Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationNCT02367365
Neovascular Morphology and Persistent Disease Activity Among Patients With NV AMD
An observational study of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block VEGF have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant imporovement in vision. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with treatment naive NVAMD or newly reactivated NVAMD
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of either treatment naive NVAMD or newly reactivated NVAMD which has been previously quiescent off treatment
- Men and women aged 50 years or older
- Able to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Potential study eye with ongoing (within previous 6 months of diagnosis of NVAMD disease activity) treatment for CNV, including anti-VEGF medications, corticosteroids, photodynamic therapy, thermal laser photocoagulation, transpupillary thermotherapy, or pneumatic displacement of macular hemorrhage
- CNV secondary to causes other than AMD
- Known or suspected sensitivity or allergy to ICG dye
- Known or suspected sensitivity or allergy to fluorescein dye
- Significant medial opacity (e.g. cataract) precluding clincial imaging adequate for interpretation
- Prior history of vitrectomy surger in potential study eye
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neovascular Morphology and Persistent Disease Activity Among Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block VEGF have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant imporovement in vision. In this study, we will determine the relative frequency of neovascular subtypes in two groups: 1) a representative, treatment-naive NV AMD patient population, and 2) a population of patients who develop recurrent NV AMD activity while off treatment and assess the frequency of persistent disease activity (PDA) according to specific neovascular morphologic subtypes. This information will clarify the scope of the PDA problem and will identify patients with PDA who may benefit from additional therpeutic strategies.
Read the detailed description
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block VEGF, a major protein mediator of angiogenesis and vascular leakage, have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant improvement in vision. Further, in spite of continuous monthly anti-VEGF therapy, up to 40-50% of patients demonstrate sustained persistent disease activity (PDA), defined as (1) unresolved intraretinal, subretinal, or sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid; (2) progressive lesion enlargement and fibrosis; and/or (3) persistent or new hemorrhage, assessed after either loading dose therapy or after sustained treatment with anti-VEGF. Since affected patients are at increased risk for long-term vision loss, PDA remains a vital clinical unmet need.
We are interested in the relationship between NV lesion morphology and response to therapy. Specifically, we hypothesize that specific NV morphologic subtypes are more frequently associated with PDA, based on preliminary retrospective analyses of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging data from NV AMD patients in our Duke Medical Retina practice. We have observed that eyes with Capillary pattern, seen as a discrete homogenous focus of microvessels, are highly responsive to anti-VEGF therapy and rarely exhibit PDA (<20% of cases). In contrast, eyes with Arteriolar pattern (large-caliber feeding artery, many branching arterioles, and minimal capillary component) and eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (variably sized and numbered, discrete saccular dilations of choroidal vasculature), demonstrate PDA in up to 70% of cases. A third subtype, choroidal leak syndrome, visible as choroidal hyperpermeability and leakage, manifest PDA in over 60% of cases. These data suggest that complex NV lesion morphology is the primary cause of PDA, and that anti-VEGF therapy alone is insufficient for these patients. However, the relative frequency of these subtypes and the association of PDA and NV lesion morphology, in a treatment-naive population free of selection bias, are unknown.
In this study, we will determine the relative frequency of NV subtypes in two groups: (i) a representative, treatment-naïve NV AMD patient population, and (ii) a population of patients who develop recurrent NVAMD activity while off treatment and assess the frequency of PDA according to specific NV morphologic subtypes. This information will clarify the scope of the PDA problem, and will identify patients with PDA who may benefit from additional therapeutic strategies.
- Being tested
- No Intervention
- Keywords
- Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, neovascular lesion morphology, indocyanine green angiography, persistent disease activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No InterventionOther
No intervention
No InterventionOther
No intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Naive NVAMD Patients | Patients with treatment naive NVAMD diagnosed in the last three months Receives: Other: No Intervention | |
| Newly Reactivated NVAMD Patients | Patients with newly reactivated NVAMD which has been previously quiescent off treatment Receives: Other: No Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of ICG neovascular subtypes
Measured: 4-6 weeks post loading dose
Percentage of each neovascular subtype exhibiting persistent disease activity
Measured: 4-6 weeks post loading dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Scott Cousins, MD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00055232
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neovascular Morphology and Persistent Disease Activity Among Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02367365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00055232
- Keywords
- Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, neovascular lesion morphology, indocyanine green angiography, persistent disease activity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block VEGF have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant imporovement in vision. In this study, we will determine the relative frequency of neovascular subtypes in two groups: 1) a representative, treatment-naive NV AMD patient population, and 2) a population of patients who develop recurrent NV AMD activity while off treatment and assess the frequency of persistent disease activity (PDA) according to specific neovascular morphologic subtypes. This information will clarify the scope of the PDA problem and will identify patients with PDA who may benefit from additional therpeutic strategies.
Detailed description
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (NV AMD) remains the leading cause of vision loss among people over 65. Intravitreal injections with drugs that block VEGF, a major protein mediator of angiogenesis and vascular leakage, have revolutionized treatment of NV AMD. However, less than 40% of treated patients have clinically significant improvement in vision. Further, in spite of continuous monthly anti-VEGF therapy, up to 40-50% of patients demonstrate sustained persistent disease activity (PDA), defined as (1) unresolved intraretinal, subretinal, or sub-retinal pigment epithelium fluid; (2) progressive lesion enlargement and fibrosis; and/or (3) persistent or new hemorrhage, assessed after either loading dose therapy or after sustained treatment with anti-VEGF. Since affected patients are at increased risk for long-term vision loss, PDA remains a vital clinical unmet need.
We are interested in the relationship between NV lesion morphology and response to therapy. Specifically, we hypothesize that specific NV morphologic subtypes are more frequently associated with PDA, based on preliminary retrospective analyses of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging data from NV AMD patients in our Duke Medical Retina practice. We have observed that eyes with Capillary pattern, seen as a discrete homogenous focus of microvessels, are highly responsive to anti-VEGF therapy and rarely exhibit PDA (<20% of cases). In contrast, eyes with Arteriolar pattern (large-caliber feeding artery, many branching arterioles, and minimal capillary component) and eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (variably sized and numbered, discrete saccular dilations of choroidal vasculature), demonstrate PDA in up to 70% of cases. A third subtype, choroidal leak syndrome, visible as choroidal hyperpermeability and leakage, manifest PDA in over 60% of cases. These data suggest that complex NV lesion morphology is the primary cause of PDA, and that anti-VEGF therapy alone is insufficient for these patients. However, the relative frequency of these subtypes and the association of PDA and NV lesion morphology, in a treatment-naive population free of selection bias, are unknown.
In this study, we will determine the relative frequency of NV subtypes in two groups: (i) a representative, treatment-naïve NV AMD patient population, and (ii) a population of patients who develop recurrent NVAMD activity while off treatment and assess the frequency of PDA according to specific NV morphologic subtypes. This information will clarify the scope of the PDA problem, and will identify patients with PDA who may benefit from additional therapeutic strategies.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Naive NVAMD Patients | – | Other: No InterventionPatients with treatment naive NVAMD diagnosed in the last three months |
| Newly Reactivated NVAMD Patients | – | Other: No InterventionPatients with newly reactivated NVAMD which has been previously quiescent off treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with treatment naive NVAMD or newly reactivated NVAMD
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of either treatment naive NVAMD or newly reactivated NVAMD which has been previously quiescent off treatment
- Men and women aged 50 years or older
- Able to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Potential study eye with ongoing (within previous 6 months of diagnosis of NVAMD disease activity) treatment for CNV, including anti-VEGF medications, corticosteroids, photodynamic therapy, thermal laser photocoagulation, transpupillary thermotherapy, or pneumatic displacement of macular hemorrhage
- CNV secondary to causes other than AMD
- Known or suspected sensitivity or allergy to ICG dye
- Known or suspected sensitivity or allergy to fluorescein dye
- Significant medial opacity (e.g. cataract) precluding clincial imaging adequate for interpretation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No InterventionNo intervention | Other | Treatment Naive NVAMD Patients |
| No InterventionNo intervention | Other | Newly Reactivated NVAMD Patients |
Primary outcome
Frequency of ICG neovascular subtypes
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post loading dose
Percentage of each neovascular subtype exhibiting persistent disease activity
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post loading dose
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2018.
Related trials for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Scott Cousins, MD principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of ICG neovascular subtypes (time frame: 4-6 weeks post loading dose). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2018.