Brain InjuriesB-AHEAD IIINCT02367300
Validation Of TBI Detection System For Head Injured Patients
An observational study of Brain Injuries, run by BrainScope Company, Inc. at 11 sites in United States.
Trial summary
A prospective, non-randomized trial to validate the database of brain electrical activity recordings and clinical information collected from patients who present to the ED following closed head injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injuries
- What is being tested?
- BrainScope Ahead 200
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 981 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects who are suspected of a traumatic, closed head injury within 72 hours will be recruited from patients who enter the Emergency Department at hospitals that are participating as clinical sites for this study.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who are admitted to the ED and are suspected of a traumatic, closed head injury within 72 hours. The patient will have a GCS 12-15 upon arrival to the ED even if GCS was lower prior to arrival to the ED (e.g., at the time of injury).
Who cannot join
- Subjects will be excluded who have forehead, scalp, or skull abnormalities or other conditions that would prevent correct application of the electrode headset on the skin.
- In addition,
- subjects with dementia,
- Parkinson's Disease,
- multiple sclerosis,
- seizure disorder,
Show all 18Show fewer
- brain tumors,
- history of brain surgery,
- evidence of acute psychosis,
- substance dependence,
- history of TIA or stroke within the last year,
- currently receiving dialysis or in end-stage renal disease,
- active fever defined as greater than 100 degrees F or 37.7 degrees C,
- current condition is "critical" in the opinion of the investigator,
- subject is suffering from an open head injury,
- subject requires advanced airway management (i.e. mechanical ventilation),
- currently receiving procedural sedation medications.
- Subjects below the age of 18 years, and prisoners will not be eligible for study.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
United States11 sites
Emory University- Grady Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
R Cowley Shock Trauma Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Wayne State University - Detroit Receiving Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
Wayne State University - Sinai Grace Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
UT-Houston Health Science Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Washington University - Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: Validation Of Point-Of-Care TBI Detection System For Head Injured Patients
A prospective, non-randomized trial to validate the database of brain electrical activity recordings and clinical information collected from patients who present to the ED following closed head injury.
Read the detailed description
The objective of this study is to validate the clinical utility of the BrainScope technology for the acute identification of structural brain injuries in a TBI population presenting to the ED with mild symptoms, following closed head injury.
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries
- Being tested
- BrainScope Ahead 200
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BrainScope Ahead 200Device
A single-use, proprietary headset containing pre-gelled electrodes will be placed on the subject's forehead according to the standard locations of the modified International 10/20 system. Subjects will undergo approximately 5 minutes of eyes closed brain electrical activity recording.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary objective of this study is to validate the clinical utility of the BrainScope Ahead 300 device for the acute identification of structural brain injuries in the TBI population, following closed head injury.
The co-primary endpoints for this study are the sensitivity/specificity pair for CT+ identified by the Ahead 300 algorithm classification.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
To demonstrate the utility of the EEG normality indicator (NI) score from a given subject presented as a percentile of the normal population and an indicator score.
Measured: 30 days
To evaluate the utility of creating a three-tier system for CT+ (CT-, Equivocal Zone (require close observation), and CT+).
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 981 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BrainScope Company, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Douglas C Oberly, Principal investigator, BrainScope Company, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367300
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-Ahead
- Acronym
- B-AHEAD III
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Huff JS, Jahar S. Differences in interpretation of cranial computed tomography in ED traumatic brain injury patients by expert neuroradiologists. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):606-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PubMed 24731934O'Neil B, Naunheim R, DeLorenzo R. CT positive brain injury in mild TBI patients presenting with normal SAC scores. Mil Med. 2014 Nov;179(11):1250-3. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00585.
PubMed 25373049Prichep LS, Jacquin A, Filipenko J, Dastidar SG, Zabele S, Vodencarevic A, Rothman NS. Classification of traumatic brain injury severity using informed data reduction in a series of binary classifier algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Nov;20(6):806-22. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206609. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PubMed 22855231Prichep LS, Ghosh Dastidar S, Jacquin A, Koppes W, Miller J, Radman T, O'Neil B, Naunheim R, Huff JS. Classification algorithms for the identification of structural injury in TBI using brain electrical activity. Comput Biol Med. 2014 Oct;53:125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PubMed 25137412Naunheim RS, Treaster M, English J, Casner T. Automated electroencephalogram identifies abnormalities in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;29(8):845-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 May 1.
PubMed 20825903O'Neil B, Prichep LS, Naunheim R, Chabot R. Quantitative brain electrical activity in the initial screening of mild traumatic brain injuries. West J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;13(5):394-400. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.12.6815.
PubMed 23359586Naunheim RS, Treaster M, English J, Casner T, Chabot R. Use of brain electrical activity to quantify traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Brain Inj. 2010;24(11):1324-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.506862.
PubMed 20722504Hanley DF, Chabot R, Mould WA, Morgan T, Naunheim R, Sheth KN, Chiang W, Prichep LS. Use of brain electrical activity for the identification of hematomas in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Dec 15;30(24):2051-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3062. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
PubMed 24040943Prichep LS, Naunheim R, Bazarian J, Mould WA, Hanley D. Identification of hematomas in mild traumatic brain injury using an index of quantitative brain electrical activity. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jan 1;32(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3365.
PubMed 25054838Ayaz SI, Thomas C, Kulek A, Tolomello R, Mika V, Robinson D, Medado P, Pearson C, Prichep LS, O'Neil BJ. Comparison of quantitative EEG to current clinical decision rules for head CT use in acute mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;33(4):493-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PubMed 25727167Hanley D, Prichep LS, Badjatia N, Bazarian J, Chiacchierini R, Curley KC, Garrett J, Jones E, Naunheim R, O'Neil B, O'Neill J, Wright DW, Huff JS. A Brain Electrical Activity Electroencephalographic-Based Biomarker of Functional Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Site Validation Trial. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jan 1;35(1):41-47. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5004. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
PubMed 28599608Hanley D, Prichep LS, Bazarian J, Huff JS, Naunheim R, Garrett J, Jones EB, Wright DW, O'Neill J, Badjatia N, Gandhi D, Curley KC, Chiacchierini R, O'Neil B, Hack DC. Emergency Department Triage of Traumatic Head Injury Using a Brain Electrical Activity Biomarker: A Multisite Prospective Observational Validation Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):617-627. doi: 10.1111/acem.13175. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
PubMed 28177169
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation Of Point-Of-Care TBI Detection System For Head Injured Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367300
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B-AHEAD III / 22-Ahead
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 981 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BrainScope Company, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective, non-randomized trial to validate the database of brain electrical activity recordings and clinical information collected from patients who present to the ED following closed head injury.
Detailed description
The objective of this study is to validate the clinical utility of the BrainScope technology for the acute identification of structural brain injuries in a TBI population presenting to the ED with mild symptoms, following closed head injury.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects who are suspected of a traumatic, closed head injury within 72 hours will be recruited from patients who enter the Emergency Department at hospitals that are participating as clinical sites for this study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects who are admitted to the ED and are suspected of a traumatic, closed head injury within 72 hours. The patient will have a GCS 12-15 upon arrival to the ED even if GCS was lower prior to arrival to the ED (e.g., at the time of injury).
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Subjects will be excluded who have forehead, scalp, or skull abnormalities or other conditions that would prevent correct application of the electrode headset on the skin.
- In addition,
- Subjects below the age of 18 years, and prisoners will not be eligible for study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BrainScope Ahead 200A single-use, proprietary headset containing pre-gelled electrodes will be placed on the subject's forehead according to the standard locations of the modified International 10/20 system. Subjects will undergo approximately 5 minutes of eyes closed brain electrical activity recording. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
The primary objective of this study is to validate the clinical utility of the BrainScope Ahead 300 device for the acute identification of structural brain injuries in the TBI population, following closed head injury.
Time frame: 30 days
The co-primary endpoints for this study are the sensitivity/specificity pair for CT+ identified by the Ahead 300 algorithm classification.
2 secondary outcomes
To demonstrate the utility of the EEG normality indicator (NI) score from a given subject presented as a percentile of the normal population and an indicator score.
Time frame: 30 days
To evaluate the utility of creating a three-tier system for CT+ (CT-, Equivocal Zone (require close observation), and CT+).
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2016.
- Background: PubMed 24731934Huff JS, Jahar S. Differences in interpretation of cranial computed tomography in ED traumatic brain injury patients by expert neuroradiologists. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):606-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 25373049O'Neil B, Naunheim R, DeLorenzo R. CT positive brain injury in mild TBI patients presenting with normal SAC scores. Mil Med. 2014 Nov;179(11):1250-3. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00585.
- Background: PubMed 22855231Prichep LS, Jacquin A, Filipenko J, Dastidar SG, Zabele S, Vodencarevic A, Rothman NS. Classification of traumatic brain injury severity using informed data reduction in a series of binary classifier algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Nov;20(6):806-22. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2206609. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 25137412Prichep LS, Ghosh Dastidar S, Jacquin A, Koppes W, Miller J, Radman T, O'Neil B, Naunheim R, Huff JS. Classification algorithms for the identification of structural injury in TBI using brain electrical activity. Comput Biol Med. 2014 Oct;53:125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20825903Naunheim RS, Treaster M, English J, Casner T. Automated electroencephalogram identifies abnormalities in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;29(8):845-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 May 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 23359586O'Neil B, Prichep LS, Naunheim R, Chabot R. Quantitative brain electrical activity in the initial screening of mild traumatic brain injuries. West J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;13(5):394-400. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.12.6815.
- Results publication: PubMed 20722504Naunheim RS, Treaster M, English J, Casner T, Chabot R. Use of brain electrical activity to quantify traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Brain Inj. 2010;24(11):1324-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.506862.
- Results publication: PubMed 24040943Hanley DF, Chabot R, Mould WA, Morgan T, Naunheim R, Sheth KN, Chiang W, Prichep LS. Use of brain electrical activity for the identification of hematomas in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Dec 15;30(24):2051-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3062. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 25054838Prichep LS, Naunheim R, Bazarian J, Mould WA, Hanley D. Identification of hematomas in mild traumatic brain injury using an index of quantitative brain electrical activity. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Jan 1;32(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3365.
- Results publication: PubMed 25727167Ayaz SI, Thomas C, Kulek A, Tolomello R, Mika V, Robinson D, Medado P, Pearson C, Prichep LS, O'Neil BJ. Comparison of quantitative EEG to current clinical decision rules for head CT use in acute mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;33(4):493-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28599608Hanley D, Prichep LS, Badjatia N, Bazarian J, Chiacchierini R, Curley KC, Garrett J, Jones E, Naunheim R, O'Neil B, O'Neill J, Wright DW, Huff JS. A Brain Electrical Activity Electroencephalographic-Based Biomarker of Functional Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multi-Site Validation Trial. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jan 1;35(1):41-47. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5004. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28177169Hanley D, Prichep LS, Bazarian J, Huff JS, Naunheim R, Garrett J, Jones EB, Wright DW, O'Neill J, Badjatia N, Gandhi D, Curley KC, Chiacchierini R, O'Neil B, Hack DC. Emergency Department Triage of Traumatic Head Injury Using a Brain Electrical Activity Biomarker: A Multisite Prospective Observational Validation Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):617-627. doi: 10.1111/acem.13175. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Related trials for Brain Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Douglas C Oberly principal investigator
BrainScope Company, Inc.
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Brain Injuries, run by BrainScope Company, Inc. at 11 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary objective of this study is to validate the clinical utility of the BrainScope Ahead 300 device for the acute identification of structural brain injuries in the TBI population, following closed head injury. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02367300, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2016.