain, with 40Gy integrated boost to evident brain metastases (using magnetic resonance imaging - MRI scan) and reduced dose to the hippocampi (<10Gy) according to RTOG 0933 protocol. IMRT achieved better results in general then the VMAT plans, especially in patients with brain metastases located closer to the hippocampi. The work has been presented in the EANS European Association of Neuro-Surgeonsmeeting last year.
Serum biomarkers for CNS damage Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 are two serum tumor markers that may be used as a potential screening tool for brain injury caused by radiation [19-27]. NSE is a glycolytic enzyme found in the CNS, expressed by neural and neuroendocrine cells. Elevated levels of NSE have been found in patients with brain metastases from NSCLC. A multi-center retrospective study involving 231 NSCLC patients demonstrated that high serum levels of NSE indicated shorter survival and was a specific marker of metastases. It is thought that the rise in NSE in brain metastasis patients reflects the extent of neuronal damage, as seen following a cerebral stroke. S100 protein is a nervous-system-specific cytoplasmic protein found in astrocytes and released into the serum when the blood brain barrier (BBB) is breached. Brain metastases were shown to be associated with elevated levels of S100 in several malignancies. Serum S-100B has also been demonstrated to be useful in determining brain damage related to stroke.
Imaging biomarkers for CNS damage Although brain radiotherapy induces white matter changes which can be depicted in standard MRI scans, no correlation was found between these changes and cognitive impairment. BBB disruption is an early, readily recognizable pathophysiological event occurring after radiation injury. It is detectable in vivo/in vitro by MRI and other imaging modalities, and appears to precede white matter necrosis. Micro-vascular leakage (MVL), calculated from perfusion MRI, is more sensitive than conventional contrast-enhanced MRI to subtle BBB opening, reflecting abnormal permeability of immature vessels. Treatment response assessment maps (TRAM) is a novel methodology, based on T1-MRI acquired up to 90 min after contrast injection, which allows depiction of subtle BBB disruption [28]. The resulting calculated maps, depict BBB functioning of the full brain, with high spatial resolution and high sensitivity to subtle BBB abnormalities. Results in >200 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors demonstrate the high sensitivity for subtle BBB disruption and the ability of the investigators maps to depict and differentiate various BBB disruption patterns within the tumor and the irradiated area.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot group | Other | Radiation: Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampiFive eligible patients will undergo WBRT with reduced dose to the hippocampi and will be evaluated prospectively by neuro cognitive testing, MRI scans and blood tests. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients with histologically confirmed LD SCLC and complete response (CR) of the primary lesion after chemo-radiotherapy to the chest and who are candidates for PCI will be accrued
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- A history of malignant disease other then SCLC
- Previous cranial irradiation
- Medical or social condition which limits the ability of the patient to undergo neuro-cognitive testing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampiVMAT plan to treat the whole brain while reducing the dose to the hippocampi. | Radiation | Pilot group |
Primary outcome
Number of patients that complete a year of imaging, neuro-cognitive and clinical follow up after WBRT with HC sparing as a measure of feasibility to conduct a randomized study in this patient population.
Time frame: 1 year
3 secondary outcomes
Number of patients with no changes in the neurocognitive tests score and QOL as a measure for the correlation between NCT and HC sparing.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of patients with no changes in serum markers for neuronal damage and as a measure for reduced damage due to hippocampal sparing
Time frame: 1 year
Number of patients with changes in imaging biomarkers (TRAM) and neurocognitive tests score decline as a measure for a potential correlation between the two.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2016.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Small Cell
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leor Zach, MD contact
Leor Zach, MD principal investigator
Director of the Neuro-Oncology service
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Whole brain radiotherapy with reduced dose to the hippocampi in people with Carcinoma, Small Cell, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Leor Zach, MD (leor.zach@sheba.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients that complete a year of imaging, neuro-cognitive and clinical follow up after WBRT with HC sparing as a measure of feasibility to conduct a randomized study in this patient population. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2016.